User talk:Marcok

English: Welcome to the Commons, Marcok!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Serliana[edit]

A me paioni archi a tutto sesto a colonne binate... Una serliana è questa Image:Palazzo Te Mantova 2.jpg o questa Image:Diocletians mausoleum-Split.jpg.

Quando metti una serliana accanto all'altra hai una successione di archi a colonne binate, non di serliane :-) Non sono un esperto, ma io per serliana ho sempre sentito intendere un'apertura isolata, non una sequenza. Ovviamente posso sbagliarmi, cmq nel caso di dubbi, su Wikipedia si usa chiedere il parere di terze persone per dirimere la questione. Nessuno di noi è perfetto. Tu prova a chiedere ad altri che si occupano del progetto architettura, e vedi cosa ti dicono loro, e decidi di conseguenza. Se non se ne viene a capo, si può provare a chiedere al bar. Ciao. --User:G.dallorto 02:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decisione salomonica. Oltre tutto ho visto la galleria con le tue foto: decisamente di qualità molto alta. Complimenti. --User:G.dallorto 20:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chiesa[edit]

Ok, grazie! ;) --Ginosal (User talk) 21:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiraduno[edit]

Non mi ci si vedi proprio per nulla, perché sono mi sono convinto del fatto che il modello Wikipedia ha dei limiti molto più gravi per quanto riguarda la condivisione di testi che per quanto riguarda la condivisione di immagini, quindi lavoro su Commons. Ma l'idea di venire m'interessa, tanto più che l'incontro si svolge comodissimamente nella mia città. Purtroppo però il link che mi indichi è rotto. Ce ne è uno funzionante? Ciao. --User:G.dallorto 01:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Immagini videogiochi cancellati[edit]

Amministratore, perche' cavolo hai cancellato le immagini che avevo uploadato, eh?! Erano completamente free/gratis, scaricabili ed updabili da/su numerosi siti, quindi esigo l'immediato ripristino delle immagini.

User talk:Karl90 14.33, 8/02/2008

Image:VillaTrissinoFromQuatgtroLibri.svg[edit]

You are right, I just checked and it is the project of villa Mocenigo. (Two sources - quattri libri itself among them). I don't know where I got the missinformation from any more. The picture should be moved I suppose. Good catch. Thanks. Haros 15:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Jackson[edit]

But it was free image on flickr... So why ? Jamcib 20:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 4a7b74e0ecbafd56a7f31e941614ca6a[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Category:Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--84user (talk) 09:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Emo Fanzolo giardino retro 2009-07-18 f01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Textbook perspective. --Ferengi 11:26, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Emo Fanzolo fronte 2009-07-18 f05b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocca Malatestiana Cesena 2006 pano.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Mbdortmund 11:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Barbaro Maser viale 2009-07-18.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Question Can you add the camera location? -- H005 21:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info Added coordinates. --Marcok 07:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. -- H005 15:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tempio di Zeus Olimpo apr2005 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Ianare 13:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Emo Fanzolo loggia 2009-07-18 f02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good composition, you got the photogrphic feeling, but the camera doesn't provide crisp details here in full solution, sorry --Mbdortmund 20:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info uploaded a different version (Mbdortmund was right: I used a wrong filter); I restarted from the original and now the sharpness is much better. I revised also the composition, nearest to the original, with no crop (the columns were too heavy). --Marcok 23:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
better now --Mbdortmund 17:11, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Marino statua della libertà.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments composition is interesting --Mbdortmund 13:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Villa Pisani[edit]

I almost have an ok picture here: http://picasaweb.google.no/hans.a.rosbach/VillaPisani# Unfortunately I did not take yet another picture to the left. But next time :-) Haros (talk) 20:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. :-) Haros (talk) 12:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Pojana photo by Marcok 2009-08-08 n14 rect.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Acceptable sharpness, pleasing natural colours, good lighting. Could probably benefit from slight cropping the green foreground. -- Smial 23:07, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel del Monte giu06 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments interesting perspective --Ianare 19:49, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Thank you Marcok for promoting my Quality Picture Candidate and especially for your suggestions. Cheers, --Jcart1534 (talk) 03:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello09 apr06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition. --Jcart1534 02:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vicenza Basilica Palladiana 14-09-08 f07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition. -Jcart1534 02:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Contarini Piazzola by Marcok 2009-08-08 n01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice shot. It's OK. --Lestath 06:47, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Badoer Fratta Polesine facciata by Marcok 2009-08-16 n07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 15:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Contarini Piazzola by Marcok 2009-08-08 n02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. -Jcart1534 01:43, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Pojana photo by Marcok 2009-08-08 n09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Crop out the stairs and the grass patch and you have my vote. A more radical crop up to the sculpture's base gives interesting results but may not be everyone's cup of tea. Also needs slight curves adjustment, a bit too dark ATM --Vladanr 19:59, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you. Having a descriptive purpose, I would not like to cut off from image an element like the stairs, however it's only a particular. I'll upload another version following your suggestions and re-nominate. --Marcok 18:01, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info Re-uploaded with balanced levels and more sharp. --Marcok 18:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC) Comment Ok, I've looked at it on my new 22" screen. The JPG artifacting is more pronounced than it seemed to me before, sharpen filter made it worse. I've tried to edit it myself and I can improve sharpness somewhat, but there's far too much loss of detail on the lawns. I'm terribly sorry but I can't support in good faith :( --Vladanr 16:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can. :-) -- H005 17:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello07 apr06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me. --Berthold Werner 08:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Badoer Fratta Polesine facciata by Marcok 2009-08-16 n06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like the composition, but the noise reductin seems to be too strong? --Berthold Werner 09:14, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info Re-uploaded with milder contast, and balanced levels. The different versions may be compared with chronology. --Marcok 14:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Looks good. --Jcart1534 00:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello11 apr06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello08 apr06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Cayambe 08:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Te Mantova 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Cayambe 10:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Pisani Bagnolo wiki 2009-08-08 n14 rect.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello20 apr06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 14:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palladio pducale.JPG[edit]

