User talk:Ssp 1.618

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "Reason - Прошу прощения за свою неадекватность. Осознавая последствия своих действий готов пообещать не совершать больше некорректных правок. Выражаю понимание, что всё загружаемое мной на Викисклад становится общественным достоянием. IP-адрес — 95.153.132.74, идентификатор блокировки — 273304. Ssp 1.618 (talk) 21:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)"[reply]
Unblock reason: "Так как А. Савин по-видимому согласен с деблокировкой, не вижу причины думать по-другому. Taivo (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)"[reply]
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  suomi  हिन्दी  македонски  русский  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

I'd support unblocking, Unfortunately it looks like SSP had a bad start here which I think it's fair to say everyone has bad starts on Wikimedia myself certainly included. –Davey2010Talk 21:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@A.Savin: You blocked the user. What do you think about unblock? Taivo (talk) 07:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can see, the block was "on user requests" which means it may be lifted on user request too. --A.Savin 10:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Функциональная блок - схема счета по фронту и спаду сигнала, со счетом на 12 (три точки отсчета), и фильтром на выходе.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Davey2010Talk 21:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Функциональная блок - схема счета по фронту и спаду сигнала, со счетом на 12, и фильтром на выходе.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Davey2010Talk 21:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Функциональная блок - схема счета по фронту и спаду сигнала, со счетом на 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Davey2010Talk 21:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Функциональная блок - схема счета по фронту сигнала, со счетом на 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Davey2010Talk 21:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Релейно - контактная схема счета по фронту сигнала, со счетом на 10 (начальный вариант).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Davey2010Talk 22:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Thanks" spam[edit]

Please stop thanking me!, I don't need to be thanked for starting DRs and I certainly DON'T need to be thanked 6 times either!. Thanking people in this manner is disruptive editing and could see you blocked. Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 11:38, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Davey2010 I wanted to be polite. I had no intention of spamming You. Please tell me what markers on my discussion page I can use to attract the attention of administrators to help me with something. I think this will help me reduce the risk of being blocked in the future due to incorrect editing of other pages. Thank you in advance and apologize for the familiarity of the Internet language translation. Ssp 1.618 (talk) 16:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]