User talk:Nemo5576/Archiwum4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lębork Derdowskiego baszty DSC 2900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good to me. --Iifar 16:33, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lębork Armii Krajowej 7 DSC 2653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lębork ratusz DSC 2619 (Nemo5576).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments reasonably good. --Vamps 07:57, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Słupsk Jedności Narodowej 2-2a DSC 1529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit of brightness would help, but QI --Poco a poco 18:44, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lębork Armii Krajowej 16 DSC 3127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Słupsk Starostwo Powiatowe DSC 1837.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. nice light! --Ralf Roletschek 12:34, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gliwice Przedwiośnie 1 Kościół św Jacka DSC 9527.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 08:49, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gliwice Jana Pawła II Rzeźba Chłopiec z łabędziem DSC 9739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Iifar 10:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lębork Młynarska 21 DSC 2466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments dobra korekcja perspektywy --Pudelek 08:06, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lębork baszta bluszczowa DSC 2406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zabrze Krakusa 13 DSC 5236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:01, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zabrze Krakusa 22 DSC 5218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:27, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Słupsk kosciół św Mikołaja DSC 1816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 18:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lębork ratusz DSC 2614 (Nemo5576).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zabrze Siedleckiego 1 DSC 5243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zabrze Cmentarna 7d DSC 5248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pyskowice stacja nastawnia Pk5 DSC 8397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Sfu 09:17, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Słupsk Spichlerz Richtera DSC 1852.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:40, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska Nowobytomska 4 DSC 5548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 08:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lębork Derdowskiego baszty DSC 2407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. Mattbuck 11:21, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Przeglądam sobie PD-Polish i trafiłęm na Twoją fotkę. Fajnie, że ktoś to tak opisuje jak Ty, w dodatku skanuje z oryginału. Ściągając coś z Internetu nie ma pewności, że nie było zastrzeżenia praw autorskich, poza tym w necie łatwiej o pomyłkę z opisem co zdjęcie przedstawia. Może pójdę na to co mnie zapraszałeś na FB, Ty też tam będziesz? Krzysiu (talk) 21:17, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska Wolności 106 DSC 6106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Florstein 15:56, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska Wolności 108 DSC 6105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Florstein 15:56, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lębork Armii Krajowej 16 DSC 2597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Neutral - other opinions please? Mattbuck 12:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pławniowice pałac DSC 8171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 09:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lębork Korczaka zegar słoneczny DSC 2283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --Iifar 07:45, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lębork Korczaka zegar słoneczny DSC 2285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 07:45, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pławniowice Fontanna z posągiem Matki Boskiej z Dzieciątkiem DSC 8154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Słupsk Baszta Czarownic DSC 1842.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lębork Staromiejska Delfino DSC 2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:50, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska Wolności 108 DSC 6103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska Wolności 112 DSC 6101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska Wolności 110 DSC 6100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska Wolnosci 112 DSC 6098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska Wolnosci 110 DSC 6104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A guide to Polish copyright[edit]

Following some recent discussions, I have attempted to compile a guide to Polish copyright. It's available at User:Piotrus/PolishCopyright. I'd like to invite you to comment on it, and of course you are more then welcome to improve it. I am contacting you and several other commons editors who I know work with Polish Copyrights, as I am not aware of any centralized noticeboard to reach them, feel free to pass this message to such a place if it exists, and to whoever else you think could be interested in such a topic. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:45, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Nemo5576,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 00:07, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Deringer unknown adamsguns.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Simonxag (talk) 11:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nemo, to zdjęcie jest świetne. Pozdrawiam serdecznie, --Paterm (talk) 18:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:EMP 44 (Shark1982).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Someone not using his real name (talk) 20:57, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Świętochłowice kościół ewangelicki im. Jana Chrzciciela DSC 7508.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Hight contrast, see notes --The Photographer 17:08, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Has some minor CA which possibly could be improved. The dark areas still show details, no underexposure. --Smial 11:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Cześć. Wykonałeś to zdjęciu więc zwracam się do Ciebie. Chciałbym dopisać wzmiankę o tym pomniku w artykule wikipedii, jednak nie mogę znaleźć w internecie żadnej informacji o jego odsłonięciu. Być może wiesz coś więcej na jego temat, albo też masz dokładniejsze zdjęcie tabliczki na nim (nie mogę odczytać jej). Lowdown (talk) 13:27, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Nemo5576,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Nemo5576,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Górnośląski Park Etnograficzny DSC 8300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rybna pałac DSC 6709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:05, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nakło Śląskie pałac DSC 6729.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Florstein 17:05, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]