User talk:Triton

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Merci[edit]

Merci pour les recatégorisations! J'en ai ai encore quelques unes à importer. Triton (talk) 21:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

De rien, c'est un travail que je fais bien volontiers sur les 4 départements bretons. Après en avoir reclassé l'ensemble des illustrations pendant un long moment. Bonnes contributions, --Fab5669 (talk) 06:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, oui j'avais encore quelques photos sous le coude. Petite question: Je crois que la catégorie Category:Chapelle Saint-Jean de Plougonvelin devrait être vidée (et supprimée?) pour moi, tout ce qu'elle contient sont des images de Category:Chapelle_Notre-Dame-des-Grâces_de_Plougonvelin (les deux étant différentes). Triton (talk) 17:45, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Actuellement, il est fait la différence entre deux édifices. Le premier, la chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Grâces, a été construit au XIVe siècle. Cette chapelle est en ruine et seul le portail est encore debout. Le deuxième, la chapelle Saint-Jean, est plus récent et date du XVIe siècle. Je ne suis pas un spécialiste du coin, aussi me suis-je basé sur les descriptions trouvées ici pour créer ces deux catégories. En attendant de plus amples informations, je vais rajouter un bandeau d'informations sur chacune des pages.
Il est vrai que souvent les deux édifices apparaissent ensemble sur les photos. Aussi ces photos sont elles catégorisées dans les deux catégories. Mais certaines sont plus centrées et n'en concerne qu'une. Pour preuve, le nombre de photos différentes dans les deux catégories : 14 contre 24. Cordialement, --Fab5669 (talk) 08:29, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ce serait ça. J'ai cherché un fait quelle était la différence et le le site de Plougonvelin est plus tendancieux. Il ne nomme pas la chapelle Notre-Dame de Grâce mais cite une chapelle sur le site de Saint-Mathieu et une autre "chapelle Saint Jean" beaucoup plus bas sur la page. Bizarre. Mais je ne suis pas plus spécialiste que toi du sujet :) Triton (talk) 11:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai posé la question directement sur le projet Bretagne. Peut-être aura-t-on un regard neuf et des réponses à ces questions rapidement ? Bonne journée, --Fab5669 (talk) 08:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turtle eggs as food.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Plassy shipwreck 2016b.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plassy shipwreck 2016b.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Traditionnal Malaysian spinning top.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Copyright status: File:Parlament de Catalunya art1.svg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Parlament de Catalunya art1.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 00:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inisheer Lighthouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
(sabella)Tidal stream generators.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Triton,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Renommages de categories sur les PNM[edit]

Bonjour,
Je ne comprends pas bien la raison de vos renommages sur les catégories des parcs naturels marins français. Vous mélangez le statut de réserve naturelle et de parc naturel marin qui ne sont pas équivalents.
Autre point, la catégorie Category:Marine natural park of Golf du Lion devrait plutôt être "Golfe du Lion" avec un "e" à Golfe. Et pourquoi n'apparait-elle pas dans Category:Marine reserves in France ? Bref, c'est un peu le bazar et il serait préférable d'en parler avant de faire les renommages... Pmau (talk) 11:47, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Pmau, justement les réserves naturelles et parcs marins ne sont pas équivalents. Je ne mélange rien du tout je vous rassure. Et pour l'instant, je ne sais pas trop pourquoi, tous les parcs marins étaient classés en "marine reserve". Je ne fais que corriger cette erreur. Quant à "Golf du Lion" en effet, ça devrait être "Golfe du Lion", je n'ai fais que copier/coller le terme issu de la catégorie existante. Elle n'a aucune raison d'apparaitre dans "marine reserves" in France vu que ce n'est justement pas une réserve marine... Triton (talk) 11:52, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. J'attends la fin de vos travaux avant de regarder à nouveau. Cordialement, Pmau (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merci :) Triton (talk) 11:55, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Voila Pmau, la catégorie Category:Marine reserves in France ne contient bien que des réserves naturelles (pas encore complet), et Category:Marine parks in France contient bien les PNM. Il reste Category:Marine reserve of estuaire de la Gironde et de la mer des Pertuis, Category:Marine reserve of bassin d'Arcachon et Category:Marine reserve of Picardy and Opale coast à vider mais je ferais bien appel à un bot pour faire ça plus rapidement que une par une. Et je n'ai pas encore renommé le PNM du Golfe du Lion.Triton (talk) 12:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gabrielli- von Karman diagram[edit]

