User talk:Llez/Archives/2017 (3)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Cassiano Formation, Middle Triassic, Sella Pass, Dolomites.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Mountain_side_rocks_of_Blåskjerdingen_(1069_m.a.s.l.),_Haram-Vestnes_Norway_-_2017-08-09.jpg

You are very welcome to help if you are up for it! A little help is always appreciated. Especially because i'm not so sure about how to remove the CAs.--Mænsard vokser (talk) 23:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesetta del Passo Sella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 15:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xerosecta edrissiana, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 12:43, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliacus variegatus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heliacus variegatus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinus cembra 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 16:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Indothais rufotincta, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Langkofel - Puez - Sella - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Langkofel - Puez - Sella - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indothais rufotincta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chiesetta del Passo Sella, Sella Pass, Dolomites.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 15:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely. But I think it'd have been even better if you'd moved slightly to the left and a slight more up angle so the round part of the tower would not have the mountain behind it. PumpkinSky 15:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)  Info Unfortunately "slightly to the left" there was a handrail (at the top of a wall which was several meters high) and I can't fly, sorry ;-). The next possible view is this --Llez 17:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC) Ah. Very understandable. I think the other photo is compositionally better but this photo is technically better. Good job on both! PumpkinSky 17:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colina pinguis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadows are regrettable. But good image quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:28, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colina pinguis, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:12, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leonia scrobiculata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 03:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 12:38, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 12:36, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church St. Ulrich - Urtijëi - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 17:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 17:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leonia scrobiculata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, Used and really good -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:49, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clypeomorus bifasciata bifasciata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 09:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 10:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clypeomorus bifasciata ssp. bifasciata (Morus Cerith), bright form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. Also very well done! -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:48, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Promotion.-- PumpkinSky 16:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Promotion.--Famberhorst 16:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clypeomorus bifasciata ssp. bifasciata (Morus Cerith), dark form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Seiser Alm 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seiser Alm 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clypeomorus bifasciata bifasciata 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 20:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 15:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 15:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forca Sassolungo - Cinque Dita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clypeomorus irrorata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pomatias elegans 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:05, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser Alm 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clypeomorus irrorata, yellow form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel - Campanile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:57, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:11, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pomatias elegans (Round-Mouthed Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:23, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clypeomorus irrorata, dark form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clypeomorus irrorata 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela di tumei - Urtijëi - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela di tumei - Urtijëi - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Seiser Alm 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seiser Alm 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urtijëi - Wooden bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Crop at the left could be better. --XRay 17:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urtijëi - Furnes aerial lift - gondola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:50, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Capela di tumei, Urtijëi, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clypeomorus irrorata 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clypeomorus irrorata, spotted form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Very useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:12, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality --Armenak Margarian 16:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cinque dita 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 16:14, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Capela di tumei, Urtijëi, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, I think the geocoding is missing on this. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Done Oooops, sorry --Llez (talk) 17:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, useful now and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 22:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

 Comment The pieta is very dark. Is it not possible to get a better photograph? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clypeomorus petrosa petrosa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cinque dita 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel Group 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clypeomorus petrosa ssp. petrosa, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 20:48, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val di Fassa - Val Duron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI. Very instructive! Annotations almost exaggerated in detail. --Milseburg 14:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel Group 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Poco a poco 12:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rifugio Friedrich August - Sleigh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trochulus graminicola, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella group - View from SW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:49, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calliostoma laugieri, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:13, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Seiser Alm 16.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seiser Alm 16.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella Group - Col Toron - Piz Boe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel - Puez - Sella - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:16, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rifugio Friedrich August - Gable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmolada 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella Group - Col Toron - Piccolo Pordoi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:50, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jujubinus exasperatus (Rough Top Snail), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:52, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langkofel Group 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, the rock in the front might be a bit too bright --Michielverbeek 18:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 20:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cantharidus polychroma, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 22:18, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Telecabin Forcella del Sassolungo, gondola.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment tilted? Charles (talk) 15:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Done You are right --Llez (talk) 16:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xerolenta obvia (Obvious Helicella), shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:08, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 15:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 15:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:45, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmolada 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:05, 16 December 2017 (UTC) IMO indeede a Q1, but it has got a lot (too many?) blue and cyan pixels --Michielverbeek 08:07, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Telecabin Forcella del Sassolungo - gondola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:15, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clanculus berthelotii, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, beautiful shell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:37, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:12, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Sella Group - Città dei Sassi.jpg

Copyright status: File:Sella Group - Città dei Sassi.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sella Group - Città dei Sassi.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turricula granobalteus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:54, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:54, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:19, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella Group - Città dei Sassi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 15:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinus cembra 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:14, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella Group - Sella Towers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:17, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:17, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turricula granobalteus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euchelus atratus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Used and useful.--Peulle (talk) 16:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:59, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euchelus atratus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems a bit overexposed on the inside of some shells. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - Sella - Marmolada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 11:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, Llez/Archives! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella group - View from West.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 09:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Granada 09:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zebrina detrita (Detritus Ena), white form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I propose we just make a bot auto-promote Llez's shell images. ;-D --Peulle (talk) 20:09, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sella group - View from West - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebrina detrita 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diodora calyculata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passo Sella - Città dei Sassi - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice! --Granada 08:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC) @Llez: Maybe a bit oversharpened and two minor spots in the sky but congratulations for that shot! Might work well at FPC. --Basotxerri 21:25, 25 December 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thanks. I uploaded a new version and removed the dust spots. --Llez 22:10, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diodora calyculata, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, best in scope, and a potential FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puez - Sella - Marmolada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice panoramic view!

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tectus triserialis 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tectus triserialis 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diodora spreta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 16:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)