User talk:Poco a poco/2016-07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Lagunillas, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 122-126 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Machu Picchu, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murallas Reales, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Iglesia de San Marco, Zagreb

Hola, Diego:

Creo que tu imagen

, que has etiquetado como "Iglesia de San Marco, Zagreb, Croacia", es en realidad la portada de la iglesia de San Cirilo y San Metodio (que está muy cerca).

Saludos, --Triedros (talk) 08:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Hola Triedros, gracias por el apunte, acabo de corregir la categoría, las descripciones y el título del archivo. Poco2 14:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 81.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamenco en el Palacio Andaluz, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:07, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de la Dormición de la Madre de Dios, Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 106-108 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia episcopal, San Antonio de Ibarra, Ecuador, 2015-07-21, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments An excellent perspective, very sharp photo, a good composition, not over or underexposed. --Michielverbeek 17:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Honda, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 45-48 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Los Paredones, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 30-35 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ferrocarril en el salar de Carcote, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 70.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ferrocarril en el salar de Carcote, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 70.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:04, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murallas Reales, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 84-86 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful image and good quality -- Spurzem 20:55, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 123.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are parts of the sky which are denoised and parts which are not. With visible bordering --A.Savin 14:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Funny, actually I didn't apply any selective denoising or sharpening here but I see what you mention. Will upload a new version shortly. Poco a poco 09:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
✓ New version uploaded Poco a poco 18:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC). Beautiful colors. --Marrovi 13:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observatorio espacial ALMA, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oasis de Huacachina, Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 19-22 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nolay, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 60.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepas, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 53.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuevo Palacio Schleissheim, Oberschleissheim, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hostal Centro Histórico Regina, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 158.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful picture and good perspective. --Marrovi 22:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Desierto de Dalí, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 109.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mezquita, Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 58.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Grietas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 85-86 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islas flotantes de los Uros, Lago Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, good quality. --Marrovi 17:43, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje cerca de Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 78-82 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:00, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ojo de San Pedro, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:00, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ojos del Salar, Desierto de Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 20-21 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:00, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 158.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:30, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mezquita, Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 57.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:57, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 46.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 46.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roca de la Ley, Parque Nacional de Þingvellir, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remolinos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-30, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reserva histórico-arqueológica Nacional de Madara, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:38, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Réplica de la Escultura Heróica de Trajano, Ruinas Romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:38, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo del Antiguo Legado Estadounidense, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 47-49 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:39, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murallas Reales, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 19:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuestra Señora de las Rocas y Monasterio de San Jorge, Perast, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 19:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observatorio espacial ALMA, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Diego,

Could you fix the description of this photo, please? The Las Bachas beach is located on the north coast of Santa Cruz so it is not clear where you took the picture. --jdx Re: 12:59, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Jdx, thanks for your message. I've renamed that file, its FPC nomination page, and so on for up to 30 other images...but now it should look fine. Poco2 17:53, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ta Keo, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo Wat Arun, Bangkok, Tailandia, 2013-08-22, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:56, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro romano de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Belém, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp photo, good perspective. However people on the tower don't add anything to the composition but a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 20:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Termas mayores, ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nolay, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 56.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pity the left frontal pole for the turret, but the quality is good to me.--Famberhorst 15:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 09-14 PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 09-14 PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salar de Pujsa, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 31-33 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murallas Reales, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 56.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 23:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje cerca de Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 65.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miembros de la Infantería, calle Jirón Junín, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 83.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:43, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Oasis de Huacachina, Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 19-22 PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oasis de Huacachina, Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 19-22 PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosaico del Templo de Isis, ruinas romanas de Itálica, Santiponce, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Machu Picchu, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Atienza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 148.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villanueva del Jalón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urnas funerarias, Sillustani, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 85.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observatorio espacial ALMA, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add location coordinates. --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
✓ Added Poco a poco 12:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flamenco en el Palacio Andaluz, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yesss --Moroder 17:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dyrhólaey, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 149-151 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I feel the cable to be very disturbing. Must it necessarily be in the picture? So a little information about that in the description would be desirable. --Milseburg 12:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
I've added more information and geodata. Regarding the cable, please, explain me how I could have avoid it but at the same time have photographed the sea and the cliff on the right. Actually I chose that spot to reduce the impact of the cable in the image, from any other location it would have been worse Poco a poco 12:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Good quality. --Moroder 17:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilla de San Pantaleón, reserva histórico-arqueológica Nacional de Madara, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMHO, needs a denoise. --C messier 08:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 13:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 Support OK. --C messier 08:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laguna Blanca, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 30-34 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! -- Der Wolf im Wald 18:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muralla, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 55.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de la iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 182.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muralla, Tánger, Marruecos, 2015-12-11, DD 57-68 HDR PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 116.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Bijuesca, España2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:22, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ojo de San Pedro, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 30.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ojo de San Pedro, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 30.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en el Parque de Doñana, España, 2015-12-07, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  sThe people honestly bother me --Livioandronico2013 20:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje cerca de Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 83.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very very very good.... --Livioandronico2013 20:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observatorio espacial ALMA, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:32, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Kotor, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 06-10 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Coímbra desde la Universidad, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments low contrast, but good quality --Carschten 22:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 75-76 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:20, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Nuévalos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 22:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de San Mang, Füssen, Alemania, 2012-10-06, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI. --C messier 12:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta

