User talk:MrPanyGoff

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 / Archive 2 / Archive 3 / Archive 4


Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linke Wienzeile 2 building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:21, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Holy Mother of God Church, Gabrovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melk abbey entrance detail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Good, but it is very bright, too bright.--XRay 07:37, 1 February 2014 (UTC) A bit darker version is uploaded.--MrPanyGoff 14:42, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality (now). --XRay 07:45, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haus der Industrie - Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:10, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! József Attila sugárút 4 - Szeged.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Problem with the crop (left side). The vertical lines of the right are not stright--Lmbuga 22:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC) File with some corrections uploaded.--MrPanyGoff 08:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality--Lmbuga 11:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madame Tussauds Wien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:21, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Riesenrad detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 17:12, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magyar Radio - Szeged.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 10:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katharinenkirche und Mausoleum Roof lantern - Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 23:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtpfarrkirche detail - Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Weitzer - Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benedictine High School of Pannonhalma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient Philippi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Johannes Nepomuk monument - Melk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imperial Carriage Museum - Schönbrunn - Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:44, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ottenschlager Straße - Spitz an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:50, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kammergarten - Schönbrunn - Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:28, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simon Rückhenbaum Epitaph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:35, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doblhoffpark - Baden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gußhausstraße 2 - Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Academy of Fine Arts - Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The branches on the left side are somewhat disturbing, but the overall quality is ok for QI. --Cccefalon 12:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marchetstraße 12 - Baden bei Wien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franzensburg - Laxenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama from Belvedere - Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 15:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ironwork - Belvedere - Vienna - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graz opera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 23:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stock im Eisen square - Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 11:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwarzenbergplatz 5 - Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rennweg 11 fragment - Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Theater an der Wien fragment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:06, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erzherzog-Johann-Brunnendenkmal fragment - Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 17:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klavierhaus Fiedler - Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szeged Cathedral fragment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 22:02, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rennweg 11 - Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 20:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great Church Tower - Kecskemet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radnóti Miklós High School - Szeged.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gray artefacts at the top left from perspective correction. --Tuxyso 15:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC) ✓ Done Sorry, they are removed now.--MrPanyGoff 16:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality now. --Tuxyso 21:14, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opernring 18 - Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 22:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kammergarten pavilion - Schönbrunn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, though sharpness is marginal. --Mattbuck 22:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ladislaus I monument - Győr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iron Log House - Győr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 18:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrplatz 6 - Baden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:55, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity column - Kecskemét.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prosecuting Attorney - Szeged.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --ArildV 08:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National Theatre of Szeged.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good for me, but the upper part of the sky is a bit dirty (pixellation?)--Lmbuga 18:29, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue at Pannonhalma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica Minor gate - Győr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roman Ruin - Schönbrunn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicolas church tower - Kavala.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annenstraße 4 - Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vilmos Apor - Győr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:55, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Imaret gate - Kavala.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albert Memorial Clock tower, Belfast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue - Katharinenkirche - Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freihaus - Vienna University of Technology.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 14:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bécsi kapu tér 11 - Győr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice, decent colors. --Cccefalon 11:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Buildings in Vienna by district[edit]

