User talk:Llann Wé²/Archives '17-'21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

"Photographs of xx"[edit]

"Photographs of xx" is a category for Photographs / works!!!!!!!!!!!! Not for Events! --Atamari (talk) 23:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2014 photographs of Wuppertal
parent Category:2014 works in Wuppertal
parent Category:2014 works in North Rhine-Westphalia
parent Category:2014 works in Germany
no events. --Atamari (talk) 23:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have inform the other team members of Festivalsommer of your mistakes. --Atamari (talk) 23:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teufel[edit]

Singer "Teufel " was on 2013-08-24 only a presenter at this event!!! I did't see Tanzwut on 2013-08-24. --Atamari (talk) 23:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne parle pas aux impolis qui ne savent pas dire bonjour. --lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 23:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

ZMF[edit]

ZMF 2015 jm41243.jpg
ZMF 2015 jm18471.jpg

Please stop your changes, they ar not valid, addintional changes I'll consider as an editwar and vadalism. The photos were taken during the concert of LM and they show the audience of that concert, therefore the category Luke Mockridge (ZMF 2015) is correct.

All concerts during the ZMF are categorised by the actor(s) who performed, and this is accepted. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 22:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

User category |x[edit]

Bonjour LW² \m/ J"ai récemment reçu cette notification de Jeff G. pour ma page de Discussion:
"changed use of User category|x} to Category:x, User category|x is for categories only"
J'avoue que cela m'a quelque peu dérouté. J'ai donc cru bon de créer une page à mon nom.
Ai-je bien fait??
Bonnes vacances si tu y es . --Pierre André (talk) 15:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Pierre André. Désolé pour ce délai mais je ne vois ton message que maintenant (enfin : je ne peux y répondre que maintenant...). Je ne vois pas trop l'utilité de cette modif' et elle n'a pas été faite avec ma(mes) catégorie(s) alors que ça ressemble aux tiennes et que, si je ne m'abuse, tu t'en es inspiré. Créer une page à ton nom permet d'y mettre ce que tu veux et ce n'est pas une mauvaise idée.
Oui, j'étais en vacances et suis en arrêt maladie à cause d'un bête infarctus, mon permis PL étant suspendu. Mais ça va bien, je suis quasiment guéri .
Bonne fête des chats. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 21:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bonsoir LW² \m/ Je n'ai rien compris à cette modif' apportée par un tiers, elle a été supprimée, puis rajoutée puis retirée, par je ne sais quel wikipedien. Effectivement en ce qui concerne la présentation de mes catégories, je précise sur ma page "Pays visités": D'après une présentation de Llann Wé², qui est très sympa et que je remercie pour son imagination.
Je suis heureux de te savoir rétabli! il est vrai que la vie nous joue parfois des tours. Personnellement je souffre d'hypertension depuis de très nombreuses années et mon médecin préfère me voir tous les mois. Je te souhaite donc un parfait rétablissement et une bonne continuation. J'espère que tu pourras reprendre ton boulot au plus vite.- Bien amicalement.--Pierre André (talk) 21:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
J'en ai pour 6 mois, minimum... Comme disait ma grand-mère, on a l'âge de ses artères et les miennes sont encrassée par le cholestérol, donc régime sans saucisson, sans côte de bœuf, sans crème fraîche, sans comté et autres saloperies bien grasses (dixit le cardio...). Moralité, tout ce qui est bon n'est pas bon... Mique alors ! Bon, ça pourrait me laisser plus de temps pour Commons mais mes PC sont HS (XP et Vista...) et n'arrêtent pas de planter au bout 10-15mn... Ce qui explique mon absence (pour ne pas dire obsolescence...).
Si tout a été rétabli (je n'ai pas regardé l'histo), ne te formalise pas, certains utilisateurs croient dur comme fer qu'ils suivent à la ligne les recommandations des Wikis, mais ce n'est pas toujours le cas. Néanmoins, une page à ton nom ne nuit pas ; tu peux même y transférer tes promotions d'images afin de soulager ta PdD sur laquelle un lien vers cette page, en bandeau, dirigera le curieux (à moins que tu ne veuilles garder en l'état). À c epropos, tu peux aussi nominer des images d'autres utilisateurs.
Je te souhaite de bonnes visites chez ton doc lol en souhaitant que tu suives ton régime de médocs (moi, 6/jour) afin que cela ne te soit pas trop pénible et te rétablisse rapidement.
À bientôt. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 23:08, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bonsoir LW² \m/ . À propos du cholestérol je crois tout le monde en fait + ou -. Bigre tu en as pour 6 mois, minimum, ça n'est pas évident. Quoique les médecins sont bien souvent sujets aux lobbys pharmaceutiques ; j'ai longtemps été sous "logimax" et puis un beau jour mon toubib m'a dit de tout arrêter... Maintenant je m'efforce de suivre le même régime que le tien ! On s'y habitue et ça n'empêche pas un petit restaurant de de temps en temps avec des amis, l'essentiel est de ne pas abuser et surtout de ne pas faire d'excès.
Merci une fois encore pour tous tes bons conseils, je commence a piger les arcanes wikipédiennes lol... Courage à toi, j'aurai une pensée pour toi je pars quelques jour au VVF Villages de Saint-Cast-le-Guildo faire un stage de randonnées. Bon rétablissement. Amitiés et à bientôt. --Pierre André (talk) 20:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Salut Pierre André. Mon cholestérol est dû à la cigarette et je n'en avais aucune trace il y a deux ans... La cochonnaille et autre beurre au gros sel de Noirmoutier ne me sont pas interdits mais doivent rester exceptionnels.
St-Cast n'est pas si près de chez moi (160km) mais moins loin que ton port d'attache habituel... Il y a de belles choses à voir dans ce coin et, te connaissant, tu vas rentrer avec une carte SD pleine de souvenirs, dont les nombreux finistères du 22  ! Les photos que j'ai faites dans les environs, il y a 6 mois, sont toujours dans mon disque dur et n'ont pas encore atteint Commons (toujours ces problèmes de PC). Bonnes randonnées. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 20:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Thank you. LW² \m/ . Je vais essayer de faire le plein d'images sur la Côte d'Émeraude pour la campagne WLM 2017, par ailleurs des temps libres sont prévus sur Dinard et à Saint-Malo. Bonne continuation à toi. --Pierre André (talk) 21:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2 pattes & Co.[edit]

