User talk:TommyG/Archive 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Many thanks

Thank you for your documentary images of the Landslide at Gjerdrum, Norway, 2020. From the Netherlands, I like to express my compassion with the people who suffered or even died in this terrible disaster. Regards, Elly (talk) 16:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, even with having seen all the pictures in media and television etc, it was still quite shocking seeing the enormous size of the hole in the ground in person. It's really hard to grasp the magnitude just from pictures. TommyG (talk) 17:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
The better you made the photo`s. Elly (talk) 18:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Rename against policy

This should not have happened. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

@Tuvalkin: How so? Original uploader request. What seems to be the problem? TommyG (talk) 18:56, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

About System Z14 file renaming

Hello, that just about this file: File:IBM System Z14 (front).png. As You can see on a official IBM images, the z14 mainframes:

  • Don't have a zSystems inscription on the doors
  • Have simplified door pattern.

This design and naming typical for z13 line (with zSystem sign) and for z12 line (with zEnterprise sign).

I create a categories for IBM z13 and IBM z14 machines for avoid same mistakes. But this file still need a renaming. Thanks.

@ThisIsNotABetter: Thanks, I have moved the file. TommyG (talk) 14:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Re:File:Richard_Kane.jpg

Well, not the same image but identical in National Portrait Gallery with the title John Campbell, 2nd Duke of Argyll and Greenwich. The same image it is in [1], [2]. Therefore the previous image was a crop from a personal blog and I don't think it is a realiable source. Thanks!--Docosong (talk) 22:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

@Docosong: Thanks, I've moved the file now. TommyG (talk) 22:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Abra Kulelagersenteret, Trondheim (1963) (13990658138).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Abra Kulelagersenteret, Trondheim (1963) (13990658138).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 13:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Copyright Correction

Hello, there I noticed you filed a complaint on the photo I uploaded File:Bolaji Ayorinde SAN.jpg I would like to know why you flagged the picture when it is my work and rightly labeled. I took the picture for an article upload and It was uploaded from my personal files. So what do you think is wrong with it Mysticmindz (talk) 19:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Mysticmindz: , since it's meanwhile been deleted, I'm unable to check what it was that alerted me, but I can say that in general, scaled down, low resolution copies of images which has previously been uploaded to multiple sites on the Internet raises a red flag and is very often a copyright violation. If this is indeed your photograph, I apologize and you can ask the deleting admin to restore your image while you go through the OTRS-process to verify your ownership to the image. TommyG (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Brenda Navarro, escritora mexicana

Hello Tommy! I watched your request for permission of this photo. As a comment, I see that the person who uploaded the photo (Ángel Soto Saldivar) has the same name as the stamp in the metadata as the author. Maybe that is useful to verify that he is the same person. Best, --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 23:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Yes, @ProtoplasmaKid: , I agree it seems likely that the user uploading the files is the author. I've removed the tag from the file, but I think it would probably still be useful to go through the OTRS-process for the image, if only to avoid similar situations in the future. TommyG (talk) 14:25, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:Anita Moen

Hei TommyG. Hva tror du om kategorien Category:Anita Moen ? Ser du noen poenger ved å beholde den...Personen er jo trossalt fortsatt i live, men ikke aktiv idrettsutøver på internasjonalt elitenivå. Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 17:05, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

