User talk:Leyo/Archive4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Parameter errors in {{Information}}

I see that you modified {{Information}} so that lots of files are added to Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. However, I suspect that there is some error in the code. For example, at File:Vertinsky.jpg, it says that parameter 1 is used, but I can't find any parameter 1 in the wikicode. Could you take a look? --Stefan4 (talk) 20:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

A = was missing. Parameter 1 will probably be the most numerous error, since it often shows missing = or an incorrect use of |. If we do not want to miss many severe errors, we cannot hide parameter 1 errors. --Leyo 21:30, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Oh, I totally missed that missing =... There's another problem: {{Flickr}} always includes an {{Information}} using the non-existing parameter "demo", so there are lots of warnings for files from Flickr. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:41, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
I thought about adding this as an allowed parameter, too. I will do it now. --Leyo 21:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Problems

Salü Leyo, kannst du mir bitte helfen — was habe ich denn hier falsch gemacht? Die Reihenfolge filedesc/license ist merkwürdig verwürfelt, und es wird noch ein kryptisches "Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse" angefügt. Für beides habe ich keine Erklärung finden können, deshalb mein Hilferuf. Merci sarang사랑 09:06, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Ich hab's auch nicht geschafft. Mit dem Beispiel in Template:Information field gibt's keinen Fehler… Frage am besten im Forum. --Leyo 11:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Danke. Ich habe noch lange weitergesucht, und meinen saublöden Fehler schliesslich doch noch entdeckt: das {{Tbc}}-Tabellenende war nicht codiert… da hat alles weitere als Tabellenelement gegolten, und natürlich viel Durcheinander angerichtet. Gruss, sarang사랑 13:02, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Missing bracket

Thank you Leyo :) --Jolanya Dyr (talk) 15:01, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Leyo, danke für Deine Korrektur. Ich war etwas verwundert über die Miniatur meines uploads. Ich habe später noch eine tiff Datei geladen, da war es nicht. Aber es scheint in Ordnung zu sein, sonst hättest Du ja was gemacht. Grüße----Oursana (talk) 13:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Am Bild selber habe ich mich nicht zu schaffen gemacht. --Leyo 14:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Aber ist denn die Miniatur daneben in Ordnung, die habe ich nicht bewußt gemacht?----Oursana (talk) 14:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Jetzt habe ich verstanden, was du meinst. Deine TIFF-Datei enthält zwei Seiten. --Leyo 17:02, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Bei mir nicht, aber ich hatte beim upload eine Fehlermeldung. Ich glaube, ich wußte gar nicht, dass tiffs auch mehrere Seiten haben können. Jedenfalls ist es jetzt repariert, wenn auch im Blindflug.----Oursana (talk) 21:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Gut. Unter COM:TIFF gibt's einige Infos, aber betreffend mehrerer Seiten steht dort nichts. --Leyo 06:59, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

experienced user

Hi Leyo,

Thank you for that! Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 11:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello Leyo. Is there any way to fix all those incorrect usage? They seem have non-empty country values. Or is it a good idea to allow country as an optional parameter? --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

This issue is being discussed at Template talk:Artwork#Maintenance category for pages using nonexistent parameters. Please join the discussion there. --Leyo 15:06, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

2 Sachen

Tachauch Leyo!

  1. Du hattest meine Nachfrage auf meiner Disk zu Deiner Katentfernungsaufforderung nicht beantwortet.
  2. Kannst Du hierzu (de) was sagen? Das betrifft schon jetzt Massen von Uploads auf Commons und de. Bislang hat sich offenbar niemand beschwert (obwohl manche Uploads nicht einmal 70 Jahre alt sind), aber ich hielte es auf Dauer für sinnvoll, das zu klären. Und offizielle Anfragen an die (u. U. einstigen) Rechteinhaber könnten uns da auf die sichere Seite befördern.

LieGrü, --Elop (talk) 12:41, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Deine Antwort kam so prompt, dass ich sie glatt übersehen hatte. Ich habe nun dort geantwortet. Beim zweiten Punkt kenne ich mich schlicht zu wenig gut aus, sorry. --Leyo 14:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Leyo,

Here is the text of the explaining panel photographed just next the object concerned:

13891

Alabaster urn of the “plain amphora “ group. Lid: reclining female figure Chest: fight between warriors and hero armed with a plough (Echetlos). Volterra (?). Second quarter 2nd cent. BC.


If you have any other description you can contact me.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 22:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

It's about the parameter accession number you used. It is not defined in Template:Information. You need to store this (currently hidden) information somewhere else. --Leyo 22:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC) PS. There are more of your uploads in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter.
  • Peux-tu m'éclairer sur ce que signifie l'insertion dans le texte de certaines de mes images de cette mention " Error in template * unknown parameter name (Template:Information): '1' " ? Par exemple dans le fichier:Spa JPG02.jpg cette mention est ajoutée, or je ne sais pas s'il s'agit de l'utilisation incorrecte des caractères, =, [, ], {, } , d'une mauvaise dénomination ou description de l'image.

Merci d'avance,

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

J'ai déjà répondu cette question à User talk:VIGNERON#Error in template. --Leyo 09:35, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Remerciements

Je te remercie vivement de ta correction sur mes légendes. Il y a longtemps que j'essai de comprendre pourquoi il y avait un message d'erreur; j'avais oublié "=". Tu es le plus fort! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:35, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

À ton service! :-) --Leyo 16:42, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Rotatebot funktioniert nicht mehr

Hallo Leyo,

seit gestern dreht der Bot keine Dateien mehr (User talk:Rotatebot#Rotatebot stopped working), könntest du den einmal warten? Herzlichen Dank! --Edelseider (talk) 11:34, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Leyo ≠ Luxo --Leyo 14:51, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Weiß ich, aber Luxo = tot (so gut wie). Und Leyo = technisch ebenfalls bewandert, oder täusche ich mich da? :-) --Edelseider (talk) 16:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Naja, ausrichten kann ich in diesem Fall jedenfalls nichts. --Leyo 16:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Moin, Leyo! Ich möchte Dich etwas zu der Kategorie "Pages using Artwork ..." fragen. Nehmen wir das Beispiel: Die Fehlermeldung "Error in template * unknown parameter name (Template:Artwork): '1'" wird durch den senkrechten Strich in der URL http://www.historicalportraits.com/Gallery.asp?Page=Item&ItemID=1107&Desc=Marquess-of-Anglesey-KG-|-Francis-William-Wilkin bewirkt. Dieser ist aber Teil des Links. Was mache ich nun? Grüße! Bukk (talk) 11:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Codieren. ;-) --Leyo 11:52, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
OK. Danke! Bukk (talk) 15:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Danke für deine Mithilfe bei der Abarbeitung der Wartungskategorie! --Leyo 18:58, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't understand the reference to the notice in red.:-/ The Commonshelper normally does not make mistakes, now I now understand what we will have to check in same cases :-) I'm asking for a favor, do not remember how to handle the date that the original uploader had declared for the photo, the photo is not that of the load, when both are known, you can fix them or should I ask others? Good wikiwork;-)--Threecharlie (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

It's not rare that file description pages created by CommonsHelper need to be fixed manually.
The date of the “creation” of the photo is relevant for | Date =, not the upload date. --Leyo 22:58, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Leyo. Recently, I've found some regexes with VFC:

  1. /\{\{(en|de)\}\}((.|\s)+?)\n(\||\{\{)/g → {{$1|$2}}\n$4
  2. /(|Description\s*=\s*)\{\{(en|de)(\|(1=)?)?\s*\}\}\n\|/g → $1\n|
  3. /\{\{(en|de)\|((.|\s)+?)\}\}\n(\||\{\{)/g → {{$1|1=$2}}\n$4

Where \n is a linebreak. They seem to solve most of the problems. --zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. If you think it's safe enough, it may be implemented in tools:~magog/cleanup_multi.htm. --Leyo 09:55, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm still improving the code, so not safe enough. But it did fix hundreds of the problems. --zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:38, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Recently? Are there so many new cases? --Leyo 12:11, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
About 360. Some of the previous edits of mine are malfunctioning non-regex-matching edits, so I reverted myself. --zhuyifei1999 (talk) 12:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
OK, I see. Many of the problems (e.g. missing “1=”) may be solved by using tools:~magog/cleanup_multi.htm. --Leyo 15:32, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

What about adding the regexes above to Commons:File description page regular expressions? --Leyo 12:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

 Agree Sorry for having too many things on my watchlist. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:40, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Erst einmal herzlichen Dank für Deinen großen Einsatz beim Artwork. Es ist spürbar besser geworden. Wie kommt man denn hier zum Artwork. Die templates schaffen hier zT feste Parameter. Dank und Gruß--Oursana (talk) 13:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Danke. Deine Frage verstehe ich leider nicht. Kannst du sie anders formulieren? --Leyo 19:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Neuer Versuch. Ich denke es ist hier besser das Artwork anstatt Information template einzusetzen mit artist creator template Dirck van Delen. Aber schon wenn ich Information durch Artwork ersetze, bekomme ich, wahrscheinlich durch das template rijksmonument, eine zweite Parameter -Spalte. Es ist aber nicht so wichtig, dann bleibt es halt so. Ich dachte nur, Du weißt hier vielleicht weiter. Mich stört, das hier der Fotograf als Author läuft anstatt der Maler und ich hätte gerne auf other version hingewiesen.--Oursana (talk) 20:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Jetzt verstehe ich, was du meinst. Das Problem ist {{Building address}}, aber ich weiss leider auch nicht, was man hier tun soll. Frag doch am besten unter Template talk:Artwork oder Template talk:Building address nach. Dort weiss bestimmt jemand Rat. --Leyo 20:14, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol

Apparently I now have Autopatrol. Does this refer to Image reviewers or OTRS? At the moment I'm not on either list.

Sardaka (talk) 06:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

See Commons:Autopatrol. --Leyo 13:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Veronese Hochzeit zu Kana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.164.204.252 10:17, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice

I'll try to fix it! --Enfo (talk) 12:53, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks again! --Enfo (talk) 13:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I was not aware that you used the same (non-specific) description to all uploads… --Leyo 13:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
All these pictures were taken during a Backstage Pass at the Museu de la Música in Barcelona, and I don't know much about the instruments and objects displayed. Because of that, in order to avoid possible mistakes, the Museum's staff decided they would check the pictures afterwards to give them a more accurate description. --Enfo (talk) 08:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
OK.
BTW: I do not like the . in Category:Museu de la Música de Barcelona. Backstage pass. In Category:Wikimedia backstage passes there is no other category with a .. --Leyo 11:48, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi! There must be a bug in the automatization. Both files are created by me in July 2005, they are own work and license is {{GFDL}}. Regards ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 00:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Just fix the syntax error. You are an experienced user. Since there are so many files in Category:Pages using Information template with syntax errors, I cannot fix them all myself. --Leyo 09:50, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Minecraft on a Chromebook 550.jpg

Hi, this image Minecraft on a Chromebook 550.jpg I uploaded it from Flickr by flickr tool , the owner published as: CC-By you can revise it: http://flickr.com/photos/29304822@N00/8316200130 --Ibrahim.ID (talk) 14:54, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Please read COM:DW and COM:LL. --Leyo 23:12, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Bug

Hi, Habe nun jeden edit einzeln versteckt. Scheint nun so korrekt? --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Ja, danke. Kannst du's beim anderen Bild auch mal für alle aufs Mal versuchen? --Leyo 13:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
ok: File:Cellulitis1c.jpg --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
File:M-xylol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 11:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

File:O-xylol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 11:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Hy! Source= http://www.museum.hu/photo/budapest/nemzetimuzeum/images/0055_t0457_maxi.jpg Tambo (talk) 09:55, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Please add Author and Date, too. --Leyo 10:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Leyo, vielleicht kannst Du mir bei der Fehlermeldung helfen, die liegt an der ref, die auch unter 2. Source ist. Ohne die ist alles prima und woanders tilt die auch. Und wie mache ich meine ref? Die [] werden auch nicht genommen. Danke und Gruß --Oursana (talk) 14:04, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Es lag an den beiden |1. --Leyo 16:31, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Danke dir herzlich. --Oursana (talk) 17:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
Thanks for all the mass-fixing work. :) Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 12:09, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. :-) I appreciate your work in this area, too. --Leyo 21:30, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Yes indeed (-: I also really like this barnstar. --SJ+ 18:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Reply to "Problemi con File:Bresso-piazzaitalia.jpg"

The file was transferred manually from it.wiki. If I can recover the original license, can you undelete it? --Gce (talk) 17:37, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

File was recovered from the originary Wikipedia (it) and re-uploaded here; please, control that license is right written. --Gce (talk) 17:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

To me, File:Bresso - Piazza Italia.jpg looks OK. --Leyo 00:54, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Translate/lang

Hi, Could you please add the Bengali language (bn) to- Template:Translate/lang (Translation is done). --Aftab1995 (talk) 16:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

{{subst:lle}} does not have any effect. I don't know what is the problem. --Leyo 16:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Summary: Images by Reddog11223

Hello Leyo, following up on our discussion on INeverCry's talkpage, and a thread on the courtesy proposal, I'd like to reopen a combined DR discussion for these three of Reddog11223's images (the ones he clearly requested to remove):

1 , 2 , 3

I don't generally like reopening any request that was just closed, but I think the discussions since the close have been relevant. And while some have been listed more than once before, the only relevant courtesy requests were the recent one, where he asked for deletion himself. Rather than have conversations on the courtesy deletion page and user talk pages, I'd prefer to have a consolidated & updated discussion, in a single DR. It's ok if the result of that is to keep again (hopefully stripping EXIF data, as you and others have suggested); that will provide a clearer history for anyone referring to those images in the future.

You were the most vocal proponent of deletion, and I understand you still think all of them should be kept. Do you have a problem with me relisting this? --SJ+ 19:00, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

To me, reopening would look like a “Zwängerei” (I don't find a good translation, sorry). First make the courtesy proposal a policy, then reopen; not the other way round.
An important aspect in this user's request is that he requested to delete all his uploads. IMO such requests should generally be declined. There are (also) many users who leave Wikipedia/Commons in anger. Do you really think that such requests should be fulfilled? For example, if I would decide to leave and request for deletion of all my thousands of uploads… --Leyo 00:48, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, I've learned a charming word (that isn't in Wiktionary!). However we delete images based on courtesy now, without a policy... the policy page is trying to capture current practice (where courtesy is considered), not to generate new practice. The issue with these reddog requests is that courtesy wasn't considered by most commentators; they used other reasons, irrelevant for a courtesy requests. To see the difference, compare the similar image that reddog nominated at the identical time with identical reasoning, closed by mattbuck.
Reddog didn't upload a lot of images, so asking to delete "all" is hardly a big deal. But I don't see him departing in anger; his deletion requests are calm and clear:
1 "Wife no longer wantsour private photo on show",
2 "Wife no longer wants her private photo on show",
3 "Wife no longer wants her Vulva on display"
Requests to delete private photos of people should get extra priority, in my view, since the subject as well as the photographer can feel harmed (as in reddog's case). I think even a photographer who specializes in portraits and has done hundreds of portraits of non-notable people, if they decided to delete them, should be honored.
If you decided to leave, while most of your photos don't have people in them, I think arequest to delete your own unused photos should be considered with respect. People would try to understand why you wanted them deleted (presumably it would be for a solid reason; just as reddog's request was), and might try to change your mind. But if you had a sincere reason, and were not just angry, I would be inclined to support such a request. Particularly for any images that were easily replaceable or had only vague educational value. --SJ+ 08:46, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
“… we delete images …”: No, as a non-admin, you cannot delete images. ;-)
Concerning the DR of Reddog11223, the images were evaluated on a per-case basis and other aspects were considered, too. --Leyo 00:14, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
"No, as a non-admin, you cannot delete images. ;-)" It looks rather insulting and reveals your lack of knowledge on what an admin is. Admins should serve the community; not rule it. :) Jee 12:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
I simply expect native English speakers to express themselves in an unambiguous way. --Leyo 23:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Mine is Malayalam. നമസ്കാരം. :) Jee 06:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
I knew this from your user page, but I was not referring to you. --Leyo 10:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Oh, OK; you may be talking about the author of those works. Jee 10:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi! Look at this: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eggerth Márta-Jávor Pál.jpg Thank you Tambo (talk) 17:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

I don't think I can help you in this case, sorry. --Leyo 00:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Austrojet.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cube00 (talk) 10:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Leyo, I'm cleaning up w:Category:Wikipedia files moved to Wikimedia Commons which could not be deleted. In the image above Magog the Ogre marked it as being unsuitable for Commons and I'm trying to resolve this either by deleting in Commons or getting a consensus that it can stay so I can remove the template from the Wikipedia file and get the file deleted from Wikipedia. (It currently exists both in Wikipedia and Commons and it doesn't need to) Hope that helps explain things. Cube00 (talk) 15:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Please do not bring problems of English Wikipedia to Commons, at least not in this large amount of cases. --Leyo 23:39, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not sure I understand how this is a English Wikipedia problem. The issue raised is that the image is not suitable for Commons. Potentially the images are in violation of Commons licencing. They do not violate the en:wiki guidelines since it can allow fair use if it needs to but Commons can not. If Commons isn't the best place to decide this, where would be a better place to discuss it? Whiling cleaning up I found some images had deletion requests like these and were decided to keep, so shouldn't these images get the same review if doubts are raised? Thanks again. Cube00 (talk) 03:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Before tagging dozens of file, the nominator should have read COM:TOO. And there is no need to be overcautious, i.e. nominating logos for deletion that are unlikely to meet TOO. In addition, you may assume that knowledge concerning TOO in German language countries is better in de.wikipedia than in en.wikipedia. --Leyo 23:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Great point about trusting the local wikis over the English one. Since concerns had been raised by an experienced administrator and I felt by raising the request I was addressing COM:PRP, however if that has caused problems I apologize. I've cancelled a few of the requests where I could show similar images on Commons, however in same cases that still hasn't been sufficient enough given Commons is understaffed and just because a lot of examples are available on Commons doesn't mean they should be. We are now starting discussions to address issues like these for other works too so I hope we are making progress. Thanks again Cube00 (talk) 08:50, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
My comment above referred to Austria, Germany and Switzerland, but certainly not to South Korea and similar countries. I don't have any specific knowledge concerning South Korean logos. --Leyo 10:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

My bot have cleaned up most of the unknowns, and the count is now below 15000 ;) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for this great effort. I don't remember the actual count before, just that it used to be very high. --Leyo 23:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Rome basilica st peter 011c adjusted.jpg

I have a message informing me that there is a problem with the e information provided for this image. I have no idea why. It is licensed according to the license provided by the uploader. I brightened the image, which was dark, and copy-pasted all the information, with the additionnal statement that the image, licensed by the creator, had come from Commons. I don't know what the problem is. Could you please explain it, or help me rectify it, since all the information is clearly provided, and you apparently know what the problem is, whereas I do not.

Amandajm (talk) 06:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

“Wikimedia commons” as it used to be is not a sufficient description of the source. The original file needs to be given (incl. link). --Leyo 10:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Hope OK, now. Jee 12:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

New URL for OgreBot's old version filemover

Hello. I've identified you as a user who has previously used OgreBot's old version filemover. Please note the new URL: toollabs:magog/oldver.php. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Protonation of File:Psilocybin.svg

A while ago, you uploaded a new/replacement image at that filename, "addressed dispute; nitrogen might be protonated". But the old and new both appear the same. All I see is a different (and better IMO) position of the indole NH, no actual chemical change of protonation states. Is this anionic form known/important? Compare to File:Psilocybn.svg, which looks like what it sounds like you were trying to do? DMacks (talk) 07:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

The dispute I addressed was in fact just the „H“ over the bond. The other was just a comment. We would need to know the two pKas in order to assess the importance of the anionic form. There are zwitterionic forms of the substance in Category:Psilocybin. --Leyo 20:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
I just added the pKa values to en:Psilocybin. The phosphate (even its second dissociation) is substantially more acidic than the amine (which makes sense anyway, but now it's cited). Is "monodeprotonated phosphoric acid and neutral amine" is likely to exist? DMacks (talk) 21:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
This visualization (all calculations → pKa) supports that. Just nominate the image for deletion. --Leyo 22:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

2 Keso-Schlüssel

Hoi Leyo, han 2 Bilder vo dt.WP nach Commons kopiert mit WP-Software "For the Common Good". Ich bin neu do und weiss nid was i mache mues, damits richtig goht. --Fqugdvin (talk) 11:54, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Mit dem Script hani no nie gschaffet, sondern mit toollabs:commonshelper. Hiä het {{Information}} änglischi Parameternäme. Die dütsche muesch ersetze. --Leyo 21:15, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Bini zdoof derzue :( --Fqugdvin (talk) 21:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
So. Mach's doch bim angere sälber. --Leyo 22:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Okay danke :) --Fqugdvin (talk) 10:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:William Pasquiet 1990.JPG

Hello. Permission OTRS have been send to : permissions-fr@wikimedia.org. I've not find the good tag for the images waiting confirmation. Thanks. --Tsaag Valren (talk) 09:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Template:OTRS pending --Leyo 20:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

template error

Yes, sorry, I saw it and thought I had fixed it, but apparently had not. Fixed now. Thank you for the heads' up! Laura1822 (talk) 16:33, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Template

Could you explain me why did you revert my edit? Regards. --Angelus(talk) 23:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

A regular deletion request is opened. Regards. --Angelus(talk) 23:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
As you continue with other such templates, it seems as if you seek being reported on COM:AN/U. --Leyo 00:14, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
I do not think it is needed! It is not my intention to do harm. Just tell me your reasons.
If it is horrible German could you help me to correct the deutch translation here? Regards. --Angelus(talk) 00:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Just leave it as is. --Leyo 00:24, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

I have fixed it. Kind regards. :-) --Angelus(talk) 20:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. I intended to notify another user (see User talk:Friedrichstrasse) and your notification was a “collateral damage”. ;-) --Leyo 00:06, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Leyo,

As you can read in the description of the file, this photo is a detail of the public mural that you see at the Santa Lucia Hill in Santiago, Chile. And according to Chilean Law 17.336 Art 44, "all monuments and in general artistic works in squares, avenues and public spaces can be freely reproduced by means of photography, drawing or any other procedure and is legal to publish and sell those reproductions". That is, the copyright of the photo of the artistic works if of the phorographer, in this case, mine, I can sell it or give it for free (and I did put the corresponding license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported). I have translated for you the original (Art. 44. Todos los monumentos y, en general, las obras artísticas, que adornan plazas, avenidas y lugares públicos, pueden ser libremente reproducidos, mediante la fotografía, el dibujo o cualquier otro procedimiento, siendo lícita la publicación y venta de las reproducciones). You can check it at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/es

By the way, you can see another detail of the mural, much bigger, in File:Homenaje a Gabriela Mistral.jpg, uploaded in 2009, and the full mural in another of my photos (File:Stgo 136-A.jpg).