¡Hola, amigo!
J'ai fini par apporter ma modeste contribution à ton travail de titan Clin
Par contre, je ne comprends pas pourquoi tu utilises un point comme clé de tri. Le classement habituel permet de repérer directement la première lettre d'un nom, n'est-ce pas plus simple que de devoir parcourir toute la liste avant de "trouver le bon" ?
Labiz
BarnCas (talk) 08:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heyho BarnCas, te voici de retour . Merci pour le compliment
Je suppose que j'ai continué comme c'était commencé mais il est possible aussi que je ne sache pas pourquoi... Une envie subite, peut-être. Je modifie tout ça pour harmoniser.
Des léchouilles sur les phares. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 21:40, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Au-delà du compliment, c'est surtout une reconnaissance du boulot impressionnant que tu as abattu pour la catégorisation des images concernant cette brave Deuche. Hercule était un petit joueur, à côté, avec ses douze travaux
Si je puis me permettre de t'indiquer / te rappeler une technique de feignasse (j'assume totalement ce statut Clin) : pas la peine de mettre, par exemple, Fredcar en clé de tri pour la catégorie Fredcar vehicles, puisque le tri se fait sur la première lettre du nom de la catégorie lorsqu'il n'y a pas de clé. C'est pour ça que je n'ai rien mis à ce propos lorsque j'ai créé la catégorie.
À pluche. BarnCas (talk) 01:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Et quand avance-t-il Hercule ?
Oui, je sais, mais pris dans l'élan...
Le w-e prochain, je vais faire le plein de Combi à la concentr' de Clisson, ça te fera peut-être un peu de boulot si je les verse ici .
Bonne fête des chats. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 21:17, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour ! Je suis très heureux de trouver une magnifique photographie de la Citroën Amisuper XC. Je prépare actuellement un livre sur le Citroën Ami 8 et ses dérivés et j'aimerai savoir si vous m'autoriseriez à publier cette photographie dans le chapitre concernant les décapotables dérivées de l'Ami 8. M.Agogué Christophe edtionsdupassereau@gmail.com

Monsters of Liedermaching ZMF 2016[edit]

What is the reason for your curious change? --Jörgens.Mi Talk 21:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Llann Wé²,

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year.

If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 14:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MB-one: Thanks a lot to propose me to participate. I'm active in those times because I can't actually work because of some illness so I have time but I expect to restart working in a few so I won't have time as now. And I'm not sure to have a enough English level to help. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 20:13, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concerts[edit]

Because the category name was misleading. If you're the photographer you'd better name the category something like "Photographs of concerts by xxxx" or "Concert photographs by XXX" (and make it a non-topical, hidden, category). The category "Concerts of" (and its redirect "Concerts by") are for the concerts of [band name]. The way it was put it looked like you were the musician who was holding the concert... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:14, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Animals As Leaders has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Λeternus (talk) 14:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Le muscadet, non...[edit]

... mais l'eau ferru, l'eau ferruchereneuse oui !
Cher ami, attention à tes "boissons de travail", lorsque tu catégorises dans Commons Clin
BarnCas (talk) 01:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mes lunettes sont usées... lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 19:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Les miennes, je les essuie avec des tranches de jambon. Ça marche nickel lol -- BarnCas (talk) 08:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Je n'ai plus droit au cholestérol :( ... lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 19:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Essaye le blanc de poulet, dans ce cas, c'est presque aussi efficace. Le plus dur, c'est de réussir à persuader un agent de la Maréchaussée d'accepter de se défaire d'un petit bout de son poitrail Clin} -- BarnCas (talk) 23:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shelley Doty[edit]

I don't want an edit war, but could you explain this edit? You did it before; I reverted you with an edit summary explaining myself (I shot this photo, I know this person, she is definitely female) and you have now reverted back. - Jmabel ! talk 03:41, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jmabel: . You can be polite and say "Hello", this could be fine; generally I never answer to impolites. Next time use some of these words. I didn't see your revert and I sort thousand pics every day... lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 19:41, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, sorry. I would have simply reverted back, but since I had done that once and you reverted me, I thought there was more to this. - Jmabel ! talk 22:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly: File:21st OEMF - Wendy Atkinson 03.jpg. Definitely female. - Jmabel ! talk 00:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Red cats...[edit]

Yes, I agree with you. Cathy Richards (talk) 15:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Black_and_white_photographs_of_unidentified_historical_trucks has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jmabel ! talk 16:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:W1356--2000CatHorse.JPG[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:W1356--2000CatHorse.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 11:50, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BevinKacon: if nothing else may please you, go on, delete it, I don't care, it's useless for 4 years... lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 13:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category Keys[edit]

Hey, I've seen you've been adding keys to categories concerning results from German WP-project "Festivalsommer". Unfortunately you've been adding whitespaces in front of some of the keys, so the sorting (which is what keys are for) is nuked. --LeoDE (talk) 21:16, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @LeoDE: .
What do you mean by "unfortunately..."?
A space as first 'letter' of sortkey situates the category at the top of the list and if you take a look at hundreds heavy metal bands categories in concert they are almost all like that, not only German Project cat's... If you want to change back 1 or 2 cat's you'll have to do it for thousand cat's sorted with this space. I don't know who started this kind of sorting but it's not me, I just do as it I saw it is.
Have a nice end of summer. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 22:45, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Originally it was a copy&paste issue. There is absolutely no sense in doing it that way. --LeoDE (talk) 11:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Would you please stop doing that or alternatively deliver a good reason why there should be a whitespace? "It has been done like that in many cases" is no good reason! Why should we intentionally destroy the sorting? Please don't get me wrong there, I love how much effort you put into categorizing this amount of pictures! --LeoDE (talk) 18:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please see COM:AN#Category Sort Keys.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @LeoDE:

  • I answered you about why I used a 'whitespace': because someone else did it before me and, as usual in Commons, I do the same of what is done;
  • You didn't say why you didn't ping me at Admin's noticeboard;
  • At Admin's noticeboard I didn't wrote YOU wasn't polite but the other German users who went on my talkpage to scold me;
  • If you think 'whitespaces' are not good try Category:Concerts by musician or musical group with the sortkey that pleases you...
  • I didn't reply sooner because I've got many more important things to do IRL.

