User talk:NoFWDaddress/Archives/2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


2017

Bonne année Scoopfinder, que cette année soit riche en scoops. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

@Thibaut120094: Une toute bonne année à toi aussi :-) --Scoopfinder(d) 15:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Photo "Benoît Philippe, verkisto"

Hello, Scoopfinder, and thank you in advance for your help. What I have to do to make the picture "Benoît Philippe, verkisto" accepted by Wikimedia Commons? I sent to Permissions an e-mail with the permission of the author of the picture. Is it not sufficient? We risk the author simply will get annoyed by our requirements. Thanks,

Susomoinhos (talk) 15:54, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@Susomoinhos: Bonjour, je ne communique pas sur les tickets, car il s'agit de données non publiques. Veuillez patienter, le temps que votre courriel soit traité ou consulter votre boite courriel si une réponse vous a déjà été donnée. Cordialement, --Scoopfinder(d) 16:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Photo Cazenave deleted

Hello, Scoopfinder.thank you for your work into wikipedia project. I cannot understand why you deleted the Cazenave file from the cazenave page. Why is the right way? I have the original mail from PhD. Anny Cazenave where she gave me the picture for wikipedia article, if you prefer you can write about her photo and wikipedia spanish article. Thank you and best regards --E1th0r (talk) 00:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello E1th0r! I can't disclose the information in the OTRS ticket more than what is said in the deletion request (no valid permission). If you are the photograph, please send an email to Commons:OTRS (read the procedure on the link). If you're not, please ask the photograph to send a valid permission to OTRS. If you have any question on the procedure, feel free to ask me. Best, --Scoopfinder(d) 21:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Ariipaea Pomare.jpg

How do you know this is Ariipaea Pomare?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 07:29, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello @KAVEBEAR: ! It has been communicated through an OTRS ticket that it was not Pomare V, but surely Ariipaea Pomare. Does it seem wrong to you ? --Scoopfinder(d) 11:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
I am just wondering. What was the source on the other end of the OTRS ticket who communicate this to you? Just wondering if it they got their information from a book, a website or just their own knowledge of the subject.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Basque Parliament election, 2001 results.svg

I'm armonizing all related files to more simpler, clearer names. Moves were already done for all of the files in these categories:

Category:Parliament diagrams of Senate elections in Spain
Category:Parliament diagrams of Congress elections in Spain
Category:Parliament diagrams of 2015 City Council elections in Spain (Galicia)
Category:Parliament diagrams of 2015 City Council elections in Spain (Valencian Community)

Curious that you denied these when the previous moves were not denied... In any case, those are files I uploaded myself. So, if you have any inconvenient, use reason #1 (original uploader's request) instead of reason #4 if you mind. Impru20 (talk) 13:52, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Alexander Pushkin automaton android by François Junod.JPG

About this file, which data is missing? Jafd88

@Jafd88: Bonjour ! ...
Il manque une preuve d'identité de Monsieur Mario del Curto et une autorisation valide (du type Commons:CONSENT/fr) de François Junod pour l'oeuvre représentée (depicted work). Bonne soirée --AntonierCH (d) 16:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Then you need two forms? One by Junod and another one by Curto? Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jafd88 (talk • contribs)
@Jafd88: Please see directly with OTRS if you're one of these person, since most of these information are non-public information and can't be released. --AntonierCH (d) 18:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
I can't access OTRS, but you can email in French to Junod http://www.francoisjunod.com/contact/ and Mario http://mariodelcurto.ch/contact.php — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.59.207.231 (talk) 07:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
@Jafd88: No, its to them to contact OTRS, not the other way around. --AntonierCH (d) 08:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Potal-K&D Black on White.png and Potal Green@3x.jpg

