User talk:Mmxx/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


O.o

Beautiful.... ;) Yug (talk) 19:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, of course it is nothing compared to your beautiful works.   ■ MMXXtalk  05:14, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks and kudos for your work on my picture! Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem.   ■ MMXXtalk  20:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the great touch-up on the jerboa image! I think it adds a visual emphasis to the unique physiology of this mammal -- and now it looks good, too! TeamZissou (talk) 22:08, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

just forwarding these words of thanks, since you really did a good job there. thanks a lot for contributing --Yamavu (talk) 10:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome and Thank you for your kind comments.   ■ MMXXtalk  13:03, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

QI/recently promoted

Hi, is there a reason why you manually moved the recently promoted QIs from that page to the galleries? I've got no pb with that, but you're aware that the bot would take care of that, right? --Eusebius (talk) 11:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I am surprised by your message, I thought we should move them manually, Just now I checked the diffs and I get it. Thanks for your notice.   ■ MMXXtalk  12:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I guess the latest bot version is more recent than the directions! I will update them. See you. --Eusebius (talk) 12:37, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks again, Regards.   ■ MMXXtalk  12:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chausey flotille de voiliers a maree bassemaree basse.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice photo --Pudelek 12:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Dear Kuru, the Image:Zametovka Grape.jpg is already nominated for QI and it is now in Consensual Review, if you think this image is should be promoted you can support it here.   ■ MMXXtalk  20:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I removed my QI nomination and supportet your nomination
--D-Kuru (talk) 08:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support. About cropping, from which side you think it should be cropped?   ■ MMXXtalk  08:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Either I woud cropp it all around (If you look at the picture deadful style on the description page: 0,5cm on each vertical side and 1cm on each horizontal side) or I would leave it, because the backround doesn't look as unimportant as I thought I I suggested the cropping.
--D-Kuru (talk) 11:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
I also think we should leave it like this, becuase the Grapes in the Background and Grape Leaves specially the one in the right are like a frame for the main subject.   ■ MMXXtalk  12:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your beautiful photos (answer)

Thank you for your compliment, it's always fun:) I just add new photos of orchid mantis ;) --Luc Viatour (talk) 13:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome. I saw your orchid collection, they are also beautiful like all your other images. Thanks and Please keep uploading, Wikimedia really needs you.   ■ MMXXtalk  13:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality images nomination

Thanks for the nomination and the correction made on the images of Chausey islands. Amicalement --Pline (talk) 18:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome, I think your photo deserve it.   ■ MMXXtalk  06:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zametovka Grape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chausey maison de Marin Marie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papilio Machaon caterpillar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. MathKnight 20:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peggys Cove - NS - Leuchturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Superb. TimVickers 01:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Picture of Chicago 2016

Hi, i downloaded yesterday a pic of Chicago 2016, but you deleted, is it because it has the logo on it??? I found the pic on Flickr and i dont know if download another one, like this one or this one?... --Vrysxy (talk) 02:16, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Dear Alex, I did mark your image as Copyright violation because the Chicago 2016 logo is copyrighted (see: http://www.chicago2016.org/terms-of-use.aspx), I also believe that any photo of a 2D copyrighted object is property of its original owner (in this case Chicago 2016), for more information about what is acceptable and what is not, please see Commons:Image casebook and Commons:Licensing. if you want you can also contact with Chicago 2016 and ask their permission to use their logo/poster, for help about requesting permission please see en:WP:ERP.   ■ MMXXtalk  08:38, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Papilio Machaon caterpillar.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Papilio Machaon caterpillar.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Benh (talk) 22:24, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello

I have uploaded a restitched and color corrected version of Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Graffiti i baggård i århus 2a.jpg - please take a look! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


File deletion warning File:Qxz-ad156.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

192.77.115.37 08:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

re:Infoboksy *

Well Ok, if You feel so strongly about.. The purpose of this shot was to show problems with some infoboxes. Regards,--Adi (talk) 07:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Well that's the commons's rule. anyway, it is fine now and i did remove the template. Thanks for your fast correction.   ■ MMXXtalk  07:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you nominated this file for speedy deletion as a copyvio, for the second time. When I came across this image the first time, I removed the copyvio notice and changed the license to {{PD-textlogo}}. Due to the simplicity of the design, this logo is not protected by copyrights, and can be used freely for any purpose. If you agree with that, please remove the copyvio tag yourself. Otherwise, notify me and I will turn it into a regular DR for discussion. Thank you. --Tryphon (talk) 16:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Nagy already removed the copyvio notice, so i'll agree with you two, however the image is not text only, and contains shape so I thought it could be protected.   ■ MMXXtalk  07:31, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
When the shapes are very simple, then there is no copyright protection, but it is sometimes hard to decide whether or not there is originality in the image. In fact, the threshold of originality varies from country to country (with UK having the lower and Germany the higher, I think). --Tryphon (talk) 11:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
You are right, but this mean anyone can use this logo for any purpose? I am not comfort with that. I also added {{trademark}} I think that is enough to protect it!   ■ MMXXtalk  11:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Yes, that what it means. Of course, the trademark protection still applies (even without the template, but that a good thing that you added it to warn potential users), so that a competitor cannot use the logo on their products or things like that. --Tryphon (talk) 13:16, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Is it good now (red cross, etc) ? Or must I all redo ? (it exists XP-like free O.S.) Bourrichon (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

It's ok now :) thank you for the correction.   ■ MMXXtalk  21:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tavurvur volcano edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tavurvur volcano edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Gambia girl.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gambia girl.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Hello,

thank you for nominating my panoramic view from Untersberg. Because I didn't know about this nomination I uploaded a new version two hours later. I hope this will not violate any rules. Kind regards MatthiasKabel (talk) 12:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you very much for uploading this nice panorama, actually I nominated it 20 minutes after your final upload, by the way can you please add Geocode to your image, also you can vote if you like :), Thanks for your comment   ■ MMXXtalk  12:38, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Untersberg panoramic view winter.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Untersberg panoramic view winter.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Karel (talk) 08:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Mmxx!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fireworks Whippets.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fireworks Whippets.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.