User talk:SantaClaus

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Speedy deletion categories[edit]

I have removed the information you added to the top of all of the csd categories. That information could already be found in the red boxes. Feel free to revert this, but if you do have good reasoning I would much prefer to discuss this to avoid getting into conflict. Lcarsdata

Thank you for letting me know. No problem at all. It was NOT my idea. I noticed but it was just for keeping the consistency with the other categories where someone put that message.--SantaClaus 00:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Please add the Categorization Marameter[edit]

Done. It was already categorised, I just added the sort value. thanks for your work! --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 08:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for your quick working. SantaClaus

I reverted your edits. It's a press release... therefore it has to have external links. Converting to internal links makes it useless when printed. Thanks for your efforts in general but that one had to be undone. ++Lar: t/c 11:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice. Yes, I understand, but if the page has external links, the page can not be hit by the tool "What links here" (people can't see the link); in short, it may cause a problem of "out of links" when the other pages are updated(moved)!? I just wonder if it is OK? --SantaClaus 11:59, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Category:Commons-mr[edit]

Dear SantaClaus you seems to have made an edit to Category:Commons-mr This Category is supposed to be for Marathi Language (This language is used in western parts of India).Your edit dated 19:39, 3 March 2007 states * This category contains French articles only.

For your info This category has nothing to do with French per say .Secondly part of Marathi speaking people do understand english but not French. So Undersigned requests to correct the edit made by you, apropriately.

Since I not fully aware of all rules at commons I hope you will help us in correcting above mentioned edit.

Mahitgar 16:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for your coming to let me know this. Oh, yes... good question. As you pointed it out, it is just a simple mistake. I have corrected it. Just in case, can you please to go to check it when you have time?
For all language internationalization, I had edited all Common-"language" pages to keep the consistency. I copied and paste, then maybe I just forgot to rewrite the word.
--SantaClaus 18:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Unclear_reason/ja has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ices2Csharp (talk) 23:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unclear_reason/lang has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ices2Csharp (talk) 23:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BadJPEG/ja has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

115.67.198.38 13:28, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sandbox/en has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

49.178.42.88 17:18, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

コモンズ・ポリシー has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


2400:2651:9200:3400:E075:6225:591D:365C 03:13, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Convert to OGG/ja has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

/Leonel Sohns stop bugging me! 13:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]