Have good times. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 16:15, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Llann Wé²: ,
  • Yeah, that was what you did - and I wanted to know a reason aside of that, because "others do it" isn't a good reason. Others jump from bridges, but it isn't a good idea anyways. As I already mentioned, this was a mistake originally and was not intended!
  • I did: I don't want to blame someone when he does great work otherwise...
  • Okay, I misunderstood you there.
  • I don't know what you mean: In the Category you mentioned all SortKeys are properly set.
  • That's no problem - I do as well Clin
Best regards from Germany, LeoDE (talk) 16:28, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Llan Wé², I just discovered this subcategory. Unfortunately the depicted band is definetely not the Toy Dolls. Do you remember who played then and there and would you mind to fix the categorisation? Thanks a lot in advance --Zinnmann (talk) 10:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just realised that you are currently rather inactive. No problem. I fixed the descriptions of File:W2615 Hellfest2016 ToyDolls 7736.jpg and File:W2621 Hellfest2016 Warzone ToyDolls 7681.jpg. Would be great if you can add the name of the now "unknown" band. Best wishes --Zinnmann (talk) 13:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Zinnmann. Yes you're right, I made a mistake, it's UK Subs. I'll fix that if my PC let me do it.
Thanks a lot for your comment. Have a fine we. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 20:48, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Texte de présentation[edit]

Bonjour Llann Wé². Si tu n'y vois pas d'inconvénient, j'ai repris ton texte de présentation sur la réutilisation d'images sur ma PU. Il est très clair et pratique. Bien cordialement, Polymagou (talk) 16:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Polymagou. Non, aucun inconvénient, je te remercie d'apprécier et d'avoir prévenu. Bonne continuation ! lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 23:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions[edit]

Hello!

When you nominate unneeded redirects for deletion, please use {{SD|G2}} instead of {{Delete}}. {{Delete}} is only for deletions that need discussion.Jonteemil (talk) 07:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jonteemil.
Thanks a lot. Is this a new template? I haven't been here for a while... I hope I'll remember it.
lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 22:06, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The template was created in 2015, having been a redirect to {{Speedydelete}} since 2013, so it isn't that new :).Jonteemil (talk) 05:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, yes! I took a look at the template's page and saw {{Speedydelete}}, but I've forget it... Thanks again, stay safe at home. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 22:16, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automobile ancienne[edit]

Bonjour, Apparemment, un utilisateur souhaiterait obtenir une précision supplémentaire au sujet d'une automobile ancienne que tu as identifiée : Commons:Village pump#Old Renault automobile. -- Asclepias (talk) 11:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Asclepias. Je n'en sais pas plus, je transfère à Projet:Auto.en. Merci à toi. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 23:08, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:École du voyage à Miribel.JPG[edit]

Hi Llann, Just wondering how do you know File:École du voyage à Miribel.JPG is a Citroën?, I've searched for the name on the van as well as things related but this van didn't come up at all so I'm interested as to how you've worked it out ? :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 00:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Davey2010. Was hard to decide but the Citroën has 2 "things" (if you see what I mean) to maintain the outside mirror. Do you agree ? lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 00:59, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wow I've never noticed that until now, I assumed all wing mirrors were the same but apparently not, Very well spotted lol, Thanks for finding that out :), Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 01:15, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome Davey2010. Thanks for "wing mirrors", lol. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 01:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vans[edit]

Hello Llann Wé², Hope you're well,
I've noticed on a few occasions you've misidentified vehicles (IE you identified this van as a Ford Transit when it obviously isn't a Ford),
If you're unsure of the make/model you can add them to Category:Unidentified vans as I patrol that category regularly :),
Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010Talk 17:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Davey2010: Yes fine, thanks, and you?
Oh! I'm terrrrrrrribly sorry. Thanks for warning. Sometimes it's very late and I my brain gets lazier ;) And I sort thousand pics each night... I'll watch better next time but every one can mistake as, IMHO, you made one here (but not very important) about the red Boxer (or Jumper?) in the back? Maybe you removed cat because it's at the second plan?
Regards lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 20:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Llann Wé², Good good, Yeah not too bad thanks,
Haha no worries, True we all make mistakes so that's understandable however we should learn from our mistakes too :)
That wasn't a mistake tho - The Jumper wasn't the main image nor could you really see it so I felt in this case it was pointless categorising,
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 00:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I thought @Davey2010: so I didn't said nothing. See you lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 00:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again @Davey2010: About vans, I saw this kind of trucks in Category:Unidentified vans; do you think these old-vintage-historical (choose the best, plz) trucks are "Vans" or "Box rigid trucks"? Were they called vans in this time? English's your native language, not me and I've some lacks with some technical terms. So each night when I'm sorting I discover many new cat's but sometimes I forget all the next day... And I often don't know if it's the same word in English, American or Commons... If you see some of my mistakes (in English or sorting), go on tell me, it won't bother me.