So, for the future, keep in mind that you can photograph, draw, film, etc any art work in Chilean public spaces and do with the resulting reproduction whatever you want. And, please, remove the scaring warning from File:Stgo 137-A.jpg. Best regards, Roferbia (talk) 08:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

OK, you may remove the tag and add {{FoP-Chile}}. --Leyo 09:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Case reports by Michael Rosengarten

Hi Leyo,

If you think this edit was necessary, there may be a lot of work ahead, as several hundreds of files have this line in their description, see this search. Btw, would it not be better to create a category:Case reports by Michael Rosengarten? — bertux 09:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

The reason for the edit was to further clean out Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. If you think creating this category makes sense, please do so. You may want to ask for help to edit the files accordingly on COM:BWR. --Leyo 23:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

You might be interested in this discussion. --Jarekt (talk) 12:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Lacking source

Re: File:Seattle - old Summit School 07.jpg and File:Seattle - old Summit School pano 03.jpg, clearly these did not lack a source, they lacked one left curly bracket in a template. Wouldn't it have been simpler to fix that than to put a warning on my user page threatening to delete them? Or am I missing something? If the warning had come from a bot, I would have understood that, but clearly this is not a bot account. - Jmabel ! talk 02:08, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Although tens of thousands of file description pages have been fixed by e.g. Jarekt, Zhuyifei1999, Michaeldsuarez and me, Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter and its subcategory keep being (re-)filled. It's like tilting at windmills. At times, I thus choose the quickest way to notify the uploader of his/her error (1 click). I would love to see a bot notifying users of new uploads with broken syntax. --Leyo 19:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Translation

Hello. :-)

In German is better:

  • "...in der Deutsch Wikipedia"

or

  • "...in der Wikipedia auf Deutsch"

Let me know. Best regards. --Angelus(talk) 01:56, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

It's "...in der deutschen Wikipedia" --Patrick87 (talk) 02:18, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
To make clear that the language (and not the country) is meant, I personally prefer … in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia. --Leyo 05:49, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
This user is an administrator on the German Wikipedia. (verify)


This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify)


This user is an administrator on the French Wikipedia. (verify)


This user is an administrator on the Italian Wikipedia. (verify)


etc...

It's good now in German? :-) Regards. --Angelus(talk) 20:24, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

I fixed two issues for you ("ein" is unnecessary and uncommon in German) and the language specification is written in lower case (as all adjectives in German are). --Patrick87 (talk) 12:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
P.S. I'm not even sure if the preposition "in der" is really correct in German. I'd rather say "Dieser Benutzer ist Administrator der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia". However the current one seems also common on German Wikipedia (but might be an Anglicism). Thoughts Leyo (I noticed you even use the current translation on your userpage in German Wikipedia)? --Patrick87 (talk) 12:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
And so? --Angelus(talk) 22:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
The German translation looks good now. --Leyo 19:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:36, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

...ein Großteil sind sicher Copy-Vios - der Benutzer ist Beratungs-resistent. (siehe de.wp) Kannst du dich drum kümmern? Danke --Xgeorg (talk) 08:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Ich habe drei Bilder getaggt und bei einem vierten einen IP-Edit revertiert. --Leyo 19:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Close request

Would you mind closing the discussion at Commons:Categories for discussion/2013/07/Category:N,N-disubstitued primary amides? There doesn't appear to be any consensus and there has been no addition to the discussion since the middle of last year. Thanks. Ed (Edgar181) 13:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

The problem is that I am unsure how to decide. --Leyo 19:39, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
How about "no consensus" which defaults to keeping it? Are there any other chemist administrators (who did not contribute to the discussion) who could close it if you don't want to? Ed (Edgar181) 12:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Zur Info, da du die Datei übertragen hattest. Grüße, –ireas (talk) 15:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for the change on my signature file. I appreciated it :)

ILM126 (talk) 08:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Leyo 08:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

file image copyright

Hello, I've seen that you've written on my page asking me to specify some more details about this file : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Van_Halen_guitar_tab_tapping_Triole.PNG But I cannot remember where I transferred it from. I guess it was from some German wikipedia but I cannot remember nor add some more and find it back. Can you help me? It was not an original file from me, it was transferred and I guess that you also see this from the info (which are in German that I don't understand). Thanks if you can help. --Elenaf (talk) 08:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

It seems that it was in fact from de.wikipedia. You should have mentioned this in the file description page. As another user fixed the file description page meanwhile, you may remove the tag. --Leyo 17:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Leyo, ich schlage vor, die Chemiebilder zu löschen; Gründe: 1) schlechte Bilder, 2) evtl. URV. Der Benutzer wurde in en:wp zudem infinit gesperrt. Viele Grüße --JWBE (talk) 08:19, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Einige der Bilder sind noch in Wikipedia-Artikeln eingebunden. Magst du da für Ersatz sorgen? --Leyo 12:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Die Dateien File:Arsenic diiodide.jpg, File:Xenon monochloride.jpg, File:Uranium Tetrabromide.jpg, File:Uranium pentabromide.jpg ‎sind m.E. am fragwürdigsten, die restlichen kann man stehenlassen. --JWBE (talk) 08:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Die ersten beiden sind in Wikipedia-Artikeln eingebunden. Solange dies so ist, werden DRs abgelehnt werden. Beim dritten hatte ich bereits einen DR gestellt, beim vierten habe ich dies soeben gemacht. --Leyo 21:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
@JWBE: Bitte beteilige dich an der Diskussion unter en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals#Arsenic diiodide. --Leyo 08:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

This is what I posted, since there was an obvious link built into the deletion notice page......

This is simply an edited version—basically, a head-and-shoulders shot—from an existing file of the complete lithograph. Where a large number of images are present in an article, this is a lot more compact. Viva-Verdi (talk) 17:08, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Post your comments to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amalia Schütz-Litho by Josef Kriehuber.jpg and nowhere else. --Leyo 14:59, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
That is exactly what I did. My comment above is my post. Viva-Verdi (talk) 15:02, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
No! You posted your comment to its talk page, not the page itself. --Leyo 15:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Just curious: How did you find them? Thanks in advance,    FDMS  4    09:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

The orphaned files within this category or files that fulfill the criteria of this category? Concerning the former, I used VFC. --Leyo 22:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
I never noticed any usage details in VFC …    FDMS  4    15:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
You need to click one of the question marks in the bottom right corner of every thumbnail. --Leyo 19:24, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Geom vzorec methan.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 07:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Category cleanup tool

