User talk:Moroder/Archives 2016-1

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:25, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Corpo di Cristo church interior anteporta Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicholas Naval Cathedral belfry Saint Petersburg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicholas Naval Cathedral detail Saint Petersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Consulate-General of France in Saint Petersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very blue photo and the quality is good --Michielverbeek 12:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of the Church of the Savior on Blood from the Griboedov Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Dolomiten aus Villanders2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Corpo di Cristo church tympanum Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Left side leaning in. --Jacek Halicki 14:21, 31 December 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks Halicki--Moroder 14:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
French Consulate (Saint Petersburg), facade on Moyka river.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 12:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:52, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Corpo di Cristo church altar with nativity Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moika river Griboedov Canal Adamini House Saint Petersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nevsky Prospekt street sign Saint Petersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 11:41, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicholas Naval Cathedral belfry Saint Petersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Corpo di Cristo church lesene on main gate Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ioannovsky Gate (Saint Petersburg), NE view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:54, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di Santa Giulia Facciata Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Petrovsky Gate (Saint Petersburg), statue of Athena.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:11, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petrovsky gate in Saint Petersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:54, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giulia church (Brescia), main facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 22:18, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Image

Dear Mr. Moroder,

I'm messaging you to let you know that we are planning to use your photo showing the ultrasound of a foetus in our IB Flash Card revision set - thank you very much for making it available.

If you want to learn more about our product you can visit our homepage at www.smart-prep.com.

If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at nikolas.hammermann@smart-prep.com.

Best regards, Nikolas Hammermann

I'm using your photo for a report

Dear Wolfgang. I took the liberty of including one of your images in the following online article of the architectural journal Arquine: http://www.arquine.com/fornix/ . The image is of course properly credited, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 50.188.179.74 (talk) 05:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Juan M. Heredia

Dear Mr. Moroder. I took the liberty of using one of your photographs for an online article in Spanish: http://www.arquine.com/fornix/ Of course it is credited to you. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 50.188.179.74 (talk) 17:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Sexten Sextner Sonnenuhr Konrad Petrides.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sexten Sextner Sonnenuhr Konrad Petrides.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 14:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Photo Use Notification

Hello Moroder,

I'm writing to inform you that I would like to use your photographs of the Ca D'Oro in an article I will be writing for the website ArchDaily. As requested, you will be credited for the images. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Thank you, LFiederer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lfiederer (talk • contribs) 04:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenuhr und Wappen Zehenter Hof Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Texture captured well --Daniel Case 20:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Round window Chiesa della Pietà Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco gotico a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motivo con finestre a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meridiana catottrica 2 Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sexten Sextner Sonnenuhr Konrad Petrides.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odles da Seceda da duman tl nibl Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lift Seceda Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skiing on Seceda in a blow of snow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Description needs an "h" --Ermell 08:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)  Comment Danke!--Moroder 09:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Odles da Seceda da duman tl nibl Gherdëina.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Odles da Seceda da duman tl nibl Gherdëina.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio dei Greci da Ponte della Pietá Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

your photo

Dear Wolfgang Moroder,

  thank you very much for your photo of the fossil Ortiseia Leonardi Museum Gròden. I am publishing an art/science book where stones and fossils are the protagonists and I would like to put your image. I will write your name in the caption as you request.

Thank you very much Kind regards Mariateresa Sartori — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.21.191.47 (talk) 16:11, 07 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa Santa Maria della Presentazione cupola a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mastle y Pic dinviern Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella Alta Badia Ciaulong Arabba da Porta Vescovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gherdëina NW da Ciampinoi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall very good quality. There are minor blurred areas in the trees below. --Milseburg 14:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna by Andreas Thamasch in the Museum Ferdinandeum (Innsbruck).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Quality image and best in scope. -- DAJF (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Funifor Arabba Porta Vescovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Photo use

Greetings,

I used this photo in a school project on the developmental lifespan (conception to birth period). You are credited in the presentation.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kazan Cathedral (Saint Petersburg), view at the blue hour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Funifer Doleda mountain top station on Col de Ross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grialëces cuecenes plu in su.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 05:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Cathedral Saint Petersburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Funifer Doleda mountain bottom station Delba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Funifer Doleda mountain top station on Col de Ross happy skiers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella Alta Badia Ciaulong Arabba da Porta Vescovo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dust spots at the right! --A.Savin 16:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Moroder 17:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)  Support OK --A.Savin 15:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Twitter

Hello,

    May I use your photo on twitter?

