Hej Liftarn!
Två ändringar av texten så blir det korrekt.
1.) Bilen är en Saab 9-3 Aero och inte en 9-5.
2.) "The reason it rides so low is not the weight of the Toppola, but that he use lower (and stiffer) racing spings."
Detta stämmer inte, det syns tydligt att bilen sjunkit ihop betydligt mer än en sänkning och vid last bak uppstår även glipa i hjulhusen fram som syns på denna bild. Källa: Jag har både en original 900 Turbo Cuppé -94 och en 900 Turbo -94 som är sänkt 40mm hemma på gården så jag vet hur de ser ut. Det är tyvärr så att det är Toppolan som "sänker" bilen bak.
Toppolan är byggd för att Kombi-Cupé bilar och jag har sett den på 99, 900, 9-3 samt Opel Kadett !!
Den passar inte på vare sig 9-5 Sedan eller Kombi.
//HeRmAN
Saab Turbo Club of Sweden #4791
Saab 9-5 Kombi, 900SET, 99
Ah, jag visste att det var en 9-3 eller en 9-5 så jag chansade. Angående sänkningen så är källan bilens ägare. Själva Toppolan lägger bara på 100 kg, fast vid fototillfället befann sig båda hans barn inne i den. // Liftarn
Jag antog att du pratat med ägarn om den var sänkt eller ej, men texten blev bättre nu. //HeRmAN
Jag kollade på vilken bild det var och av bilden att döma var det bara en unge inne i Toppolan. Jag tror han bara satte på styvare fjädrar bak vilket kan förklara lutningen. Sedan fanns det väl en del grejor där inne också. Jag vet faktiskt inte men den ser onekligen extremt låg ut. den ser ut som om den skulle skrapa i vägen. // Liftarn
Går det även att ändra bildfilens namn? 9-5-with-Toppola.jpg
(Är helt grön på att aktivt använda wiki) //HeRmAN
Nja, inte direkt. Jag får ladda upp den under nytt namn. Så nu finns den som Image:9-3-with-Toppola.jpg. Den gamla filen finns kvar tills en admin raderar den. // Liftarn
Hi Liftarn, why did you remove this picture (and the other one) from Category:Automobiles ? I suspect you have a reason for that but since I'm fairly new around here it eludes me. As I'm always in search of enlightenment please enlighten me. :-)
Cheers, Prieni18:35, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Liftarn, I feel enlightened now :-) Sounds very reasonable.
Now, if I look at the category Vehicles by brand and the list of subcategories there, shouldn't Category:Gordon-Keeble be renamed to Gordon-Keeble vehicles?
Cheers Prieni14:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It could be, but I don't know how to do that. // Liftarn
Hej Liftarn, jag antar att det är du som fotat Saaben (och övningskör?). Det är nog ändå bäst att du skriver ut vem som har fotat, gärna även när bilden tagits. Thuresson 15:51, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Nej, det är en kille på 900klubben. Men jag har frågat honom om lov och han gick med på att släppa den under CreativeCommons. // Liftarn
you upload a picture that is already here! See [1] and several more. Many images from Nordens Flora don't need a duplicate upload with just another file name, please check the Nordens Flora category before. And please don't forget to put all your images into a gallery or a category. Thanks a lot - 80.144.70.7412:24, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I see you added "Category:Unknown subject" to some of my images. I thought that category was for images that do not have identifying information or categories already. My images (mostly of Hurricane Katrina destruction) that you added this tag to already had information and categories, so I don't understand you adding that tag. Wondering, -- Infrogmation
Yes, but the brand (preferable also model) of car pictured is unknown. I have managed to identify some of them, the rest I marked as unknown. // Liftarn
Ah, I see. For these cases, I suggest we start a new category "Category:Unidentified automobiles", which would be a sub category of both "Category:Automobiles" and "Category:Unknown subject". Ok, or other ideas? Cheers, -- Infrogmation16:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds perfect. I considered doing so, but didn't get around to. There is Cars to be sorted, but I'm not sure what it's for. // Liftarn
Good, I started that. Thanks for your work. After the hurricane and flood, especially at first, I was often too astonished at the flooding and sights like cars balanced on top of fences to take note of the make notes on the make of cars seen. Sorry. Though I think I've gotten some interesting photos. Cheers, -- Infrogmation18:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
On at least some of them the logo in the grille is visible so somebody who knows a bit more about american cars will probably be able to identify them. // Liftarn
Hi Liftarn, just regarding some of your comments on FP nominations, there is no requirement for a Featured Picture at Commons to be illustrative of anything in particular. Images can be featured simply because they're technically brilliant, or impressive, or beautiful, or rare, or any other feature that doesn't have anything to do with the subject itself. So opposing a nomination because the image "doesn't illustrate anything" is maybe not so appropriate here. But you don't have to give a reason for opposing, anyway. :) cheers, pfctdayelise09:24, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I know that, but it's just my personal view. I want pictures that are illustrative and not just arty pictures that may look good but are useless as illustrations. // Liftarn
When we improve on existing SVG flag images, don't just go back and re-upload their pre-improvement versions under different names. It's a pointless waste of disk space. Denelson8309:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Stop putting the {{Redundant}} template there. Do you know if there is a {{non-redundant}} template (or similar) to prevent irreflexive people from putting the redundant template without examining the situation? Greetings. --Angus19:42, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Shifting the burden of proof, eh? Anyway, since people here favors the accussers, I'd better answer.
