User talk: Torana

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

HERZLICH WILLKOMMEN! ~ WELCOME!

TO THE TALK PAGE OF

Torana




If you expect a quick answer, please use my talk page at the

› German Wikipedia ‹



Archive


File:1979 Kia Brisa K-303 - 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:1979 Kia Brisa K-303 - 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 16:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replied there. For the record: These photos were properly licensed at Flickr when I uploaded them and I have no doubts that Katherine Tompkins was the author. I see no reason why these should be deleted.   • hugarheimur 19:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Eiserne Hand aus dem RothenburgMuseum[edit]

Hallo Torana, ich kann dir die Beschreibung an der Museumsvitrine liefern: "Eiserne Hand (linke Prothese). Plastisch geformte Greiffinger mit angedeuteten Fingernägeln. Feststehender Daumen, jeweils zwei Finger beweglich und arretierbar. Verrieglungsknopf auf der Oberseite des Handgelenks. Die Hand kann zum Anlegen geöffnet werden. Deutschland, 2.Hälfte 16.Jhdt." Mehr Information habe ich leider nicht. LG ---Xenophon (talk) 10:25, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Xenophon: Vielen Dank! Das ist doch schon mal gar nicht schlecht und gibt dem Eintrag in meiner Liste ein wenig Fleisch. Schöne Grüße   • hugarheimur 10:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Opel GT Aero[edit]

Thanks for fixing, I hadn't realized that there were two of them. I wonder if there are any pictures of the other prototype out there? mr.choppers (talk)-en- 13:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr.choppers: Yes, there are. In fact, I have some in the works, it’s just that I’m terribly unorganized. Also, they’re not very good, because Opel hide their concept cars in a badly lit cellar and I’m not a particularly good photographer, either. Cheers   • hugarheimur 02:52, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cool! I try to bring a tripod for those occasions, but sometimes the curators are (understandably) nervous about such implements around their treasures. Best, mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@mr.choppers: Well, I finally uploaded my photos, and it took me barely two years ;o) They can be found here. Best regards  hugarheimur 01:38, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lord Belbury (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Copyright status: File:Zürcher-Lüthi Victoire ad c. 1896–1900.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Zürcher-Lüthi Victoire ad c. 1896–1900.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved