User talk:Martin Falbisoner/Archive 6 2018

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blue Penny Museum exterior, as seen from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support used & best in scope.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 21:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:17, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nara Park, November 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nara Park, November 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Iceland proposal

Hello Martin. I just received an invitation to contribute to the survey about the proposed Iceland Conference 2018. I didn’t know that the Commons Photographers User Group was planning this, but I fully support the idea and have submitted a response to the survey. When the CPUG was set up I did ask to be involved, but I see that the debate about who might attend Wikimania 2018 has not been widely circulated. Although I didn't know about the debate, I have independently applied for a scholarship myself. Best wishes Charles (talk) 10:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

• Hey Charles, I have to admit that I'm not really involved in planning the Iceland Conference. Unfortunately it seems I won't even be able to attend this great event... :-/ I suggest you talk to Frank. Cheers, --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

edit?

Hello Martin, thanks you for your support, but I don't understand your edit. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:12, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

• Oops, thanks for letting me know, Christian! Just some weird copy/paste error, sorry. I used that line on Diego's nom... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

ok, I know all about that kind of mistake me too. :) Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Portrait by unknown author.jpg

Hello. I recently proposed renaming the file "File:Portrait by unknown author.jpg" (current title). It appears finally however that the painting is indeed from Pierre Allais as originally claimed (although it certainly does not depict the person originally described): see [1]. So I think it could be renamed "File:Pierre Allais (1700-1782), Ritratto di signora.jpg". What do you think? Sapphorain (talk) 11:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Done, Sapphorain :-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wesseling Refinery at Dusk, March 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rheinland Raffinerie Wesseling as seen from N by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment interesting, but it will add by night to the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

•  Done —Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:39, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your support

Hello Martin, weird things going on at the FPC. First I saw your support for my photo, then it wasn't there anymore. Thank you anyway. Would you do me the favor to place it there again (with your comment of a tiny bit too few space above). I wonder what happened. Kind regards. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenbachhaus Munich Foster Extension, March 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But IMO minor JPEG artifacts. --XRay 10:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frauenkirche Munich, March 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and QI. But IMO DoF could be better (church not sharp enough) and minor JPEG artifacts. --XRay 10:24, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theatinerkirche Munich, March 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maximilianeum Munich at Night, March 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:37, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Munich Subway Station Oberwiesenfeld.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Munich Subway Station Oberwiesenfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:31, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lenbachhaus: Foster extension, worm's-eye view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Nice picture, used. Voltmetro 14:48, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment But I'm not sure this justifies a scope. Charles (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Frauenkirche, Munich as seen from N, taken atop Kardinal-Faulhaber-Straße 1.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of Theatinerkirche, Munich as seen from S, taken atop Kardinal-Faulhaber-Straße 1.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
West facade of the Maximilianeum as seen from W at blue hour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Amazing work, useful. Voltmetro 14:47, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Munich Subway Station Oberwiesenfeld -2.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Munich Subway Station Oberwiesenfeld -2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 09:45, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Munich Subway Station Oberwiesenfeld.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
U-Bahnhof Oberwiesenfeld: with incoming train.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - Is "long exposure" a useful sub-scope? I think long exposure photos are a useful scope and pictures of this U-Bahn station are a useful scope, but I don't really know if "long exposure photo of U-Bahn station" is a useful subcategory for a scope that focuses on the station as the main category, if you get my meaning. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

• good point, Ikan Kekek. I've changed the scope. "With incoming train" is a bit more specific. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Maximilianeum Munich at Night, March 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maximilianeum Munich at Night, March 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Frauenkirche Munich, March 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frauenkirche Munich, March 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lenbachhaus Munich Foster Extension, March 2018 -2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lenbachhaus Munich Foster Extension, March 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenbachhaus Munich Foster Extension, March 2018 -2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:KAS-Wiederaufbau-Bild-4-4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:KAS-Wiederaufbau-Bild-4-4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo Martin Falbisoner,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech (talk) April 2018

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kranhäuser Cologne, April 2018 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:35, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kranhäuser Cologne, April 2018 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:47, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kranhäuser Cologne, April 2018 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:34, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Theatinerkirche Munich, March 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Theatinerkirche Munich, March 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kranhaus, Rheinauhafen Cologne: panorama including Cologne Cathedral as seen from S by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Very beautiful picture; it would be good to include by night in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Done, Archaeodontosaurus --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:33, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kranhäuser Cologne, April 2018 -01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kranhäuser Cologne, April 2018 -01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Martin Falbisoner/common.js

Hi Martin Falbisoner, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Martin Falbisoner/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 3 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 17 character 6: Label 'User' on The statement. - Evidence: User:The Photographer/QICvote.js
2. ISSUE: line 17 character 9: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: User:The Photographer/QICvote.js
3. ISSUE: line 17 character 33: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: User:The Photographer/QICvote.js

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 10:04, 29 April 2018 (UTC).