Leyo,

I believe the category cleanup tool is now functional. It is at toollabs:magog/cleanup_multi.htm. Let me know if it doesn't work. It still has a file limit of 5000. If you need me to recode that, it is fairly simple; I can do it without a problem. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:00, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. It worked well for a small category, but not for a large one, where I got a timeout. --Leyo 18:38, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Did the script stop running after the timeout, or did the bot keep going? It's entirely possible the script was still running on Tool Labs after the HTTP request timed out. I admit I used the lazy method of coding this wherein the browser just waits while the process finishes; this too can be fixed. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:31, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
The confirmation page was not shown, but an loading error. However, the bot did obviously start anyway after a while. --Leyo 19:42, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Well, I didn't expect it to be pretty. I will eventually fix this, but for the time being, just ignore that. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Hmm. It looks like the bot has some bugs in it that are causing it to abend. I will be looking into this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Well, I have it running on my personal machine right now, but not on Tool Labs (starting a separate process with the correct parameters is harder than it sounds). If you have any you want me to do, let me know, and I will work it until I get this fixed. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Looks like it's working again. I haven't had time to thoroughly test, so feel free to report bugs. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for looking into it. I haven't discovered any bugs yet. --Leyo 18:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
I just fixed it (*fingers crossed*) so that it now actually does both subcategories and not subcategories, rather than bugging out and just never performing the edit. @Julian Herzog: might want to know this as well (although I did run Julian's edits for him after fixing it). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:32, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't fully understand, but I'm happy with the result, so thanks. :) — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 17:37, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Great, thank you. --Leyo 19:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Leyo, benötigt man diese Kategorie bzw. die per Bot erstellten neuen Unterkategorien eigentlich noch? Mit dem neuen Commonshelper gelangen die verschobenen Dateien, wenn ich es richtig gesehen habe, leider nicht mehr in diese Kategorie... Grüße --Brackenheim (talk) 10:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Die Frage kann ich gerade nicht beantworten. Falls dem so wäre, würde ich das „leider“ auch unterschreiben. Wdwd weiss wohl mehr. --Leyo 21:53, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Soweit ich beobachten kann (bin nicht Bot-Betreiber von commonshelper) verwendet der neue Commonshelper mit OAuth die Vorlage {{BotMoveToCommons}} nicht mehr. Durch OAuth ist der commonshelper nicht mehr so einfach zu erkennen, da er im Namen des Benutzers den Transfer durchführt. Wenn ich Dateien via User:Wdwdbot verschiebe, verwende ich nicht mehr den Commonshelper, der Transfer wird seit einigen Monaten selbstständig durchgeführt, und verwende diese Vorlage auch nicht mehr.
Ob man diese oben genannte Kategorie noch braucht, kann ich nicht sicher sagen. Würde aufgrund der Randbeobachtung eher auf "wird nicht mehr gebraucht" tippen.--11:18, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Ich habe Dschwenn gefragt und er meinte, es wäre kein Problem, die Änderung dem Bot mitzuteilen. Oder wäre es besser, die Kategorien erstmal zu lassen, falls man sie (hoffentlich) doch wieder benötigt? Gruß, --Brackenheim (talk) 09:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Ich hielte es für eine Möglichkeit, dass der CommonsHelper {{BotMoveToCommons}} je nach Benutzergruppe einfügt oder eben nicht (Admin, Filemover, …). Aber dies sollte wohl andernorts (wo?) diskutiert werden. --Leyo 19:12, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Diese Idee gefällt mir sehr gut! Das "wo?" ist eine gute Frage... Was die Transfers aus de.wiki betrifft, könnte man dies sicherlich auch bei de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt Commons-Transfer besprechen. User:OgreBot 2 führt ja die clean ups bei neuen Uploads durch. Dabei könnte er ja überprüfen, von wo aus transferriert wurde und ggf. die Vorlage hinzufügen. Ich denke, dass könnte evtl. einfacher sein, als diese Änderung im CommonsHelper unterzubringen. Habe schon häufig gelesen bzw. gehört, dass der Entwickler vom CommonsHelper für derartige Dinge manchmal recht lange braucht... --Brackenheim (talk) 21:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Leyo,

ich habe mir durch einen Uploadabbruch irgendwie das Vorschaubild kaputtgemacht. Würdest du mir die Datei für einen Neuanfang löschen?--Kopiersperre (talk) 15:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Leyo 22:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

That Great War map

File:Terrain from the Aisne to the North Sea (land over 100m above sea level shaded).jpg This map that you sorted out has been deleted, yet you sorted out the copyright details? Keith-264 (talk) 19:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Instead of talking about matters, you could have corrected the file description page and removed the problem tag at the end. --Leyo 20:28, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Any danger of you minding your manners?Keith-264 (talk) 21:04, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello Leyo. I have actually shown the source and author of the original file, but some brackets were missing, making it probably confusing for the system that follows these things. Now I have corrected it and removed the warning tag. Hope it is all well now. Cheers --B. Jankuloski (talk) 20:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. There are actually several similar cases in Category:Pages using Information template with syntax errors that need correction. If you are bored… ;-) --Leyo 21:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Fichier: Juda-Strasbourg.pdf

Bonjour Leyo, Je ne Comprends Pas l'Anglais. Alors je te Réponds "également la photographie." CELA Veut dire Que la photo also is concernée. Cordialement. M. Rosart Rosart ( talk ) 06:47, le 7 Septembre 2014 (UTC) La traduction n'est pas très bonne, mais je confirme :"also the photograph". 92.138.245.55 07:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Files from de-wiki

Hi.

Perhaps you could help fix these files?

  1. File:Erscheinungsort.jpg
  2. File:Dorf17eich.jpg
  3. File:Dorfvonoben1.jpg
  4. File:Dorfvonoben2.jpg
  5. File:Dorfeinfahrt7E.jpg
  6. File:HamburgerDom.jpg
  7. File:Stralsund 02 2008 118.jpg
  8. File:Stralsund 02 2008 092.jpg

Some need a original upload log and some just need a check of license (GFDL version 1.2 or later).

I'm finding the files in Category:License migration candidates (trying to clear it). --MGA73 (talk) 13:39, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done except of the first five, where I asked the user who made the transfers to fix the file pages. --Leyo 18:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Millennial

I sent a copy of the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. If I should send it somewhere else, please let me know. Thanks. --Briancua (talk) 17:33, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Roche Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

kashmiri 02:05, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Leyo,

der Bildname ist mir zu peinlich. Könntest du das Bild löschen?--Kopiersperre (talk) 15:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done. Falls du's noch nicht unter einem anderen Namen hochgeladen hättest, hätte man's auch verschieben können. --Leyo 21:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Probleme mit Creator

Hallo Leyo,
könntest du bitte prüfen, was ich für einen Fehler gemacht habe bei dem Anlegen von Creator:Wendel Dietterlin? Der von mir angelegte Creator:Friedrich Brentel scheint mir völlig identisch zu sein, und der funktioniert, allerdings klappte es mit den Berufen nicht. Grüße --Mewa767 (talk) 17:52, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Ich hab's korrigiert. Bezüglich Berufen solltest du die Vorlagendokumentation sowie Template:Occupation/list beachten. --Leyo 10:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Who stops first

I know that it is difficult when someone is escalating, but who stops first? Please would you moderate some of your language and your approach. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

I had all of them deleted for copyvio. These images are not mine, so I had no right to upload them (I did not upload them, actually, I only marked them for moving them from it.Wiki to Wikicommons, but after so many years, who cares about what happened then). Problem solved. Should you find more of them, please let me know, and I'll have all of them deleted. Bye! --User:G.dallorto (talk) 02:59, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Do you think it:File:Milano palazzoclerici galleriaarazzi.JPG is a copyvio? If no, it would have be sufficient to correct the information concerning source and author in the version on Commons. --Leyo 21:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Errors introduced by using VisualFileChange

hi, thanks; would you care to help out at m:File metadata cleanup drive; that would be helpful. 8 down - 2 million to go. Slowking4Farmbrough's revenge 14:32, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

File:FIFA Logo(2010).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 02:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

The USA MLB Team Change Good The Logo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonybbbmonkey (talk • contribs)

No idea what you are trying to say, sorry. --Leyo 20:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Errors in DeKay's illustrations

Hi, Leyo. Thank you for telling me. (Excuse my bad English.) I made the changes in the images. I hope the syntax error is resolved. Thanks. Jarould Zook 00:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. --Leyo 01:20, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Admin activity request