Have a fine friday lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 01:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Llann, Good question, From what I can gather the term "van" came into use around 1940s-1950s I believe (this is a 1955 van), Vehicles such as the one you linked would've be called "Wagons" I believe, The majority of what's in "Unidentified vans" aren't vans but would be Wagons (or maybe trucks),
If you're asking if they're vans or Box rigid trucks then personally I'd say neither ?, Both terms weren't used not until 1970-1980s,
Personally I think everything pre-1970s should be removed from that category as I don't think they'd of been classed as "box rigid" in those days,
Thanks and you have a nice day too :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: So I hope I'll be clear enough... As I saw in the cat's I've visited, this is a wagon rigid truck (cat'ed) as descripted in c:Category:Wagon trucks, a covered (uncat'ed) one. Wagons are flatbed with sides, titiling or not, and "dumpless" (?) and was used for horse-drawn 4-wheeled carrying chariots (covered or open). I guess for box trucks, box and cab are separated counter to box vans in the same body so this one has more the box van's silhouette than the box truck's. In France, vans are fourgonnettes and camionettes, and box vans are fourgon all assimilated as trucks (camions) in current use, but trucks are more than 3,5T. So this is a pickup and this is a wagon. Keep smiling lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 22:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ahhh okay :), Anyway happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 21:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image coup de cœur du 25 septembre 2020 - Wiki Loves Monuments France[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 Votre photo « W2633 Champtoceaux CulDuMoulin Coucher 20160124 034.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 25 September 2020.

Maud-Sophie Leccia WMFr (talk)

Bonjour Llann Wé²[edit]

Bonjour Llann Wé², je suis heureux de voir que tu as participé à la campagne Wiki Loves Monuments France, pour laquelle ta photo à fait l'objet d'un coup de cœur, ce dont je te félicite . Sincèrement je me demandais ce que tu devenais, d'autant plus que lors de nos dernières correspondances, tu m'avais précisé des ennuis de santé. Bonne continuation à toi. Au plaisir de te lire, bien amicalement (ton vieux filleul) --Pierre André (talk) 10:19, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salut @Pierre André Leclercq: merci pour ta sollicitude ! Ayant eu, comme bon nombre, du temps libre, récemment, j'ai fait un peu de tri de photos, pour certaines prises il y a de plus de 5 ans et oubliées dans un tiroir d'un de mes HDD ; mon PC et son Win XP devenu obsolète, j'ai laissé tombé par dépit de sa lenteur de réaction et ça me grrrr! car j'ai un autre HDD qui n'apparaît plus sur le bureau, dans lequel il y a d'autres photos en souffrance. Là, je suis avec un vieux portable, sous Ubuntu, mais lent lui aussi sinon, j'en eu versé plus pour WLM... Effectivement, j'ai eu la surprise du gentil paragraphe ci-dessus pour cette photo (ma modestie en prend un coup).
Côté santé, merci de t'en soucier, c'est bon ; les seules séquelles de mon infarctus sont 6 médocs journaliers...
Chez toi, tout va bien ? lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 23:47, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Llann Wé²:  Thank you. pour ta réponse, ça va pour moi sinon mes problèmes de sénior âgé de + 75 ans (arthrose, HBP, et une pointe de diabète), Comme tu le dis heureusement qu'il y a les médocs, encore qu'il ne faut pas trop en abuser, pour leurs effets secondaires. Personnellement je m'active beaucoup dans les campagnes lancées dans Wikipédia, elles occupent bien mon temps surtout "Wikipedia Asian Month" et "le Mois américain Wikipédia" (mais je suis très en retard). Lors de ces campagne j'y ai croisé quelques uns de tes filleuls à qui en MP j'avais demandé de tes nouvelles (en vain). Avec ce foutu virus, prends bien soin de toi. Bonne continuation, amitiés. --Pierre André (talk) 10:23, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Pierre André Leclercq: oui, hélas, on s'use...
Ici, confinement s'écrit "con-fouine-ment", ce qui m'oblige à blinder la maison (en plus des autres travaux qui traînent) pour qu'elle n'y entre plus et c'est du boulot. Un de mes voisins a hérité de sa mère (ou sœur ou frère, on ne sait)... Donc, la Wiki, déjà éclipsée par le boulot, ne passe plus au 1er plan...
Voilà les nouvelles neuves du dedans. Bons versements lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 20:34, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stalles d'Ambon[edit]

Bonsoir, non les stalles de gauche et de droite sont protégées mais je n'ai mis qu'un cadre pour ne pas surcharger l'image avec le même texte. J'ai donc rajouté une précision dans la note. Cordialement.Finoskov (talk) 18:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Finoskov: ok, merci. Je vais verser la photo de celles de gauche. Y a-t'il autre chose de classé parmi le reste du mobilier (à ta connaissance) ? lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 22:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour si vous avez d'autres photos que celles déjà versées, voici la liste des autres objets protégés et les références correspondantes :
  • les statues : St Roch
Logo monuments historiques
This object is classé Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56000006.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (religious statues)|Ambon Julitte

St Cornély

Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56004053.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (religious statues)|Ambon Julitte

St Isidore

Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56004058.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (religious statues)|Ambon Julitte

St Guillaume

Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56004057.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (religious statues)|Ambon Julitte

Ste Julitte & St Cyr

Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56004052.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

[category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (religious statues)|Ambon Julitte]

N.D. de Bon Secours

Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56004062.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

[category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (religious statues)|Ambon Julitte]

  • autel agneau mystique et tabernacle
Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56004049.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

[category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (altars)|Ambon Julitte] [category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (tabernacles)|Ambon Julitte]

  • armoire
Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56005263.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

[category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (pieces of furniture)|Ambon Julitte]

  • retable latéral sud
Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56004055.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

[category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (altar pieces)|Ambon Julitte]

  • les crucifix : grand crucifix avec croix
Logo monuments historiques
This object is classé Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56000007.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

[category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (crucifixes)|Ambon Julitte]

grand crucifix sans croix

Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56004054.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

[category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (crucifixes)|Ambon Julitte]

petit crucifix

Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56006302.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

[category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (crucifixes)|Ambon Julitte]

crucifix moyen

Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56004051.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

[category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (crucifixes)|Ambon Julitte]

  • lutrin
Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56004056.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

[category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (lecterns)|Ambon Julitte]

  • fonts baptismaux
Logo monuments historiques
This object is inscrit Monument Historique in the base Palissy, database of the French furniture patrimony of the French ministry of culture, under the reference PM56006303.

