User talk:Soy Juampayo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Soy Juampayo!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:16, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Soy Juampayo, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:2016-01-12 martes 234038 - Bilz y Pap.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015-07-28 martes 150532 - Abcdin (Temuco).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MarioFinale (talk) 20:36, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, (tJosve05a (c) 23:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Foto de Abcdin[edit]

Hola Juampayo, el rótulo de la tienda no tiene un diseño creativo como para estar protegido, son solo letras. Y en el interior del escaparate tampoco se muestran (ni se ven con nitidez) objetos que pudieran tener copyright, así que no hay problema con la foto. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014-11-11 martes 1716 - Colegio Bautista (Temuco).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 20:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014-06-10 martes 1225 - Funcionario biblioteca Galo Sepúlveda (Temuco).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.

We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files.

Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  русский  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  বাংলা   +/−

MiguelAlanCS (talk) 09:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reutilización de recursos subidos a Facebook[edit]

Hola, he visto que tienes experiencia subiendo imágenes a commons. Mi pregunta es como lo haces para subir una imagen propia a commons que también hayas compartido en una red social, para que un bot no te la borre por derechos de autor (estoy hablando de una imagen de propia autoría).

Si me pudieras orientar estaría muy agradecido. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CuervoNN (talk • contribs) 23:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CuervoNN, te saludo cordialmente. Disculpa la demora. El tema es el siguiente: que Commons no tiene cómo comprobar que tú eres la misma persona que subió las fotos a Facebook o Instagram. Tú puedes decir que la cuenta de la red social es tuya pero con decirlo no basta. Yo podría crearme una cuenta de Facebook que diga que soy Luis Miguel pero no lo soy. Entonces, lo que tienes que hacer cuando subas una foto que ya esté en tu red social, envías una OTRS para que Commons pueda verificar que se trata de ti. Todo lo referente a las OTRS lo puedes encontrar aquí, pero cualquier duda que tengas referente a este tema o cualquier otro, no dudes en preguntarme nuevamente. Te mando un abrazo. --Juampayo Escorpio (talk) 10:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2022-12-03 Saturday 01.47.27 (UTC-3) Los Piukenes (Temuco).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Bedivere (talk) 03:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Bedivere. Acabo de ver los problemas que mencionas acerca del etiquetado de mi foto File:2022-12-03 Saturday 01.47.27 (UTC-3) Los Piukenes (Temuco).jpg. Es correcto que indiqué un origen en el parámetro "fuente" del resumen. Ambos enlaces agregados a dicho parámetro, tanto en inglés como en español, llevan a la página de Instagram donde subí la foto original. En la descripción de la foto, en dicha cuenta de Instagram, está indicado que la publiqué bajo la licencia (CC BY 4.0). No sé si dicha licencia tengo que indicarla también en el parámetro "permiso" del resumen, además de la sección Licencia, en su página de Commons (lo indiqué desde un principio en la sección Licencia, y pensé que era redundante agregarlo, también, en el "permiso", teniendo en cuenta que, además, la mencioné en la "descripción" del resumen). Por favor, indícamelo para arreglar todo y que la foto no sea borrada. Saludo cordial. Juampayo Escorpio (talk) 16:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Juampayo. Lo que corresponde que pongas una plantilla de revisión de licencia dado que la fotografía fue publicada en otro portal y de hecho se cita como fuente. Si un revisor de licencias (license reviewer) le da el visto bueno, se mantendrá. Bedivere (talk) 16:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bedivere, la página de la foto en Commons ya tiene una revisión aprobada en su sección Licencia. Juampayo Escorpio (talk) 16:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts gentilmente la ha revisado. Muchas gracias Bedivere (talk) 17:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Bedivere: Si el sitio externo tiene una licencia claramente, la plantilla correcta no es {{Npd}} sino {{LicenseReview}} (sin argumentos, si no eres un revisor de licencias). -- King of ♥ 17:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Correcto. Mi aproximación no fue la más apropiada pero ahora al explicarle a Juampayo creo quedó clara la intención. Sere más cuidadoso. Bedivere (talk) 17:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Town_planning_of_Padre_Las_Casas has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


186.174.144.85 04:29, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]