User talk:Pruneau/Archive 1

Flickr images

Hi. As a result of your request at Commons talk:Flickr images/reviewers, I have added you to the reviewers list. Please see the instructions at Commons:Flickr images/reviewers and add {{User trusted}} to your userpage. You can ask me if you need any help. Cheers, giggy _(:O) 09:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token d25b155a571d98e2ddc80fb414875c5d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image:DonJuanPoster2.jpg

J'ai corrigé le problème : [1] Stef48 (talk) 20:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Sculptures

Hi Pruneau,

perhaps you could overthink your vote in this debate, the sculpture is old enough for public domain. If you look at the clothing and the stone, it must be from the 19th century.

Mbdortmund (talk) 11:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Plankton satellite image.jpg

Hi there, could you take another look at this discussion? TimVickers (talk) 16:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Flickrreview

Well I'm refining the parameters for tagging, so images like your example shouldn't get tagged. Furthermore, the fact that the bot has edited the page will prevent it doing so again in the future. I'm aware this run is throwing up a fair bit of inappropriate tagging, when I complete the first section of the run later today I'll go back and check over the edits. The remainder of the run will be done semi-automatically, so spurious tagging won't arise.--Nilfanion (talk) 15:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Alexey Pajitnov - 2575833305.jpg

Hello. Thanks a lot for your patch. I dont know why the robot dont upload the image itself. I remember seeing Flickr image uploaded like that. Maybe im in wrong. ~ bayo or talk 20:39, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

De rien ! Si tu es passé par Flinfo, il est normal que l'upload n'est pas marché : le script donne les informations sur l'image, mais il faut télécharger et uploader l'image "à la main". Si tu es passé par un autre robot, c'est effectivement bizarre. Pruneau^talk 21:56, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for supporting me in my successful RfB. Cheers, Rocket000(talk) 21:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:AB7 Excitation Nebula.jpg

We have now updated our ESO copyright notice (http://www.eso.org/public/outreach/press-rel/copyright.html) and have also made reference to it on the category page: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:European_Southern_Observatory_Images.

I like your suggestion about getting the wider community involved in uploading images, but for now we want to create some sub-categories for images (as there are potentially quite a few).

Thanks for your help, Lars Lindberg Christensen (talk) 13:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christ Church, Oxford.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Looks ok to me. This picture offers a better view over the quadrangle, and a more "illustrative" one (i.e. without snow), but it seems of lesser quality to me. --Eusebius (talk) 14:31, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support

=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

COM:TS

I've done some changes to the template proposal, including new icons for alot of things too. Check it out ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Vitrail de Saint Anatole

Bonjour, il y a eu une demande pour la restauration de la version originale de cette photo. Du coup j'ai uploadé séparément ta version recadrée sous Image:Ablis - Saint Anatole cropped.jpg. Je l'ai mise sous GFDL et CC-BY 3.0 mais tu peux choisir une autre licence. Les deux versions sont comparées en Most Valued Review.--Eusebius (talk) 08:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Merci de m'avoir prévenu ! Je n'ai pas vraiment de préférence entre les deux versions. Pruneau^talk 14:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Many Thanks

Dear Pruneau,
Thanks for your support of my Request for Adminship. I’m honored by your trust.

Cheers, SterkeBak

Thanks for "Double Image" Template Fix

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Doug_youvan now has a Commons double image. Thanks. Want to caption it? Man in moon, green cheese, GDI?Doug youvan (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

My RFA

Thank you very much for supporting my RfA. I'm really honored to have gotten unanimous support and I hope I can live up to everyone expectations! Let me know if you need anything. --J.smith (talk) 18:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Lismonde etc...

Bonsoir,

J'ai vu que tu t'es intéressé à mes demandes de suppression comme Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Le_Lierre,_1929_par_Carlo_LAMBERT.jpg et Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Léon_van_Dievoet,_architecte_(1907-1993),_dessin_par_Lismonde,_1943.jpg, mais ce n'était que l'apéritif. Le plat de consistance des images téléchargées par ce même utilisateur, c'est Category: Léon van Dievoet. Teofilo (talk) 22:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Bonsoir, je constate avec surprise que vous voulez supprimer l'unique photo représentant Le Lierre par Carlo Lambert qui malheureusement n'a pas su poursuivre sa carrière de sculpteur car il est mort en 1940 lors de la guerre.

C'est là sans doute une des rares choses qui restent de son oeuvre et qui mérite d'être connue.

Veuillez me contacter si vous désirez des détails supplémentaires. Si vous me donnez votre e-mail je répondrai directement à vos interrogations.

Bien cordialement à vous.

Bruxellensis

Voir la réponse de Teofilo. Cordialement, Pruneau^talk 09:47, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!

Dear Pruneau, thank you for your kind nomination and the trust you've put into me. I hope that I can live up to your expectations and please let me know when I can do something for you. Best wishes, AFBorchert (talk) 17:54, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

POTY Galleries

Hello, Pruneau. I found you have arranged the January-August 2008 FPs into categories for POTY2008. User:Pruneau/POTY 2008 categories is a great work! Would you arrange the September-November 2008 FPs, too? (The December FPs are to be arranged in January 2009.) Or is there anything I can help you? :-) Best regards. --miya (talk) 10:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi Miya. I'm quite busy right now in real life. If no one else does it, I'll probably have time to arrange the POTY galleries in early January ( so I would do September-December in one big lump). But if you feel like taking care of it, by all means go ahead! It would be very helpful, and could help put momentum in the project, which needs some desperately. I'm sorry I can't be of more help at present - I just have too many deadlines piling up. Cheers, Pruneau^talk 18:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Pruneau. Thank you for encouraging me. I began to sort FPs of September, October and November, hoping it would be some help (though some of the images are very difficult for me to categorize). Cheers.--miya (talk) 15:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi Miya. Thanks for taking care of the galleries! I now have a bit more time to help with POTY; is there anything specific I can help with? Pruneau^talk 12:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Pruneau. To tell the truth the person who took care of Galleries is Adam Cuerden (Thanks Adam!). Please sign in Commons:Picture of the Year/2008/Committee and join the mailing list. Thank you.--miya (talk) 23:04, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

RfC

The decision for a consensus in which you took part last August is being disputed on the Annie Chapman talk page and within the archive space of the original decision here. The user cites recent changes to UK copyright law, recent changes in WP policies, and recent changes to the licensing template, (none of which are my forte) as being reasons why the decision was wrong.. I would like to defer to those with more knowledge on the subjects the user brings up so I have left this note on the talk page of those involved and you are invited to participate. Thank you,
Berean Hunter (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hello, Pruneau. Thank you for supporting me in the request for adminship. Although it hasn't done successfully, I proud that twenty-nine trusted contributors -including you- voted for me. Thank you again for your trust.--OsamaK 14:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)