User talk:Paris 16/02

Category:Marché Bastille

Merci pour la Category:Marché Bastille --Havang(nl) (talk) 16:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Flickr

You have uploaded pictures of Père-Lachaise from Flickr. But a lot are:

• copvios. It's easy to see that this one is too recent. For this picture, there is a category with the template {{NoUploads}}
• already on Commons: File:Monument aux Morts by Bartholome Père-Lachaise (2).jpg and File:Père-Lachaise - Monument aux morts avant restauration 08.jpg
• all are bad quality pictures (low-res, HDR). There is already 4000 pictures of the Père-Lachaise on Commons.

I don't understand why you did this mass upload without verification. ~Pyb (talk) 16:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

I've repaired your mistakes : 21 copyright violations, 24 duplicate photos. I've lost my time because you didn't do the minimum of verifications before launching the bot and because you didn't repair your mistakes ! If you don't know the law in France, don't use a bot. Next time, I'll leave a message on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. ~Pyb (talk) 12:58, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Waste bags in Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Palais Royal et Comédie Française, Paris, France.jpg

File:Palais Royal et Comédie Française, Paris, France.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tiraden (talk) 14:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

VIS Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Treaty of Paris, 1783.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Treaty of Paris, 1783.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--Slaunger (talk) 21:12, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Regarding this, I do not think it is a good idea. A VIS is not a VI. --Slaunger (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes, something like that. --Slaunger (talk) 18:43, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

It was by the way funny for me to close this VIS because in June I stayed in a Hotel Danube on Rue Jacob 58, right next to Rue Jacob 56, the location where the treaty was signed on Hotel d'York in 1783 . --Slaunger (talk) 19:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

No, only a rather expensive bill after renting the best room on the hotel, but it was worth it! --Slaunger (talk) 19:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Le Caroussel du Louvre, galerie commerciale n1.jpg

File:Le Caroussel du Louvre, galerie commerciale n1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:11, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Modification de photos

Bonjour ! Quand tu importes une photo par-dessus une autre, pourrais-tu préciser la nature des modifications apportées ? Merci ! 11:16, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Cour d'honneur

Greetings Paris 16: I capitalized the Honneur because that is the way Andrew Ayers writes it in his book The Architecture of Paris. (It's a bit of an odd name for the court, since usually a cour d'honneur is an entrance court.) Also the name was capitalized for Category:Galerie de la Cour-d'Honneur (Paris), which was created by User:Mu, who I suspect is French. At least I believe user Mu lives in Paris. (BTW, do you happen to know what the "Galerie de la Cour-d'Honneur" is?) Anyway, I suspect the capitalization is not consistent, even in French sources. However, since you changed it to to lower case for Category:Cour d'honneur du Palais-Royal, shouldn't we also change it for all the other categories using the same name? --Robert.Allen (talk) 22:31, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bal du moulin de la Galette by Renoir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I suggest a scope: Bal du moulin de la Galette by Renoir --MrPanyGoff 06:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC) And the same manner for all other paintings nominations.--MrPanyGoff 06:18, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

• Now the scope names are OK, imo.--MrPanyGoff 11:26, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

---

 Support Unless there are other better versions, this image is most valuable. --George Ho (talk) 22:34, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Auguste Renoir - Dance at Le Moulin de la Galette - Google Art Project.jpg: -1
3. Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Le Moulin de la Galette.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Auguste Renoir - Dance at Le Moulin de la Galette - Google Art Project.jpg: Declined.
File:Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Le Moulin de la Galette.jpg: Promoted. <--

--cmadler (talk) 14:21, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kenzaburō Ōe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

• Incomplete description, per cmadler: as it is a very important part of all the pictures of this person, I think we need the name of his optician...--Jebulon (talk) 09:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Pere-Lachaise

Could you stop doing mistakes ? If you have a question about my edits, you could leave me a message. I've a lot of books on this subject. Chopin had two graves : his body is in Paris, his heart is in Poland. And because of homonimy problems all over the world, the new category scheme for the graves of the Père-Lachaise is Adam Smith (Père-Lachaise, division 54). ~Pyb (talk) 01:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Grande Galerie Louvre by Thomas Allom.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grande Galerie Louvre by Thomas Allom.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:08, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Grande salle ENC n1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grande salle ENC n1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:12, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Aux armes!

