User talk:Luigi Chiesa/archivio

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colonne distillazione.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


Riferimento all'immagine per la licenza[edit]

L'immagine http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/Logo_Caver.JPG l'ho presa da questo sito www.oggiogno.it e modificata come la vedi. Ma non so neanche a chi rivolgermi per chiedere l'autorizzazione. --Skull Andrea 21:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Allora vuol dire che la cancellero' anche se mi sembrava bello riportare lo stemma in quanto fa da collegamento a "CAVER" che significa "Capra" che ne rappresenta il paese. Un'altra cosa. Mi son trovato questa scritta nella mia discussione: Image:Torchio del 1742.jpg You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. --Panther 07:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


A me sembrava di averla sistemata a dovere. Prova a dare un'occhiata. La foto l'ho scattata io quindi non ci sono problemi di licenza. Fammi sapere e se vuoi sitemarla tu, te ne sarei grato. Ciao e grazie. --Skull Andrea 22:35, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chiodi quadri.jpg[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiodi quadri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--Pko 07:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orobica... che fu?[edit]

Ciao! ho visto la "chiamata ai fotografi" e poi ho seguito saltellando di link in link; forse qualche fotolina la posso fare, ma ho un amico che sicuramente ne può fare molte e migliori delle mie; certo però almeno il "credit" lo vorrà... tu ne sai qualcosa? Però intanto mi sono chiesto : che cosa significa galleria "orobica"? E' qualcosa che ha a che fare con quella precisa zona geografica che tratti tu?

Io credo che sia io che il tipo che conosco si possa fornire foto soprattutto di altre zone... che si fa? Su Commons? E per ogni foto bisogna spedire qualche certificato firmato da qualche parte? Come funzia? Non darmi un link, ti prego... ho seguito parecchio ma sono sicuro che tutto il casino che mi hanno fatto le varie letture, una persona me lo sa chiarire velocemente... Se non sei tu la persona giusta, a chi posso chiedere (non un admin di quelli che si incazzano!) ... anche perchè forse io dovrò fare da tramite per il mio amico, almeno le prime volte :) Non che non ce la faccia (come capacità), ma sicuramente non ha tempo...  ;-) Ho visto anche che hai delle richieste di roba "di qualità" / certificati : che cosa sono? Ciao e scusa il casino e l'invadenza. :-) --wikit_2006 22:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alzano Lombardo San Pietro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

- Alvesgaspar 20:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mi hanno cancellato un immagine[edit]

Mica è possibile sapere chi è stato, e con quali motivazioni lo ha giustificato ? Grazie--Freegiampi 20:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie pe rla risposta, era una screen shot su una mia discussione su wikipedia, aveva messo come copyright che era proprietà di wikipedia, volevo sapere se avevo infranto qualche regola su commons, siccome dall'Italia mi stanno facendo scherzi, se non viola niente la ricarico...
c'era il copyright con il logo di wikipedia, essendo uno scrennshott del sito, se lo trovo te lo faccio vedere,,,--Freegiampi 20:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC), comunque se io faccio uno screenshott sul sito di wikipedia italia, lo posso pubblicare su commons, e che licenza ci devo mettere, scusa il disturbo..e Grazie--Freegiampi 20:45, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
da qui sono risalito a chi è stato ed il perchè, Grazie, Grazie sei stato comunque molto gentile..

Brownsea Island memorial stone[edit]

I saw the edit work you did on the this stone, and it is EXCELLENT!!! Wim van Dorst 08:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]


Elemosiniera[edit]

Grazie x l'attenzione. Ho rimodificato e pare che il ns/ amico si sia dato pace :) --Lalupa 05:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Primi passi su Commons[edit]

Ciao Luigi, non ci conosciamo ma ho notato che sei particolarmente presente nel bar italiano, pertanto diciamo che ti ho etichettato come esperto di Commons. Ho solo una richiesta: potresti dare un'occhiata ai miei primi contributi qui? Uno due tre e quattro. Te lo chiedo perchè in questo momento sono il classico niubbo che teme di non aver fatto le cose come si deve :) te ne sarei grato. A presto--Gacio tell me 20:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

grazie per la gentilezza, cercherò di tenere ben presente la tua foto. Solo 2 dubbi rimanenti:
  • in Amsterdam: per evitare la numerazione, che effettivamente non è un granché bella da vedere, e allo stesso tempo differenziare i titoletti, posso usare un altro metodo (quale?); oppure vanno bene anche tre titoletti identici?
  • queste 3 foto le ho scattate con il mio telefonino che, pur essendo dotato di fotocamera da 3 megapixel, è pur sempre un telefonino. insomma, niente lavoro da professionisti. pensi che vada bene comunque, oppure è una pratica scoraggiata su Commons? Ad esempio ho inserito una delle foto in it:Coffee-shop, e il risultato obiettivamente non è malaccio--Gacio tell me 21:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok, provvedo subito, grazie ancora--Gacio tell me 23:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armatura cilindrica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Image deletion warning Image:HeraldTrojan.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Jkelly 18:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stampo rame.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Ciao,[edit]