Hi

I noticed that you reverted (1, 2) my edits in which I added the OTRSPermission template to File:Potal-K&D Black on White.png and File:Potal Green@3x.jpg. I am an OTRS member on the info-da queue (Danish), but not on any permissions queue. The ticket 2017012710006991 with the permission for the images was forwarded with no instructions from the permissions queue to info-da. I checked the permission and it appeared OK, so I added the template. I tried asking around on IRC if I should forward the ticket back to permissions, but I didn't get an answer, so I just left it on info-da. How should I proceed? --Cgt (talk) 13:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

@Cgt: Hi! :-)
I didn't know that you were an OTRS agent, but since you don't have access to the permission queue, I guess the template should still be added by someone who is "accredited" to handle permissions. Also, I coudln't check the permission, so I did not add the templates back... maybe you should leave a note on the ticket to sum up (if it's not in English) and put it in the permissions queue? --AntonierCH (d) 14:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
I wrote a note in English explaining the situtation and moved it to permissions-commons. Thanks. --Cgt (talk) 13:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Photos La Petite Chartreuse

Tu ne pouvais pas essayer de m'en parler, avant de lancer une DR, afin de comprendre un peu mieux la situation ? On dirait une sorte de revanche après ton commentaire apparemment empreint d'agacement sur WP au sujet des infobox. Dommage d'agir comme ça. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Bonjour (déjà...) TwoWings. Je n'ai pas jugé bon de t'en parler, car le débat permettra immédiatement de clarifier ce point : le copyright est détenu par la personne qui prend la phot (punkt schluss). Il n'y a pas d'exceptions.
Quant à tes accusations de "revanche", après celles de faux-nez : je pense qu'il faut que tu arrêtes tes accusations à tout va. J'ai regardé ta participation sur Commons suite à ta notif, mais le débat lancé n'est aucunement une revanche. Merci de ne plus m'écrire si c'est pour m'accuser d'autres intentions... sinon, je suis ouvert à la discussion évidemment. --AntonierCH (d) 13:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC) + 15:17, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Il doit y avoir méprise : où t'ai-je accusé d'être un faux-nez ???
Pour revenir au fond du débat. C'est bien beau de dire que "le copyright est détenu par la personne qui prend la phot", sauf que : 1) il n'y a techniquement pas de copyright à ces photos ; 2) honnêtement, quand tu demandes, par exemple, à un inconnu de prendre une photo de toi devant un monument pendant des vacances, ça voudrait dire qu'il t'es impossible de faire ce que tu veux de cette photo car tu ne seras jamais capable de retrouver le photographe et lui demander son identité et son autorisation ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
PS : oui, bonjour. Désolé, j'étais trop agacé par cette DR. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:07, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Pourrais-tu me répondre sur la soi-disante accusation de faux-nez, car je ne vois vraiment pas de quoi tu parles ? Cordialement. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:24, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sandrine Viglino (cropped).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sandrine Viglino (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sandrine Viglino (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

— Racconish ☎ 10:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

@Racconish: Il n'y a aucune raison de douter de l'origine d'un tel média qui est amateur et dont la disponibilité sur Internet montre une copie depuis Wikimedia Commons et non l'inverse (Permission is obvious or not required). Je vais cependant notifier l'uploader pour voir si elle peut tout de même envoyer une permission valide si nécessaire. Si tu es en désaccord, merci de te justifier, voire d'ouvrir une DR. --AntonierCH (d) 17:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, je vois que l'auteur est Stéphane Schmutz et que son autorisation n'est pas rapportée. Par ailleurs, il me semble qu'au titre de la licence choisie, son nom devrait être clairement indiqué pour qu'il puisse être crédité. Mais je suis tout prêt à reconsidérer si tu veux bien m'expliquer un peu mieux pourquoi tu n'es pas d'accord. A défaut, il me semble que cette suppression de bandeau n'est pas convenable. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 17:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Je l'avais vu, mais la photo est disponible nul part. Il semble évident que l'uploader est Stéphane lui-même et il s'est crédité en indiquant son pseudonyme (réel, pas Wikipédien) ce qui est suffisant. Si tu y tiens, tu peux évidemment ouvrir une DR. Dans tous les cas je viens d'avoir la resp. marketing de SV qui devrait nous transmettre une meilleure photo sous licence libre sous peu. --AntonierCH (d) 18:07, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Le fait que la photo ne soit pas disponible ailleurs ne signifie pas nécessairement que l'auteur a explicitement donné son accord pour qu'elle soit téléversée sur Commons sous licence CC-BY-SA. Il peut très bien, par exemple, l'avoir adressée au téléverseur pour son usage personnel. En revanche, si, comme tu sembles le supposer, le photographe et le téléverseur ne font qu'un, le plus simple me semble être de lui expliquer qu'il faut transmettre son accord, ce que faisait précisément le bandeau que tu as supprimé. Faut-il vraiment en passer par une DR ? Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 18:16, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Sandrine Viglino (cropped).jpg