беларуская (тарашкевіца)  brezhoneg  català  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  português  русский  українська  +/−

[category:Objets monuments historiques in Morbihan (baptismal fonts)|Ambon Julitte]

Wikimediament vôtre.Finoskov (talk) 07:39, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Finoskov: tout ça !?! Cette église est bien garnie ! Je n'ai pas tout (20 autres photos), je ne pensais pas qu'il y avait autant de choses... Merci encore lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 03:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Neil Ferguson (British epidemiologist and researcher)[edit]

it was probably a mistake?? Greetings --Joanna Kośmider (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to you too @Joanna Kośmider: yes, you're right... Nobody's perfect... I sort hundred files each night so sometimes one falls in the bad box; only one in 3 or 4 thousand: not so bad! Have good week-end lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 02:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Llann Wé²,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:W2401-SymboleConduite.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Shyamal L. (talk) 06:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dolmen du Crapaud photos I plan to use[edit]

Hello. You have wonderful photos of Dolmen du Crapaud that I plan to use in my new e-book. I discovered that collapsed megalith is associated with a Leonardo da Vinci painting, the earlier Mona Lisa. The symbol in the painting and the Dolmen are a perfect match, which unlocks a Secret Leonardo concealed in the painting. It may be my cover image, that is how important it is. Thank you for the use of the image.

Doug Zimmerman Antonito, CO @DeCloakingSecrets on Instagram decloakingsecrets.com — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.57.62.198 (talk) 22:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France ![edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files beginning with "Otvorenie letnej čitárne v Medickej záhrade"[edit]

  • en You made a big mistake that you repeated several times. All pictures that start with "Otvorenie letnej čitárne v Medickej záhrade" you put in "category:Poland" by mistake, although these pictures belong in "category:Slovakia". I ask you to correct these mistakes and put all pictures "Otvorenie letnej čitárne v Medickej záhrade" in the "category:Slovakia". Correct categories only if you are 100% sure.
  • fr Tu as fait une grosse erreur que tu as répétée plusieurs fois. Toutes les images qui commencent par "Otvorenie letnej čitárne v Medickej záhrade" vous avez mis dans la "catégorie Pologne" par erreur, bien que ces images appartiennent à la "catégorie Slovaquie". Je vous demande de corriger ces erreurs et de mettre toutes les photos "Otvorenie letnej čitárne v Medickej záhrade" dans la "catégorie Slovaquie". Corrigez les catégories uniquement si vous êtes sûr à 100 %.
  • de Du hast einen grossen Fehler gemacht den Du mehrmals widerholt hast. Alle Bilder die anfangen mit "Otvorenie letnej čitárne v Medickej záhrade" hast Du fälschlicherweise in kategorie Polen reingesetzt, obwohl diese Bilder in die Kategorie Slowakai gehören. Ich bitte Dich diese Fehler zu korrigieren und alle Bilder "Otvorenie letnej čitárne v Medickej záhrade" in die kategorie Slowakei zu setzen. Korrigiere Kategorien nur dann wenn du 100% sicher bist.
  • pl Popełniłeś duży błąd, który powtórzyłeś kilka razy. Wszystkie zdjęcia, które zaczynają się od "Otvorenie letnej čitárne v Medickej záhrade" omyłkowo umieściłeś w "kategorii Polska", chociaż te zdjęcia należą do "kategorii Słowacja". Proszę o poprawienie tych błędów i umieszczenie wszystkich zdjęć "Otvorenie letnej čitárne v Medickej záhrade" w "kategorii Słowacja". Poprawiaj kategorie tylko wtedy, gdy masz 100% pewności.
  • slk Urobili ste veľkú chybu, ktorú ste niekoľkokrát zopakovali. Všetky obrázky, ktoré začínajú na "Otvorenie letnej čitárne v Lekárskej záhrade" ste omylom zaradili do kategórie Poľsko, hoci tieto obrázky patria do kategórie Slovensko. Prosím o opravu týchto chýb a zaradenie všetkých obrázkov "Otvorenie letnej čitárne v Lekárskej záhrade" do kategórie Slovensko. Opravte kategórie iba vtedy, ak ste si 100% istý. 77.1.177.60 14:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files beginning with "Pracovná diskusia na tému "Aktuálne výzvy v regionálnej osobnej železničnej doprave"[edit]