Buenas, Poco a poco, en la categoría "Exterior of the Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta" se ha colado una fotografía que no debería estar ahí ya que no pertenece al lugar en cuestión. Se trata de:

Yermo Santa Maria

que no tiene nada que ver con el monasterio soriano. Un saludo. --Zumalabe (talk) 08:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Hola Zumalabe, gracias por el aviso. Creo que se trata del Monasterio de Santa María de Herrera en Burgos, he añadido esa categoría. En cualquier caso la imagen ya venía mal categorizada porque definitivamente no es de Santa María de Huerta. Una máxima del movimiento es "ser valiente", así que no dudes en hacer tú los cambios que consideres oportunos en mis imágenes, y en las del reto. Saludos! Poco2 08:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
El problema es que en Commons no me sé manejar bien. No suelo subir fotos ni moverlas dentro de las galerías (como mucho edito textos incorrectos o renombro archivos, pero a mas no llego). Saludos.--Zumalabe (talk) 08:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Bah, Zumalabe, todo es ponerse, cualquier duda aquí estoy, Poco2 08:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Museo Soumaya, Ciudad de México, México, 2015-07-18, DD 12.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museo Soumaya, Ciudad de México, México, 2015-07-18, DD 12.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Thank you my friend, I wouldn't have come to the idea to nominate it. The colleagues in Mexico are really happy about it, since that building is the venue of lots of activities related wo Wikimedia. Poco2 13:39, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for creating a new category.
Sincerely,
Dominicus Bergsma (Famberhorst).--Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

No problem with that, Famberhorst, sometimes it is quicker to do something than trying to explain it :) Poco2 16:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Catedral de Gniezno, Gniezno, Polonia, 2014-09-17, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Gniezno, Gniezno, Polonia, 2014-09-17, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 21:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje cerca de Þingeyri, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en isla Lobos, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 50.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Las Bachas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo del Señor de Luren, Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tejado, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:49, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Nacional, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 93.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:49, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ta Phrom, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murallas Reales, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 12-16 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting and overall well stitched. IMHO rather bright in some parts but good enough for QI. --Milseburg 23:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Mina de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 121.JPG, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! INeverCry 19:29, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en el Parque de Doñana, España, 2015-12-07, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje de isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 71.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje cerca de Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observatorio espacial ALMA, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-06, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paseo Alcalde Sánchez Prados, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 89-91 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 111.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The dark areas are very dark. I'm assuming because of the difficult light. But good quality. --Mummelgrummel 18:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje de isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 72-75 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:35, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Amanecer en el lago Titicaca, Puno, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amanecer en el lago Titicaca, Puno, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Araníbar, El Puerto de Santa María, España, 2015-12-08, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Arzobispal, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 62.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and a good focus to main object. However the top of the palace might have been sharper, a week support --Michielverbeek 14:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisajes cerca de Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 84.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:03, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en Río Grande, Chile, 2016-02-05, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:03, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en las cercanías de Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:33, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sala Compañía, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 39-41 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your votes in favour of my pictures at Quality Images Candidates (Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_July_19_2016).

All the best! Multicherry (talk) 18:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Well, Multicherry, I guess, I did it because they deserved it. Keep on nominating at QIC! Poco2 19:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 13-15 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 17:59, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salar de Carcote, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 53.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 23:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacristía Mayor, Catedral de Sevilla, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 112-114 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 23:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Valle Arcoiris, Río Grande, Chile, 2016-02-05, DD 16-18 PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valle Arcoiris, Río Grande, Chile, 2016-02-05, DD 16-18 PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urna funeraria, Sillustani, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 99.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle de la Luna, San Pedro de Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 154.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vicuñas (Vicugna vicugna), Laguna de Salinas, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viru Bog, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 62.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 136-139 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en Alcubilla de las Peñas, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 83.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Villavicencio, Alcázar, Jerez de la Frontera, España, 2015-12-07, DD 63.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Verum 20:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de San Telmo, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 74.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paso fronterizo con Chile, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 161.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Jkadavoor 03:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zayapa (Grapsus grapsus), Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 150.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zorro andino (Lycalopex culpaeus andinus), Laguna Colorada, Bolivia, 2016-02-02, DD 101.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ágora, Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias, Valencia, España, 2014-06-29, DD 46-48 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Órgano, Catedral de Sevilla, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 97-99 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Árbol de Piedra, Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 21:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta del Danubio, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:40, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta del Danubio, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta del Danubio, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta del Danubio, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Piedras Rojas, salar de Aguas Calientes, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 69.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Piedras Rojas, salar de Aguas Calientes, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 69.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radona, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 80.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roca de la Ley, Parque Nacional de Þingvellir, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Río Bruzau, Surdila Greci, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Río Dambovita, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