Why did you choose Vienna district [number] / [name] as the name for the subcategories of Category:Buildings in Vienna by district? I would appreciate it if you could name them the same way users did with subcategories of Category:Streets in Vienna. |FDMS 19:22, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree that it is too long and I'm not satisfied as well, but it is often users to search by district number because they remember it easier. I even think to change the mentioned streets categories names because I wasted too much time weeks ago to work with them with now existed names.--MrPanyGoff 19:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't change the name of Streets in Vienna subcategories! On Commons (as well as on Wikipedia), district numbers are only used in very few cases, as they are not official names of districts. One could also argue for using postal codes instead of city names, but I know for sure that there is consensus for using geographical names instead of numbers. It would be very confusing if although the name Währing is used on any other Wikimedia project, Commons uses 18th district instead of Vienna. If you do not agree with me, feel free to "defend" your opinion and try to convince me and the other users, but as far as I know most users support the usage of district names. |FDMS 20:19, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I also prefer names instead of numbers! But exactly in commons I see using of numbers for the big cities.--MrPanyGoff 20:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you want to change streets category names then?    FDMS  4    18:30, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FULLACK FDMS, I was also quite surprised to see that rather complicated names with district numbers. Please reduce names to simple names of district, like Category:Buildings in Hernals‎. And like Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Hernals‎, Category:Public art in Hernals‎, Category:Culture of Hernals‎. That is the usual naming convention all around Vienna. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:45, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK--MrPanyGoff 21:51, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Testudo ibera Pallas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stefánia 6 - Szeged.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 15:49, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herrengasse 19 - Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szeged Cathedral tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:58, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milkó-palota fragment - Szeged.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diefenbachgasse 46 - Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:29, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landhaus detail - Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:29, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grazer Dom epitaph 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Given that the stone plate is shaped rectangular, it needs a perspective correction (right border rectilinear, left border leaning) --Cccefalon 06:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC) ✓ Done Is it better for you now?--MrPanyGoff 07:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes. I appreciate your efforts. --Cccefalon 14:02, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Schonbrunn Palace - Vienna.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schonbrunn Palace - Vienna.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soldiers monument - Vrazhdebna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. Perhaps the vignetting could be reduced a bit. --P e z i 19:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church - Vrazhdebna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Cccefalon 16:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herzogshof - Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grazer Dom epitaph 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 13:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais Niederösterreich - Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 10:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nandina domestica - Balchik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franzensburg tower 01 - Laxenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:21, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauengasse 12 - Baden bei Wien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hybrid tea rose - Korlita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality imo. --JLPC 17:18, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town Library office - Baden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church - Vrazhdebna 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franzensburg tower 02 - Laxenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:32, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Győr City Hall tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 15:46, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pannonhalma church detail 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pyb 14:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kecskemét City Hall - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 14:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Somogyi Street - Szeged.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Iifar 13:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear MrPanyGoff,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klauzál Square 8 - Szeged.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:15, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lion statue - Laxenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz I monument - Graz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 09:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pannonhalma church detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good, white in white is not easy. --Ralf Roletschek 15:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abies cephalonica - Balchik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House - Razlog.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please take care of the bird; I made an annotation. --Cccefalon 09:16, 7 April 2014 (UTC) *Removed.--MrPanyGoff 10:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abies photo[edit]

Hello Pany - can you find out if Balchik Palace have any provenance data for their tree which you took this photo File:Abies cephalonica - Balchik.jpg? To me it looks much more like Abies borisii-regis than A. cephalonica, the leaves are too blunt-tipped for A. cephalonica. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 09:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Islet Agios Dionysios.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:55, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lefkimmi ferry 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 09:04, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lefkimmi ferry port 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --P e z i 13:03, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Nicholas' Church COA 01 - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:05, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eastern Stüler Building - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reichstag tower - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guanaco - Berlin zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--ArildV 11:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pope Sixtus V - Bode museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:15, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Town Hall dome - Potsdam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 09:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosaics - Kaiser Wilhelm Church - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 11:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Japanese serow - Berlin zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 10:19, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oranienburger Straße No31 - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Cayambe 09:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brandenburger Straße 72 - Potsdam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Nicholas' Church dome - Potsdam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 08:18, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New Synagogue tower - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:22, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poststraße 25 - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:59, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House - Corfu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Alexander Plaza - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 12:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Große Orangerie detail - Charlottenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:36, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucas&Iohannes - Berliner Dom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kulturbrauerei tower - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:56, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Danziger Straße - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:10, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giraffe - Berlin zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crawler crane - Corfu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venetian well - Corfu fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maitland Monument - Corfu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. The shadows are a bit dark IMO--Lmbuga 09:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotes Rathaus detail - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilhelm von Humboldt statue - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cypriot statue - Neues Museum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cypriot statue - Neues Museum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Bassin - Potsdam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Mary's Church - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cypriot statue - Neues Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:08, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charlottenburg Town Hall fragment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Peter und Paul church - Potsdam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue 01 - Charlottenburg - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Engelbecken-Hof - Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 13:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Peter und Paul - Potsdam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some white parts of the cloud look "burned", and I don't think it's due to my monitor's setting. Correctible ?--Jebulon 16:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I don't agree that there is much OE on the clouds. On sunny days, whiet clouds "have to be" a little OE in a realistic image. I think the compo is a bit too centred, but that isn't enough reason to consider it non QI. --Stegop 23:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)  Support QI IMO --Christian Ferrer 20:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

File:RegistanSquare Samarkand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 15:40, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Hotel Veliko Turnovo[edit]

Hello,

I am writing you from the swiss architecture magazine archithese. We would like to publish your image of the Hotel Veliko Turnovo in our next issue. Did I understand it right, that we can publish it without any fee in our magazine and the copyright is: Plamen Agov • studiolemontree.com?

Thank you for your help and sunny regards from Zurich.

Isa Fahrenholz

redaktion@archithese.ch

t +41 (0)43 960 39 50


Покана за участие в „Уики обича Земята“[edit]

Здравейте, MrPanyGoff!

