User talk:Phrontis

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Phrontis!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Phrontis!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done (June, 2009).--Phrontis (talk) 10:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Audi 100 2 door[edit]

Many thanks for cleaning this picture. (I was the one who uploaded it with all those specks.) You must have taken a lot of time with it. And the result is a big improvement.

I am beginning to learn how to clean up my more deserving picture for myself, but I have learned already that (1) it cannot be rushed and (2) it takes a long time.

Brutal change of subject:

Do you own a camera (well, obviously yes) and do you ever go near to Saarlouis? I translated an entry on the Ford Escort / Focus plant from French wiki. It would love a picture. So would the francophone entry, de mon avis. Probably if you go near the plant with a camera, Henry Ford will arrest you, but if you drive past on the Autobahn as a passenger with a fast shutter on a sunny day one gets the odd panoramic glimpse. (I do the drive very occasionally myself, but not yet as a passenger and always feeling pressed for time. And it always seems to be raining.) If you know the area, it might even be possible to find somewhere to stand still and get a shot without annoying Henry. Just thinking on paper, please understand...

Besten Gruessen Charles01 (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Charles01, I'm glad to hear that my "cleaning" of the image is appreciated ;-) BTW: I'm using the clone tool of GIMP - I think it took me ten minutes or so to clean the picture (except for the windscreen). My parents did own a Audi 100 4-door built in 1979; I think it was the same color as the one on your picture (Inari silver metallic).
Yes, from time I see the Ford plant in Saarlouis, and I have a camera... The problem is to find the right place for an impressive picture. I've already visited the production twice... I'll keep it in mind - stay tuned! Best regards, --Phrontis (talk) 09:55, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't meant to reply. One should not always insist upon the last word. But no, the 2 door Audi 100 along the coast from Knokke was light metallic green. Memory plays tricks of course. And the old Dias certainly fade. But I'm >99% sure it started out light metallic green. Plus I MIGHT have put some sort of anti dazzle filter on the lens which MIGHT have affected the colour ab initio.
That metallic green seems to be a difficult colour for the film processors to handle. But here's an example of how the colour looked (on an Audi 80) in even brighter sunshine (my picture taken near Luzern), along with one from a wiki-colleague of the same colour on a rainy day apparently in or near Paris. There's also one of an old Audi 100 C2 Avant in that colour, but that was in such bright sun that the colour is not so apparent.
As far as the slide is concerned, I do not recommend that you or I attempt to make the car greener unless you're a mega-Gimp-Fachmann. It looks so much better than it did. (But of course now the picture is in Wikikepda I assert no special right to tell anyone what to do with it.)
I'm glad you're also in favour of a picture of the Ford Saarlouis plant. I will watch and wait for that one.
Best wishes Charles01 (talk) 10:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is exactly the light green of my parents' car. On the "cleaned" image, you can only guess the color when you know it. In German, it was called "inarisilber metallic". No, I'll never "correct" the color - this is difficult or maybe impossible. Once I tried to correct an image with a wrong white balance - it was impossible with jpg files, so I gave it up. Thanks for the additional images! I have also dias of the Audi 100, but no scanner to digitalize them. Best regards from Saarbrücken (25 km from the Saarlouis plant), --Phrontis (talk) 11:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Finally I managed to take a picture of the Ford Plant at Saarlouis and to publish it on the article of the French WP! It is difficult to give an impression of the whole plant, you would need to take an aerial picture. I hope my work is sufficient, too. --Phrontis (talk) 19:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MiltonFriedman.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MiltonFriedman.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Denniss (talk) 22:20, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deniss, I didn't upload the original file itself. I've uploaded a modified version (with corrected aspect ratio). I assumed that the original file had a sufficient permission. Sorry, I can't say more about this topic. --Phrontis (talk) 21:42, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nevus sebaceous photo[edit]

Please remove the nevus sebaceous photo from the wiki article as it is a photo of a compound nevus, not a nevus sebaceous. This photo is a gross misrepresentation. Thanks.

