User talk:Kub347

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kub347!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:05, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Kub347!

Sobre el escudo de armas de monseñor Grzegorz Balcerek, la versión oficial no tiene la cruz detrás del escudo, lo cual es un gran error, la cruz es un elemento heráldico obligatorio, pues es la principal señal que indica que es obispo, el sombrero y las borlas se pueden suprimir del emblema, no es lo ideal, pero se puede hacer, pero la cruz debe estar detrás del escudo, de lo contrario esta indicando que no es obispo, generando confusión, por eso la versión que hice para Wikipedia tiene la cruz, para que el resto del mundo sepa que se trata de un obispo. Por ejemplo los cardenales que no tiene la consagración episcopal, que solo son presbíteros, no tienen la cruz detrás del escudo, indicando que no son obispos. No se quien diseño el escudo pero demuestra un gran desconocimiento heráldico. Por favor permite que la versión de Wikipedia tenga la cruz, no quiero una guerra de ediciones, no tengo tiempo para eso. Saludos --SajoR (talk) 23:30, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

online translation: Hello Kub347!

On the coat of arms of Monsignor Grzegorz Balcerek, the official version does not have the cross behind the shield, which is a big mistake, the cross is a mandatory heraldic element, since it is the main sign that indicates that it is bishop, hat and the tassels can be removed from the emblem, it is not ideal, but it can be done, but the cross should be behind the shield, otherwise it is indicating that it is not a bishop, generating confusion; that's why the version I made for Wikipedia has the cross, so that the rest of the world knows that it is a bishop. For example, the cardinals who do not have the episcopal consecration, who are only presbyters, do not have the cross behind the shield, indicating that they are not bishops. I do not know who designed the shield but it shows a great heraldic ignorance. Please allow the Wikipedia version to have the cross, I do not want a war of editions, I do not have time for that. regards --SajoR (talk) 23:30, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konrad Krajewski (2010).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:43, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nadinsp. Helena Michalak (2018).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joachim Brudziński (2018).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]