Пиша ви като на редактор с много допринесени към Общомедия и Уикипедия свободни снимки на българската природа. :) Може вече да сте разбрали, а може и сега да научавате, но от една седмица тече фотоконкурсът „Уики обича Земята“. Състезанието съществува от три години и тази година в България се провежда за първи път – от 1 до 30 юни. Целта е да се съберат снимки от защитените местности, резервати, природни и национални паркове на България. Ще се радвам, ако се включите и за пореден път допринесете към Уикипедия със своите снимки. Можете да качвате и снимки, направени преди периода на конкурса. От всички качени в националния етап на състезанието снимки, журито ще избере десетте най-добри, които ще продължат в международния етап на "Wiki Loves Earth", където победителите ги чакат чудесни награди като участие на конференцията Wikimania'2016 в Италия. :) Поздрави, Spiritia 15:17, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bansko 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neofit Rilski House, Bansko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 06:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

QI Tunisia training[edit]

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 20:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Добре дошъл във фотоконкурса „Уики обича Земята“ 2016[edit]

File:Wozzy-3.jpg
Уози те поздравява и кани да участваш в „Уики обича Земята 2016“!

Здравей,

получаваш това писмо, тъй като миналата година си участвал в изданията на „Уики обича Земята 2015“ или „Уики обича паметниците 2015“. Сега, до края на месец юни, те каним отново да участваш в тазгодишното фотосъстезание „Уики обича Земята 2016“. То се провежда при същия регламент, но в сравнение с миналата година – и с награден фонд!

Отново търсим твоите снимки от защитените природни обекти на България – национални и природни паркове, резервати и защитени местности и отново това могат да са както пейзажи, така и снимани в близък план животни и растения. Отново няма ограничения за броя снимки, с които можеш да участваш в конкурса и можеш да използваш същата регистрация в Общомедия като миналогодишната. Единственото условие на конкурса е да отдадеш снимките си под свободен лиценз и без водни знаци и други надписи с декларации за авторството върху тях.

А наградите? Те са за авторите на първите 10 класирани снимки, които продължават в международния кръг на „Уики обича Земята“ и ще представят страната ни. Авторите на първите 10 снимки ще получат награди ваучери от фото магазин или книжарница, а една от тези 10 снимки ще бъде издадена като официална пощенска марка на Р. България. И това ако не е вълнуващо? Междувременно, ако качиш над 25, 50 и 100 снимки, ще получиш съответно виртуална бронзова, сребърна и златна значка от талисмана на конкурса – кукумявката Уози ;)

Въобще тази година участието в „Уики обича Земята“ е много по-интересно и вълнуващо, и също толкова важно за разрастването и подобряването на свободно достъпното енциклопедично знание на български език! Затова не се колебай, а просто участвай! :)

Поздрави,

Екипът на „Уики обича Земята“!

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Für den Transfer des Fotos des Falkensteiner Rathauses nach commons.wikimedia.org! Aarp65 (talk) 11:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Nativity of Christ - Pirot - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ibrahim Pasha Mosque, Razgrad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Sky a little bit noisy. --XRay 17:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Grandezza - Brno - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Felix of Cantalice - Brno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building on Zelný trh - Brno - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:37, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building on Zelný trh - Brno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:18, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reduta Theatre - Brno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Yerpo 04:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pirot Central Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lion sculpture - Razgrad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:38, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ivan Lechev 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Peulle 10:47, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kutna Hora House 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cordell Crockett.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is really impossible to take photos at a rock festival without getting the black on black on black and a crop would unbalance it, right now it has a sort of "yin and yang"-effect so ok for me. W.carter 08:01, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apartment building - Niš.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland[edit]

Hallo MrPanyGoff!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter info@wikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]

„Уики обича паметниците 2016“ започва! :)[edit]

Здравей!

Организационният екип на фотоконкурса „Уики обича паметниците“ те кани от 15 септември до 14 октомври да участваш на тазгодишното издание на конкурса и да помогнеш за съхраняването на културното наследство на България и илюстрирането на свободната енциклопедия Уикипедия. Изпратихме ти това писмо, тъй като знаем за твоята съпричастност към уикипедианската кауза от участието ти в някое от досегашните издания на състезанията „Уики обича паметниците“ или „Уики обича Земята“ през 2015 или 2016 година.

Отново търсим твоите снимки от културните паметници на България – манастири и църкви, възрожденска архитектура, автентични крепости, музеи и музейни експонати. И тази година няма ограничения на броя снимки, с които можеш да участваш в конкурса. 25, 50, 100 или повече – зависи от теб! Както всички фотографски конкурси в Уикимедия, най-важното условие е, че трябва да предоставиш снимките си под свободен лиценз, без водни знаци и други надписи с декларации за авторството върху тях. Още за правилата на конкурса можеш да прочетеш оттук.

