User talk:Tgsflash

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tgsflash!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Tgsflash,

du hast kürzlich dieses Bild hochgeladen. Du gibst dabei an, der Fotograf dieses Fotos zu sein. Hast Du denn wirklich dieses Foto aufgenommen? Viele Grüße, Mosbatho (talk) 22:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo,
das Foto ist nicht mehr in Verwendung. LG. Tgsflash (talk) 21:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Das ist keine Antwort auf die von Mosbatho gestellte Frage. Es steht der Verdacht im Raum, dass Du das Foto nicht selbst erstellt hast. Mit der Bitte um Klärung. Gruß, Hasenläufer 21:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ist mir schon klar. Das Foto ist ein Scan aus meiner Sammlung, darum der Verweis auf mich. Natürlich ist das nicht mein eigenes geschossenes, zu der Zeit war ich noch Kind.
Das Foto kann entfernt werden. LG. Tgsflash (talk) 13:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Als Urheberrechtsverletzung gelöscht. Beste Grüße, --Polarlys (talk) 19:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Gasthaus zum Goldnen Löwen.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: "Own work" seems not to be true. It looks like an old postcard with another copyright owner.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Hasenläufer 20:55, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Es handelt sich hier um eine historische Postkarte, die in meiner Sammlung ist.
Aufgenommen habe ich das Motiv natürlich nicht selber. Tgsflash (talk) 21:14, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dann sind die Angaben „Quelle: Eigenes Werk“, „Urheber: Tgsflash“ und „Datum: 11. Mai 2023“ wahrheitswidrig. Auf der anderen Seite der Postkarte sollte stehen, wer der Urheberrechtsinhaber ist – wahrscheinlich ein Postkarten-Verlag. Bitte korrigieren und ggf. korrektes Jahr der Produktion der Postkarte (nicht das Upload-Datum) angeben. Gruß, Hasenläufer 21:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
mach ich. Tgsflash (talk) 10:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Wachgebäude 1991.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wachgebäude 1991.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Wachgebäude 1991.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Mosbatho (talk) 21:23, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, der als Urheber genannte Wolfgang Schmidt müsste die freie Lizenz gegenüber permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org (OTRS) bestätigen. --Túrelio (talk) 06:42, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, ich habe leider keinen Kontakt mehr zu ihm. Werde mich aber darum kümmern. Das Bild ist auch nicht mehr in "meinen" Artikeln verlinkt. Tgsflash (talk) 10:13, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sinnvolle Angaben notwendig[edit]

Hallo, danke für deine Uploads. Ich möchte dich bitten, sinnvolle Angaben bei den historischen Aufnahmen zu tätigen, d.h. Herkunft, Entstehungszeit und Urheber (sofern bekannt) anzugeben. Als Uploader ist man da in aller Regel nicht der Urheber (auch nicht durch scannen/abfotografieren). Entsprechend verbieten sich auch restriktive Lizenzen wie CC-BY-SA-4.0, da niemand dich angeben muss, wenn er eine 120 Jahre alte Postkarte weiterverwenden möchte. Ich wäre dir dankbar, wenn du deine Uploads entsprechend nachbearbeiten könntest. Danke, --Polarlys (talk) 19:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bau Rennradbahn Leipziger Vorstadt.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bau Rennradbahn Leipziger Vorstadt.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bau Rennradbahn Leipziger Vorstadt.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 19:13, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Perel Fashion Week 2018.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: from ZEITmagazin
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Polarlys (talk) 19:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt bin ich gespannt, welches Foto von ihr frei nutzbar ist. Ansonsten bleibt der Artikel ohne Foto.
Die Angabe von Urheber und Quele macht dementsprechend auch keinen Sinn, wenn Fotos trotzdem zum löschen vorgemerkt werden, weil sie nicht unter der GNU liegen.
Quelle und Urheber sind ja am Foto eingetragen, wie es normalerweise dafür vorgesehen ist. Tgsflash (talk) 10:46, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Trägerraketensystem OTR-22.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Trägerraketensystem OTR-22.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Trägerraketensystem OTR-22.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 19:20, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Polarlys (talk) 19:30, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sind aus dem Lapis. Quelle Meier, S. (2013). Neu im Mineralienmuseum Mähring: Die Bültemann-Sammlung. Lapis, Jg. 38, Nr. 12, S. 42–49.
Nun bleibt die Frage, ob es reicht die Angaben in der Quelle in den Fotos nachzutragen, oder ob das trotzdem Lizenzverletzung bleibt. Dann macht auch die Angabe von Quellen keinen Sinn (weil man ausschließlich selber der Fotograf aller Fotos sein muss). Tgsflash (talk) 10:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Foto: Wolfgang Schmidt"[edit]

Hallo, ich bin es wieder, bist du Wolfgang Schmidt? Wenn nicht, dann musst die Erlaubnis einholen, dass dieses Foto auf Commons veröffentlicht werden darf. Viele Grüße, Mosbatho (talk) 20:24, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo,
ich bin nicht Wolfgang.Und bezieht sich auch nicht auf dieses Foto, die ich von ihm habe.
die Datei kann gelöscht werden.
Ich habe einen sauberen Scan mit Angabe zum Verleger und Jahresdatum (den Tag bekommt man nicht raus) nochmal hochgeladen. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gasthaus_zum_goldenen_L%C3%B6wen.jpg
Vorab die Klärung, ob dieses Foto nun für den Artikel wieder verwendet werden darf, ebvor ich es einbinde und es dann doch wieder gelöscht ird, weil eine Genehmigung vom Verlger geholt werden muss, oder sonstiges Commons Gedöns nicht zutrifft. LG. Tgsflash (talk) 09:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Danke für die Info! Bitte bemühe Dich darum, das nicht mehr benötigte Bild zu löschen. Noch eine Frage, dieses Bild und dieses Bild wirken wie YouTube-Screenshots vom entsprechenden Auftritt. Ist das zutreffend? Liebe Grüße, Mosbatho (talk) 21:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ja,ist zutreffend. Damit es quasi als eigenes Werk zählt. Wenn das nicht zutrifft, dann löschen. Dann soll sich ein anderer bemühen an ein freies Foto zu kommen. Ansonsten bleiben meine Artikel demnächst bilderlos. VG. Tgsflash (talk) 18:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Gasthaus zum Goldnen Löwen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ 08:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo,
ich bin nicht Wolfgang.Und bezieht sich auch nicht auf dieses Foto, die ich von ihm habe.
die Datei kann gelöscht werden.
Ich habe einen sauberen Scan mit Angabe zum Verleger und Jahresdatum (den Tag bekommt man nicht raus) nochmal hochgeladen. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gasthaus_zum_goldenen_L%C3%B6wen.jpg
Vorab die Klärung, ob dieses Foto nun für den Artikel wieder verwendet werden darf, ebvor ich es einbinde und es dann doch wieder gelöscht ird, weil eine Genehmigung vom Verlger geholt werden muss, oder sonstiges Commons Gedöns nicht zutrifft. LG. Tgsflash (talk) 09:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung zum Stammtisch[edit]

Hallo Tgsflash, ich sehe in letzter Zeit deine Bearbeitungen rund um Dresden öfter. Deswegen wollte ich dich gerne mal zum Stammtisch einladen. Wenn du Lust hast schau mal auf de:Wikipedia:Dresden vorbei. Beste Grüße --sk (talk) 09:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]