It's a diagnosis from a doctor, so I can't see any reason to remove the photo. Aside from the fact that this is an anonymous entry and you give neither source neither proof... --Phrontis (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Wendelin Plastikfigur.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Kungfuman (talk) 15:33, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And copyrighted Wum toy. --Kungfuman (talk) 15:33, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Please delete both files (I thought that only an own drawing of a cartoon figure would be not acceptable, but now I know better). --Phrontis (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Leider musste ich File:HaseFelix res.jpg auch löschen. Es ist eben nicht der normale "Teddy", der inzwischen gemeinfrei sein dürfte. -- RE rillke questions? 17:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Askania AP XII[edit]

Hallo Phrontis, ist dir bekannt wo diese Aufnahme entstanden ist?

Die Antwort gibt's auf meiner Benutzerdiskussion auf WP --Phrontis (talk) 11:18, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Permission request[edit]

Thanks for your contributions! I would like to ask you permission to reproduce your akathisia video on an antipsychotics video lecture. I am a bit confused about how to better describe its use. I would embed the video on a slide describing neurological side effects of aripiprazole, the mini video is freely distributed through YouTube. The problem is that the same video will also be part of a paid e-course. I'm very interested in providing this video to healthcare professionals, akathisia is sometimes hard to understand if you haven't seen it. Thanks for your time.

Flavio Guzman, MD

Hi Flavio, thanks for your request. You can use my video for all above mentioned purposes (even for a paid e-course) provided 1) you name me (author „Phrontis at Wikimedia Commons“) and 2) refer to the license "Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0". I think the easiest way is to use a short subtitle for this purpose. I'm glad if my video can help healthcare professionals to understand a disease! Have a nice day, --Phrontis (talk) 18:30, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. --Phrontis (talk) 19:48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image inquiry[edit]

Dear Sirs,

in our new schoolbook „HOGA Gesamtband Köche” we want to publish a photo from you. We found it on the following homepage http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:SilberPunze90g.jpg&filetimestamp=20101227220523.

We need the picture as highres data in 300 dpi for 10 cm. Do you have the picture in this highres Data and may send me the data per email? And do you give us the permission for publishing ? My email: annette.moehle@westermann.de

Thank you very much for your help in advance!

Yours sincerely

Annette Möhle


Bildungshaus Schulbuchverlage Westermann Schroedel Diesterweg Schöningh Winklers GmbH Bildredaktion Georg-Westermann-Allee 66 38104 Braunschweig Tel: 0531-708298 Fax: 0531-7088535 E-Mail: annette.moehle@westermann.de

Geschäftsführer: Ulrike Jürgens, Thomas Michael, Dr. Peter Schell Amtsgericht Braunschweig - HRB 9572

Display-Sprache bei Junghans RC alarm1[edit]

Hallo Phrontis, weißt du vielleicht, ob man die Sprache der Wochentagsanzeige bei der Junghans RC alarm 1 ändern kann? Auf meiner „Junghans Mega alarm 1“, die ansonsten genau so aussieht, werden englische Wochentage angezeigt, ich glaube aber, dass es bis vor kurzem deutsche Kürzel waren. – 77.20.110.59 00:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ist mir nicht bekannt. Ich werde aber versuchen, einen Blick in die Bedienungsanleitung zu werfen (das kann aber eine Weile dauern). --Phrontis (talk) 14:18, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Das wär super. Hat keine Eile. Danke :-) – 77.20.211.155 21:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So, jetzt hab ich's. Die Bedienungsanleitung sagt dazu: "Die Wochentage werden in englischer Schreibweise angezeigt!" --Phrontis (talk) 16:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Besten Dank. Wie man sich täuschen kann … – 77.21.171.77 20:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wigo Digitalwecker[edit]

Sehr geherte Damen Sehr geehrte Herren

Im Internet hab ich gesehen, dass Sie einen Electr. Digitalwecker verkaufen, gerne hätte ich angaben wo ich diesen Wecker in der Schweiz kaufen kann oder ob ich einen solchen durch Sie beziehen kann.