Salve, what kind of source are you missing? The source is Palladio's book, the autor of the foto is me or my camera! Please be so kind and give a more detailed information. Salve, --Warburg (talk) 07:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Segnalazione[edit]

Ciao, scusami l'OT qui su Commons. Ti volevo solo segnalare questo tipo di modifica fatta a tappeto su tutte le voci "Nati il..." e "Morti il...".--Trixt (talk) 11:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization[edit]

Re: [1]:

What is the point of adding a category that is not in the hierarchy?
The English-language plural of "thief" is "thieves".

Jmabel ! talk 00:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, any text in a description is just as searchable as category text. The whole point of using categories is to hook something into the hierarchy. - Jmabel ! talk 21:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ma anche no dai, è solo un modellino --Sailko (talk) 18:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WELCOmE.jpg[edit]

Ciao, ho messo in cancellazione immediata questa immagine, in quanto evidentemente fair use: è uno screenshot da un videogame e come tale non può essere rilasciato in cc-by se non da chi ne detiene tutti i diritti.--Nanae (talk) 09:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chapels o Orartories?[edit]

Ciao, come credo tu ricordi mi sto divertendo con la fotografia e la categorizzazione di chiese, oratori, chiesette, cappelle, capitelli e via via verso il sempre più piccolo e popolare. Tralasciando gli ultimi mi trovo alle volte perplesso per la differenza che abbiamo in it.wiki tra it:Oratorio (architettura) e it:Cappella, presumo anche per l'"evoluzione" temporale degli edifici religiosi che negli anni hanno visto aggiungere a quelli a semplice pianta una serie nicchie laterali, vedi it:Cappella radiale, che sostanzialmente inglobavano i culti popolari per i vari santi all'interno dell'edificio religioso principale della zona, presumo per richiamare più facilmente i fedeli (se dico delle stupidaggini porta pazienza, correggimi, le mie sono solo deduzione logiche). Ritornando a noi qui in Commons abbiamo due categorie "italiane" IMHO sovrapponibili, la Category:Chapels in Italy e la Category:Oratories in Italy, che credo sia il caso di unificare in qualche modo, mi rimetto quindi alla tua cultura architettonica nel ragionare se una Cappella gentilizia di un palazzo o villa padronale (vedi File:Villa Pisani Montagnana by Marcok 2009-08-08 f03.jpg) sia da considerare o l'una cosa o l'altra o, come io credo, si debbano infilare nella stessa categoria mettendo un disclamer multilingua in testa alla cat per far capire agli utenti di lingua straniera che in Italia la definizione è simile e/o sovrapponibile alle loro "Chapels" create magari con un altro iter religioso. Tra l'altro, come credo tu ben sappia per aver parlato con i responsabili dei Beni culturali delle diocesi, negli annuari diocesani queste sono indicate come oratori, cosa che aumenta la confusione dell'utente non esperto che si approccia al problema. Che ne pensi? Scusa del pippone, se ti va si potrebbe anche ragionarne per altre vie telematiche (un sms e ti chiamo). :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 10:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, altra carne al fuoco ;-) Così ho una cat, Category:Churches in Costa di Rovigo dove si può trovare la qualunque, la chiesa parrocchiale Category:San Giovanni Battista (Costa di Rovigo)‎, la ex chiesa parrocchiale prima della riunificazione, ora considerata oratorio Category:San Rocco (Costa di Rovigo), una cappella gentilizia di un palazzo rurale ora scomparso Category:Oratorio di Ca' Michiel (Costa di Rovigo) (nella cat degli interni si vede l'accesso murato riservato ai proprietari), un classico oratorio/cappella campestre (che nell'Emilia-Romagna settentrionale chiamano chiesolini) Category:Madonna della Salute (Colombano, Costa di Rovigo) e più di un oratorio popolare Category:San Giovanni Decollato, detto San Giovannino (Costa di Rovigo), per non parlare del sacello ai caduti ex oratorio Category:Oratorio Santa Maria Assunta (Costa di Rovigo). Mi sa che ho fatto filotto, manca altro? :-)))))--Threecharlie (talk) 11:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ancora sull'architettura religiosa[edit]

Ti chiedo una nuova cortesia benché presumo non esista una netta differenza tra i termini: resto ancora dubbioso sull'attribuzione di una foto ad un it:Abside, qui Category:Apses, ed un it:Presbiterio, forse perché popolarmente è chiamato abside anche la parte interna della chiesa che occupa il retro dell'altare maggiore, almeno nelle strutture non rotonde. dato che mi trovo in difficoltà potresti per cortesia fornirmi degli esempi eclatanti in modo da non potermi confondere?. Grazie ancora :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 17:44, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Porta pazienza se non è argomento commonaro...[edit]