  • en You made a big mistake that you repeated several times. All pictures that start with "Pracovná diskusia na tému "Aktuálne výzvy v regionálnej osobnej železničnej doprave" " you put in "category:Poland" by mistake, although these pictures belong in "category:Slovakia". I ask you to correct these mistakes and put all pictures "Pracovná diskusia na tému "Aktuálne výzvy v regionálnej osobnej železničnej doprave" " in the "category:Slovakia". Correct categories only if you are 100% sure.
  • fr Tu as fait une grosse erreur que tu as répétée plusieurs fois. Toutes les images qui commencent par "Pracovná diskusia na tému "Aktuálne výzvy v regionálnej osobnej železničnej doprave" " vous avez mis dans la "catégorie Pologne" par erreur, bien que ces images appartiennent à la "catégorie Slovaquie". Je vous demande de corriger ces erreurs et de mettre toutes les photos "Pracovná diskusia na tému "Aktuálne výzvy v regionálnej osobnej železničnej doprave" " dans la "catégorie Slovaquie". Corrigez les catégories uniquement si vous êtes sûr à 100 %.
  • de Du hast einen grossen Fehler gemacht den Du mehrmals widerholt hast. Alle Bilder die anfangen mit "Pracovná diskusia na tému "Aktuálne výzvy v regionálnej osobnej železničnej doprave" " hast Du fälschlicherweise in kategorie Polen reingesetzt, obwohl diese Bilder in die Kategorie Slowakai gehören. Ich bitte Dich diese Fehler zu korrigieren und alle Bilder "Pracovná diskusia na tému "Aktuálne výzvy v regionálnej osobnej železničnej doprave" " in die kategorie Slowakei zu setzen. Korrigiere Kategorien nur dann wenn du 100% sicher bist.
  • pl Popełniłeś duży błąd, który powtórzyłeś kilka razy. Wszystkie zdjęcia, które zaczynają się od "Pracovná diskusia na tému "Aktuálne výzvy v regionálnej osobnej železničnej doprave" " omyłkowo umieściłeś w "kategorii Polska", chociaż te zdjęcia należą do "kategorii Słowacja". Proszę o poprawienie tych błędów i umieszczenie wszystkich zdjęć "Pracovná diskusia na tému "Aktuálne výzvy v regionálnej osobnej železničnej doprave" " w "kategorii Słowacja". Poprawiaj kategorie tylko wtedy, gdy masz 100% pewności.
  • slk Urobili ste veľkú chybu, ktorú ste niekoľkokrát zopakovali. Všetky obrázky, ktoré začínajú na "Pracovná diskusia na tému "Aktuálne výzvy v regionálnej osobnej železničnej doprave" " ste omylom zaradili do kategórie Poľsko, hoci tieto obrázky patria do kategórie Slovensko. Prosím o opravu týchto chýb a zaradenie všetkých obrázkov "Pracovná diskusia na tému "Aktuálne výzvy v regionálnej osobnej železničnej doprave" " do kategórie Slovensko. Opravte kategórie iba vtedy, ak ste si 100% istý. 2A01:C23:8920:2E00:8880:BDF5:B22:89FA 20:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey, Dude ! You know what? They're better where they are than where they were!
    So: ...
    lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 22:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DART[edit]

You got at least one of these wrong; you might want to look and see if you made other similar mistakes on buses in the DART (Dallas Area Rapid Transit) system. - Jmabel ! talk 15:37, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO...!!!
I've sorted around 25.000 pics from 'uncat'... Give me some mistakes and smile because I'm an idiot. May be some disambig can be done fore these cats.
lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 20:31, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure of your intent here[edit]

[1]: you replaced a category that exists with one that doesn't. - Jmabel ! talk 04:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to you too.
Right, I did it. I started to sort and create in alphabetic order and may be I missed this one, and some other I guess. But I'll cross them back in a few.
Done! Do you feel better now?
Have a nice day. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 23:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation of snow thrower trucks[edit]

Hello Llann Wé²,

would you please stop these edits? The Category:D-902 is allready contained in Category:Snow thrower trucks, so this is a clear case of what not to do per COM:OVERCAT. Same goes for the images in Category:D-470.

Also, this is not a box rigid truck. The back of the truck is an engine compartment only, there is no space for cargo. If you do not know the technical details, please do not just put categories on it per assumption.

Regards, --Druschba 4 (talk) 01:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Druschba.
Thanks a lot for your advices and corrections, it's very kind.
Overcat is better than no cat or wrong cat, I guess.
Every one can make mistakes and every one may correct them without saying "stop!" (some users don't care/know and drop pics in the first cat they find and I don't cry stop each time I have to move files). It'd be better to say "thank you for all your job but you're wrong for some edits", or something cool like that... I'm sure I won't "stop that" because I started to sort all category:Trucks by brand (after it'll be category:Trucks by manufacturer even if some are the same but not all), but I think I've completed 'snow throwers' and other 'snow removal trucks', except if I find unsorted ones. I've started C brands so I'm far from Ural or Zil... But be sure I'll cross back some of bad sorted files when I'll be sorting. Then I'll move or remove them.
In which category do you suggest to classify it? It's a shape of box truck, not a flatbed, not a wagon, not a curtainside... English is not my mother language, so sometimes I can't find the good cat or create a unexisting one (may be Google knows all technical terms but may be I don't ask him correctly, who knows...), so if you know the right word, please don't hesitate to move or create the good cat if not exist, it'll help me and other users.
Have a fine week. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 23:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Llann Wé²,
I would have ask much more politely, if you would not have done the exact same edit on the same files twice and undo my edits in between without any comment, where I've already had it fixed ones and tried to point out the problem. Otherwise I would not have contacted you - I did not at the first time. I can also not predict whether you are done on the snow removal truck topic or the same thing happens all over again tomorrow. But I am not willing to continue doing things more than ones for no good reason. So - here we are, talking about it. No hard feelings.
You use cat-a-lot, please check your results for OVERCAT with the tool. That is only two clicks (in case you did not know). This is not too much efford to ask for, I believe. There is really no good reason to put it away for later. Other users (like me) do not know whether you come back later and fix it, and might find it necessary to do the job meanwhile. And this is absolutly not about crying or that I do not appreciate hard working users like you - do not get me wrong on that.
The truck is a snow thrower. Nothing else, no additional classification needed. It is it's only purpose. The vehicle's is not designed for hauling cargo, so the file should not be in a cargo truck category. Even if it might look on the first glance like a box truck - it is not. In the classification that we use over here in Germany, it would not even be a truck, regardless that it is built on a truck chassis. It would be considered a self-propelled working machine, just like a harvester or a street sweeper. That is not the English view of things, but it is not a box truck for shure.
Have a nice week, too. Regards --Druschba 4 (talk) 02:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi.
Netherless, courtesy is a good diplomatic tool...
I agree with you for many things but as you know Commons, it's better to create the right cat when you see some of these 'errors', so any one can see (and/or discover) the sensible category for the next of this kind of "things". In France too it's not a truck, it's a Schneepflug even if it blows or pushes the snow. Many of what Commons sees like trucks are not trucks in French but we have to manage with. In France, 'trucks' (camions) is for more than 3.5t ; under 3.5t (or 8t -we won't quibble) that's commercial vehicles (utilitaires), like pickups are, but all pickups are "pickup trucks" for Commons and not "pickup commercial vehicles" for small ones.
As I wrote above, "box" is more about the shape than the use. Feel free to sort them only in 'Service vehicles' and out of 'Trucks', it'll be ok for me.
About Overcat: I used it but it only shows overcat files, it doesn't show which cats are duplicate so we have to search for hours and sometimes doesn't give any overcat even if there's some. Example: this cat is in '6x6 military trucks' and '6x6 military trucks' is in 'six wheeled trucks' and some of these files are in 'six wheeled trucks' but Overcat doesn't find any overcat... So, that's why I don't use Overcat...
Have a fine weekend. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 00:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I actually have no desire to change the snow thrower truck category and remove it from the truck category tree. That will most likely turn into a general discussion I am not willing to deal with, simply because I do not have the time or the nerval strength to participate in the way it would be required. The problem of the different definitions of what a "truck" is, when comparing Europe and America, are obvious and for shure as old as commons.
The snow thrower picture is contained in the service truck category through the category structure, that's good enough for me at the moment. I've checked the box rigid truck category briefly and could not find any other service vehicles that do not carry at least a bit of cargo or a lot of equipment (like fire engines). Nor did I see snow thrower trucks. I would go with the english article in this case, also because it seems that there are more languages with a simular situation. Is there no french article about box trucks? Maybe it is sorted wrong on wikidata?
Overcat is not flawless - I know. But it would have easily caught the things we are talking about now. It is additional work if you find a wrong categorised picture - that is true. But if you've put it there first, than it would be only fair to do the work, also if it takes time, I believe.
Have a nice week. Regards, --Druschba 4 (talk) 16:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What can I say ?...
In French, we use box (fourgon) for the shape: 'box van' and, as you have in Germany, some of them are not for cargo but for Handwerker tools (WV Crafter...), or police, ambulances, armoured vans, service vans... not uniquely for moving goods...
We don't have wiki-page for 'fourgon' (box shape), it's camionnette'/'Kleintransporter'; both point to 'van' in EN.
But, 'fourgon' is a large term for us: camionnette/Lieferwagen = van, fourgonnette/Kastenwagen = van, fourgon = box van, fourgon bâché = covered wagon, fourgon frigorifique = refrigerated box... But every French (except me -lol) call that camion (truck) because it's more simple, but 'camion' (in good French), or 'poids-lourd' (LKW), is for more than 3.5t. In Commons, each time there's the term box, it's the shape. for all, not only for cargo... Compacting waste collection trucks have abox shape too. So, snow thrower as a shape of box (ok, I won't bother you more with that...). Just to say we don't call things the same in all countries. German is better (and a little bit complicated) because all the meaning is in one word.
When I started here, I had to learn new words; It still remains now but I have a bad memory for english technical terms I only use on Commons; sometimes I miss or melt them... I've started a list French/English but I lost it...
See you. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 01:52, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Catégories "Roman trucks" / "Red Roman trucks" ?[edit]