Grazie per avermi risposto al Bar. Volevo chiederti se sto seguendo bene il consiglio che mi hai dato in tale discussione.--OrrOz 14:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toy soldiers[edit]

Greetings. Most toys are copyrighted art. Thus, all photographs taken of them are derivative works of that work of art, and their copyright belongs to the toy company. Please see Commons:Derivative works. Yours, Mysid 08:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Drillpress.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Drillpress.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 16:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Bergamo interno GAMEC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--User:G.dallorto 21:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Bergamo monumento al partigiano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--User:G.dallorto 21:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crespi ciminiera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crespi panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Settala chiesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branzi panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


Pay attention to copyright Image:Il Bergamo.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Trixt 00:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

grazie![edit]

ti rispondo dopo circa... un anno!!! per qualche motivo mi ero perso tutto... ma ho letto e il mio problema era sempre quello per il quale ti avevo contattato e quindi GRAZIE! Per quel problema il tempo non era passato!! :)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giulianova porto 02bis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Image deletion warning Image:Dmac_structure.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Karelj 20:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie mille![edit]

grazie per aver allegato la mia immagine alla sua corrispettiva voce! ero così demoralizzata che non avevo più controllato e mi sono accorta solo ora che invece qualcuno aveva già tempestivamente provveduto! grazie!--Daum 18:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geotagging[edit]

Ciao, grazie della risposta al Bar volevo chiederti come hai ricavato la stringa "region:IT-VR_type:city(264000)_heading:180". Cioè IT-VR è chiaro, anche type:city, il numero invece da dove salta fuori? Per quanto riguarda l'orientamento sto calcolando. Jacopo 10:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie, una bella idea[edit]

Sì, direi che la tua modifica è ancora più adatta, sia perché non si legge la tabella posteriore che per l'impaginazione ora più consona al template. Grazie per averci speso del tempo :-)--Threecharlie 00:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mandorle sgusciate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Simply good. Lycaon 13:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frutti Chimonanthus praecox.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality botanical illustration. Lycaon 08:51, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:William Speirs Bruce.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--ЭLСОВВОLД talk 14:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Approvazione di page rename[edit]

Ciao! Mi sono iscritto fra i candidati a "trusted users" per i rename, ma nel frattempo.... potresti approvare, come trusted user, il rename di Image:Note on equitation.djvu? Ho fatto una richiesta ma non ho avuto ancora risposta (va be' sono passate poche ore...), ma non posso lavorare in wikisource con l'immagine djvu se prima non viene corretto il nome.

Grazie! --Alex_brollo Talk|Contrib 16:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token b930de1e1c973745d05be4ce5f0c8902[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Users in Italy[edit]

Visto, grazie della segnalazione :-) --Samuele (talk) 08:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Immagine Stazione san filippo Neri[edit]

Ciao, ho visto che hai fatto un ottimo lavoro con l'immagine in oggetto. Volevo farlo io, ma me ne e' mancato il tempo. Non avrei saputo fare di meglio. Bravo ciao --Mario1952 (talk) 13:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC04949.JPG[edit]

Ciao, ho scattato una fotografia ad un infopoint de parco dello stelvio... Insomma era una riproduzione in una vetrina dalla quale ho tratto le informazioni che ho messo nella descrizione. Cmq va rinominata e io nn so come fare... --Bolo77 (talk) 15:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Volevo rinominare l'immagine ma penso che la descrizione non coincida con la foto. Potresti essere più preciso, inoltre dovresti dire dove hai scattato la foto, dato che si vedono riflessi di un vetro dovrebbe trattarsi di un museo. --Luigi Chiesa (talk) 07:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Renaming British artillery shell diagrams[edit]

You are making big mistakes in renaming the British artillery ammunition e.g. Image:BL8inchHENavalShellDiagram1934.jpg as Image:Diagram of British HE shell.jpg

You have omitted the important identification information : calibre, mark, year etc. There are many similar diagrams and need to be uniquly and descriptively identified.