Code issues in User:Martin Falbisoner/common.js

Hi Martin Falbisoner, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Martin Falbisoner/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 17 column 10: Unexpected identifier

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 10:04, 29 April 2018 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bayerisches Nationalmuseum Munich, April 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prinz-Carl-Palais Munich, April 2018 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prinz-Carl-Palais Munich, April 2018 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prinz-Carl-Palais Munich, April 2018 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:55, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lenbachhaus: Foster extension, worm's-eye view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support better Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Lenbachhaus Munich Foster Extension, March 2018.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope)
2. Lenbachhaus Munich Foster Extension, March 2018 -2.jpg: 1 <--
=>
File:Lenbachhaus Munich Foster Extension, March 2018.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:Lenbachhaus Munich Foster Extension, March 2018 -2.jpg: Promoted. <--

---- DeFacto (talk). 18:16, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prinz-Carl-Palais as seen from SE at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Prinz-Carl-Palais Munich, April 2018 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prinz-Carl-Palais Munich, April 2018 -02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bayerisches Nationalmuseum Munich, April 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bayerisches Nationalmuseum Munich, April 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bayerisches Nationalmuseum as seen from S at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Godorf Station at Dusk, May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:30, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Godorf Classification Yard at dusk as seen from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:49, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:20, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Godorf Station at Dusk, May 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Godorf Station at Dusk, May 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Scope

Hallo, wie die Vorschriften mich verpflichten. Ich informiere Sie, dass ich die Kategorie eines Bildes, für das Sie gewählt haben, geändert habe.
freundlich
Guten Tag

----

Scope changed from Category:Château de MorthemerCategory:Église Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption Morthemer (Valdivienne) to Category:Château de Morthemer --Picte (talk) 07:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Mayor de Santa Ana, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 19:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lopesan Baobab, Maspalomas, May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 19:45, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

zombies and Poooo9ooop

My dear Martin Falbisoner, thank you for reminding me by your revert, Difference between revisions of "File:Infinity Edge Pool, Mauritius.JPG" that no good deed goes unpunished. --Taterian (talk) 21:04, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