...ma mi riesce più facile arrivare a te da qui. Visti i recenti scambi di idee mi sarebbe molto utile (ma sarebbe utile a tutta ala comunità) una traduzione da qui inserendola come è ovvio come sottopagina di quel wikiprogetto in lingua italiana ma che sarebbe fondamentale linkare anche qui in Commons, inoltre l'immagine della pianta della chiesa divisa per "settori" è intuitiva e non abbisogna di faticose traduzioni e discussioni multilingua. Sai chi se ne potrebbe occupare? Grazie :-)))--Threecharlie (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Marcok,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 20:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File tagging File:Pierson's Puppeteer.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pierson's Puppeteer.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pierson's Puppeteer.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AVRS (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiGita[edit]

Ciao Marco, qui trovi alcune foto scattate da me oggi, se utili per il futuro o una breve gallery sulla WikiGita. --Pottercomuneo (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vista panoramica[edit]

Ciao Marco, Grazie per l'informazione; la cosa un po' mi stupisce e un po' mi fa arrabbiare, ma soprattutto mi pone tante domande.

Che cosa significa architettura contemporanea? L'età contemporanea - in storia - inizia con la rivoluzione francese ma, al fine di cui parliamo, il periodo è più ristretto? Ad esempio, le immagini del cimitero maggiore, costruito nella prima metà dell'ottocento, possono essere pubblicate? Oppure, per restare alla pagina del borgo Berga, quelle dell'ex Gil o dell'Istituto Fogazzaro, degli anni trenta del novecento?
Che cosa si intende per architettura? Soltanto le opere di un certo rilievo come quelle che mi hai citato, oppure anche modeste costruzioni? Qualsiasi costruzione al giorno d'oggi ha un progettista.
Parliamo solo di nuove costruzioni o anche di restauri?
Non si possono pubblicare soltanto se la costruzione è il contenuto esclusivo o principale dell'immagine, oppure anche quando ne rappresenta soltanto una parte?
La cosa vale anche per i monumenti, ad esempio quello di Neri Pozza sul ponte San Paolo e la fontana di piazza delle poste?

A questo punto, che faccio: cancello le immagini? Intanto ti ringrazio e a presto Claudio

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

⧼Wikibase-terms/Marcok⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Marcok,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete[edit]

Hello, please delete photo "Fuck You", thank you.---Gaard van der Pol (talk) 22:51, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dato che sei del mestiere...[edit]

Ciao, mi potresti dare una mano nel capire cosa in lingua inglese è più adatto a definire un porticato, "porches in..." o "arcades in..."? Vedo che (sembra) venga indifferentemente usato uno o l'altro termine ma se anche fossero equivalenti sarebbe, per evitare che "categorizzatori seriali" come me impazziscano, da uniformare le categorie ad un singolo termine, che ne dici? Aspetto news :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 13:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hope no one minds my weighing in on someone else's talk page, but in English a "porch" and an "arcade" are entirely different. A "porch" is raised above ground level; an "arcade" is at ground level or perhaps one step above. A "porch" is mainly a place for sitting; an "arcade" is mainly a place for walking, and may even extend straight through a building, where as a "porch" is strictly along the edge of the building. - Jmabel ! talk 16:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Jmabel: , help me for understand, therefore in Category:Porches in Emilia-Romagna the only porch is File:Piazza Santa Fara - Bobbio.JPG?--Threecharlie (talk) 23:04, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'd say so. I might call even that one an "arcade" (in a different sense of the word than I was thinking of above) because it is composed of a series of arches. But it is the only one I would call a porch. - Jmabel ! talk 00:15, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ancora sulle vere da pozzo[edit]

Ciao, ho visto gli spostamenti e ti ringrazio, però ancora non mi è chiara la sovrapposizione tra Water wells e Well heads, dove alle volte vedo "Water well heads" che forse è una forzatura e non è corretto. Dimmi se il ragionamento fila... in teoria dove c'è una vera da pozzo c'è anche un pozzo, quindi sempre in teoria si dovrebbero creare due categoiria "parallele" dove infilare le immagini, una perché legata all'architettura come elemento architettonico (la vera), l'altra legata all'idrauilica e alla distriubuzione delle acque (potabili o meno) di risorgiva o reflue. In pratica però, e scusa il sofismo derivato dall'attività su altre categorie artiustiche, se una vera da pozzo si trova in un museo è chiaro che non c'è anche il pozzo, inoltre potrebbe resistere la vera in una posizione dove una volta vi era realmente un pozzo ma al momento (dello scatto) era secco o interrato, o contaminato, o comunque che non ha più la medesima funzione... Morale, limitiamo le categorie all'effettivo soggetto dello scatto (la vera) e non a quello che ne è collegato (il pozzo)? Una similitudine mi viene con gli antichi acquedotti romani che, mi risulta, in qualche raro caso ancora vedono scorrere acqua che però dubito sia effettivamente utilizzata a scopi idraulici. Che ne dici? Scusa per la pedanteria :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 07:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Copyright by Wikimedia Italia[edit]

Hi Marcok! I noticed that you've uploaded a few files tagged with {{Copyright by Wikimedia Italia}}. Specifically:

I'm afraid the wording of this template is not consistent with our licensing policy. Our licensing policy requires all content on Commons to be free. There used to be one single exception from that, which was that non-free content was allowed if the copyright was held by the Wikimedia Foundation. However, that exception has been removed from the policy (after the Wikimedia Foundation finally joined the free content movement), and more importantly: the exception never applied to Wikimedia chapters, which are legally independent of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Could you please review the licensing of these files? Given that the Wikimedia Foundation has released its logos under a free license, is there any content in the files mentioned above which the Wikimedia Italia chapter or any other contributor can claim copyright over and does not wish to release under a free license?

Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 19:51, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, LX. ~~I'll modify~~ I have fixed the tags. --Marcok (talk) 20:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Immagine poster[edit]

Ciao Marcok, ho inserito l'immagine del poster sul sito del film a questo indirizzo https://stayhuman.tv/production/?lang=it completa di loghi CC BY-SA 4.0

Ho inviato l'immagine a questo indirizzo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard

L'immagine ora è a questo indirizzo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Restiamo_Umani_-_The_Reading_Movie_-_POSTER.jpg

Ce l'ho fatta oppure c'è ancora qualcosa che non va? Se c'è qualcosa che non va puoi per favore aiutarmi a risolvere questa situazione per me impossibile da risolvere? Grazie --Utente23 (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos of Barletta Colossus[edit]

Dear User Marcok,

my name is Stefan E. A. Wagner, I am Archaeologist from Germany. At the moment, I am writing a scientific essay about the Barletta Colossus and I urgently need some pics of this statue.

I would use it for scientific publishing only. NO commercial use. I saw on Wikimedia, that you are a very good and clear fotographer, so I would feel very honored, if you could imagine to give me some pics for publication. Of course I would cite you as the photographer and you also would get a free version of my essay, if it will be published.

Please answer me on the following E-Mail-adress:

drakkenree@googlemail.com

Thanks and best regards,

Stefan E. A. Wagner — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ardipithecus (talk • contribs) 13:27, 2 March 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti

Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno.

Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione.
Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link.
La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST.

Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento
Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-)

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste

Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parco Querini Vicenza tempietto settembre 2012 by Marcok f02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK for me. --C messier 14:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa Misericordia Vicenza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 en France, 22 September 2016[edit]

Votre photo « Chateau de Villandry 3 sept 2016 f11.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 22 September 2016.

Cordialement, Lundi Novembre (talk) 12:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mi fai una cortesia?[edit]

Molto tentato nel spostare massivamente il contenuto di Category:Cupolas in Italy in Category:Domes in Italy (anche se in realtà a una prima occhiata sembrerebbero tutte chiese da cui Category:Church domes in Italy), dato che le categorie delle altre cupole per nazioni contengono effettivamente un'altra tipologia di infrastruttura/elemento architettonico posso sfruttare le tue conoscenze per vedere se c'è da salvare qualcosa oppure spostare tutto? Scusa per la rogna, so che ci vuole tempo...--Threecharlie (talk) 11:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Threecharlie: In effetti non capisco: la voce en:Cupola sembrerebbe corrispondere a it:Lanterna (architettura) (tanto che la voce è stata proposta per l'unione con en:Roof lantern). Dunque in teoria Category:Cupolas in Italy andrebbe unito non a Category:Domes in Italy ma a Category:Lanterns (architecture), d'altro canto esiste anche Category:Lanterns (architecture).... Non ci capisco più nulla. È meglio allargare la discussione prima di fare unioni, direi... --Marcok (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ecco come diavolo si chiama in architettura la... lanterna!!! A chi la si potrebbe allargare? Mai vorrei che arrivasse in mano a qualche ignorante, in senso letterale, che senza avere aperto mai un libro di architettura in vita sua sostenga che "ha ragione", comunque sia, assodato che quelle ritratte nelle foto non sono lanterne ma cupole nella loro interezza (sarebbe come categorizzare la foto di un'automobile mettendoci anche (o solo) quella delle ruote) se una volta accennata la discussione poi stagna io provvedo a spostare e pace. Intanto grazie per la consulenza ;-)--Threecharlie (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mi permetto di pingare anche @DenghiùComm: per conoscenza :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 20:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Avete controllato nella en:WP le voci delle relative parole? --DenghiùComm (talk) 05:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DenghiùComm and Threecharlie: C'è questa corrispondenza: voci su en.wiki: en:Cupola e en:Roof lantern (proposte per il merge) - categorie corrispondenti su Commons: Category:Cupolas e Category:Lanterns (architecture) (IMHO da unire) - voce in italiano unica it:Lanterna (architettura). Personalmente aspetterei che vengano unite le 2 voci nella en.wiki, poi si potrebbe fare la stessa cosa con le categorie di Commons. --Marcok (talk) 09:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chissà, forse ne hai idea...[edit]

