User talk:Romary

Re: Grandeur des images PNG

Romary, pour réduire la grandeur de vos images PNG, il faut télécharger soit le logiciel OptiPNG, soit PNGCrush. Ces deux logiciels vous permettront de réduire la grandeur de vos images PNG, et les deux sont disponibles pour les systèmes d'exploitation Linux et Windows. Je recommanderais OptiPNG, qui est plus vite que PNGCrush et qui produit des plus petites images.

Les deux logiciels peuvent être téléchargés aux sites web ci-dessous:

• OptiPNG: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~cosmin/pngtech/optipng/
• PNGCrush: http://pmt.sourceforge.net/pngcrush/

Merci, Andrew pmk 26 June 2005 14:27 (UTC)

réparation de mon français

Merci beaucoups pour votre assistence a Commons:Service SVP.

Savez-vous c'est le français de ma mémoire, et pas le français de une traduction d'internet? Je suis fier de mon français mauvais, pourqoui il est mon français et pas le français robotique. Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 14:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

categoría

Hola, cambié las imágenes Rail section.JPG y Image:Rail entier.JPG a una categoría más específica, porque Category:Steel-profiles refiere a perfiles para estructuras, no Rail. Saludos, --Tano4595 22:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Ruta Nacional A006 - New picture

Romary,

I wanted to let you know that I uploaded a new version of the picture you voted on the Featured Pictures Candidates page. Could you please vote again for the second version?

Thanks in advance, --Alpertron 12:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006 Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February. Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote).--MichaelMaggs 21:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

FP

You might like to have a look at the FP discussion at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Silvereye - Zosterops lateralis to see if you want to review your vote. --MichaelMaggs 23:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Merci

Merci pour ton vote, et maintenant, il ne me reste plus qu'à me rendre utile. Michelet-密是力 15:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DK Fanoe Windmill01.JPG

Thanks for your support! I didn't know that the image had been nominated until I was told that it had been promoted; it was a pleasant surprise. Cnyborg 20:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Re Enrico Ciccone

Bonjour

j'ai vu votre commentaire. J'ai mis 2 photo d'enrico

Une qui se retrouve un peu partout sur des sites web celle-ci: Image:Enrico_ciccone1990.jpg ... http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Enrico_ciccone1990.jpg ... que j'ai legerement modifier la grandeur et la renommé. il y a plusieurs sites qu'ils ont cette photo ... c'est une photo public et Libre elle pourait etre apcepté?

L'autre celle ci: Image:Enrico_ciccone.jpg ... http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Enrico_ciccone.jpg ... M'appartient, C'est une photo personnelle J'ai besoin d'une licenses mais comment je fait??? Si vous pouvez m'aider cela serait tres apprécié.

Bientot je ferai la page d'Enrico Ciccone aussitot qu'il aura le temps de verifier sa Bio...Le Document de ma recherche sur lui. Vous comprenez que c'est la personne la mieux placé pour me donner plusieurs info.;)

Par la suite je mettrai les photos lorsque la page sera fait...

Merci

Mon e-mail: linda_leonard5( )hotmail.com

Re de Re Enrico

Ok j'ai choisi La Balise la voici

{{PD-self} }

C’est assez simple pour l'instant ...

Je ne veux pas perdre ma photo et tout recommencer… il me reste 6 jour :S

Je fais quoi avec ma balise dois-je écrire quelque chose dedans et par la suite je vais la mettre ou?

A Permission?

Et en passant merci énormément !!!!!!!!

Lia papillons je trouve pas le symbole pour le 4x Lia papillons 21:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Je reviens plus tard te lire bonne soirée...

salut à toi

Super sympa de te voir ici. Je ne t'ai pas cherché, note, mais j'ai wine dans ma liste de suivi, va-t-en savoir pourquoi. Typicité hexagonale ? ++ Alvaro 15:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Category:Black and white photographs of mariage

Image deletion warning

Category:Black and white photographs of mariage has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Hesperian 23:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Phare de la Vieille

Salut,

Non ce n'est pas moi qui ai lancé cette proposition, mais en voyant l'image je me rappelle que j'aurais dû le faire il y a déjà plusieurs mois ! Elle est effectivement à supprimer.

Au passage, si tu veux renommer une catégorie, il y a maintenant une solution plus simple que de changer son nom sur chaque image.

• Première méthode : écris {{category redirect|Nouvelle catégorie}} sur l'ancienne catégorie, et un bot passera un peu après (un jour après je crois) pour corriger les liens ;
• Deuxième méthode : mettre une demande sur User:CommonsDelinker/commands, un robot qui fait ça tout seul. Elle est réservée aux admins pour éviter les abus mais tu peux laisser une demande sur la page de discussion. Par exemple, écris sur la page de discussion une demande avec {{move cat|Photos de mariage|Marriage photos}}.