Hello Triton,

Is this really your work?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gabrielli%E2%80%93von_Karman.svg

I don't see it in your gallery.

Theosch (talk) 17:58, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theosch. Yes, I did it following a request on the French graphic workshop. I didn't put requests in my gallery. Why? Triton (talk) 18:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Triton! I want to translate the diagram into English and use it in a book, so I wanted to make sure of the author, and it wasn't characteristic of your work. I can use your real name, if your like. Theosch (talk) 20:23, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. My pseudonym is good for this file. Triton (talk) 21:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merci! Theosch (talk) 12:37, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Echinostrephus[edit]

Hello, Pour l'oursin Echinostrephus, plus le temps passe et plus j'ai des doutes sur l'existence de 2 espèces, distinguées uniquement par un caractère assez peu fiable (un doublet de pore en plus), et sans réelle cohérence géographique. Tous les oursins de ce genre que j'ai rencontrés dans ma carrière avaient le nombre "normal" de pores, correspondant à l'espère originale E. molaris, et il est possible que E. aciculatus concerne simplement des spécimens extravagants de la même espèce. Aucune différence génétique n'a pu être mise en évidence non plus. C'est pourquoi, en attendant de nouvelles publications sur cette espèce (élimination ou confirmation), la page ne peut être illustrée... Amitiés, FredD (talk) 04:15, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paul Hallez.jpg[edit]

File:Paul Hallez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 16:56, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alister Hardy.jpg[edit]

File:Alister Hardy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 20:48, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo 2 millions d'articles[edit]

Salut, Triton.

Bravo pour le logo 2 millions d'articles avec bandeau rouge, ainsi que le bandeau simple ! Mais on dirait que l'approche entre le R et le T d'ARTICLES se fait mal quand on utilise des versions en haute résolution (la partie droite "TICLES" semble se déplacer à gauche et mord sur l'autre partie quand on zoome). Ce n'est pas trop visible dans les utilisations actuelles, cependant. Peut-être est-ce dû au système que j'utilise. Mais as-tu ce problème ?

Très cordialement, --Warp3 (talk) 01:54, 7 July 2018 (UTC).[reply]

A priori corrigé Warp3. Triton (talk) 03:15, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
ARTICLES est OK, maintenant. Il y a encore un petit souci dans l'espacement entre les lettres pour le logo 2 millions d'articles avec bandeau rouge (à 2000 pixels, par exemple, où il devient trop grand, ça fait un peu dépasser le texte à droite du bandeau), mais ça peut aller. Merci encore de l'initiative !
Très cordialement, --Warp3 (talk) 04:43, 8 July 2018 (UTC).[reply]
C'était une demande sur l'atelier graphique, pas une initiative de ma part ;) J'ai mis le texte en chemin, ça devrait aller Warp3 Triton (talk) 15:11, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
...Alors, disons l'initiative de prendre la commande Clin ! Bon, là, c'est ✌ parfait !
Très cordialement, --Warp3 (talk) 05:31, 9 July 2018 (UTC).[reply]

File:Guyane map-fr.svg[edit]

File:Guyane map-fr.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

5.62.59.81 15:05, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BSicon ZOLL.svg[edit]

