User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2008/October
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
permissions-de@wikimedia.org
Hallo Mbdortmund, ich habe zu allen Trachtenbilder mit dem Namen "Juppentracht_**.JPG" eine Einwilligungserklärung der abgebildeten Personen an permissions-de@wikimedia.org gesendet.
Warum erhalte ich zu diesem Bild
nun doch eine Personality rights warning?
Welchen Baustein einer Lizenz muss ich setzen, wenn das Bild frei ist? --Böhringer (talk) 13:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Das wusste ich nicht, das mit der Einverständniserklärung, ich finde, Du solltest das erwähnen.
mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 14:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Das Tiket bekomme ich von wikimedia.org erst noch - dann erledigt sich die Sache so oder so. --Böhringer (talk) 20:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Gut, sorry, wenn ich Dich geärgert habe. --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Nein, Du hast mich nicht geärgert - mit der Sache meinte ich, dass der Baustein, der die Erlaubnis zur Veröffentlichung darstellt von den Administratoren gesetzt wird und dass es sich dann so oder so erledigt hätte. In diesem Falle wird die Personality rights warning entfernt. mfg --Böhringer (talk) 06:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dortmund-Oper 2502.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zeche-Zollern 2044.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dortmund-Oper 2540.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Raising the bar
Hi Mathias,
You might want take a look at this discussion -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Do-Bittermark 2719.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hallo Mbdortmund, ich teile Deine Bedenken bezüglich der Beiträge von WTMuploader, die Du heute nacht auf #wikipedia-de geäußert hast und habe deswegen eine entsprechende Diskussion eröffnet, zu der ich Dich herzlich einladen möchte. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 07:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Habe dort geantwortet. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Attendorn 3112.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image Tagging Image:SaintJohnFlag.jpg
|
Thanks for uploading Image:SaintJohnFlag.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 18:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
This image is from user Thee17. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:07, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Hallo Mbdortmund, ich hab mitbekommen das du Bilder in die RIK-Kategorien einsortiert hattest (Dankeschön!) und möchte dich deshalb auf das hier aufmerksam machen. LG --Nati aus Sythen (talk) 10:50, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Nati, ist mir gar nicht aufgefallen, dass ich da Kategorisierungen vorgenommen habe. Kannst Du mir ein Beispiel geben? --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:07, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- G´Morgen, hatte welche mit Catscan, letzte Änderungen, gefunden. Kann natürlich auch sein, das die Datenbasis spinnt, derzeit kann ich catscan gar nicht starten. Ist auch nix schlimmes mit dem Kategoriebaum zur RIK, ich will nur versuchen alle zusammen zu bringen. --Nati aus Sythen (talk) 05:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)