Salut, @Llann Wé², tu as annulé ma modification de File:Roman-cisternulo en Năvodari, 1.jpeg, où j'avais enlevé la Catégorie:Roman trucks. Cette page a déjà la catégorie Red Roman Trucks, dont « Roman trucks » est une supercatégorie; alors il est inutile de l'utiliser en surplus. N'est-ce pas ? –– Renardo la vulpo (talk) 06:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, @Renardo la vulpo: cette modif' est volontaire car la couleur d'un véhicules ne donne pas son type/modèle. Quelqu'un cherchant n'importe quel modèle de Roman sans en connaître le modèle commencera par cette catégorie mère avant d'aller chercher dans toutes les couleurs proposées. De plus, en étant rangé dans la couleur, ça laisse entendre qu'il est classé dans la catégorie du modèle. Je viens de créer 2 cats qui résolvent ce problème.
Merci pour ton suivi. Bon weekend. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 23:26, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please research what a tank is before filling categories like that, or you are likely to end up filling them with a lot of inappropriate files. Thanks. Ain92 (talk) 10:52, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to you too!!! I'm very pleased to meet you.
Before, they were not in one of 'vehicles in snow' cats. In a while I'll be back in 'military trucks' to sort better than it is but I don't know when and you droped them in the good cat because you seem to know those vehicles better than me; thanks a lot, good job.
Have a nice end of week. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 23:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm also interested and military trucks (e. g. created Leyland DAF military trucks, Aurunima Bolyan in Bangladeshi military service, Renault TRM 180.11 in Bangladeshi military service, Renault Kerax in Bangladeshi military service, Lancia 3RO, Oshkosh Wheeled Tanker, Albion AM463 refueller, Steyr 640, Praga military trucks and others), glad to see other people working on it! Do you think you have enough knowledge/competences to identify historical military trucks?
  • BTW, I was surprized to see you placing military truck types into "Green something". Mind you, military trucks don't have to be green or even greenish, they can be white, they can by sand-colored, they can have a camo pattern apllied etc. Also, AFAIK on Commons the practice is only to use "Green something" for bright colors and not olive drab. Ain92 (talk) 16:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi again.
    I do what I know. Generaly I zoom on pics I have a doubt and if I don't know I put them in mother cats I know. Sometimes with CatALot or manual search I discover cats I can't guess but I'm not a pro, I should not be enough precise for some but I'll do my best. Sometimes I miss... Sometimes I don't find the right cat... i don't know all, I learn every day. And I meet cool guys.
    For your tanks not really tanks (sorry...), next time it'll be 'tracked military vehicles' and you'll have to move them in the good cats so I'll thank you each time :)
    I'm glad you talk about that. Because there's no color for military vehicles (or I dindn't found it...) I wanted to create a 'Military coloured vehicles' without giving any color, just move all beige, green, white (as some UN vehicles), etc, including 'camouflage' to have only one color cat but only files without color cat. That's why I dropped many files in green because I think I won't go back to the trucks brands I've already sorted (A & B done, C in progress).
    Do you agree with this idea of color? Is it better to ask at the VP?
    I don't know Russian brands (not better than US ones) so I do many changes of type/models, only cabs, colors, functions.
    Thanks. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 02:19, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Do you know about all the "Unidentified" categories? Like Unidentified trucks etc.
    • I don't think that creating such a "military coloured" category would be useful for anyone, it is going to duplicate regular military truck categories and likely lead to overcategorization IMHO. Village pump may be an appropriate place to brainstorm the idea though) Ain92 (talk) 09:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful[edit]