It provides an image of the flag of Venezuela which has two unique features: 1. the design is close to the flags actually used in Venezuela, 2. since the image didn't change in more than one year, you are almost guaranteed that when you insert this image in an article, it won't suddenly change later. You can trust that Image:Venezuela flag 300.png means that image.
On the other hand, Image:Flag of Venezuela.svg is the playground of the "creative people" of commons. One day they add one star, another they change the colors, they put the coat of arms, they take it out, they take out the stars and the coat of arms... etc., etc. If you insert Image:Flag of Venezuela.svg in your article, maybe you get what you want, maybe not... maybe not now, but later yes, or vice versa... who knows?
Authors are irrelevant. They will all be assimilated into the GFDL. Ahem... Ok, I'll try. It's good advice, but no rule. // Liftarn
"Authors are irrelevant" -> i hope this was irony. for images from de.wikipedia it is a rule, see de:Wikipedia:Wikimedia_Commons#HOWTO_/_Anleitung, and if you don't give credit to the author the local sysop has to put in order. But when there are some hundred pictures in a category, which has ideally to be empty, this is not funny, you know what i mean ;-) thanks for cleaning up! --BLueFiSH?!14:22, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please transfer images with the correct license[edit]
The original seems to be gone, but I find it hard to beleive I marked it as PD-user by misstake. But, then I have transfered a lot of pictures so it's not impossible I made a misstake or two. // Liftarn
Hej Liftarn, en användare kontaktade mig på min diskussionssida och undrade om denna bild. Bilden är inte från före 1923 och det är inte klart varför bilden skulle vara PD. Kan du vara snäll och undersöka vilken licens som gäller? Thuresson13:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
hi Liftarn, could you please provide the source and add it to the image? a more detailed description would be nice too, thanks alot.. Gryffindor23:50, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have much information, but I've added what I have. // Liftarn
Thanks for uploading Image:IngvarCarlsson.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson12:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Ingvar carlsson.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson12:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The image comes from the English Wikipedia where it was uploaded by Cyrruss. I just transfered it to commons and made the cropped version Image:IngvarCarlsson.jpg. // Liftarn
Thanks for uploading Image:Campdavid.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Nv8200p15:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Skogsvrak.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. skINMATE06:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Anchor CQR.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk23:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think it came from English Wikipedia, but I checked and even if there is an image with the same name it's a different picture. // Liftarn
Thanks for uploading Image:Fela.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jkelly22:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Liftarn, maybe you didn't notice some things... like Template:Deletion requests is 247 kb long. Like we have copyright violations stretching back eight weeks on a process that is supposed to be 7 days. Like there are nearly 1000 items in Category:Against policy, and that is supposed to be a category for speedy deletion due to copyright violations. Like we have OVER 1000 items that have been tagged as unsourced since March, that are supposed to be deleted after 7 days. And that's just March - April, May and June have their own months. Like the images you nominated are being widely used! Do you think we have nothing better to do than replace links for perfectly good images for no reason other than "an SVG version exists"?