Gerne erwarte ich eine Antwort

Oswald Lühy Pflanzerbachstrasse 8 CH 8967 Widen Tel. 056 - 633 22 23 Fax 056 - 633 22 01

Besten Dank für Ihre Bemühungen

Sehr geehrter Herr Lühy, ich habe das Foto eines Weckers hier eingestellt, aber ich habe keinen zu verkaufen. Leider kann ich Ihnen hier nicht weiterhelfen. --Phrontis (talk) 20:29, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:08, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag,

wir sind ein Fachverlag, der u.a. Spiele zur Aktivierung demenzkranker Menschen herausgibt.

Für das neueste Projekt zum Thema „Alte Begriffe“ hat unsere Autorin ein Bildmotiv zum Thema „Gehaltstüte“ (Dateiname: GehaltstueteBeamter1940) hier bei Wikimedia Commons herausgesucht.

Können Sie uns hierzu druckfähige Daten (300 dpi) zukommen lassen? Können wir bei Ihnen dazu eine Abdruckgehmigung erhalten?

Freue mich zeitnah von Ihnen zu hören.

Mit herzlichen Grüßen aus dem Verlagshaus in Hannover

Andrea Hübener-Fietje Lektoratsassistenz Verlagsbereich Altenhilfe Vincentz Network GmbH & Co.KG

Plathnerstraße 4c | 30175 Hannover T +49 511 9910-195 | F +49 511 9910-196 andrea.huebener@vincentz.net | www.vincentz.net

www.haeusliche-pflege.net www.altenheim.net www.altenpflege-online.net

Photo purchase[edit]

Hello, I would like to know if it's possible to purchase a photo you uploaded to Wikipedia under creative common attribution license. The photo I'm talking about is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:VirtuellesStudio_Greenbox.jpg

I'm looking for a license which would let me use the photo in commercial way but without attribution. Let me know if it is possible and if so name the price. Have a good day ☺️ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skulio (talk • contribs) 15:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:J.P.BembaPoster.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ghouston (talk) 22:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2020-08-18: Question in Spanish[edit]

Hola, tengo un depósito que es parte de un molino para grano de café, necesito si tiene el año de fabricación según número 2951,villeroy & boch. Oresmen (oresden) Alguna referencia agradezco si es posible o donde dirigirse, gracias

Unfortunately, I don't understand your question even after using a translation tool from Spanish into both German and English (I don't speak Spanish). The only thing I understand is the question of the production year of the Villeroy & Boch item with no. 2951 (produced in the Dresden factory?). I can't answer this question. Automatic translation:
Desafortunadamente, no entiendo su pregunta incluso después de usar una herramienta de traducción del español al alemán y al inglés (no hablo español). Lo único que entiendo es la cuestión del año de producción del artículo de Villeroy & Boch con el n. 2951 (¿producido en la fábrica de Dresde?). No puedo responder a esta pregunta. (Traducido automáticamente.) --Phrontis (talk) 05:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Servus,

im Mai 2022 hast du File:Manasse Anzeige crop.jpg in der Kategorie ÖAMTC hochgeladen. Ich habe mir den Artikel Atelier Manassé durchgelesen, finde aber keine Beziehung zum ÖAMTC. No, ich bin ein Piefke, kenne also die Personen aus dem Artikel kaum. Aber vielleicht wäre ein kleiner Hinweis bei dem Bild nützlich? Grüße – Renardo la vulpo (talk) 15:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Renardo la vulpo, die Beziehung des Bildes zum ÖAMTC besteht in einem Rabatt von 10 % für Mitglieder. Das geht leider nur aus dem Kontext der gesamten Zeitungsseite, nicht aber aus dem Bild allein hervor (werde ich gleich im Kommentar erwähnen). Evtl. könnte das irgendwann im ÖAMTC-Artikel verwendet werden. Nach bisherigem Kenntnisstand hat das Atelier Manassé selbst keine Verbindung mit dem ÖAMTC (evtl. war der Inhaber Mitglied oder dergl., dafür gibt es aber bislang keinen Beleg. Viele Grüße, --Phrontis (talk) 09:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Danke – Renardo la vulpo (talk) 13:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]