Sorry but my photos are not allowed to be published on social networks including Twitter as clearly stated--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crepa Neigra rifugio Valeruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel group from the Sella pass 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not sharp enough, as usual. But for not-architectural theme there is okay, I guess. --Florstein 09:06, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corte seconda del Milion e porticato del teatro Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco romanico e porticato del teatro Corte seconda del Milion Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Langkofel group from the Sella pass 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Langkofel group from the Sella pass 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angelo con turibolo Santa Fosca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good, maybe there is room of improvement for the aspect ratio? the head looks a bit distorted, not sure, though --Poco a poco 14:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the review. I checked the arch and it is a perfect semicircle --Moroder 16:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte dei Sospiri Ponte de la Canonica a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocifisso nella Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo Zanipolo Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio di San Lio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quadrifora gotica Rio di San Lio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:West view from Piz Boe 16to9.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:West view from Piz Boe 16to9.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vogatori Gruppo Tre Archi San Marcuola Canal Grande a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace Bragadin Quadrifora on the Rio di San Lio canal (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazzetta San Marco a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good sharp photo, nice perspective --Michielverbeek 15:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venezia - Palazzo ducale - Colonna 21 - Lapicida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtyard of the Doges Palace Venice Renaissance windows gothic arch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 14:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa San Zan Degola Venezia cappella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de Ron Sureghes Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overexposed area is not significant enough, QI to me --Poco a poco 09:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Judgment of Salomon Doges palace Venice 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta della Carta Palazzo Ducale Piazzetta San Marco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok, for info traces of CAs at top but it is hard to see it, so ok --Christian Ferrer 10:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adam on Doges Palace in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciampac in Val di Fassa Dolomiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa San Zan Degola Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bridge of Sighs (Venice), Southern aspect.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Geremia church and Palazzo Labia in Venice view from Canal Grande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 01:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio Marin Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brescia duomo facciata principale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ala Napoleonica Procuratie dettaglio centrale finestre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ala Napoleonica Procuratie dettaglio centrale arco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dantercepies bottom station Sëlva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stunning photograph. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ala Napoleonica Procuratie dettaglio centrale fregio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio Marin canal (Venice), Southern view from Ponte de la Bergama.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Permission to Use your Photo

Hello,

My name is Stephen and I have a Catholic blog on Tumblr at http://chi-the-rho.tumblr.com

I would like to share your beautiful photo found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dlijia_dla_ploania_de_La_Ila_Glasmalerei_Herz_Mariä.jpg

I will give proper credit as well and will detail the following in the upload:

Dlijia dla ploania de La Ila Glasmalerei Herz Mariä

By Wolfgang Moroder (Own work) / CC BY-SA 3.0 or GFDL, via Wikimedia Commons

May I have your permission to share this photo?

• sure, it's a pleasure --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:47, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ala Napoleonica Procuratie arco con nudi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Correr ingresso con affreschi Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piazzetta Campanile San Marco Biblioteca Marciana Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:11, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio della Zecca Giardini Reali Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to most important part from the photo but tre in the center is a little bit oversharpened --Michielverbeek 14:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC) Comment I usually, as in this case, don't sharpen and camera settings are neutral in regard to sharpening. Thanks a lot for the review --Moroder 14:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West view from Piz Boe 16to9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giovanni Elemosinario (Venice), main gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scola degli Albanesi rilievo vescovo facciata Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 18:59, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scola degli Albanesi facciata Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madonna con Bambino Nino Pisano Palazzo Cini Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarnowska American Bar ingresso a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:58, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Correr ingresso con affreschi dettaglio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:18, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti arch iron grate Venice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliefs by A Felici Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti Venice 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Molin (Venice), portal on Campo San Maurizio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:19, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Piazza San Marco and Venice on Easter 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Now its good quality. --Rftblr 21:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica di San Giorgio Maggiore dossale ligneo dettaglio a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Funifor Arabba Porta Vescovo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica di San Giorgio Maggiore dossale ligneo a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

using one of your images

Dear dr. Moroder,

For a physics class I teach I used one of your pictures (Ultrasound image of the foetus at 12 weeks of pregnancy in a sagittal scan). Thanks for providing these for the community! --Derekjan (talk) 16:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti (Venice), arches with iron grilles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama Piazza San Marco and Venice on Easter 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama Piazza San Marco and Venice on Easter 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scola degli Albanesi rilievo San Maurizio facciata Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now --Hubertl 09:32, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scola degli Albanesi rilievo madonna bambino facciata Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now --Hubertl 09:32, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Using a picture of the 4 Tetrarchs in Venice.