J’apprécie beaucoup ton travail en VI. Je soutiens tes peintures que tu as bien choisies. Je le fais doucement pour ne pas avoir l’air de me précipiter. Si tu les places en VI c’est que tu as la conviction quelles sont bonnes. Je t’engage à remplacer les images dans les différents Wiki. Je l’ai fais au moins pour les glaneuses de Millet sur une image horrible qui trustait les wiki et qui mériterai d’aller au panier. J’y au déposé le label de faible qualité. Bonnes Fêtes ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Source by Ingres.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:20, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:20, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Gleaners by Jean-François Millet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:20, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Balcon by Édouard Manet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Birth of Venus by Alexandre Cabanel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:56, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
L'Absinthe by Edgar Degas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 SupportUseful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:18, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Church at Auvers by Vincent van Gogh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:18, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Dr. Gachet by Vincent van Gogh (Musée d'Orsay).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:17, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Chemin de fer by Édouard Manet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:49, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:21, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Pierre-ès-Liens de Rolampont (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 17:28, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment Please add information to the file description page about the architect (if known), year of construction, etc. Because France has no Freedom of Panorama, this information is absolutely necessary to verify that the work is free. cmadler (talk) 14:12, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:25, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Blagny-sur-Vingeanne (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:38, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment Please add information to the file description page about the architect (if known), year of construction, etc. Because France has no Freedom of Panorama, this information is absolutely necessary to verify that the work is free. cmadler (talk) 14:11, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:24, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Seine (Saint-Seine-sur-Vingeanne) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:37, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment Please add information to the file description page about the architect (if known), year of construction, etc. Because France has no Freedom of Panorama, this information is absolutely necessary to verify that the work is free. cmadler (talk) 14:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Commanderie de Moisy-le-Temple (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment Please add information to the file description page about the architect (if known), year of construction, etc. Because France has no Freedom of Panorama, this information is absolutely necessary to verify that the work is free. cmadler (talk) 14:08, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte de Joigny (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 17:29, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment Please add information to the file description page about the architect (if known), year of construction, etc. Because France has no Freedom of Panorama, this information is absolutely necessary to verify that the work is free. cmadler (talk) 14:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 06:25, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Fin d'année

Bonsoir Paris16.

Je crois qu'on ne remarquera jamais assez l'excellence de tes contributions à "Commons", et je voulais profiter de cette fin d'année pour t'en remercier. Tu as le don pour dénicher des images d'excellente qualité, et pour nous montrer des raretés, tout à fait passionnantes et intéressantes.

Personnellement, je te remercie pour toutes ces belles images de cette année, et je te félicite pour tes choix, surtout, bien sûr, ceux concernant cette Ville dont nous partageons (avec d'autres), toi et moi, la passion, "notre" Paris.

Je te souhaite une excellente fin d'année 2012, du bonheur et les meilleurs succès pour 2013 !

Merci et bravo, --Jebulon (talk) 17:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Filemover

Hi Paris 16. In consideration of your experience and numerous valid file rename requests, I've added the filemover right to your account. INeverCry 03:24, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Église Saint-Martin d'Alpuech

Très belle église mais de là à l'a présenter deux fois en VI...Elle est très déformée veux tu le modifier ou je le fais? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:46, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Et l'erreur de prespective. çà me prend 5 minutes mais je ne pourrais pas voter après. Ceci dit, je ne suis pas inquiet çà passera. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Civil war reenactment 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Civil war reenactment 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Paris Fashions, 1912 (LOC).jpg

Why are you removing the original on-photograph information? In many contexts it would be preferred to keep it... AnonMoos (talk) 06:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument Charles Garnier (Paris).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Chartres, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aqueduc de Luynes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin d'Alpuech, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met . --JLPC (talk) 11:49, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame de Lahonce, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:41, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2012 inauguration ceremony of the President of France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

This FP is the best in scope, of course.--Jebulon (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 00:16, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charles Baudelaire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 09:10, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Indeed ! It's a must ! --JLPC (talk) 09:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 10:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gioachino Rossini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope... Another Carjat's perfect one ! --JLPC (talk) 22:45, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 10:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Boutique Lancel sur la place de l'Opera à Paris en 1935.jpg

File:Boutique Lancel sur la place de l'Opera à Paris en 1935.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 07:25, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Saint-Lyphard de La Ferté-Bernard, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 17:58, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais ducal de Nevers, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:56, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 17:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison, 7 place de la Cathédrale (Chartres), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 17:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Étienne Carjat, Portrait of Charles Baudelaire, circa 1862.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Étienne Carjat, Portrait of Charles Baudelaire, circa 1862.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Étienne de Launois-sur-Vence, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment Please indicate the architect if known and the year of construction. (I assume this is many centuries old?) cmadler (talk) 15:48, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 11:00, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vieux-Port de La Rochelle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)