A+, le Korrigan →bla 10:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Black and white categories

Hello, please take a break in categorizing the images inside Category:Black and white photographs and join the discussion on Commons:Village pump#Categories. Your work is not really useful, since it just doubles the category tree and can be easily replaced with the CatScan tool. Thanks. --Fb78 07:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Hou la, ça c'est du débat ! C'est un vieux sujet : on a des outils qui permettent de croiser des catégories, mais pour l'instant ce n'est pas intuitif à utiliser. J'ai remarqué quand même la façon de faire implicite sur Commons :

• Il y a d'une part les catégories "Sujet" qui sont souvent subdivisées en petits éléments ("Churches", "Churches of Puy de Dôme")
• D'autre part les catégories "Type", souvent subdivisées elles aussi ("Maps", "Distributional maps")
• Par contre, les croisements entre les deux sont plus rarement trouvés.

Je pense que c'est pour ça que tes créations posent problème. Je n'ai pas d'avis tranché sur la question... désolé ! le Korrigan →bla 14:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Et pour devenir admin : pas de problème, sur Commons c'est essentiellement de basses tâches ménagères (qui ne sont pas sans noblesse), et même si tu ne fais pas énorme (comme moi) ça soulage les autres admins. Ensuite, si tu te mêles des demandes de suppression et des conflits, c'est sûr que ça prend un tour différent, mais personne ne t'y obligera... le Korrigan →bla 14:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Je continue sur ce sujet en quittant le bistro où peu de personnes ne semblent "accrocher", en fait, le problème vient de la catégorisation excessive qui ralentit toute spontanéité c.à.d. la recherche à priori ou à posteriori de la catégorie qui laisse souvent un sentiment de frustration (le rejet par quelqu'un d'inconnu) ou souvent de défaitisme quand on voit les arborescences proposées et par ailleurs lorsque l'on a terminé, on s'aperçoit que la photo pouvait s'inscrire dans 2 ou 3 autres catégories, de plus il est vrai que le travail effectué sur une image que l'on veut rendre plus "jolie" subjectivement n'a pas trop sa place dans les projets, il suffit de lire les commentaires concernant l'attribution "photo de qualité" pour s'en convaincre (d'ailleurs à ce sujet je trouve anormal que l'on retrouve autant d'insectes et de fleurs, avec des noms pas possibles, et en plus prises par des professionnels qui squattent les premiers rangs).Bon j'arrête mon côté grincheux et je souhaite que tu te présentes comme administrateur, afin de te poser des questions plus techniques sur Commons car je débute , et afin de te permettre de laisser derrière toi les péripéties de WP-fr Doalex 17:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Cathédrale et bazar

Merci,

C'est vrai que c'est plutôt le bronx sur les basiliques et encore pire sur les églises. Un peu d'harmonisation ne fait pas de mal. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 16:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

AIDE (suite)

J'aimerais savoir comment on peut créer une seconde page user, un peu comme la tienne: Trucs et machins, cela rentre-t-il dans le moule Commons ? Mon idée c'est de pouvoir figer mes photos quelque part afin de tranquillement les placer ensuite dans une catégorie de base (j'ai pas compris encore comment procéder à l'insertion des images dans des catégories plus pointues). Doalex 14:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

merci beaucoup pour ces renseignementsDoalex 13:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Logiciel RAW

Merci pour les compliments ! ^^ Sinon DXO c'est pas mal si ton parc d'objectifs est globalement compatible. Pour l'instant, les objos couverts ne sont pas très très nombreux donc c'est un peu pénible (ils feraient mieux de se consacrer à ça plutôt qu'à sortir de nouvelles versions). Capture NX, c'est facile à utiliser (je pense en particulier aux fameux U-points) ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Ne pas confondre Julien et Julien

Flûte, la gaffe ! J'ai révoqué mes modifs, vu qu'il n'y effectivement pas moyen de savoir : tous deux ont droit à l'épée et à la palme. C'est « Saint-Julien » tout court le nom du village ? J'essaie de vérifier dans la base Palissy de qui il pourrait s'agir... Sinon, je constate qu'on est presque voisins : je passe mes vacances près de Châteldon :-) Jastrow (Λέγετε) 20:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Josephine_Baker_4.jpg

I would appreciate your input to the recent deletion request, see Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Josephine_Baker_4.jpg Fernande 14:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Image doublon

Re-Bonjour. Je tatonne, je tatonne dans le Category:Duplicate et ne trouve comment faire. Aurais-tu le temps de faire la demmande de suppression pour moi ? L'ancienne photo : [1] et la nouvelle fraichement chargée : [2]. Merci encore. Saruman 14:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Super, tes explications ! Merci ! Saruman 20:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Bouncing ball FP candidate

There is a new extremely professional re-edit from my original RAW file by Richard Bartz, and I'd urge you to vote for this instead of my own imperfect Photoshop efforts. Thanks very much to Richard for the work he's put in. Please consider voting or amending your vote at: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bouncing ball - strobe.jpg. --MichaelMaggs 17:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Voir Bistro: Commons: Quality Images et Commons:Featured Pictures