• Hey Taterian, ?? I just wanted to remove the remaining vandalism on that page... Thanks for helping clean up the mess (that I don't get at all by the way). It's just that some information was still missing and it appeared the easiest way to restore the last "stable" version... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC).
  • PS, Taterian, see here. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White Peacock, Palmitos Park, May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Common Bottlenose Dolphins, Palmitos Park, May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bald Eagle, Palmitos Park, May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Mogán, May 2018 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:30, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Mogán, May 2018 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Mogán, May 2018 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bandama Caldera, Gran Canaria, May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Path leading from Bandama Caldera, Gran Canaria, May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of San Juan Bautista, Arucas, May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The wall lamp left, which sits against the left tower. the photo can also be seen as over-worked. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 05:11, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Agüimes, May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. However, I think the whole image is leaning to the right. It may be just an effect of the growing range behind the city though --Podzemnik 00:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)  Comment the verticals are straight, so I guess it's the effect you mentioned --Martin Falbisoner 05:57, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plaza Mayor de Santa Ana as seen from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lopesan Baobab, Maspalomas, May 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lopesan Baobab, Maspalomas, May 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Infinity Pool Lopesan Costa Meloneras, May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cenobio de Valerón, May 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lopesan Baobab, Maspalomas, May 2018 -2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Maspalomas, May 2018 -1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Maspalomas, May 2018 -2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I want a Martin Falbisoner auto-promote-bot. --Granada 06:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion (selbst nachgetragen)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agüimes as seen from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Puerto de Mogán: panorama as seen from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lopesan Baobab, Maspalomas, May 2018 -3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:21, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro de Maspalomas, May 2018 -3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 07:54, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavo cristatus mut. alba (male display): head.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful picture - Voltmetro 21:53, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:White Peacock, Palmitos Park, May 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:White Peacock, Palmitos Park, May 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hotels in Maspalomas: Lopesan Baobab Resort as seen from E during Golden Hour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Picte (talk) 10:38, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langer Eugen, Bonn, June 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hotels in Maspalomas: Lopesan Baobab Resort as seen from E during Blue Hour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Sure, why not? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:02, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Langer Eugen: Detail of the facade as seen from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lopesan_Baobab,_Maspalomas,_May_2018_-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lopesan Baobab, Maspalomas, May 2018 -3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Langer Eugen, Bonn, June 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Langer Eugen, Bonn, June 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Puerto de Mogán, May 2018 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puerto de Mogán, May 2018 -02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympic Roof Munich, July 2018 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:35, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympic Village Munich, July 2018 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:07, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympic Village Munich, July 2018 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Podzemnik 00:35, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympic Roof Munich, July 2018 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:35, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Müllersches Volksbad Munich at Dusk, July 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GPSLeo 11:35, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympic Aquatic Center and Olympic Tower Munich, July 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GPSLeo 11:35, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasteig Munich at Dusk, July 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But I think there could be a higher resolution. --GPSLeo 11:35, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympic Roof Munich, July 2018 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:35, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Podzemnik, I've cropped the image significantly. I hope I've still got your support. --Martin Falbisoner 10:55, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of the Gasteig at dusk as seen from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support and here's why. In spite of VIS 1.5.3 In general, the VI for a building scope should be a daylight picture it also states if some part of the building is particularly worth of interest and just as scopes of different directional views are considered worthy of their own scope this is a fantastic picture on its own merits and is used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:54, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Olympic Roof Munich, July 2018 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olympic Roof Munich, July 2018 -02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Müllersches Volksbad at dusk as seen from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I've been off and on about this nomination for a couple days. I've landed on support. My rational is essentially the same as the other one; if some part of the building is particularly worth of interest and just as scopes of different directional views are considered worthy of their own scope this this shot should overcome In general, the VI for a building scope should be a daylight picture (although I agree generally with that provision.) -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Müllersches Volksbad Munich at Dusk, July 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Müllersches Volksbad Munich at Dusk, July 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yawning Infant, August 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:58, 6 August 2018 (UTC) Very nice image. But is it sharp enough? -- Spurzem 15:27, 6 August 2018 (UTC) It is sharp enough. Without a shallow dof the background wouldn't be as pleasant as it is --Martin Falbisoner 17:16, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yawning people: head shot of young infant.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good scope (the infant bit) and good image. Meets the criteria, and doesn't need to include geocoding info for privacy reasons. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Yawning Infant, August 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yawning Infant, August 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garzweiler surface mine, October 2018, -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:56, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garzweiler surface mine, October 2018, -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Garzweiler surface mine, October 2018, -01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garzweiler surface mine, October 2018, -01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

			* Happy Holidays 2019, Martin Falbisoner! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you, George, the same to you and yours! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:26, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

			* Happy Holidays 2019, Martin Falbisoner! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten! Glückliches Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- XRay talk 06:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

• Danke Dir, Dietmar - Dir ebenso! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:26, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

* Happy Holidays 2019, Martin Falbisoner! *

Joyeux Noël et tous mes vœux de bonne et heureuse année 2019. --Pierre André (talk) 09:37, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you, Pierre, the same to you and yours! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:26, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)

			* Happy Christmas time and all the best for 2019, Martin Falbisoner! *
			Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Joyeux Noël et bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом! Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком! ... :) -- Poco2 13:47, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

• Danke Dir! Dir und den Deinen ebenso, Diego! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)

			* Merry Christmas and all the best for 2019, Martin Falbisoner! *
			Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Joyeux Noël et bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом! Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком! ... :) Ermell (talk) 16:12, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

• Danke Dir Reinhold - ebenso schöne Weihnachten und guten Rutsch! —Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Black worn leather jacket detail 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Black worn leather jacket detail 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Your best shot 2018

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm wishing you all the best for the New Year and I hope you're going to have many memorable photo opportunities in 2019. With 2018 coming to an end, it's time to look back at the past 12 months. I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2018 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2018

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:29, 30 December 2018 (UTC)