User talk:Nunux34

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nunux34!

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Au pied du barrage de Cotatay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice image taken with old school settings. Like the colour temperature that leads to an greyish impression of equality of main subject, trees and washed-out sky. --Jotzet 15:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observatoire météorologique au sommet du mont de l'Homme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Colors could be improved, crop at the bottom too. --XRay 16:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Garde-Guérin ( Prévenchères ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Perspective IMO acceptable, but sharpness/DoF could be better. I wonder why, because it's f/10. May be another focus point would be better. --XRay 06:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intérieur du pertuis du barrage de la Rouvière ( Gard - Occitanie ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Noise is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 16:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le barrage de la Rouvière (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Un peu trop de bruit, pourquoi 400 iso ? Mais qualité suffisante pour QI. --Selbymay 09:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Déversoir à surface libre du barrage de la Rouvière (2) ( Gard - Occitanie ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:42, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Étienne depuis le Guizay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality picture but description needed (il faut décrire l'image de façon plus complète, en français et en anglais.) --Selbymay 16:59, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Description ajoutée --Nunux34 17:30, 28 October 2017 (UTC) "& en anglais", ce serait parfait, commons est une banque d'images internationale. --Selbymay 18:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La « source véritable » de la Loire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de La Roche (Saint-Priest-la-Roche) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oppidum du Rocher du Causse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMO, quality good enough --PJDespa 22:12, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menhir du Col de Bès (HDR).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barrage de Ceyrac (vue du ciel).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Chenspec 07:09, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Charbonnière has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 03:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine de Pilate (La Jasserie).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Iketsi 14:13, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]