User talk:MikeRun

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MikeRun!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:24, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Over-categorization[edit]

Hi! I like your SVGs, but they were put into very broad categories. E.g. First_law_of_Kepler.svg is in the categories Physics, Astronomy, Astrodynamics and Kepler motions. Kepler motions is a subcategory of Astrodynamics, which itself is a distant subcategory of both Astronomy and Physics. This is called over-categorization. Please consider reading the official policy on categories to learn more about it and why it is a problem. Thank you. TilmannR (talk) 08:37, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not oxygen[edit]

Oxygen has 8 protons! File:Isotop O-12.svg, there are two other similar misleading files [1], [2] — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.167.228.180 (talk) 10:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otto-engine-all-strokes.png[edit]

Rotation is clockwise.
Rotation is clockwise.

Arrow shows the wrong direction.

Arrow shows the wrong direction. Rotation is clockwise. --Tomatenbrille (talk) 11:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The engine was mirrored for aesthetic reasons. Arrows are correct, in my opinion! MikeRun (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Electric Potential[edit]

Thanks for uploading Electric-dipole-field-lines-and-equipotential-lines.svg. In case you are interested, VectorFieldPlot now has a built-in functionality to draw potentials, using the function draw_contours(). An example with code can be found at VFPt charges plus minus potential+contour.svg and the colored background is of course optional. Your image could be created with the code

doc.draw_contours(func=field.V, levels=sc.linspace(-0.46, 0.46, 33), linewidth=2.1, linecolor='#808000', resolution_px=1)

--Geek3 (talk) 13:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! MikeRun

Please, do not add files to this category manually ! Use the script, or the template Igen; please tag your other SVG files as well, see e.g. Kirchhoff-example-circuit-loops.svg for example. -- sarang사랑 14:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this was not done on purpose. I think for instance had "Created with VectorFieldPlot" in the original soucre file, since it is shown as hidden category. Or maybe the deriveFX tool did this?!?! --MikeRun (talk) 16:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It should not be categorized manually with [[Category:Created with VectorFieldPlot]]. The Category:Valid SVG created with VectorFieldPlot will be added by the template.
I did it now also with the VFPt Earths Magnetic Field Confusion overlay.svg -- sarang사랑 18:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you[edit]

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Fantastic drawings! I believe those are very precious works for Commons. With this I award you the Graphic Designer's Barnstar. Keep the good work going. --Geek3 (talk) 10:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!!! --MikeRun (talk) 20:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Field direction[edit]

Hey, great work you're uploading. I think one of the fields in File:VFPt wires parallel individual and combined fields.svg has a wrong direction. --Geek3 (talk) 10:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, this was the result of careless copy and paste. the direction is now correct. Thanks for hinting! --MikeRun (talk) 13:53, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zyclotron[edit]

Hi MikeRun, I discovered an mistake in your image about the Zyclotron File:Zyclotron.svg. The circular path of the particle must be counter clockwise and not clockwise. Because according to the Right Hand Rule the Lorentz force points in the back at the beginning and so will the paticle move also to the back. Then the circular path will be counter clockwise. If the particle would be negatively charged or the magnetic field would point upwards the image would be correct.

You are right! Thanks for hinting! I reversed the direction of the magentic field. MikeRun (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Maya-NR-Simulation-with-Waveform-frame788-overlay.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Delatron2000 (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright in Youtube-Videos[edit]

Hi MikeRun, i am a german youtuber who makes learning-videos on youtube. I have seen your work and i like it a lot. My question is, can i use your graphics for my thumbnails of my youtube-videos? I have done a lot of research regarding copyrights, which says that it should be allowed to do if i put your name and the titles and links to your work and the licenses in the video-description. But to be a hundret percent sure, i wanted to ask you if that is OK. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2003:ED:7F17:FBC6:5C7F:48AD:85AB:1CB0 (talk) 17:05, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thats OK! Please be so kind and post a link of one of your videos here, since I am curious about it MikeRun (talk) 09:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, this is a recent video with one of your graphics in the thumbnail: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGRQ0j8BeWQ — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2003:ED:7F01:2F36:4441:2A9F:724A:3F99 (talk) 17:45, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! MikeRun (talk) 21:34, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Thank you for your "Einstein triangle" for the energy-momentum relation, it's a really cool way to display the equation and I'm using it in my highschool thesis! Wish me good luck, I really need it! Hahah, have a nice day! From Italy

Angenios (talk) 00:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kitten!!! Good luck for you thesis! MikeRun (talk) 20:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Leibniz-newton.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Leibniz-newton.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Leibniz-newton.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both paintings are in PD and are linked on the page. I'am not sure which license to use on my derivative work. Can you help me? MikeRun (talk) 15:20, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]