User talk:Peregrine981

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hej Peregrine981

Tak for nomination af mit foto Image:Kaloe.jpg til featured pictures :-) Mvh Malene Thyssen 19:33, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

the origin size image has been uploadee[edit]

For your request on the image water lily [1], I have uploaded the original version of that image.--Yongxinge 13:55, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peregrine981, what do you mean with your comment? -- aka 19:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bay Area San Francisco picture better[edit]

You said:
Oppose to San Francisco Bay Area, not an exceptional picture from space. The bay is cut at the south and north. If we allow this, why not any other pic from space? Peregrine981 08:01, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Can you, give me one Bay Area San Francisco picture better of this?
Well, here you can see the San Francisco airport, airterminal, airplain by airplain, you can see Berkeley University Campus building by buliding, you can see Alcatraz building, Golden Gate pilon, from 290 Kilometers altitude, I would like to see better, if you can.
You are wrong about cut south and north bay.
You can see the Sierra Nevada and its lake from here.
Give me another Bay Area photos from Ocean to Alta Sierra better of this.
Thank you.
--Roger (Messages) 19:43, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

HI, I want to use that image, where yo said: If you do use this picture for some reason, I would be happy to hear about it. Thanks.. I want to use in Enciclopedia Libre, a free encyclopedia, the bifurcation of Wikipedia spanish, but I want to choose one of that licences, i don't know if is possible, i would like to use the GNU FDL only, and not the others. Thank you, and excuse my english. --Alexan (♦♦♦♦) 17:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:1920assemb.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:1920assemb.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. — Timichal 12:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:1920assemb.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Fred Chess 16:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delist[edit]

Hi, just notifying you that I have put one of your image Image:Countryandcitydaegu.jpg up for delisting on com:fpc. sorry Benjamint 10:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently, it was not delisted after all. Question: are Jisan-dong and Beommul-dong mountains or villages, or suberbs of Daegu? --Berru 21:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Countryandcitydaegu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

85.196.168.244 16:22, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Moneybillscoins3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Sdrtirs (talk) 20:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To Notify You:- Your image may depict a non-free image of currency and is listed for speedy deletion. Please see the image description page for more information. --ADtalk 21:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but Image:Moneybillscoins3.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.


čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--ADtalk 13:13, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I need to use one of your Korean Air photos for a brief article I am writing. May I have your express permission to do so? In order to do that, I need a letter sent to my personal email, please. It is: elliemk at mindspring dot com. In the letter, just say, "I give Ellie Kuykendall permission to use any of my Korean Air photos for her work for Demand Studios." I will give you credit for the photo. Thank you.

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 21:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brussels_centraal_interior.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm11671 19:07, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brussels_central_renovations_2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 07:33, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photos Belgium[edit]

Hello,

To begin, the purpose clearly shown by Wikimedia Commons is to offer an on-line media library all the files of which are freely reusable by all, and for any usage. A photography which breaks the copyright cannot answer this expectation.

Furthermore, by asking for the deletion of the files which break the copyright, we put under cover the photographer who risks to be prosecuted, as well as the persons who would reuse this file.

I have no pleasure to ask for the deletion of files, I fight actively for the creation of a law of freedom of panorama in Belgium and somewhere else, but in the meantime, these photos have to be to delete.

Greetings. --M0tty (talk) 14:16, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry M0tty, But the whole part of the "FOP"-clause of Belgium how it used on Commons is based on nothing! This is so-called self-learning of law, which absolutely doesn't result in a professional conclusion. Romaine (talk) 01:26, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Euro accession.svg[edit]

Hi Peregrine981, I am going to change the image within the next hour. Just to inform you. Gugganij (talk) 19:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just changed the map and the descriptions in Commons. regards Gugganij (talk) 20:22, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

File:København terminal 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Apalsola tc 13:31, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acadie Sails Halifax 2004.jpg[edit]

I'd like to use your fine image of Europa sailing past Georges Island as the banner image on my Twitter account. I did a short tall ship voyage in Europa and your image shows the view from my workplace at Pier 21! Dan Conlin (talk) 02:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:DWEdmonton1.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:DWEdmonton1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seoulgamesmascot2005.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mz7 (talk) 15:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newottawamap.png[edit]

The user "Early Andrew" seems to longer have a userspace, so you seem to be handler of this map. I'm not sure where EA got the original image but the township names correspond to the old Region of Ottawa-Carlton at the time of its creation in1968 and don't to the names at it dissolution nor to they represent the "New Ottawa" wards. For example, the names of North Gower and Marlborough disappeared in 1974 with the creation of Rideau Township. Yet the highway overlay shows the new roads at the time of the late 80s-early 90s. I would suggest that this map be replaced with a more accurate Newottawamap.png. I'd happily do it but I've not yet done an image edit that multiple pages incorporate. With your permission I'd investigate how it's done seamlessly. Regards. 2607:FEA8:C21F:CF00:B177:D473:3BF1:9C45 23:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:240 Sparks Elevators.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:240 Sparks Elevators.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:240 Sparks Elevators.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 22:43, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]