User talk:Tonync~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Speedy deletion[edit]

You have to give a reason (see Commons:Deletion guidelines. If you think an image has inaccurate source/license information, you can tag it as such by putting:

{{subst:nsd}} ~~~~

Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:20, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

我知道,只叫“快”但那么慢!这是因为我们没有够多管理员。请你报名. :P
我也请你用Commons:巴别塔。 你是{{User zh-yue}}吗?
(我想问你:写繁体中文根写粤语有没有大区别?我没想到有大区别。--pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:30, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
我觉得繁体和简体字的区别跟美国语和英国语的区别多大了!!
我质问你因为我看到了“頭版“, 我不知道为什么有广东化和繁体中文?? 繁体在这:主頁。好像很奇怪。pfctdayelise (translate?) 02:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Flag of Macau[edit]

No, that link does not help. If you can provide an exact construction sheet, I can implement it properly. Denelson83 05:28, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for uploading your files to Wikimedia Commons. There seems to be some license information missing regarding this particular file, however. Could you please fix this? Thank you--Orgullomoore 00:19, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tonync~commonswiki,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Pyongyang Metro Map 2.png is out of date. Could you update it? Thanks again. Stefan4 (talk) 00:31, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

23:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

05:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)


File:HK-Skyscrapers-anotated.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 23:08, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]