Ciao, dato che è territorio tuo, riusciresti a risalire alla chiesa dove è esposta questa pala, vedi Category:Jacopo Apollonio? Qui dove hanno trovato le immagini, grazie :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 08:24, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Threecharlie: Tutto quello che so è in it:San Nazario (Italia) (non è proprio vicina dato che è in Valsugana). Su Commons c'è solo la Category:San Nazario (comune, Italy). La parrocchia è intitolata ai Santi Nazario e Celso martiri [2] anche la chiesa, provvedo a sistemare le categorie. --Marcok (talk) 09:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 09:22, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Questa invece sì...[edit]

Rieccomi, problema simile a quello precedente. OpenStreetMap mi geolocalizza alcune immagini by Panoramio, alcune le ho categorizzzate, altre ancora da categorizzare, come Villa Saraceno detta palazzo delle Trombe a Category:Finale (Agugliaro) quando vedo altri scatti, sempre di Via Finale, geolocalizzati in una struttura vicina che fa riferimento alla pagina it:Villa Saraceno (opera tua del 2008). Puoi dare un'occhiata? Grazie :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 04:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Castello di Chenonceau : nome sbagliato[edit]

Ciao Marcok. Le tue fotografie qui sotto sono quelli del castello di Azay-le-Rideau e non quelli del castello di Chenonceau. Cordiali saluti. LIONEL76 (talk) 19:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nome sbagliato : castello di Chenonceau → castello di Azay-le-Rideau

Français : Bonjour Marcok. Vos photographies ci-dessus sont celles du château d'Azay-le-Rideau et non celles du château de Chenonceau. Cordialement. LIONEL76 (talk) 19:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English: Good morning Marcok. Your photographs above are those of the castle of Azay-le-Rideau and not those of the castle of Chenonceau. cordially. LIONEL76 (talk) 19:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non tutti i pavimenti sono floors o no?[edit]

Ciao, domanda tecnico-linguistica: questa pavimentazione, forse esterna alla villa in questione, e che ho trovato in più di un'aia deve essere categorizzata solo in Category:Floors in Italy (o in Veneto)?--Threecharlie (talk) 08:53, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Threecharlie: Credo che floor sia usato soprattutto per i pavimenti interni. In questo caso mi pare che creare la categoria "Brick pavements in Italy" da mettere all'interno di Category:Pavements in Italy potrebbe essere la soluzione migliore. --Marcok (talk) 08:38, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vicenza[edit]

Vi ringrazio per le tue correzioni sulle didascalie delle mie immagini di Vicenza. Cercherò di ricordare tutto perché non ho finito. Bravo per il tuo impegno. Sei un wipikedien esemplare. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mi dispiace dargli tanto lavoro, l'ortografia è difficile per me qualunque sia la lingua, sono dislessica pesante. Cerco di catturarmi facendo buone fotografie, ma per l'ortografia sono un "terrorista". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Archaeodontosaurus: Nessun problema, WikiCommons è pieno di immagini con titoli sgrammaticati ;) L'importante è il contenuto delle foto. Complimenti per tutte le foto che carichi e per l'ordine meticoloso con cui le inserisci nelle categorie. --Marcok (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RICHIESTA INFORMAZIONI[edit]

CIAO SONO svemma.32 NON HO CAPITO QUALI SONO I CODICI CHE MANCANO E CHI LI DEVE INSERIRE. NON HO CAPITO INOLTRE COSA DEVO FARE PERCHE' LE MIE FOTO PARTECIPINO AL CONCORSO. CIAO ASPETTO UNA TUA RISPOSTA GRAZIE.

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Architetto Sebastiano Locati (1862-1939).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Architetto Sebastiano Locati (1862-1939).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronhjones: You tagged many images with a source provided. Most of the images were imported from it.wiki. You also tagged many images of monuments authorised for Wiki Loves Monumnets (where ALL monuments are authorised). But you also tagged as copyviol my own works, and I find it not acceptable for Commons:AGF. Please remove unnecessary tags and be careful. --Marcok (talk) 07:49, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They were correctly tagged as a derivative works. There is no link to show they are PD, or a death date of the creator, or who the creator is - you cannot claim a 70 years after author dies, unless you show us the author and death date. Italian wiki might allow such omissions, but commons needs to be able to check that the license is valid for both the country of origin and the US. Also I note there are no licenses for the US in the images - that is another reason that could cause deletion. {{PD-100}} does not include licensing for the US. They need to be changed to an appropriate license in COM:TAG. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:15, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronhjones: Sorry, but most images you tagged are already with sources, and almost all are so old they are clearly out of copyright. For example File:Antiquitatum_variarum_volumina_XVII_pagina.jpg. Sometimes the sources are in the description field (it happens importing old images). You also tagged many Wiki Loves Monuments images I personally shoot (probably ignoring that ALL WLM-Italy monuments were previosuly authorized, even if there was a clear link to follow!). And so on. This means you apparently didn't spent any time to analyze - or even watch - every single image before tagging them. I'm a long-running Commons user and also an admin in it.wiki, but during the last 15 years till now I newer saw a such behaviour. As a GLAM WiR I imported - or helped importing - thousands images, also using other usernames. When an image can be easily fixed (like most images you previously listed), every Commons user generally helps fixing it. And all images will be fixed... if you leave enough time to Commons users. So I'm very sorry for the lack of collaboration. I think this doesn't create a good environment, expecially for new users. --Marcok (talk) 14:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of files there where you are assuming that the image is past 70 years photographer's death, and you state "unknown". That is obviously very wrong. If it is truly unknown and the country is 70pma, then it has to be pre 1898 and use both {{PD-old-assumed}} + {{PD-1923}}. Just a quick look shows quite a few in the 1900-1920 region - you cannot guarantee they are PD, unless you can show the creator's death. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 14:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlexanderPopovic.jpg[edit]