Hi. I'm not sure how fr:Wikipédia:Atelier graphique/Images à améliorer works, but it would have been less disruptive to upload a separate file, as File:BSicon ZOLL.svg was already in use on hundreds of different pages. Jc86035 (talk) 12:18, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street art Fort de France 04.jpg[edit]

File:Street art Fort de France 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:03, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:13, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mythological creatures[edit]

Hi. They are all Greek and go in: Category:Creatures of Greek mythology‎. Thank you. --Allforrous (talk) 23:38, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mémorial Delgrès( Fort Louis Delgrès ).jpg[edit]

File:Mémorial Delgrès( Fort Louis Delgrès ).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikinews 15 ans[edit]

Bonjour,

Pourrais-tu faire, comme tu l'as fait avec les 2 millions d'articles de WP_fr, une image ou il y a le logo de Wikinews et un bandeau 15 ans (en français) ?

Merci, AirSThib (talk), le 13:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC), administrateur de la Wikinews francophone.[reply]

Ton diagramme de Gabrielli-von Karman[edit]

Bonjour, cher Triton. merci pour ta captation et recréation du diagramme de Gabrielli-von Karman. Ton travail m'a sauvé la mise (une petite mise, mais quand-même) lorsque j'ai ajouté au bas de l'article "Finesse (aérodynamique)" des considérations sur l'extension du concept de finesse à tous les véhicules et moyens de transport. Cette extension m'était apparu évidente et était devenu un de mes petits dadas (j'en ai d'autres). L'un de nos camarades contributeur m'a alors signalé (dans la bonne humeur, ce dont je le remercie) qu'il fallait sourcer mon ajout. J'ai donc cherché tous azimuts et je suis tombé par hasard sur ton diagramme de GvK. Sauvé par le grand Karman ! (on est parfois sauvé par plus grand que soi) (je ne connais pas Gabrielli) (sauvé par toi aussi, donc). Bref, il semble que cette notion de finesse généralisée puisse être assez difficile à concevoir (même si c'est une évidence pour nous).

Mise à jour 2004 du diagramme de Gabrielli-von Karman donnant la finesse "totale" des différents modes de transport.

Donc merci pour ton diagramme de GvK ! La mauvaise nouvelle, c'est que j'ai capté la mise à jour de l'Imperial College ainsi que les différentes versions du diagramme de 1950 et que je ne trouve pas tout à fait les mêmes courbes que toi. Je me dis que tu as dû prendre certaines options qu'il faudrait préciser. Je viens de publier ma captation du diagramme de G-vK : C'est tout frais. À présent il faut que j'ajoute force notes pour éclairer les différente options adoptées pour le dessin de ce diagramme. Je n'ai d'ailleurs pas réussi à trouver le texte d'origine de Gabrielli et von Karman ; or, dans ce texte, ils doivent s'expliquer sur la façon dont ils ont tracé leurs courbes (en particulier sur la façon dont ils ont fait leurs moyennes et sur la façon dont ils ont dessiné leurs courbes au milieu des patates des différents mode de transport. Si tu as eu accès à ce texte, envoie-moi le lien... Merci d'avance. Évidemment, donner les courbes de finesse des différents modes de transport à vitesse maximale n'est pas écologiquement très intéressant. Ce qui est plus intéressant est la finesse "commerciale" à vitesse de croisière (ou vitesse commerciale). J'ai trouvé le graphe d'Akagi et Papanikolaou (plutôt consacré aux navires) et le l'ai capté (avec certains apports évidents).

Finesse commerciale des différents modes de transport à vitesse maximale, d'après Akagi 1991 & Papanikolaou 2005.

Cela donne le graphe ci-contre. Hélas, ce diagramme est toujours à vitesse maximale ! Dommage, mais cela place bien les différents mode de transport en perspective. Bon, je vais ajouter mes foutues notes... Amicalement, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 15:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Bernard de Go Mars: . Ce schéma a été réalisé suite à une demande dans l'atelier graphique. Je n'ai pas exactement saisi ce que tu souhaitais je t'avoue, je ne suis pas un pro dans le domaine ^^" Triton (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merci, cher Triton, pour ta réponse. Ces choses sont effectivement difficiles pour des gens non spécialistes. Il me semble même que les spécialistes d'aviation (familiers de l'utilisation du concept de finesse) ont du mal avec l'extension de ce concept à tous les modes de transport. Je vais prendre contact avec JeffMik1 (pour lequel tu as créé l'image en question du diagramme de G-K). J'ajoute que les apports de l'Atelier Graphique sont essentiels car il existe beaucoup de diagrammes ou de graphes qui devraient être transcodés en SVG puisque la science est (nécessairement) internationale (sinon elle ne serait pas la science). Amicalement, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 08:35, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cap Fagnet[edit]

Bonjour Triton, n'oublie pas de chausser tes lunettes la prochaine fois avant d'effectuer un revert. En effet, la catégorie Cap Fagnet est une fille de la catégorie Sea cliffs in Seine-Maritime. Tu fais donc de l'hyper-catégorisation, chose inutile et à proscrire. Bonne fin de journée. --Birdie (talk) 13:55, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Au temps pour moi. Triton (talk) 14:00, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Opinicus_in_heraldry[edit]

Category discussion warning

Opinicus in heraldry has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 13:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrait ou correction de l'Illustration adenovirus astrazeneca[edit]

Bonjour, votre illustration est fausse. L'adénovirus injecte un double brin hélicoïdal d'ADN. Là il n'y a qu'un seul brin qui suggère un ARNm alors que ce n'en est pas. Ensuite il faut clairement matérialiser le noyau et le cytoplasme car l'ADN se trouve dans le noyau, le noyau rejete l'ARNm simple brin dans le cytoplasme ( hors de lui-même ). Merci. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB10:D:8500:E1CF:B3C8:6840:80FD (talk) 09:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Il s'agit d'une simplification bien entendu. J'ai rajouté les éléments que vous avez mentionné pour plus de clarté. Triton (talk) 18:09, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Same-sex marriage in the United States.svg[edit]

File:Same-sex marriage in the United States.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2601:644:4401:4DE0:C090:6FE8:DD7D:57CF 19:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Je suis intéressé par l'une de vos photos pour un usage non commercial (rives de la Penfeld)

Pouvez-vous me contacter ici : renaud@createm.fr

Merci, bonne Journée Renaud Lozachmeur

Copyright status: File:Logo Organisation des pêches de l'Atlantique nord-ouest.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Logo Organisation des pêches de l'Atlantique nord-ouest.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Organisation des pêches de l'Atlantique nord-ouest.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Darwin (trad. Barbier) — Les plantes insectivores, 1877 (fig. 6).svg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Darwin (trad. Barbier) — Les plantes insectivores, 1877 (fig. 6).svg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Darwin (trad. Barbier) — Les plantes insectivores, 1877 (fig. 6).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Sea Mining schematic[edit]

I like your work on the image [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_sea_mining#/media/File:Deep_sea_mining_schematic_1.svg and was wondering how to include this image (example via MIT) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353483138_Extent_of_impact_of_deep-sea_nodule_mining_midwater_plumes_is_influenced_by_sediment_loading_turbulence_and_thresholds @[2]https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353483138_Extent_of_impact_of_deep-sea_nodule_mining_midwater_plumes_is_influenced_by_sediment_loading_turbulence_and_thresholds Jenmedia (talk) 16:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jenmedia: . I'm not sure I understand your question. If you want to reuse the picture here you can do so freely. You just need to mention the author (me). If you want to use the pictures visible on the publications you need to ask the permission of these authors. I can maybe make similar pictures, if you indicate the precise image that interest you. Triton (talk) 19:12, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Midjourney[edit]