Bonjour, Toi l'auvergnat qui sans façon un jour ...etc m'a apporté ton aide, je sais que tu n'aimes pas les polémiques cependant je souhaiterais que tu regardes ce sujet et me donnes éventuellement ton avis sur ce que j'écris à Xavier, je suis peut-être à côté de la plaque concernant mes interventions sur le sujet ci-dessus et sur la différence entre 2 licences ? Mais je reste pantois devant le procédé de Xavier.--Doalex 10:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Copie de mon message à l'adresse de Xavier:

je me suis permis de remettre votre commentaire dans l'ordre chronologique, en effet je trouve cela discourtois pour celui qui lit les billets dans l'ordre. Vous avez utilisé le même procédé sous le sujet Licence Creative Commons initié par Romary et je remets votre commentaire là aussi à sa place pour permettre aux lecteurs de suivre, car ici je faisais une réponse à Romary et je pense que cette personne est assez intelligente pour comprendre que vous apportez ensuite une précision. Libre à vous d'ignorer les interventions des autres contributeurs mais dans ce cas veuillez préciser dans votre commentaire: en réponse à sans devoir intercaler en force et sans consentement votre propre commentaire.( Si vous n'êtes pas l'auteur de ces modifications je vous prie à l'avance d'accepter mes excuses).--Doalex 09:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Merci pour ton mot sur ma page, effectivement et compte tenu de la réaction de Xavier, à laquelle j'ai répondu (je suis, c'est vrai assez, têtu), et après quelques recherches je crois que, effectivement je suis tombé sur un as de la forme et du fond et que, par conséquent, le Bistro de Commons n'ayant pas pour vocation de laisser les joutes oratoires se développer je ferai attention de respecter l'indentation (que ce mot est moche) lors de mes interventions mais je ne reprocherai pas aux autres de ne pas respecter cet usage! Bonne semaine.--Doalex 14:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Photo de l'aéroport

Merci pour le merci ! Je suis un peu déçu par la qualité, d'autant plus que la luminosité n'était pas très bonne. Mais au moins, elle donne une bonne vue d'ensemble. --Fabien1309 15:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Engelberg 01.JPG

Thanks for your comment on my picture. Do you support it or was your entry just ment as a comment? --Simonizer 21:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

• • Thanks for your support. I realized your pictures of the Auvernge region. Is it a good region for vacations? --Simonizer 12:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes. Landscapes, food... Alvaro 10:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks both of you for your answers. Am very interested in more information. I like Hiking, Camping, takeing nature and landscape pictures, swimming in natural water and good food. --Simonizer 12:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the tips. My girlfriend can speak french, so its no problem --Simonizer 19:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

deprecated function in your monobook.js

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

File tagging Image:Chapdes vercin2.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Chapdes vercin2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Chapdes vercin2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Coyau (talk) 10:55, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Chapdes-Beaufort

Hi, I'm afraid that I had to delete your photos of Chapdes-Beaufort, as there is no freedom of panorama in France, and so while the photos are your copyright, the subject is not free, and so they cannot be hosted here. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Coyau (talk) 18:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Any information on Paul Gavelle?

Hello! I'd like to know if you could, perhaps, have any information regarding a photographer, who was probably French, called Paul Gavelle, who worked in the early 20th century in France. I believe he took photos in Eu. Thank you very much! Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 05:39, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Category:Black and white photographs of plants

Category discussion notification

Category:Black and white photographs of plants has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--ELEKHH^T 07:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Category:Men by Wilhelm von Gloeden

Category discussion notification

Category:Men by Wilhelm von Gloeden has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

- dcljr (talk) 08:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Fontaine_labyrinthe.jpg

File:Fontaine_labyrinthe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 13:08, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Montaigut-le-Blanc plaque cimetiere 0707.jpg

File:Montaigut-le-Blanc plaque cimetiere 0707.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 00:54, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Joseph Clausat.jpg

File:Joseph Clausat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jastrow (Λέγετε) 09:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Vernines Notre-Dame Salette.jpg

File:Vernines Notre-Dame Salette.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.204.228.38 20:43, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Legislative 2007 Clermont Montagne.jpg

File:Legislative 2007 Clermont Montagne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Carmes momument.JPG

And also:

• File:Carmes monument detail1.JPG
• File:Carmes monument detail2.JPG

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON en résidence (talk) 12:47, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Four à pain de Ribeyre

Bonjour, je suis en train de cartographier les fours à pain en France. J'ai vu votre photo du four de Ribeyre et je vois qu'il n'est pas cartographié sur Openstreetmap et pas localisé. Ou est-ce que le four est situé à La Ribeyre ? Merci ! Emlaurent (talk) 12:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)