Yes, I did notice it was a long list, but do you have any suggestion for a better way to get the obsolete images deleted? // Liftarn
How about, don't bother, because we have around 11,000 copyvios that still need to be deleted? Thus this is an extremely low priority. Developer Brion Vibber: "If a file may have actually been used by someone at some point, do not remove the old version just because there's a "better" one. It may still be in use." pfctdayelise (translate?) 11:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I looked at the logo in the front. It first looked like ...OGE, but that didn't sound like any marque I have heard of. Then I looked again and saw that it's not an O, but a D. And a truck with a name ending in ...DGE has to be a DODGE. If I'm wrong it's not the end of the world and it's easy to change. // Liftarn
Thanks for putting your pics up. I've used the Norwegian rat picture on my blog at http://www.lepak.com/katztales.html and have credited and linked to your page here at Wikicommons.
Hallo, you are writing in this photo's description:
"I have obtained email authorization from the Plymouth Historical Society Director to use the image. ["You have our permission to use one of the photos of the Alter Car - Thank you for your interest in the Museum! Beth Stewart, Director"]
I am unsure of what Licensing Status to bin this photo against."
That is not too surprising: The trouble is that the licence is far from clear. Firstly, it is the copyright holder who needs to issue the licence. This is not necessarily the museum, but rather the author's heirs.
Secondly, it is not clear what is licenced for what image exactly. Could you get a clear licence using this template and mail it to the Wikimedia foundation? As it is now, the image will have to be deleted. Regards, --Wikipeder15:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the comment is from the original uploader on English Wikipedia. // Liftarn
Hi - I have deleted Roborally_cards.jpg, because it was a clear copyright violation (reproduction of copyrighted work). Sorry about that. Please read Commons:Licensing carefully before uploading more images. -- Duesentrieb(?!)12:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Then they should perhaps be deleted from English Wikipedia too since that's the source. // Liftarn
The english wikipedia allows fair use images - which this probably is. But it's mistagged there, I guess. I'm not an active contributor there, and don't know the customs. Go ahead and change it as you see fit. -- Duesentrieb(?!)13:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. These are quite remarkable. Can I ask you to not leave the date field blank? It would be very helpful to be able to see immediately when these were taken. Jkelly21:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for moving my photograph from the English Wikipedia to Wikimedia Commons. Please do not forget to credit the original author(s) when transferring images or articles between projects in order to maintain compliance with GFDL and Creative Commons licensing. Take care, Can't sleep, clown will eat me17:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, you need to verify your results when using such an automated tool. In this particular instance, it converted a {{GFDL-self}} template into a stripped down GFDL template without carrying over any of the historical contibution data, such as the original author. Can't sleep, clown will eat me21:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Even if it's stripped from the permission (are you sure it was there in the first place?) the original author/uploader should appear in the author section. // Liftarn
Thanks for uploading Image:Zil111.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.45.602:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Stockholm county COA.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Fred Chess22:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Black mage.svg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image talk page.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading Image:GatlingGun.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao03:34, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:19julio1936.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo20:05, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Campesinos.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo20:13, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Catalunya.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo20:14, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Cnt fai.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo20:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Luchadores.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo20:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Snake.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo20:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading Image:Lauku Kvass.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk21:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What? It clearly says (in two different places) that I created it myself. // Liftarn
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Image:Durian.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading Image:M410zr.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Samulili08:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually you don't sice with old USSR pictures all you need to know is the date of first publication, but then I see you didn't care and just deleted them anyway. // Liftarn
Jag körde med Inkscape fast I det fallet krävdes en del manuellt arbete med bitmappen eftersom vissa linjer blev så tunna så att de försvann i den vektoriserade versionen. // Liftarn
Perhaps mediawiki's SVG renderer fails to handle something. The image may have some error. // Liftarn
Could you please take a look at it as the png version is really used, and it would be quite nice to replace it with that version ... BenAllard (talk) 23:31, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Image:DSCF2285.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
I saw you redid the Saab APC pic. - nice - but you forgot to indicate the knock sensor (#1 - between cylinders 2 and 3 in the block) and the solenoid valve (#4). mvh 193.202.109.25409:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I noticed that after uploading it. I just haven't gotten around to fixing it. // Liftarn
Thanks for uploading Image:Donkey Kong jr Tabletop.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jusjih16:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition[edit]
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
) don't appear in links. I don't know why. Regards, EDUCA33E 06:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