File:Sandrine Viglino (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Classiccardinal (talk) 19:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello AntonierCH, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

suppression de fichiers en cours d'instruction

Antonier, votre collègue Jcb m'a mis dans les difficultés : il a supprimé tous les dossiers que je vous avais transmis et pour lesquels vous aviez bien précisé les avoir mais que cela prendra du temps pour les instruire. Or ces illustrations sont indispensables aux notices, je pense à celle de Lyautey, ou celle de Ferdinand Guillebot de Nerville. Il me dit maintenant qu'il ne les remettra que si vous le lui demandez ! Pouvez-vous le faire ? Je vous en serais très reconnaissant. Cordialement --Anglo-norman (talk) 13:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Notification de traduction : Commons:Wiki Loves Public Space 2017 in Belgium

Bonjour, AntonierCH,

Vous recevez cette notification car vous avez signé en tant que traducteur de français sur Wikimedia Commons. La page Commons:Wiki Loves Public Space 2017 in Belgium est disponible pour la traduction. Vous pouvez la traduire ici :

La priorité de cette page est haute. La date limite pour traduire cette page est 2017-06-30.

Coming Saturday the photo contest Wiki Loves Public Space starts in Belgium to celebrate the implementation of Freedom of Panorama in Belgium. Participants are asked to upload photos of modern buildings, public artworks, historic monuments and memorials to enrich Wikipedia.Please help

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Public_Space_2017_in_Belgium

Thanks!

Romaine

Votre aide est grandement appréciée. Les traducteurs comme vous aident Wikimedia Commons à fonctionner comme une véritable communauté multilingue.

Vous pouvez modifier vos préférences de notification.

Merci !!!!

Les coordinateurs de traduction de Wikimedia Commons‎, 20:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Ticket

Hi! I just added a comment zu Ticket:2017060210014635. Not thinking you can't do it on your own, I thought I just let you know what I stumbled upon. C(_) Best, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:15, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello Hedwig in Washington and thank you for your kind message and help. Don't worry, any help is appreciated and I rather have more information to handle the case. I couldn't know what the file represented since I am not an admin and always have to request undeletion to then figure out what can be kept or not... I asked the OTRS requester to clarify how he owns the rights on these files. Best! --AntonierCH (d) 08:15, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

OTRS permissions

Hello, AntonierCH. I have some photos needed OTRS permissions (uploaded for a month), could you help to check it?

This kind of photo has been handled by other Commons administrators before. And these are some related tickets: otrswiki:Special:PermaLink/76592. Thank you. 長谷川明 (talk) 12:14, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello 長谷川明. It is useless to notify several agents (@Thibaut120094, Seb26, FDMS4, Dogad75, and Anthere: ): we are all volunteers and there is no reason that your ticket receive a more urgent treatment than others. I also don't appreciate the spamming that you did and would kindly ask you to stop this behavior. There is a big backlog for permissions, please be patient. --AntonierCH (d) 13:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

I had uploaded a set of videos from my vimeo account. Thanks for doing Commons:license review on them. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:59, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
You're welcome Bluerasberry. Thank you for your contribution to Wikimedia Commons. BR --AntonierCH (d) 20:08, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Le Emer