Hallo Leyo, kannst du bitte gelegentlich die beiden prot.edit.requ Template talk:Created with und File talk:Recherche silhouette.svg erledigen? Damit das nicht so lange dauert wie sonst. Merci sarang사랑 13:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Leyo 03:09, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Danke, nun ist auch das in Ordnung.
Auf der grösseren Baustelle (Uf-DR) habe ich noch Namen vorgeschlagen, hat bisher keinen interessiert. Aber ehe wir Uf ausmerzen braucht es einen beseren Ersatz, den ich gerne entwerfen werde. sarang사랑 19:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Ich habe dort geantwortet. Einen guten Vorschlag für einen Vorlagennamen mit einer sinnvollen Länge habe ich leider auch nicht. --Leyo 01:38, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Und ich habe dort nun noch einige weitere Vorschläge unterbreitet. Mir gefiele Image development am besten - sofern dann auch der shortcut "Idev" erlaubt ist, stört der lange Klarnamen nicht so sehr. -- sarang사랑 11:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Jetzt ist der DR beendet; dennoch werden wir Uf ersetzen und dann deleten - in aller Ruhe. Deine Namensvorschläge erscheinen mir gut brauchbar, doch ehe ich weitermache würde ich gern geklärt haben ob (und wie) die Erweiterung in Information erfolgt, auf dass es dann zusammenpasst. Vielleicht kannst du die zuständigen Leute anstossen, damit da was kommt? Ein zusätzliches optionales Feld “Image creation” würde endlich eine Vereinheitlichung der Info-Box ermöglichen, das wäre eine sehr gute Sache; und eine sinnvolle Übersetzung in alle Zungen kann so gewährleistet werden. Jarekt wird das sicher nicht schwerfallen! Als Alternative zu so einem Parameter/Feld (nach Author) kommt noch Other fields 1 (nach Description) in Frage, da sind sicher viele mit den Umständlichkeiten der Informations fields überfordert. Und da auch noch Übersetzungen einzubauen ist sicher nicht sinnvoll.
In Template talk:Uf#Usage examples sind Beispiele dieser Positionierungen.
Mein unprotection request steht nun auch schon einige Zeit ohne Reaktion. Die Vorlage ist ja nun wirklich nicht so gefährdet, aber wenn du meinst kannst du mir einen ping geben damit ich schnell die Erweiterung einbaue, und ich pinge dich dann damit du wieder protecten kannst. Salü sarang사랑 17:22, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Zum Abschluss: von deinen Vorschlägen (die niemand kommentierte) erscheint mir {{Image generation}} am geeignetsten. Bei "Image creation" irritiert mich die Assoziation zu "creation" - die Grafiken werden ja meist nicht durch den Schöpfungsakt einer göttlichen Instanz erschaffen, sondern mehr oder weniger mühsam gebastelt; deshalb habe ich "development" überlegt, weil "Entwicklung" den Entstehungsprozess besser beschreibt. Doch "generation", also etwa "Erzeugung" trifft es auch ganz gut, obwohl es wiederum weniger zur Serie der "Created with ..."-Vorlagen passt. Mithin endlich EOD, für ev. weitere Diskussion schlage ich Template talk:Uf vor. sarang사랑 08:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Ja, eine weitere Diskussion dort macht Sinn. Wenn's um einen zusätzlichen Parameter in Template:Information (den ich als unnötig erachte) geht, dann entsprechend auf der dortigen Disk. --Leyo 22:03, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Drdoht

Hi, Leyo. Thanks for helping. I think you understand the problems. Could you possibly instruct Drdoht? - Hoops gza (talk) 01:58, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour Leyo, tu a modifié la légende de l'image citée ci-dessus, je ne sais pas quel sont les régles pour les images importées de flick, mais les détails que j'ai ajouté sont réels, à moins que tu en ais de plus pertinents ? Si il y a une procédure à suivre merci de me la proposer. Sincèrement Garitan (talk) 17:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Tu as ajouté une erreur de syntaxe et l'image était donc dans Category:Pages using Information template with syntax errors. --Leyo 22:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
A oui, trop de précipitation, ce devrait être mieux maintenant, merci 89.81.146.153 08:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC).

Merci a toi, Leyo, x ton attention. Bonne année ;) --Lalupa (talk) 22:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Hoi Leyo, ist dieses Bild ein Fall mit Urheberrechtsverletzung? Ich habe die entsprechende Änderung im Artikel de:Taminabrücke noch nicht gesichtet. Gruss --Schofför (talk) 12:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Ja, es braucht wohl eine Genehmigung des Urhebers. --Leyo 20:34, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Danke für diese Information. Ich werde das Bild aus dem Artikel nehmen, da es über den unter Weblinks angegebenen Link (Fotomontage der Brücke über die Tamina Schlucht) abgerufen werden kann. Dort ist noch eine weitere Fotomontage der Brücke zu finden. (unterdessen habe ich eigene Fotos von der Baustelle in den Artikel gesetzt )
Die vom gleichen Benutzer hochgeladene Datei File:Mels-Einwohnerdiagramm.jpg habe ich im Artikel de:Mels gesichtet, weil ich mir damals keine Gedanken über die Herkunft gemacht habe. Nun bin ich mir nicht mehr so sicher. Es ist zwar nur eine Grafik mit den Einwohnerzahlen, die auch über das Bundesamt für Statistik abgerufen werden können - ist aber aus der Webseite der Gemeinde Mels kopiert. Vielleicht wirfst du auch dort einen Blick darauf. Gruss --Schofför (talk) 10:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Im Impressum wird übrigens Fotolia als Bildquelle angegeben.
Beim Diagramm stört mich mehr das falsche Dateiformat. Eine Schöpfungshöhe sehe ich da nicht. --Leyo 13:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Kronprinsesse Louise from 1892, Denmark

There is a tag for Danish photos older than 70 years without known autor. This is 123 years old and has presumably never ever been a copyright issue ever before. I have also e-mail from the webbpage, which simply says it's ok to use their 123 year old photo. Please help me here, I'm no expert in these kinds of matters. What shall I do ? Here's the webbpage http://www.helsingorleksikon.dk/index.php/Kronprinsesse_Louise

My mail to fakta@helsbib.dk

fra Pontus Eriksson (født i 1964) Timmermansgatan 25 261 38 Landskrona SKÅNE

pontus.eriksson4@comhem.se tlf 0046 418 301 311


Hej ! Jeg skriver på Engelsk Wikipedia (det er helt uden løn). Jeg har den senere tid skrivet om HH som rute. Med historie bag til Adam af Bremen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HH_Ferry_route#Regular_ferry_history Som de kan se er de mest mine egne småtriste fotografier + et kort, der står til rådighed at bruge for illustrationer

Til sagen - Billedet af "Princessen Louise" fra 1892 må være udenkopyright, 123 år senere. Men jeg vil ikke bruge det , hvis I ikke kan lige att billeden også kommer med i Wikipedia. Bliver I arge på mig hvis jeg bruger det foto ? Men hvis jeg må for Jer, så kommer et større publikum verlden over få adgang til dette interesante foto. I får selvfølgelig credit for det. (Det synes hvis man klikker på større billed)

Med venlige hilsner (og undskuld mine danske stavfejler) Pontus Eriksson

"Hi ! I wright on English Wikipedia (without pay). I have lately written about HH as a route. Including history back to Adam of Bremen. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HH_Ferry_route#Regular_ferry_history As You can see, are there mostly my own little gray and dull pictures + a map, wich are available for illustrations. To the matter- The photo of "Prinsessen Louise" from 1892 must be without copyright, 123 years later. However I won't use it, if You dislike the photo to appear on Wikipedia. Do You get angry with me if I use the photo ? But if I may, it will be accessable to a wider audience world wide, of this interesting photo. You will of cource be given cerdit for it (It becomes obvious if one presses for a larger picture) With nice greetings (and sorry for Danish misspellings) Pontus Eriksson"


Answer


Hej Pontus,


Det er okay!


Venlig hilsen

Merete Gotthardt

Helsingør Kommunes Biblioteker


(Municipality library of Helsingør) "Hi Pontus

It's okay!
Nice greetings
Merete Gotthardt"

Boeing720 (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

MGA73 (Danish) and Stefan4 (Swedish) do surely have a better knowledge on Danish copyright issues than I do. One of them will probably help you soon. --Leyo 16:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lazord00d has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lazord00d (talk) 05:58, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Handwaermer11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cake7545 (talk) 20:42, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Baukastenwaschmittel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🎂CAKE🎂 08:31, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

lazord00d won't take no for an answer.