File:AlexanderPopovic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:40, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili[edit]

Gentile Marcok, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again![edit]

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso![edit]

English | Italiano | +/−

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Marcok,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Marcok,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Foto pagina Eugenio Soncini[edit]

Ciao Marcok, non sono sicuro che questa sia la procedura migliore per comunicare con te. Spero di non fare casino. Potresti per favore suggerirmi come procedere? Le foto sono scannerizzazioni delle foto dell'archivio Soncini eseguite prima che l'archivio fosse donato al CASVA dagli eredi (cioè da me). Le foto furono scattate da professionisti (di alcuni ho il nome) su incarico di Eugenio Soncini che le ha regolarmente acquistate. Dunque i diritti erano suoi e sono passati a me. Ecco perché ho dichiarato che sono mie. Non è corretto? Cosa dovrei dichiarare? Grazie dell'aiuto. --Magneaz (talk) 10:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bain collection[edit]

@Fæ: I see you are tagging the Bain collection files for deletion because a jpg and a tif exist of the same file. The standard procedure has been to save both, and link one to the other. See for example: File:Prince Henry LCCN2014712471.jpg, the outliers are an artifact from migrating and renaming the images prior to User:Fae migrating the entire collection and using a standardized naming scheme, so they link automatically. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 20:10, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vos photos à Versailles[edit]

Bonjour,

1/ La référence Mérimée que vous avez indiqué est erronée (IA00027727, Parc de chasse du château de Versailles dit Grand Parc/Gran parco di caccia di Luigi XIV).

2/ Dans le champ “Description”, on ne met pas une référence Mérimée, mais une description.

Salutations --Thor19 (talk) 09:14, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Thor19: Merci pour la clarification. Mais l'objet de la modification doit toujours être explicatif. Et il n'est pas clair pourquoi les coordonnées géographiques sont également supprimées. --Marcok (talk) 10:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Monti by city[edit]

Ciao, avendo appena scovato un'errata attribuzione di una foto di Monti di una chiesa, ho utilizzato il {{Monti by city}} nella nuova Category:Historical images of Mola di Bari by Paolo Monti ma ho notato che invece di puntare a Category:Historical images of Mola di Bari punta direttamente a Category:Mola di Bari. Dato che ci hai già messo le mani più volte ed è un po' complesso, potresti fare in modo che punti a quella categoria più coerente, così da infilarla in Category:Historical images of Italy by city, invece di quella "madre"? Se non hai tempo/voglia ci provo io, basta un fischio :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 12:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao @Threecharlie: Il template funziona correttamemente, ha solo un "problema": categorizza correttamente solo dopo qualche ora/giorno (quando è stata aggiornata la cache del server, credo). Funziona ovviamente solo se esiste la categoria madre, per cui facciamo così: provvisoriamente inserisco la categoria manualmente per poter giustificare la categoria madre (che altrimenti risulterebbe vuota nell'immediato e verrebbe messa in cancellazione). Pingo anche @Spinoziano (BEIC): perché gli capiterà ancora di trovare casi simili in futuro. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 08:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France ![edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Foto chiesa e comune dubbio[edit]

Ciao! Cavolo... mi ero confuso... quella raffigurata è in effetti la chiesa di "Marciaga", "Marzana" è un'altra... ho sbagliato il nome! Che stupido... --Adert (talk) 13:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gabrielle Ray (before 1973) - Archivio Storico Ricordi FOTO002691.jpg[edit]

File:Gabrielle Ray (before 1973) - Archivio Storico Ricordi FOTO002691.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Мельников Мадина (talk) 09:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Marche è iniziato: partecipa anche tu![edit]

Ciao Marcok,

ho visto che hai contribuito a Wiki Loves Monuments. Se ti va, carica qualche foto anche per il concorso locale Wiki Loves Marche (pubblicità progresso).

Tanto per far gola al concorso nazionale, quest'anno abbiamo premi da favola: ti anticipo soltanto che la premiazione avverrà sabato 7 gennaio 2023, alle 17 al Castello di Gradara. Il resto lo lascio alla tua fantasia.

Coraggio, prendi la tua macchina fotografica, il tuo smartphone o quel che vuoi, e carica foto come se non ci fosse un domani!

Grazie e a presto,
Giacomo Alessandroni ^{What's up!} 15:34, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per aver partecipato a WLM Italia 2022[edit]

Grazie per aver contribuito con le tue fotografie all'edizione 2022 di Wiki Loves Monuments. La pregiuria ha selezionato le foto finaliste tra cui saranno scelti i vincitori: Castelli, Monumenti. La cerimonia di premiazione si terrà sabato 3 dicembre a Formigine: se sei interessato a partecipare segui gli aggiornamenti sulla pagina dell'evento.--Ysogo (talk) 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)[reply]

Thank you for having contributed with your pictures to the 2022 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments - Italy. The prejury has selected the finalist pictures among which the winners will be chosen: Fortifications, Tradional contest. The awards ceremony will be hold in Formigine on Saturday December 3rd: if you are keen to join, follow the updates on the page of the event.--Ysogo (talk) 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC) This message has been delivered through Global message delivery system)[reply]

Inaugurazione mostra "Wiki Loves Monuments Veneto 2022"[edit]

Buongiorno Marcok,

sono Matteo Zaffonato, Coordinatore Regionale OpenStreetMap per il Veneto di Wikimedia Italia.

