User talk:Lewis Hulbert/Archive/2016

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bald eagle at the Hawk Conservancy Trust 2-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Lewis Hulbert/Archive,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gateway Arch, St. Louis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Few pixels, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 15:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

A foto

Hello. You have made some fotos in places to the west of London. There is a village en:Seend in Wiltshire, England which is to the west of London. If you will be some time by this village then make a foto of Holy Cross parish church’s stained glass window with a blast furnaces on it like on this example. There is a necesity of this foto for this category Category:Blast furnaces on stained glass windows. Thank you. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 21:48, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Seend is about 70 miles away from where I'd usually take photos, but if I'm ever in the area I will definitely try. Have you tried asking the Flickr user to release the image under a compatible CC license? That might be an easier option. --Lewis Hulbert (talk)

Ok. It's clear. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 23:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. Nicholas, Newnham, Hampshire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persian astrolabe at the Saint Louis Art Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:15, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bracknell and Wokingham College.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 11:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. Mary the Virgin, Stratfield Saye front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moor Close, Newbold College, Binfield.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sharp, without perspective problems. Daniel Case 02:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)