Най-добрите 10 снимки, които журито класира от националния кръг на конкурса, ще продължат в международния кръг на „Уики обича паметниците“, където ще представят страната ни. А авторът на снимката-победител на международния кръг ще получи като награда участие на световната уики-конференция „Уикимания“, която ще се проведе през август 2017 година в Монреал, Канада.

Но по-важното е, че твоите снимки междувременно ще помогнат за илюстрирането на съществуващите статии в Уикипедия, а защо не и да вдъхновят написването на нови статии, свързани с българската култура и история! Благодарим ти предварително за всяка една твоя снимка, с която допринасяш към свободното познание!

Поздрави,

Екипът на „Уики обича паметниците“! (Доставено от MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vatican Museums entrance 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza di Tor Sanguigna - Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:18, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palace of Justice - Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Resolution could be better for this kind of image. EXIF data missing. --XRay 13:45, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta San Giovanni - Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Giovanni in Laterano - Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 16:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurelian Walls - Porta Asinaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:16, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borghese - Giovanni Lanfranco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued image set: Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari (Venice), exterior has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 03:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mausoleum Ossuary Garibaldino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 21:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borghese - Hall 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pietro in Montorio - Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:19, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Фотоконкурсът „Уики обича Земята“ 2017 започва – очакваме те![edit]

„Уики обича Земята“ 2017 започва!

Здравей, MrPanyGoff

получаваш това писмо, тъй като миналата година си участвал/а в изданията на „Уики обича Земята“ през 2015 или 2016 г. или „Уики обича паметниците“ 2015 или 2016. До края на този месец юни, те каним отново да участваш в тазгодишното фотосъстезание „Уики обича Земята 2017“.

Отново търсим твоите снимки от защитените природни обекти на България – национални и природни паркове, резервати, защитени местности и природни забележителности и отново това могат да са както пейзажи, така и снимани в близък план животни и растения. Специален акцент тази година поставяме на снимките на балканските и българските еднемични растителни видове. Отново няма ограничения за броя снимки, с които можеш да участваш в конкурса и можеш да използваш същата регистрация в Общомедия като миналогодишната. Не е нужно и снимките да са правени през този един месец – можеш да разгледаш архивите си и да споделиш снимки и от минали години и сезони. Единственото условие на конкурса е да отдадеш снимките си под свободен лиценз и без водни знаци и други надписи с декларации за авторството върху тях.

Авторите на първите 10 класирани снимки ще продължат в международния кръг на „Уики обича Земята“ и ще представят страната ни. Някои от партньорите ни в конкурса ще предоставят награди – книги по география и екология. Междувременно, ако качиш над 25, 50 и 100 снимки, ще получиш съответно виртуална бронзова, сребърна и златна УОЗ-значка  ;)

Но най-важното за „Уики обича Земята“ е, че с дарените от теб снимки енциклопедичното знание, достъпно на български език, се разраства и подобрява, тъй като използваме снимките за илюстриране на съществуващи и създаване на нови статии в Уикипедия! Затова не се колебай, а участвай! :)

УОЗдрави,

Екипът на „Уики обича Земята“! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Da Ponte Fountain - Koper.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Jacob church - Koper.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loggia Koper.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koper Administrative Unit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:01, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decree of Dionysopolis[edit]

Hi,

I noticed you took many pictures at the National History Museum, Bulgaria, including many Ancient Greek inscriptions. Do you happen to have taken a picture of the Decree of Dionysopolis by any chances? The article badly needs a picture. It may look like this. In case you have it, I would much appreciate if you could upload it. Thanks a lot! --Codrin.B (talk) 10:50, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A photo[edit]

Hello! On Behalf of the team behind www.thefeelofsofia.com I want to inform you that we used your photo with the correct license underneath in our blog for The Sofia University. Thank you so much for the great work that you've done. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.100.201.89 (talk) 06:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th[edit]

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Photo of Mount Fuji[edit]

Hello,

I just want to inform you that I have used your good photo in my video/ vlog. I make vlog as a hobby. You can watch in youtube qOt2CxlZig8 Thank you kindly for sharing your photo.

Best Regards, S. Toha Stef Toha (talk) 01:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

дай феисбук — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.158.165.212 (talk) 15:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Peter's Square - north colonnade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gpood quality --Michielverbeek 14:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed a handful of images from this category, which should only contain Commons Featured Pictures. -- Colin (talk) 22:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pantheon of Rakovski - Kotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kotel Town Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enguridam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-M.nelson (talk) 21:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]