Hello. I cannot understand the problem with the picture. I am the author; since I usually upload my photos on another site (naviearmatori.net, with the account "Haddock"), I sent a mail to OTRS, which is referenced in the ticket I linked in the picture. @Elitre: , can you please confirm?--Eustace Bagge (talk) 05:20, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

ps: I am now looking at the mail I sent. It is in italian, so maybe the language barrier is not helping; in any case, reference is made in the mail only to the first 150 or so pictures because that's what I had uploaded at the time. Should I send a mail to OTRS every time I upload a picture on "naviearmatori", to make sure I don't have further problema?--Eustace Bagge (talk) 05:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
@Eustace Bagge: Thank you for your messages. The problem is simple : the template {{PermissionOTRS}} can only be added by OTRS agent (see the template documentation). This is to make sure that the permission is valid and covers the media in question. In your case, you can send a request to OTRS to have a template made just for you - like {{Shootzurich}} - that you can add freely on medias you upload. Be sure to give an explicit permission that covers any media that you upload and that is also uploaded on naviearmatori.net, with the account "Haddock". Feel free to ask me anything if this is unclear and thank you for your contribution to Wikimedia Commons. Best regards. --AntonierCH (d) 09:34, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind answer. Just one question - is there any specific format I have to follow?--Eustace Bagge (talk) 20:58, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
@Eustace Bagge: Hello and sorry for the delay! Not really, if your permission already covers your upload from a specific website. If not, please use the usual OTRS procedure. Best, --AntonierCH (d) 12:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
(Sorry for the delay, I am not an OTRS agent anymore, but for context, in the past it.wp agents have always allowed editors to specify that detail themselves. I'm pretty sure this is documented somewhere, but it's not a big deal now. Thank you. --Elitre (talk) 06:08, 6 September 2017 (UTC) )

ENDOOM file review

Freedoom v0.2 ENDOOM opened in SLADE v3.1.1.5

I noticed you reviewed File:Freedoom v0.8 ENDOOM.png, but didn't do so yet for File:Freedoom v0.1 ENDOOM.png. I uploaded another file (shown here), which should hopefully help with your license review. WubTheCaptain (talk) 13:46, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

@WubTheCaptain: Thank you for your messaged. I did not review it on purpose because I did not find evidence that this version of the logo is freely licensed. Can you point me where it is actually stated ? Thx in advance. BR, --AntonierCH (d) 12:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

@AntonierCH: The license is in a file named COPYING in the freedoom-iwad-0.2.7z archive. doom2.wad is the Freedoom 0.2 WAD archive, which is shown in the SLADE screenshot.

There should be a better reference in the permission field of {{Information}} for BSD 3-clause statement now.

The ENDOOM lump has remained unchanged in Freedoom v0.2, and the DeuTex source tree (as you've seen it for v0.8 hosted on GitHub) for these very old releases has rotten away (imported to Git as one big commit since Freedoom v0.6). 2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 15:21, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

To clarify, the freedoom-iwad-0.2.7z is a compressed archive and needs to be extracted with 7-Zip, p7zip (7z x freedoom-iwad-0.2.7z) or a similar tool. 2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 15:25, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Autorisation OTRS en attente de validation

Bonjour AntonierCH,

Merci d'avoir traité la semaine dernière l'autorisation OTRS de Ueli Frey pour 8 photos de chanteurs et musiciens photographiés dans les années 70/80 (dont celle-ci : File:Supertramp - Roger Hodgson (1979).png). M. Frey a envoyé une seconde autorisation pour 2 photos supplémentaires le 3 octobre à 8h54 à l'adresse permissions-fr@wikimedia.org. Pourriez-vous prochainement traiter cet email pour délivrer un ticket OTRS aux deux images concernées ? Merci beaucoup  ! Prévenez-moi surtout si l'email ne vous est pas parvenu, cela m'était arrivé une fois par le passé. Excellente continuation --ΛΦΠ (talk) 15:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NoFWDaddress/Archives/2017&oldid=430327232"