User talk:Tiouraren

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tiouraren!

-- Welcome (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Larger Tongtianlong image[edit]

Hi, how did you get the larger image of Tongtianlong? I only seem able to find a smaller version in the web version of the paper... FunkMonk (talk) 08:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found it from Sci-News, but I'm not quite sure if this version is in the original size. You can check this out: http://www.sci-news.com/paleontology/tongtianlong-limosus-feathered-dinosaur-china-04355.html User: ([[User talk:|talk]]) 08:44, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Nice, for some annoying reason, it seems the images in the actual Sci. Rep. journal articles can be no wider than 925px... --FunkMonk (talk) 14:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Artist's concept of the "Planet Nine".jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Artist's concept of the "Planet Nine".jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcpag2010 (talk) 02:24, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Artist's concept of the "Planet Nine".jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Artist's concept of the "Planet Nine".jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcpag2010 (talk) 07:32, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artist's concept of the "Planet Nine".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JCP2018 (talk) 11:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2019[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--01:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sinopterus dongi NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:18, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nurhachius sp. skull NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hyphalosaurus (BMNHC Ph325) NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GRDN711 20:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old TRA Taichung station May 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Slightly noisy for a photo taken in such nice day, but OK. --LexKurochkin 08:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaria abydata ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Slight blurring in places, but ok for QI --Tagooty 04:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pingasa ruginaria pacifica dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Slight blurring in places but ok for QI --Tagooty 04:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pingasa ruginaria pacifica ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ethmia nigroapicella dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Micronia aculeata dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Micronia aculeata ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:45, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ethmia octanoma ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Oppose The strip spoils it for QI, it could be fixed (tricky though) but not a QI to me like this --Poco a poco 12:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I retouched the light reflections. --Zinnmann 14:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good job! QI now, thank you for the fix! --Poco a poco 09:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macaria abydata dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 17:55, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sinamia NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 07:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Philydrosaurus proseilus NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Velvet 05:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ethmia nigroapicella (kou leafworm) - dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sinopterus dongi (fossil).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sinovenator sp. skull NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Microraptor gui (BMNHC Ph763) NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haopterus gracilis skull NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Genibatrachus baoshanensis with skin remains NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protopteryx fengningensis (BMNHC Ph1060A) NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ikechosaurus sp. abdomen NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 05:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monjurosuchus NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sinamia head NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 06:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ikechosaurus sp. skull NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 06:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yabeinosaurus tenuis and Lycoptera muroii NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Longipteryx chaoyangensis (BMNHC Ph930A) NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nausinoe perspectata ventral 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015, Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you had already uploaded a file this year, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--13:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Dahengping and Mount Erzai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tomer T 17:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dzharatitanis kingi restoration.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IJReid (talk) 17:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Male Trabala vishnou guttata (rose-myrtle lappet moth) - dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Trabala vishnou guttata dorsal.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trabala vishnou guttata dorsal.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

你說你有拍到二座山,可是照片只有一座山頭,所以我想知道你如何確認是大橫屏山?--Kai3952 (talk) 17:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

我注意你添加類別會有「過度分類」的情況發生。如果類別已經存在,那麼不需要重複添加。因為過多重複這些無意義的類別,不僅失去分類本身的價值,反而造成後面的人想要來編輯時會產生混亂,屆時他們要清除過度分類就會比你現在添加類別更麻煩。儘管這是方針,但是我更喜歡別人可以自己去學習如何避免過度分類。感謝你的配合--Kai3952 (talk) 18:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaohsiung Music Center and Great Tiger Bridge during 2022 Taiwan Lantern Festival.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rachis-dominated feathers Burmese amber NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:38, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kaohsiung Music Center and Great Tiger Bridge during 2022 Taiwan Lantern Festival.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kaohsiung Music Center and Great Tiger Bridge during 2022 Taiwan Lantern Festival.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elcanidae Burmese amber NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sinamia scales NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:51, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crato Formation Odonata NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --IamMM 12:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kubanochoerus gigas NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance of Botanical Garden of NMNS, Taichung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 19:35, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nankang Formation amber NMNS (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment You should identify the rock the amber is on, and Category:Focus stacking images of unclassified subjects seems like a bad category that should be instead turned into something specific. -- Ikan Kekek 06:08, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Half done Modified the category and still consulting what kind of sedimentary rock it might be. -- Tiouraren 07:12, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaohsiung Music Center and Lingyaliao Railroad Bridge lit with Ukrainian flag colors during 2022 Taiwan Lantern Festival.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 16:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raisaitau Common School gate inscription.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Kaohsiung Music Center and Great Tiger Bridge during 2022 Taiwan Lantern Festival.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Sinopterus dongi NMNS.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Tiouraren,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Baimao viewed from Acunkeng, Taichung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ourapteryx yerburii ssp. specimens and male genitalia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 23:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ourapteryx nonmarginata NHMUK 010218986 hindwing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:08, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ourapteryx yerburii - Mounted specimen - male dorsal/Male genitalia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ourapteryx yerburii ssp. specimens and male genitalia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ourapteryx yerburii ssp. specimens and male genitalia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on FP candidate[edit]

Hello Tiouraren, I believe that addressed the pointed out issue regarding HDR artifacts, could you please, give here some feedback. Thank you! Poco a poco (talk) 20:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset at Le Meridien Taichung May 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Combrian 14:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Longipteryx chaoyangensis (BMNHC Ph930B) NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Combrian 14:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camponotus Dominican amber NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, I guess than a more precise id is not possible here --Poco a poco 19:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yijenplatycnemis huangi NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nankang Formation amber NMNS (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pleurosaurus sp. NTM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asialepidotus shingyiensis NTM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 10:32, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mesosaurus brasiliensis NTM I02048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caudipteryx zoui (BPV 085) gastroliths.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zygoptera swarm Burmese amber NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalligrammatidae Burmese amber NMNS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nankang Formation amber NMNS (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not perfect, but good enough. --Kritzolina 07:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Shaolai viewed from Mount Yuanzui.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:54, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaohsiung Music Center and Lingyaliao Railroad Bridge lit with Ukrainian flag colors during 2022 Taiwan Lantern Festival (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shaolai Mountain - viewed from Yuanzui Mountain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2023[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--20:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hehuan West Peak and Baigu Massif.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ourapteryx incaudata NHMUK 13321086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 20:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ourapteryx primularis NHMUK 15106124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ourapteryx nakajimai – Mounted specimen - dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ourapteryx versuta – Mounted specimen - dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ourapteryx incaudata – Mounted specimen - dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ourapteryx clara formosana late instar larva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ourapteryx versuta NHMUK 15106187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ourapteryx clara – late instar larva.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ourapteryx nakajimai NHMUK 15106081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Excellent --MB-one 15:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]