Also, for sorting purposes, the most important thing is the gun calibre and shell type, not the fact that it is a diagram. We want all shells for the same gun sorted together, whether diagram or photograph. Hence the name should end with diagram if it is used.

Please do not delete these diagrams until you have proper names. I recommend you just place spaces between the parts of the name as it is now. Rcbutcher (talk) 05:21, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. This is a request to remove you from the list of people who are allowed to rename images. Somebody with the status 'trustworthy user' should be trustworthy, and you are not. Today there were six faulty renamings, all caused by you. Except one all were noticed after replacing them in the other projects, which now means a lot of extra work to repair your thoughtless renaming actions. -- Cecil (talk) 16:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marchi[edit]

Ok, grazie mille per le tue risposte--Il Beffa (talk) 10:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Museum of Turin photos[edit]

Dear Luigi, Do you have any other photos from the Egyptian Museum in Turin other than this one by you: Image:Reperti museo egizio.jpg? I notice there are very few pictures on Commons from this famous museum--only 15 in all from these 2 categories: [1] and [2]. Just curious. I thought this museum was famous for containing the treasure from Kha's tomb among other things. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Luigi, It is strange that Italy has such a law. There are many other Commons photos from the Louvre, BM and Altes Berlin museums...even Palermo. I see some pictures from the Turin Museum like these 2 from Kha's tomb on flickr: [3] and [4] but the license is not free....and they cannot be placed on Commons. I suppose placing in say 6 or 7 images from Museo Egizio in Turin into Commons is not excessive provided they are of acceptable quality. If the quality is poor, then they shouldn't be placed on Commons at all. I note that there are many Commons images from the Museum of Palermo here: [5] Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dear Luigi, I understood what it was saying after I used the babelfish translator. I suppose it is up to you; if you have a few good images from Museo Egizio that you can upload to Commons for others to use on other Wikipedia language pages, please feel free to do so. For instance, this image of Seti II's statue here: Image:Turin statue of Seti II.jpg is used for this king's English article here. But it was licensed freely on flickr...so I could upload it onto Commons. There are few images of the objects from the tomb of Kha or statues from Turin but as I said...it is up to you to decide, Luigi. Sometimes, as a friend on Wikipedia told me, a little of something is better than nothing. But I respect whatever decision you make. Thank You from Canada --Leoboudv (talk) 22:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trump Tower[edit]

Gentile Luigi, ho controllato dal link che mi hai detto tu ma io non l'ho messa sotto la categoria di Chicago. L'ho messo sotto la categoria di Edifici in New York... come mai ha cambiato l'indicizzazione? Saluti--Witchblue (talk) 08:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A new bot[edit]

Hello, did you discover that a new bot is running now to categorise images on pages? If a page is on the list User:Multichill/Category suggestions, you can create the corresponding category, (you put also the page in that category); you tag the category with {{Populate category}} and BotMultichillT will populate after an hour or so the category for uncategorised items and make certain recategorisations. Give it a try. Havang(nl) (talk) 20:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See for an exemple the history of Carrodano and Category:Carrodano. Havang(nl) (talk) 20:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gorgonzola[edit]

I have given a message merge for Category:Gorgonzola (city) and Category:Gorgonzola (MI). Both categories have images. You may pronounce what name has preference. And what do you think of moving Category:Gorgonzola to Category:Gorgonzola (cheese)? Greetings, Havang(nl) (talk) 16:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Immagine[edit]

Ciao, vorrei sapere qualche programma utilizzi per disegnare le molecole chimiche come la melammina...puoi rispondermi su wikipedia?--Eremdaviq (talk) 17:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyfraud[edit]

hello there,

you once tagged an image of Rembrandt as a copyright violation [6] because it came from a museum website. You might want to voice your opinion on this topic here Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#PD-art_images_from_museum_websites_allowed.3F. cheers Gryffindor (talk) 14:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helianthus tuberosus controluce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pila di Volta 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Please hel[edit]

Could you kinldy categorise and check this --> Category:Museo egizio (Milan) - Book of the Dead ?. Thank you. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 01:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per la risposta. Provvederò. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Altimetria sicilia[edit]

Ciao, grazie per la correzione, nella fretta ho dimenticato di cambiare la modalità di salvataggio. --Skyluke | @it.wk 12:15, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese radicals[edit]

Grazie for your help in categorizing some of the images I made (Category:Kangxi Chinese radicals). If you want to do more than categorization, and help me finishing up the set, there is more to be done at Commons:Kangxi radicals. (Some of the characters are well done and others need work). Be well, -Magna (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File deletion warning File:Elastolin figures.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--User:G.dallorto (talk) 05:42, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]