Hello Llann, thank you for categorizing automobiles and trucks. I've seen a lot of new categories at my images ... and I had to fix a lot. Please: Categories like Category:Automobiles facing left are for orientation, Category:Side views of automobiles for view. So it isn't a good idea to move images from Category:Automobiles facing left to Category:Side views of automobiles. They should be copied. (BTW: An image with an automobile facing left/right can be e member of side views or three-quarter views.) On the other hand it is not a good idea to add images to Category:Side views of automobiles, if they are already in Category:Side views of Volkswagen automobiles. This is overcategorization. Please read COM:OVERCAT. And the last one: If you add categories like Category:Red Terex trucks, please create them. It isn't a good way to add red links. --XRay 💬 05:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello XRay.
Thanks a lot for the info. Sorry. My bad. I was looking for files sorted in 'autos by views' instead of 'trucks...' (if you see some...). Now I know, I won't do that again.
Have a good weekend. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 01:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yard Truck @ Cutrale Citrus Juices Auburndale, FL[edit]

For the record, the industrial building in Auburndale, Florida with the Yard Truck I took back in July, is not part of the Auburndale Citrus Packing House. In fact, I have to adjust the geotag in the Wikidata infobox. --DanTD (talk). DanTD (talk) 15:07, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to you too!!!!!!
If we can't belive infos of files... Lol :)
I can't guess it wasn't the right location. Thanks for moving it. I'm not sure I'll remember if I see another one from there but there's not so many pics of uncat terminal tractors. May be...
Have a good weekend. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 01:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

W1346-Nantes CimMisericorde Pieta JVallet 55759.JPG[edit]

Bonjour, vous avez versé une photographie "Pietà, par Joseph Vallet, Cimetière Miséricorde, Fr-44-Nantes". Cette sculpture est attribuée à Jaques Perrin sur le site de Patrimonia et sur le site du musée d'Arts de Nantes, alors que vous l'attribuez à Joseph Vallet. Y a -t-il une autre source d'information ou s’agit-il d'une inversion ?

https://www.navigart.fr/museedartsdenantes/artwork/110000000003026

https://patrimonia.nantes.fr/files/live/sites/patrimonia/files/actu/fiche_christmort.pdf

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:W1346-Nantes_CimMisericorde_Pieta_JVallet_55759.JPG

Bonne fin de journée, cordialement François de Dijon (talk) 09:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour François de Dijon.
Merci pour l'info. Il est fort possible que je me sois trompé, au vu des liens. Pas de souvenir...
Bonne semaine. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 22:14, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful[edit]

You do useful work, but sometimes a bit too hasty. I see that you added the category:Images with watermarks to several images. In February you added such a category to this file. Problem is: the watermark was already removed two years earlier. I have seen several hundreds of these files. Could you please take care in the future? And perhaps correct the mistakes? Vysotsky (talk) 19:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tes remerciements[edit]

Salut, La reconnaissance pour le travail effectué est trop rare. C'est pourquoi j'ai beaucoup apprécié tes remerciements pour ma contribution sur ta photo du monument aux morts dans l'église Saint-Cyr-et-Sainte-Julitte d'Ambon. Au plaisir. Sylvain. Chêne de la sagesse (talk) 06:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Sylvain.
Il est tout à fait normal pour moi de remercier les contributeurs qui font avancer les choses pour mes fichiers, ainsi que ceux qui corrigent mes erreurs (quand je les vois passer, ma LdS est trèèèès longue...). Je ne le fais pas systématiquement sur toutes les modif's mais au moins pour une lorsqu'il y en a eu plusieurs.
Merci d'être passé. Bon weekend. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 02:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Salut, Merci pour ton message. Cela fait quand même plaisir de recevoir des remerciements, même si ce sont des remerciement automatiques. Au plaisir. Sylvain. Chêne de la sagesse (talk) 07:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Il n'y a pas de quoi Sylvain, mais ce n'est pas "automatique", c'est de la politesse, c'est dans mon éducation. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 23:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Catégories "Photographs taken on"[edit]

Bonjour Llann Wé². Les 9 fichiers trouvés par [2] ont plusieurs catégories "Photographs taken on" avec des dates différentes. Vous serait-il possible d'y jeter un coup d'oeil et de corriger les dates ou catégories si nécessaire ? Cordialement. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Cryptic.
Merci pour le signalement. C'est corrigé.
Bonne continuation. lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 03:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove useful categories[edit]

Hello! You just removed Hood ornaments with Revision of 824758220. An ornament is not only a tiny statue. I suspect it was an oversight on your part. I've set a better category now: Triumph hood ornaments. --XRay 💬 05:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.
Yes I did because for me it's more a logo (or badge) so I thought it was "doublon", but OK. I've juste saw this one: Category:Triumph logos on automobiles. But if you cat this pic as hood ornament I guess you'll have to do the same with almost all the files in Category:Logos of vehicles & subs because many badges are pined on hoods... lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 01:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your corrections. Do you think you could add to the category the ports of Brittany with are on the ocean coast of the Bay? Kind regards, tyk (talk) 08:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ola @Tyk. Sí, es posible, pero no inmediatamente, en 2 semanas, porque tengo otras actividades en la vida real, relacionadas con el tiempo... Todos mis mejores deseos para el 2024. (traducción Gogol) lol LW² \m/ (Lie ² me...) 08:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Estupendo, muchas gracias. Feliz 2024!! tyk (talk) 08:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]