La contatto per ringraziarla di aver partecipato al concorso in oggetto e per avvisarla che la mostra "Wiki Loves Monuments Veneto 2022" verrà inaugurata il giorno 18 novembre alle ore 17 presso il complesso Santa Caterina in via Cesare Battisti 241 a Padova. Noi giurati gradiremo se potesse essere presente quel giorno.

Se volesse partecipare all'evento le chiedo gentilmente di confermare la sua presenza tramite questa pagina: Wikipedia:Raduni/Premiazione Wiki Loves Monuments Veneto 2022

Può trovare maggiori notizie riguardante l'evento qui.

Cordiali saluti
Matteo Zaffonato (talk) 17:35, 15 November 2022 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)[reply]

Premiazione e mostra fotografica di Wiki Loves Puglia 2022[edit]

Grazie di aver partecipato a Wiki Loves Puglia 2022. Vorrei informarti che la premiazione del concorso regionale si terrà il 10 dicembre alle 18:00 presso la Sala del Colonnato del Palazzo della Città metropolitana di Bari (Lungomare Nazario Sauro 27). Contestualmente verrà inaugurata la mostra fotografica delle edizioni 2020, 2021 e 2022 che rimarrà esposta fino all’8 gennaio 2023 e poi girerà per le città della Puglia, tra cui Brindisi (a seguire, dal 14 febbraio al 14 marzo 2023 presso il Palazzo Granafei-Nervegna). Ulteriori informazioni nella pagina di raduno. Ti aspetto per scoprire insieme le foto che hanno vinto questa edizione del concorso! --Ferdi2005 _(msg) 17:29, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Toscana[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'edizione 2022 di Wiki Loves Monuments ha concluso giorni fa il suo processo selettivo.

Quest'anno non abbiamo segnalato in corso d'opera perché abbiamo avuto delle metriche di adesione molto più alte rispetto agli ultimi anni, quindi incentivare il caricamento sarebbe stato controproducente per i partecipanti più occasionali. Probabilmente il prossimo anno ci sarà un calo fisiologico, e conviene pertanto preparare i vostri scatti per il 2023.

I semifinalisti, come ogni edizione, sono invitati alla cerimonia di premiazione che quest'anno si terrà nel tardo pomeriggio di sabato 28 gennaio p.v. a Montespertoli (FI) presso il Museo della Vite e del Vino.

Qui i risultati finali, che saranno annunciati a breve sui canali sociali. Seguite quelli per ulteriori aggiornamenti.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

WikiToscana

Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

toscanawiki

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2022 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2022 #WLM2022

Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Marcok,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Giovanni Antonio Fasolo[edit]

Giovanni Antonio Fasolo has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Adamant1 (talk) 16:59, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Immagine per ICAR[edit]

Ciao, scusa se ti scrivo sul tuo account personale ma non sono sicura che guardi ancora quello professionale del progetto. Ti volevo segnalare che sono in cancellazione varie foto della BNC di Roma, una delle mie è molto usata nelle pagine del progetto ICAR, magari preferisci sostituirla per tempo con un'altra senza avvisi. Buon wiki,--Pạtạfisik 08:38, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Patafisik Ciao, grazie per l'avviso. Ho visto che c'era una autorizzazione per WLM anche se scaduta, quindi ho proposto di salvare le foto (ma non la tua purtroppo). Marcok (talk) 08:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, ero troppo in anticipo sui tempi! XD Pạtạfisik 08:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 è iniziato: partecipa anche tu![edit]

Buongiorno Marcok,

ricevi questo messaggio perché in passato hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia o Wiki Loves Earth Italia.

Anche quest’anno torna Wiki Loves Monuments: da oggi al 30 settembre puoi partecipare caricando le tue foto per contribuire a illustrare il patrimonio culturale italiano: vai sul sito wikilovesmonuments.it e scopri come fare!

Oltre ai 20.000 monumenti già in concorso, quest’anno si aggiungono più di 60.000 edifici religiosi, tema centrale di quest’edizione. Prendi la tua macchina fotografica, o il tuo smartphone, e individua i monumenti in concorso tramite la nuova web-app – disponibile sia da mobile che desktop – app.wikilovesmonuments.it, da cui potrai anche caricare direttamente i tuoi scatti. Sono ammesse anche foto scattate prima del concorso, purché siano inedite.

A livello nazionale verranno premiate le dieci migliori fotografie: cinque per gli edifici religiosi e cinque per le altre categorie di monumenti; queste immagini parteciperanno anche alla fase internazionale del concorso. Non sono ammesse immagini con watermark o cornici, né fotografie eccessivamente elaborate in postproduzione. Qui puoi consultare Il regolamento completo e per qualsiasi dubbio puoi scrivere a contatti@wikilovesmonuments.it.