Hello,

Author, I'm preparing right now an illustrated version of a previous book about the material used to celebrate, in France, the Wedding anniversaries. For example, you celebrate the Cotton for 1 year of mariage, the Silk for 12 years, and Porphyrus for 33 years.

I think that your picture is great for the beauty itself of the statue and as an example of the colour of the stone.

So I would ask you if it's possible for me to use it in the frame of this project, with, of course, attribution. Is Moroder the name you want to use ?

Thanks a lot,

Have a nice day,

Nicolas Perrot Strasbourg

• It's a pleasure to help you in your publication. Please send me the complete reference of the book (Author, title editor and ISBN. For the attribution pleas write my complete name Wolfgang Moroder. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:46, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Funifor Arabba Porta Vescovo 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Funifor Arabba Porta Vescovo 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

using an image

I'll be using an ultrasound picture in a physics class. Thank you!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain firs with fresh snow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 18:30, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highland Peak Highland bowel Colorado.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain Ruthies run.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highland Peak Hunter Peak Hayden Peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowmass gondola and Ski area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Rftblr 19:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Highlands cloud 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Highlands base area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Funifor Arabba Porta Vescovo top station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Georgetown Colorado 6th street Masonic Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A week support because the image is a bit deformed --Michielverbeek 08:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC) Done I corrected the vertical lines. I'm not sure what you mean with "deformed". Thanks for the review --Moroder 18:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC) Comment Sorry wrong word, distorted would have been the right one --Michielverbeek 06:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC) Question What is distorted in this photo? --Moroder 09:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC) Sorry, I did not react this morning. The top of the building was a bit distorted in first instance, but it is looking better now --Michielverbeek 23:54, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain Bonnies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 19:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Highlands bowl from Loge Peak .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ute cemetery Aspen winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 19:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain ski area aspen trees FIS chair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 20:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Colorado Building built 1986 e Hayman Avenue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain skiing near the town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:58, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Case alle Fondamenta Zacchere Venezia notte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Base pilone Piazza San Marco Venezia Alessandro de Leopardi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:43, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punta della Dogana lato nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:38, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Camerlenghi Rialto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Rftblr 22:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Base pilone Piazza San Marco Venezia Alessandro de Leopardi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:43, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Venezia Castello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Corner della Regina sul Canal Grande dettaglio mascheroni 1914 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Georgetown Colorado building 1867.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:03, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cristo con due angeli facciata orientale chiesa dei Gesuati .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa San Giorgio Venezia torretta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campane nel Campanile San Giorgio Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Case alle Fondamenta Zacchere Venezia sera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO contrast should be better and the sky is overexposed. Please check your image. --XRay 06:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC) Comment I can't do better than this, unfortunately the light conditions were suboptimal but I like the ambience --Moroder 07:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC) Weak  Support may be HDRI as solution. I think you developed the image from RAW. IMO good enough for QI. --XRay 07:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC) Comment Thanks! Is HDRI possible with just one RAW file?--Moroder 13:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Mountain ski area aspen trees FIS chair detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I think the white spots in the sky are snowflakes. --XRay 06:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC) Done Cleaned the sky, thanks --Moroder 07:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ala Napoleonica Procuratie dettaglio ufficio postale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not convinced about the left crop but still QI to me --Poco a poco 12:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa San Barnaba Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Dllu 00:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Base della colonna di San Teodoro in Piazzetta San Marco Nenezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balconies in Venice Cannaregio Lista di Spagna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Snowmass panorama on Pitkin county from Big Burn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:10, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Base pilone Piazza San Marco Venezia Alessandro de Leopardi 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The people in the backgound are a little bit disturbing. --XRay 07:28, 30 March 2016 (UTC) Comment Thanks, unfortunately it is difficult to get rid of people on Piazza San Marco during the day ;-) --Moroder 09:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspen Snowmass panorama on Pitkin county from Elk camp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, sharp enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 06:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street lamp and street sign Aspen Mill Street Durant Av.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:19, 31 March 2016 (UTC)