@Migrant: Jeg antar den ble opprettet i sin tid fordi den inneholdte bilde(r) av personen? Ser ut til at bildene ble slettet etter en diskusjon i 2019. Siden hun ikke lenger er aktiv så er kanskje sjansen for at det dukker opp nye bilder av henne relativt små og jeg ser ikke noe poeng i å ha tomme kategorier liggende her på Commons. Commons er et media-arkiv og om det ikke er noe å arkivere, så er det ikke noe poeng i å beholde arkivmappen. Om det skulle dukke opp bilder en gang så er det jo bare å gjenopprette kategorien. I tillegg gir det et feil inntrykk når det ligger en lenke til Wikimedia Commons på artiklene rundt om på språkwikiene, all den tid det ikke faktisk finnes noen bilder her. TommyG (talk) 17:27, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Takk for lenking til diskusjonen, den bør kanskje lenkes i redigeringa ved sletting av kategorien også og si at da ble kategorien tom, når filene i den ble slettet. Er ellers enig i tankemåten din om villedende lenking til wikipediaer og wikidata når kategorien er tom. De sjansene jeg ser for å kunne få noen nyere bilder er vel at noen gjenkjenner henne som skiinstruktør/skitrener eller noe ? Men hvordan er sjansen for at noen faktisk gjenoppretter en kategori og ikke oppretter en ny kategori uten den gamle kategoriens historikk, og hvordan behandles isåfall slike ting om så skulle skje. Spørsmålene her er rettet til deg fra undertegnede fordi jeg anser deg som en erfaren norskspråklig bruker med noe peil på hvordan slike ting behandles utifra hva jeg kan lese av din redigeringshistorikk på Wikimedia.Commons. PS. Små språklige/typografiske rettelser i mitt startinnlegg også. Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 17:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
@Migrant: Kikket litt på COM:CSD#Category og C2-kriterie er "C2. Unuseful empty category", og det er det jo strengt tatt ikke, men jeg tror det er litt varierende hvordan dette praktiseres av Admins på commons. Jeg søkte også litt rundt, og bildene som den gangen ble slettet ligger jo fremdeles ute på Mynewsdesk.com med en akseptabel CC-lisens: https://www.mynewsdesk.com/no/trysil/images/anita-moen-518102. Så, jeg tror at om noen hadde tatt seg bryet med å kontakte han som tok bildene, Ola Matsson / Skistar Trysil, så er det godt mulig at man kunne fått lastet de opp igjen. Da måtte man ev. fått de til å gå gjennom COM:OTRS for å verifisere lisensen. TommyG (talk) 07:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Det tror jeg blir for mye for min del, så interressert er jeg ikke, da prøver jeg meg heller på en egenskaps-presisering i denne redigeringen ihvertfall inntil videre. For jeg holder på med å rydde litt opp i norske vinter-OL-utøvere med bilder eller helst kategorier på commons og deres lenker til commons i norsk bokmålswikipedia. Slik at de blir mest mulig riktig iforhold til hvilke OL-tropper de var medlem av som utøver selv om de konkurrerte eller ikke (trenere er ikke kategorisert). Men hva mener du egentlig om at det er jo noen f.eks. tidligere skiløpere som senere har vært trener og vært trener for senere OL-tropper og har egne commons-categorier burde de også kategoriseres som yyYearyy Winter Olympics sportspeople from xxNationxx eller burde det lages differensierte kategorier for disse. Og hva med slike hovedfunksjonærer noen har jo tidligere vært utøvere og har egen commons-kategori. Med vennlig rest-påske hilsen Migrant (talk) 18:01, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Screenshot from his video.png

File:Screenshot from his video.png is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD G8 (page dependent on deleted or non-existent content)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:16, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

MOTD Notification
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Nes kirkeruiner.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Gazi Yazargil father of Modern Microneurosurgery.png → Gazi Yaşargil father of Modern Microneurosurgery.png

Hi. Can you rename this file? (Gazi Yazargil father of Modern Microneurosurgery.png → Gazi Yaşargil father of Modern Microneurosurgery.png) Thanks. - Aybeg (talk) 15:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Sure, done. TommyG (talk) 17:53, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Rename the images

Hi User:TommyG I saw you renamed some of the images I requested but there are more.

[3] and could you rename the images that are linked to this one. Irani's name is spelt wrong.

And for this one [4] [5]

it’s a different person the name of the person in Ihana Dhillon not Puri and I have proof.

Look in the source [6] and this [7] quite different. Also if you don’t believe me check Dhillons page [8] so please rename these two as well Preetykaur761 (talk) 15:12, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

user:TommyG please can you rename then please don’t ignore my request. Preetykaur761 (talk) 08:46, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

[9] rename this as well thank you Preetykaur761 (talk) 08:47, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

There's nearly 300 images in the rename requests backlog. I'm working my way through it, but it takes time. TommyG (talk) 09:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

File:- all polar bears wish you God Jul - Happy Christmas - Bon & Joyeux Noël - Fröhliche Weinachten - Prettige Kerstdagen - Felices Navidades (13691398143).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:- all polar bears wish you God Jul - Happy Christmas - Bon & Joyeux Noël - Fröhliche Weinachten - Prettige Kerstdagen - Felices Navidades (13691398143).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, TommyG (talk) 11:46, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Declines

Hi Tommy, When you decline files could you please provide a reason for each one - Unfortunately I'm not a mind reader and not all your declines have been obvious (for instance there was indeed a mistake in this file and again without moaning a Google Search would've told you that :) ),
Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010Talk 21:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for letting me know. TommyG (talk) 09:09, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Tråd på Torget

Hei, mulig du har sett det, men det har kommet en konkret anvisning på hvordan man kan melde seg som frivillig mht. å behandle spørsmål om bilder:

https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Torget#Send_inn_ans%C3%B8kning_om_%C3%A5_v%C3%A6re_del_av_de_Volunteer_Response_Team_(VRT)-frivillige

Hvis du melder deg, så vil jeg stemme på deg, og sikkert flere andre fra dette prosjektet. Mvh. Ulflarsen (talk) 12:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

@Ulflarsen: Hei, har svart på min diskusjonsside på no.wp. TommyG (talk) 18:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Junta Militar Peruana de 1968-1980.jpg rename