Hi! I just wanna tell you that the correct license to use for images generated by Midjourney and similar websites is PD-algorithm. Due to the way Commons policy currently works AI generated works cannot be copyrighted Trade (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: , yeah I noticed, I still need to change the few images I put online. Thanks for the reminder. This put this category in question by the way. Triton (talk) 21:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Wikibooks-logo-fr-noslogan-light.svg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Wikibooks-logo-fr-noslogan-light.svg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wikibooks-logo-fr-noslogan-light.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Avoir l'échelle sur une image de Géoportail[edit]

Salut Triton ! J'ai vu que sur cette image File:Bassine agricole de Pouillac (Cramchaban, Charente-Maritime, France) - 2021.png que tu as téléversée en la prenant sur Géoportail que tu as mis la légende. Pourrais-tu me dire comment tu as fait ? Je voudrais exporter des images satellite de bassines, mais quand j'utilise l'outil capture d'écran, je ne peux pas prendre la légende sans qu'elle n'apparaisse en très gros sur l'image. Merci :) Skimel (talk) 15:47, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Skimel: , j'ai juste gardé la légende d'origine qui s'affichait sur l'image aérienne en fait ^^'(en faisant une capture d'écran). Je ne sais pas si c'est aussi visible avec les images satellites? Triton (talk) 10:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
D'accord, je pense que ça doit dépendre de la taille de l'écran alors. Quand je fais une capture d'écran avec légende, ça me donne ça : File:Bassine de Nouaillé-Maupertuis (86340) - 19 juillet 2020 (avec échelle).png. Skimel (talk) 12:24, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Skimel: oui je ne comprends pas trop. Je mets l'image en plein écran aussi, c'est peut être ça? J'ai mis une nouvelle version, si ça te va. Triton (talk) 13:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup pour la nouvelle version en haute résolution ! Je travaille sur un ordinateur portable avec un écran de 15 pouces, c'est peut-être la raison pour laquelle ça ne donne pas la même chose que chez toi ? En tout cas, ça serait super pratique si Géoportail avait une fonction export d'image ! Skimel (talk) 13:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Je suis sur portable aussi mais avec un plus grand écran (je ne sais plus combien). Mais oui, ce serait pratique comme fonction ;) Triton (talk) 17:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 15:11, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AI-generated images[edit]

When uploading these type of images please include a category to indicate whether or not the prompt was included Trade (talk) 13:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Trade. I try to add a prompt to every of my new uploads and will try to find the old ones too. Triton (talk) 14:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was talking about the category, not the prompts itself Trade (talk) 22:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! do you think we could add a Prompt template/module to Information so that it's automatically categorise if there is or isn't a prompt informed? Would be easier. Triton (talk) 09:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bassine agricole de Pouillac (Cramchaban, Charente-Maritime, France) - 2021.png[edit]

File:Bassine agricole de Pouillac (Cramchaban, Charente-Maritime, France) - 2021.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 16:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bassine de Nouaillé-Maupertuis (86340) - 19 juillet 2020 (avec échelle).png[edit]

File:Bassine de Nouaillé-Maupertuis (86340) - 19 juillet 2020 (avec échelle).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 17:00, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Skeleton illustration Ahkiyyini.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Skeleton illustration Ahkiyyini.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Skeleton illustration Ahkiyyini.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

==


Tous mes voeux pour cette nouvelle année, Triton !
―Tisourcier

Incidentally[edit]

What was your rationale here? It seems fairly applicable... DS (talk) 00:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's an ooold modification. Not 100% sure but I think I was trying to make some cleaning in the category. The name "monsters" is not really applicable since everybody can have a different interpretation of this title. If my memory serves I only kept files specifically mentionning "monster" in the title. I see it's already a mess again. Concerning this specific picture, it's indeed mentionned in the description. No problem to revert my modification. Triton (talk) 13:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cluricaune midjourney.png[edit]

File:Cluricaune midjourney.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

66.244.113.183 08:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Triton&oldid=847398489"