In bocca al lupo e buon divertimento! --Ysogo(talk) 05:0, 1 September 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Ritorna Wiki Loves Puglia anche nel 2023![edit]

Ciao, ti scrivo perché in passato hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments con fotografie della Puglia. Ritorna anche quest'anno, per la quinta edizione, il concorso regionale di Wiki Loves Monuments dedicato alla Puglia: Wiki Loves Puglia. A partire da quest'anno partecipano anche tutte le chiese e gli edifici religiosi; c'è anche un'altra novità: le fotografie verranno caricate su Wikimedia Commons attraverso la nuova app del concorso. Vorrei invitarti a partecipare anche quest'anno con le tue fotografie della regione entro il 30 settembre! Inoltre, abbiamo in programma ben 13 wikigite in diversi comuni pugliesi, compresa un'editathon a Brindisi il 9 settembre. Ti aspetto! Grazie, --Ferdi2005 _(talk) 10:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per aver partecipato a WikiLovesMonuments 2023 - Italia[edit]

_{(English version available here)}

Ciao Marcok, grazie per aver partecipato all’edizione italiana di Wiki Loves Monuments 2023!

È stato un anno da record, con oltre 52.000 immagini caricate su Wikimedia Commons, di cui già 2.800 utilizzate sui progetti Wikimedia (numero destinato ad aumentare). Stiamo davvero documentando il patrimonio culturale italiano insieme!

In attesa del risultato dei lavori di selezione delle fotografie da parte delle giurie, ti chiediamo di dedicarci pochi minuti del tuo tempo per rispondere a un breve questionario (anonimo), che ci aiuterà a fare ancora meglio il prossimo anno: link al sondaggio sul limesurvey di Wikimedia Italia

Grazie ancora. --Ysogo(talk) 21:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)[reply]

Your opinion about OpenRefine and its Wikimedia Commons features: two (!) surveys[edit]

Hi! You have recently tried/used Wikimedia Commons features in OpenRefine (uploading files, or editing existing files). I'm curious to hear how this has gone, also if you only briefly tried these features.

To help the OpenRefine team with future improvements, it would be immensely helpful if you would be willing to spend a bit of time filling in two surveys. (Yes, two! Each of them uses a different method and (open source) platform). Both will run until approximately end October 2023.

A first, classical, survey (fully anonymous) where you can tell us how you use the Commons features in OpenRefine, and how you (want to) learn to use them better;
A second, more experimental survey (also fully anonymous) in which you prioritize the features that matter most to you. This second survey is a bit strange in that you can 'just keep clicking'. Feel free to use it as long or as briefly as you want; you can stop any time. Please also add your own suggestions!

Many thanks! With kind regards, SFauconnier (talk) 10:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Premiazione Wiki Loves Puglia 2023 - 15 dicembre 2023[edit]

Ciao, ti scrivo perché hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Puglia 2023. Sono lieto di invitarti alla premiazione del concorso fotografico che si terrà il 15 dicembre 2023 alle 17:00 presso l'Aula Magna "Aldo Cossu" dell'Ateneo dell'Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro". Inoltre, il 4 gennaio 2024 alle 18:00 inaugureremo la mostra fotografica del concorso presso il Centro Polifunzionale Studenti Ex Palazzo delle Poste dell'Università degli Studi di Bari e rimarrà esposta fino al 31 gennaio 2024 (orari 08:30 - 20:30 lunedì - venerdi; 08:30 - 18:00 sabato; 09:00 - 16:30 domenica). Ti aspetto il 15 dicembre! --Ferdi2005 _(talk) 19:03, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Toscana[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'edizione 2023 di Wiki Loves Monuments si è conclusa.

Lo scorso anno non avevamo segnalato l'inizio del concorso perché abbiamo avuto delle metriche di adesione più alte rispetto agli ultimi anni, quindi incentivare il caricamento sarebbe stato controproducente per i partecipanti più occasionali.

Anche quest'anno l'adesione è stata alta (anzi nettamente più alta), probabilmente perché c'erano molte foto di chiese (la novità di quest'anno) negli archivi dei partecipanti storici e per questo non è stato inviato un messaggio durante settembre, mantenendo la strategia di massimizzare la promozione durante gli anni di minore partecipazione.

I finalisti son stati nel frattempo selezionati e annunciati. Qui troverete il riepiligo con i vincitori. Continuate a seguire i nostri canali social per ulteriori informazioni riguardanti la cerimonia di premiazione, che avrà luogo a Piombino nei prossimi mesi. Tutti i semifinalisti sono cordialmente invitati a partecipare.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

WikiToscana

Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

toscanawiki

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2023 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2023 #WLM2023

Inviato da Alexmar983 usando MediaWiki message delivery

Category:World_War_III[edit]

World War III has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 06:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Toscana - Premiazione[edit]

Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

L'edizione 2023 di Wiki Loves Monuments si concluderà a breve con la cerimonia regionale.

I semifinalisti, come ogni edizione, sono invitati alla cerimonia di premiazione che quest'anno si terrà dalle 16:00 alle 18:00 di sabato 16 marzo p.v. a Piombino (LI) nella sala consiliare.

Come sempre, si consiglia di seguire i canali sociali.

per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista

Per informazioni:

toscanawikimedia.it

WikiToscana

Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

toscanawiki

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2023 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2023 #WLM2023

Alexmar983 tramite --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]