Well this should come as no great surprise, but everyone's favourite laserist has reuploaded 34 of his images to en.Wikipedia and has added most (all?) of them back to articles. He's done this at the same time as opening an undeletion request for those same images on Commons. I'm not sure where he got those sources from, but I won't participate in the deletion discussion, as I can not promise to be impartial with this user. I am currently in the process of uploading a set of images to replace his ones. He has also insulted me on my talk page at en.Wikipedia, so I'll not participate. I tend to stay away from these sorts of discussions anyway. I'll leave the decision with you about what action to take. - Jynto (talk) 23:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

PS: I've just seen your contributions on en.Wikipedia - looks like you're already aware. :-) Jynto (talk) 23:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

editprotected

Danke für die Eliminierung von User:Alkab/SVG. Ich versuche gerade, den ausufernden Wildwuchs von template-redirects ein klein wenig einzudämmen; ohne das allzusehr in einen Kreuzzug ausarten zu lassen... Es mag ja nicht schaden, wenn jeder nach Lust und Laune seinen eigenen Redirect bastelt, doch IMHO leidet irgendwann, bei mehr als 20 Varianten, die Übersichtlichkeit.
Darf ich dich in diesem Zusammenhang bitten, einige redirects auszutauschen wo ich als simple user nicht ran kann:

Bei letzterem gibt es seit langem die SVG-Version, aber weil das PNG in Layouts der wikisource-Seiten eingearbeitet ist wird es intensiv frequentiert. Da muss auch irgendwann mal jemand ran, der die Berechtigung hat.
Und weil ich nichts dazu finden kann noch eine Frage an dich: bei filemove werden die weltweiten Vorkommen von einem tool ausgetauscht. Kann ich dieses tool auch verwenden, um zB von PNG nach SVG auszutauschen? 新年快樂 und besten Dank sarang사랑 08:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Die Linkfixes habe ich vorgenommen. Zu deiner Frage: Möglicherweise klappt's mittels User:Sreejithk2000/JustReplace.js. --Leyo 23:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Discussion of image description formatting

There is a proposal for a style guideline for image descriptions at the Village Pump. Previously, you have expressed an opinion about such formatting. Please feel free to join in the discussion! — hike395 (talk) 18:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Re. File:The Cathedral of Dodoma.JPG, File:St. Michael's Cathedral, Korogwe.jpg & File:Road to Korogwe, with the Usambara Mountains. Tanzania.jpg

Hi there! Re. the aforementioned subject, I have had a warning that these 3 photos are to be cancelled, as done in a rather clumsy way. Kindly accept my sincere apologies for the inconvenience that I've unintentionally created. The aforementioned photos have been obtained from the English Wikipedia, please see Dodoma and Korogwe. FYI, I'm a rather new wiki-volunteer, who joined the team by late Nov.2014, and therefore has a limited experience re. Wikicommons. Furthermore, the day that the image downloading occured (I think it was in two separate occasions), and both occasions, while in the download process, my internet sign was extremely weak and I think that it auto shut me-off (if such a term exists), meaning that my signature was involuntarily erased. I do not wish to create problems, the contrary - I have always been a problem solver. Therefore, I kindly ask you to please reconsider your decision, as IT SHALL NOT BE REPEATED AGAIN. Thank you for your time. Yours sincerely, --Aristo Class (talk) 19:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Aristo Class, you don't need to apologize.
--Leyo 22:59, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Leyo Hi! I happen to be very busy this week-end, can I deal with the issue by Wednesday (04Mar.2015) evening?

Many - many thanks --Aristo Class (talk) 12:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

That's fine. --Leyo 20:45, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry about the missing license for the Dodoma cathedral picture - I took it myself and am happy to provide it with a commons license. I'll be trying to upload it to Commons. --Baba Tabita (talk) 17:43, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

File:000 1333 Dodoma Cathedral.JPG --Leyo 20:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Leyo Hi! I hope that everything is all right. Many thanks for your understanding and patience. With kind regards --Aristo Class (talk) 18:47, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

I added the original upload log. That's one reason why toollabs:commonshelper should be used. --Leyo 20:16, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

It seems that I'll have to do some additional studying, re. "Wikimedia Commons". THANKS A LOT Leyo! --Aristo Class (talk) 16:03, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Edit request

Hallo Leyo, du warst der letzte an diesen geschützten Vorlagen, deshalb komme ich damit zu dir. Seit Wochen hat SiBr4, von mehreren anderen Benutzern kommentiert, eine nun wirklich gute Version von {{Vector version available}} erstellt, und natürlich auf Herz, Nieren und andere Organellen ausgiebigst getestet. Nun soll das ganze in die Realität entlassen werden und harrt in {{Sandbox/vva}} auf jemanden, der das übertragen darf. Machst du das bitte? Nach dem Übertrag kann diese Hilfsdatei gelöscht werden. Gruss sarang사랑 18:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Um mir das Ganze genau anzuschauen, fehlt mir im Moment die Zeit. Was spricht gegen das etablierte Vorgehen, also das Setzen von {{Edit request}}? --Leyo 19:18, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Leyo, beim etablierten Vorgehen dauert es immer endlos lange bis irgendeiner irgendwas macht. Vorhin habe ich dir all das erzählt damit du sehen kannst dass hier wirklich sorgfältig und überlegt gearbeitet worden ist. IMHO kann die Vorlage ohne weitere Prüfung so übernommen werden!
Es ist natürlich deine Verantwortung und ich finde gut dass du sichergehen willst. Es ist schliesslich der Sinn der protection die Funktion einer mehr als 63000mal verwendeten Vorlage sicherzustellen, und öfteres Herumeditieren zu vermeiden. Und du kannst mir zwar glauben, aber musst es nicht: Vertrauen ist gut, Kontrolle ist besser.
Wenn du also genauer nachsehen willst, wirst du in der Disku alles finden können, auch den link zu den sandbox-templates. Bis auf die noinclude-Kategorisierung sind sie ident. Es ist alles oftmals geprüft worden, zuletzt auch nochmals von mir.
Selbst wenn du gerade zu viel um die Ohren hast und dennoch meinst genauer hinsehen zu müssen, wird es so sicher um einige Wochen früher gehen. Oder willst du es vielleicht an einen Admin-Kollegen delegieren? Oder soll ich jemand anderen bitten? Einen schönen Tag sarang사랑 07:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyviol?

hi, prejudice, the marked a user who uploads images to overwriting other, here is the 'user Caarl 95 I would like to ask you if can control his contributions, see, I am also turning to a director, because I think that 'user MI STINKS MUCH, I personally feel the smell of puppet --82.50.39.138 20:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

I'd suggest you post this issue on COM:AN/U. --Leyo 20:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thanks, but I would first ask, because I do not know how these programs commons, I'm afraid to let the chaos,

Hi! I write to you only to point out to you that the IP who wrote to you is A3cb1 evading?...--Caarl 95 (talk) 20:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Leyo, kannst du mir kurz erklären, wodurch sich obengenannte Kategorie füllt? Im Wikitext erscheint ja keine Änderung. Danke und Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 10:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Teilweise ist YaCBot dafür verantwortlich, meist wurden die Seiten aber einfach neu gerendert. --Leyo 10:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Aber wie kommt das File in die Kategorie definiert, da sie ja nicht im Wikitext steht? --Arnd (talk) 12:51, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Durch Template:Information. --Leyo 13:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Werden eigentlich alle Dateien, bei denen ein benutztes Templates geändert wird, automatisch neu gerendert? Oder ist das eine Art Cronjob? --Arnd (talk) 19:14, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Diese Frage kann ich dir nicht beantworten, sorry. --Leyo 19:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Leyo, weißt du zufällig wie ich Regex-Suchen über den Wikitext wie z. B. diese auch per Wikiapi absetzen kann? So scheint es nicht zu funtionieren. Ich brauche das für meine Bot. Danke und Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 15:22, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Nein, leider nicht. Bei pywikipedia ist's gleich wie hier. --Leyo 18:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Guten Morgen Leyo, könntest du bitte mal die ganzen Files "De AAV*" in der o. g. Kategorie touchen, damit sie verschwinden? Danke. --Arnd (talk) 06:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Ich kann's frühestens heute Abend machen. --Leyo 08:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Leyo 17:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Leyo, hier noch ein paar weitere Files in der o. g. Kategorie mit Bitte, um Berührung: De Württ Jahrbuch SL 1892*. Danke. --Arnd (talk) 06:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Kann das dein Bot nicht? --Leyo 09:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Noch nicht. Außerdem habe ich offiziell gar keinen Bot, da es wohl eine ganze Weile dauert, den Botstatus zu bekommen. Habe das übrigens mal als Feature für VisualFileChange.js vorgeschlagen. --Arnd (talk) 09:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Habe noch was, DE CDA*. Bin am Botcode dran. Ein, zwei Tage, dann sollte es laufen. --Arnd (talk) 12:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Ban appeal reference