FPC

File:Casa de la Prensa Libre, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 19.jpg

FP for me. Clin 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the hint, Arion, I took good note :) Poco2 17:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Laguna Honda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 34.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laguna Honda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 34.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago de Como, Italia, 2016-06-25, DD 02-06 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Would consider cloning out leaves on left hand side --DXR 14:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done, thanks, I didn't see it Poco a poco 15:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Varenna, lago de Como, Italia, 2016-06-25, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 14:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Punta, Bellagio, Lago de Como, Italia, 2016-06-25, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 17:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Playa de la Punta Roja, Marsella, Francia, 2016-06-22, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 11:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rebollosa de Jadraque, Guadalajara, España, 2015-12-28, DD 151.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto, Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wirkt sehr schief, ist aber gerade. --Ralf Roletschek 19:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casino de Montecarlo, Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Agel, Francia, 2016-06-23, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centro histórico, Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMHO good quality. --Mummelgrummel 03:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cementerio, Galbinasi, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Casa de la Prensa Libre, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de la Prensa Libre, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please remove little dustspot at top left --DXR 13:21, 26 July 2016 (UTC)}
✓ Done, thanks Poco a poco 18:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta del Danubio, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Casa de la Prensa Libre, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de la Prensa Libre, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI and interesting with the unsightly air-conditioning -- Spurzem 20:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC) --  Comment This could be a copyright violation. The architect, Hora Maicu, lived until 1975, and there is no freedom of panorama in Romania. -- Renardo la vulpo 21:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casino de Montecarlo, Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta del Danubio, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murallas Reales, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 78-80 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de Arte Religioso del Arzobispado, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 60.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avenida de la Unión, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The shadows in the trees and on the back of the street sign (hard to distinguish it) are a bit too dark. Any chance of lighten them a little? W.carter 14:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 18:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, much better! Good quality. W.carter 07:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Menaggio, lago de Como, Italia, 2016-06-25, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are four (?) dark spots in the middle of the image. I don't think they are meant to be there. W.carter 19:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)}
✓ Done, thanks Poco a poco 19:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Good, I like the boat at the bottom, it makes it more than an ordinary panorama. Good quality. W.carter 07:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta del Danubio, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 16:27, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago Titicaca, Puno, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago Gazivode, Kosovo, 2014-04-15, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casino de Montecarlo, Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:27, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:27, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delta del Danubio, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment The horse is good quality but I'm not convinced concerning the crop. --Verum 11:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Not sure what problem you saw in the crop, but I've retouched it and the curves Poco a poco 19:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
QI enough in my opinion. --Jkadavoor 10:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Modificaciones en commons y caché

Hola Poco a Poco,

me está pasando algo raro al subir correcciones de mis imágenes. Como eres administrador en Commons ¿quizá te suena si hay algún problema con el caché de Wikimedia?

Te explico: no veo las correcciones que he subido, en su lugar siempre me aparece la primera versión de la imagen. En el histórico se ven las versiones que he subido pero la versión actual siempre es la primera.

En concreto se trata de estas tres (en una foto me pusiste unas sugerencias en las imágenes de calidad):

Al principio pensaba que el problema lo tenía en el caché de mi navegador pero lo veo mal también cuando cambio a otros. ¿Ves tú la última versión con las correcciones?

Un saludo,

--Basotxerri (talk) 09:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Hola Basotxerri, no es nada que no nos ocurra a la mayoría. Para forzar al navegador a que cargue la página basta con incluir ?action=purge como sufijo de la URL, ej. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lech_-_B%C3%BCrstegg_02.jpg?action=purge Si no quieres hacerlo a mano, en los accesorios de las preferencias hay 3 o 4 que incluyen un enlace para precisamente purgar las páginas. Saludos, Poco2 09:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Hola Poco a Poco, gracias por el consejo. Pues no sé todo esto se comparta de una forma muy extraña, hasta ahora nunca me ha pasado esto. Parece que después de purgar sí se ven las imágenes bien pero en histórico sigue estando mal. Bueno, ya verás qué te sale al revisarlo :-) ¡Qué tengas un buen día! --Basotxerri (talk) 10:09, 31 July 2016 (UTC)