User talk:Rudko

Archive 2008 - 2012

Earlier discussions see @ User talk:Rudko/Archiv

A cup of coffee for you!

Hello Rudko, thank you for your help with the uncategorisized images. You can use the tools on the left toolbar when you have activated this. For blurry images please use the {{Blurry}}-tag, for no permission the "no permission button" or "no permission with comment", or no source (for images with sources like "internet" or "google" or similar sources). In doubt of own work the DR-button. It is more easyer then. When you have any questions you can visit and ask in IRCThis user chats on Freenode: #wikimedia-commons Have a nice day AtelierMonpli (talk) 09:36, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the tipp... and especially for the cup of coffee, I will need gallons of it to categorise the years! Rudko (talk) 14:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Akihabara picture4.jpg

Why did you tag this file as {{No license}}? It has a license. Multichill (talk) 15:24, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Multichill, I mean it is a derivated work, the toy figure is a copyrighted work from autor. Rudko (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Please get to know the templates before you start tagging lots of picture. You're now saying en:user:Rei is not the author. Multichill (talk) 19:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dortmund-Innenstadt-Nord Feldherrnstr7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good light and sharpness, but with your editing you produced remarkable noise in the sky. Masked sharpening and/or selective denoising should help. --Tuxyso 08:51, 21 April 2013 (UTC)  Comment Somewhat denoised. But I did not edit anything before. -- Smial 20:50, 21 April 2013 (UTC) IMHO QI now. --Tuxyso 18:20, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

OWL Bild der Woche

Hallo Rudko, das ist ein sehr schönes Foto. Herzlichen Glückwunsch. Wewoewi (talk) 09:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Wewoewi, ehmmm ich weiß nicht genau was Du meinst, srry. Rudko (talk) 10:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Das meine ich:

Innenansicht des heutigen Ehrenmals im Schlosspark Schöttmar, Stadt Bad Salzuflen, Kreis Lippe.

- Wewoewi (talk) 18:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

• 

Achso, ja erst jetzt habe ich verstanden aus welchem Anlass, danke das Foto habe ich durch die Gitter am Ehrenmal fotografiert, lg Rudko (talk) 00:38, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments

Hallo Rudko, da Du mir an der ein oder anderen Stelle als Fotograf von Baudenkmalen aufgefallen bist und Du einige Bilder im September hochgeladen hast: Du kannst an

Wiki Loves Monuments

2013 teilnehmen, wenn Du möchtest. Einfach die Vorlage {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2013|de}} auf die Beschreibungsseite des Fotos kopieren und es in die Kategorie Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, DE-NW (falls es aus Nordrhein-Westfalen stammt) einsortieren. --Alex (talk) 21:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Alexander, ja Du bist mir auch durch die kleinen Veränderungen in den Beschreibungen aufgefallen, welche ich fortan übernommen habe. Danke für den Hinweis, habe ja bzgl. WLM nur den Uploud-Formular an der Startseite gesehen, welcher mich zwingt, eine Lizenz auszuwählen, die ich sonst nicht verwende. Deswegen lade ich die Bilder mit der Zero-Lizenz auf den gewöhnlichen Weg hoch. Danke auch für den Tipp mit den Schablonen. Für die September-Bilder werde ich Sie noch einfügen, wer weiß, vllt bekomme ich zumindest nen kleinen Preis. --Rudko (talk) 21:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Ja, stimmt, die Dokumentation zu alternativen Upload-Möglichkeiten ist mangelhaft. Ich erinnere mich dunkel, dass das mal moniert wurde, aber dann hat sich keiner drum gekümmert. Einbau der Vorlage und Kategorisierung sind auf jeden Fall notwendig, nur ein Foto von einem Baudenkmal im September hochladen reicht nicht aus. (Soll ja Leute geben, die das machen, aber partout nicht am Wettbewerb teilnehmen wollen.) Drücke auf jeden Fall die Daumen; wenn ich es richtig sehe, wurden ja schon Fotos von Dir hier auf Commons ausgezeichnet. PS: Ich bin auch kein Experte, was die Bildbeschreibungen hier auf Commons angeht. Das was ich gefunden habe, habe ich mal versucht einzubauen. --Alex (talk) 22:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Rudko, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Rudko, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

File:Milan Duomo 14.06.2012 15-42-51.JPG

File:Milan Duomo 14.06.2012 15-42-51.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Milan Duomo 14.06.2012 15-43-05.JPG

File:Milan Duomo 14.06.2012 15-43-05.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Rudko,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Wiki Loves Earth 2015

Hello, You receive this message because we noticed your contributions relating to the Moroccan natural heritage. We would welcome you to participate in the contest Wiki Loves Earth, which aims to encourage the development of natural protected areas throughout the Wikimedia projects (mainly Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons media encyclopedia). The contest runs from 1 to 31 May 2015 and is open to all. Prizes will be awarded at the end. A question, a problem? Do not hesitate to leave a message on the discussion page of the event. See you soon, Reda benkhadra (d · c) For more details | Contact

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Rudko,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Copyright status: File:StatueLippramsdorf.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:StatueLippramsdorf.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Agadir 29.03.2011 16-06-30.JPG

And also:

• File:Agadir 29.03.2011 16-08-43.JPG
• File:Agadir 29.03.2011 16-09-20.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Agadir 28.01.2011 15-06-19.JPG

And also:

• File:Agadir 28.01.2011 15-06-52.JPG
• File:Agadir 28.01.2011 15-06-59.JPG
• File:Agadir 28.01.2011 15-08-54.JPG
• File:Agadir 28.01.2011 15-09-13.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Agadir 27.01.2011 18-48-31.JPG

File:Agadir 27.01.2011 18-48-31.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)