Hi TommyG, why did you revert my rename request at File:Junta Militar Peruana de 1968-1980.jpg? It falls under COM:FNC reason 3: "To correct obvious errors in filenames, including misspelled proper nouns, incorrect dates, and misidentified objects or organisms." Thanks, -M.nelson (talk) 20:46, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Because we don't rename files that are under a delete review. Feel free to ask for a rename again when the delete request has been closed. TommyG (talk) 05:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Alf Olsen (1917-2005) (48909268333).jpg
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Alf Olsen (1917-2005) (48909268333).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, TommyG (talk) 13:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Skulle det ikke vært omvendt

Er ikke beskrivelsen på File:Sjøflyhavna i Hommelvik (14659864375).jpg feil, dvs. at det er LN-KAG som er Junkersen og LN-LAI som er Short Sandringham? Jeg tok ikke sjansen på å endre, da jeg ikke vet hvem som var hhv. Jutulen og Veslefrikk. mvh, --Apple farmer (talk) 10:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

@Apple farmer: Høres ut som noe du vet mer om enn meg. Men, når jeg kikker på beskrivelsen på originalen fra Flickr, så ser det ut til at den er rettet opp og stemmer overens med det du mener er rett. TommyG (talk) 10:14, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, TommyG (talk) 12:35, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


About my Renaming Request

Hi. I saw you just declined my request of renaming my file (File:Japan_Districts_of_the_House_of_Representatives_map.svg). Are you suggesting that I have to manually change every single wiki page currently using my old image to the new file? That seems like a lot of needless work. Sorry if I bothered you-沁水湾 (talk)It

I am suggesting you take the current version of the file and upload that file as a new file. You then update any articles using that file to point to the new filename if that is correct. Once that is done, you revert the file back to the version uploaded by Talleyrand6. You can't usurp files and make them into something completely different, then have them renamed to fit your new completely different file content, just because it's convenient for you. The original file had a completely different content and was not specific to the 2021 elections. See COM:OVERWRITE for more details. TommyG (talk) 07:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Reagan at 10 Downing Street date

Hi. I've written notes here. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, that seems reasonable. Just reference the talk page when changing the date so that others don't need to wonder why the date doesn't match the archive source. TommyG (talk) 16:50, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Done. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:24, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 192-026, KZ Mauthausen, SS-Uschaf.jpg

@TommyG: going thourgh the history of this file, I noticed you renamed it upon request of now blocked user MilHistExp: Reason: The rank of this person was SS-Unterscharführer. The thing is, to my knowledge it should read SS-Unterscharführer (kurz: Uscha; Ansprache: Unterscharführer). Unless of course I am missing something here. :-) Thanks. Lotje (talk) 12:13, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@Lotje: I'm not quite sure what the question is? At the time, the rename request seemed reasonable, but I don't write or speak German, so I may of course have gotten it wrong. Is it that is should be SS-Uscha and not SS-Ushacf? If so, please feel free to create a new rename request to get it corrected. TommyG (talk) 13:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
@TommyG: , I made some interwikilinks which might be helpful and prefer pinging @Bundesarchiv-B6: who might be able to advise on this. Renaming files of the Bundesarchiv is something I personally wouldn't do. German people are very organized and I wouldn't want to screw up things for them. :-) Lotje (talk) 13:22, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
@Lotje: , I've seen quite a few cases of images uploaded by Bundersarchive referencing obviously incorrect locations or names of ships etc when reviewing the uploads related to Norway back in 2008 and onwards, so I wouldn't worry too much about that. But, please let me know if there's anything to you actually want me to do about it. TommyG (talk) 12:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you TommyG for coming back to me on this one. Don't think there is an urgent need to do anything right now. Though, if Bundesarchiv-B6 react to my ping, they might change it themselves. :-) Cheers. Lotje (talk) 12:47, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
OK TommyG is right, it's a "Unterscharführer - so Lotje and TommyG, thank you very much for your advice, we have changed it already in our database www.bild.bundesarchiv.de and on Wikimedia Commons!--Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 13:52, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Off the record

Only me again, that user page has been deleted I see now. :-) Lotje (talk) 12:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Reverted edit

Hello @TommyG. I saw that you reverted edit made to "File:Madeline Eklund No. 24 - 49546940628.jpg". Since it was reverted, why the insult? daSupremo [talk] 22:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

@DaSupremo: Well, most of the tags were factually wrong. It's not a poster, it doesn't depict design, other than the fact that all printed materials are designed in some form or way and there are no rectangles in the image. I call it what it is, and it would be useful if you were a bit more thorough when picking tags to apply to files. TommyG (talk) 07:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
@TommyG Since it was 'wrong', the revert was enough. What I do not understand is the insult after the reversion. Concerning the last sentence, I will keep that in mind. daSupremo [talk] 10:57, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TommyG/Archive_2021&oldid=676354844"