I mentioned you as a reference for this year's ban appeal. I sent you a copy of my appeal to them via Email (please check your inbox). ArbCom might ask you about your thoughts on allowing me return and ask you to recommend restrictions and such. I recommended you since you understand how much time and effort I placed into helping the community here. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 20:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice and good luck. ArbCom discussions are not accessible online, right? --Leyo 18:38, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Right, ArbCom conducts ban appeals via Email, and sorry for the late reply; I was distracted by other things. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Please remove red box you added to my photo fritz fröhlich soldat again for second time. My own photo taken on my own wall in my own house. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.3.125.239 (talk • contribs)

Please read COM:FOP. --Leyo 21:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Leyo, ich hab da so meine Zweifel über die Echtheit dieses Fotos. Es soll angeblich 1953, im Todesjahr von David Farbstein, in den USA aufgenommen worden sein. Auf dem runden Button an der Jacke finde ich die Jahreszahlen «1926-2008» und auf der rechten Seite steht der Name «Bob Reardon». Und dann ist da noch dieser Weblink Bob Reardon. Gruss --Schofför (talk) 22:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Am besten klinkst du dich in die Diskussion unter als:Benutzer Diskussion:92.107.28.7 (Viktor)#David Farbstein ein. --Leyo 23:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Mach ich. --Schofför (talk) 21:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, It looks better, but it doesn't work with spaces. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

The revert is probably OK, then. However, not providing a reason in the edit summary is inacceptable. --Leyo 20:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
BTW: <!-- --> that is also inserted via MediaWiki:Edittools does have spaces. --Leyo 20:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
I've opened a thread there. RegardsUser: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  21:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Transparent background and stylesheet

Hi Leyo,

I got the ".eps → .svg using scribus" trick working, finally. It produces compounds with transparent background, but I guess that is okay, is it? And I wanted to ask. Do you know if the provided stylesheet can be backwards applied to structures created in ChemDraw? Or do I have to open the stylesheet and then re-draw the compound from scratch? Thanks. --Wesalius (talk) 16:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

A transparent background is better than a white one.
No, you don't need to re-draw anything. Just select “File” → “Apply Document Settings from” and choose the right stylesheet. You need to answer the question with “Yes”. --Leyo 18:08, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. We are now finally getting the final versions that render properly and use your stylesheet. There just some resistant compounds that wont open in scribus, I will maybe ask you later for help when we are done with the working ones. --Wesalius (talk) 21:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
To be honest, your new uploads still look quite different than the consensus style:
The differences include e.g. the (relative) font size and the font type (serif vs. sans-serif). --Leyo 22:11, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
We applied your style sheet, you did not state in the village pump conversation that different font is also prefferable. We started to use Liberation-Sans as Patrick87 said that mediawiki replaces arial with it - see his comment at Commons:Graphics_village_pump#Problem_rendering_chemical_structures. Howabout you create a page with guide on creating vector chemical structures (since you say it is a "consensus") here on commons instead of de.wiki so people dont have to learn the hard way (like redoing their work 4 times)? --Wesalius (talk) 22:28, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
I thought that if you apply the stylesheet that I sent you, everything including the font will be the same. Sorry for that.
Well, I guess that this table may be understood also without good skills in German. There is also a page in en.wikipedia, but a little less detailed. It also says “Please use sans-serif fonts like Arial”. --Leyo 22:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Ha, we managed to apply your suggested settings. How do you like our latest uploads? --Wesalius (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I do! Just one comment concerning “R” such as in File:Terciární amin.svg. Indexes used for labelling (i.e. not counting) must be superscripted, see third bullet point. --Leyo 00:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
We fixed all the occurences we encountered. Thank you for your guidance through the whole process, next time we will produce nice vectors right from the start :-) --Wesalius (talk) 07:10, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Busarellus nigricollis Pantanal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 19:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination in FPC

Hello Leyo! Nice to meet you! You can nominate your photo for FPC, of course, if you want to. I would nominate it, but I already have two active nominations. Your photo(s) is(are) very nice! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Concerning the linked picture, I am not sure if it's good enough for FPC. --Leyo 12:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks anyway! Clin 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buteogallus meridionalis Pantanal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A nice picture but a tighter crop would be helpful. --Palauenc05 20:04, 17 May 2015 (UTC) and it´s tilted ccw too --Hubertl 20:51, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
@Palauenc05 and Hubertl: ✓ Done. ArionEstar 22:44, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 Support --Palauenc05 15:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Umstellung fertig

Hallo Leyo, die Vorlage {{Uf}} kann nun gelöscht werden. Jemand hat die Kategorie UFwU angelegt, die soll auch weg. Gruss sarang사랑 06:45, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --Leyo 16:55, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Wrong pipe (|) in use of Photograph template: incorrect parameter

Dear Leyo,

you wrote about Category:Pages using Photograph template with incorrect parameter

Hi Hansmuller. Could you please fix your uploads in this maintenance category? --Leyo 12:53, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing this out to me, i am sorry about this (|). I immediately fixed about 20.

Yes, there is VisualFileChange. --Leyo 15:23, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Bolivares

Hallo Leyo,

wärst du so nett mir diese gelöschten Dateien per Wikimail zu schicken?--Kopiersperre (talk) 20:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Done. --Leyo 22:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Danke.--Kopiersperre (talk) 17:50, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 15:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Benutzerrechte

Hallo Leyo,
warum hast Du meine Benutzerrechte geändert? Welche dieser Rechtegruppen gehöre ich an? --Tommes 13:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Ah, ich sehe in Deinen Edits: "13:11, 24. Sep. 2015 Leyo (Diskussion | Beiträge) änderte die Gruppenzugehörigkeit für User:Roter Frosch von (–) zu Automatischer Kontrollierer (experienced user (> 1000 edits) who has never been blocked; you may apply for other user rights on COM:RFR)" --Tommes 13:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Reicht dir Commons:Patrol/de#Autopatrolled als Erklärung? --Leyo 14:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Dateien umkategorisieren

Falls Du noch nicht ausgelastet bist, darf ich Dich gleich auf Category:Brauerei hinweisen? ;) --Tommes 13:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Danke...

...für's Sperren! Gruß --Sir James (talk) 09:26, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Bundesrat der Schweiz 2015.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck!- Popo le Chien ouah 10:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Deleted as dup, but File:Triallyl cyanurate2.svg that you noted as the specific replacement has some mistakes. I don't have the ability to do chem svg easily:( DMacks (talk) 02:38, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

The uploader, The Titou, is still active. He may want to fix the structure himself. --Leyo 16:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, I respons on the talkpage of the picture. --Titou (talk) 18:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
I replied there. BTW: Your ping did not reach DMacks, because you made it after having signed. --Leyo 21:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Luckily I had watchlisted the image-page:) DMacks (talk) 22:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
what? are commons templates like notif or notifinv on wp:fr ?? it means template which workes always (before and after sign :o) {{Ping}} seems too rudimentary...--Titou (talk) 05:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
The ping needs to be in the same edit as the signature. That wasn't the case. You added the ping later. See mw:Manual:Echo#Technical details for more information. --Leyo 10:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)