User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2015/Q2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi Tony, there is always 3 dustspots on this image (see notes), but I promoted it as they are very difficult to see, nice day. -- Christian Ferrer 11:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, they're so hard to see that I can't find them even when they're pointed out to me. Do you do something special to your monitor to make dust spots easier to see? -- King of 20:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have a good calibrated monitor and good eyes but no more, maybe both helps :). This is good to clean the lens when it begins to be some scouring dustspots. To more easily see the dustspots a combined increase contrast and clarity with your editing software can help, you cancel these settings after after correcting. -- Christian Ferrer 11:42, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My camera has a very good sensor-cleaning system, so I've never had to clean my sensor. It's just that in the rush of things, I forget to turn the camera off and on, so any dust accumulated during that session will show up. The dust seems to be gone from the next day's pictures. -- King of 02:04, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • When I'm dust spot hunting, I open the image in Photoshop and add an adjustment layer (curves), and then set it so that the contrast is really, really high. Select the actual image layer, edit, then delete the adjustment layer, and poof, they're gone. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:51, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Brooklyn May 2015 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dustspots (see note) --Christian Ferrer 04:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed King of Hearts 05:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco from Twin Peaks September 2013 panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Shadow could be reduced, but IMO still QI. --XRay 12:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco from Twin Peaks September 2013 panorama 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:36, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 18:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco from Twin Peaks September 2013 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 10:16, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco from Twin Peaks September 2013 panorama 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:07, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Stitching errors, see my notes. --Cccefalon 11:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed --King of Hearts 20:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ok --Cccefalon 05:45, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:46, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Very few problems for 11mm (cropped). --Hubertl 17:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:59, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francisco from Twin Peaks September 2013 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Use of Mission San Jose (Fremont) photo[edit]

I am a member of the Mission Peak Chamber Singers and we are creating a CD of our Christmas at the Mission concert and I wondered if we could use your Mission Photo on our CD back cover? (I'm using a picture of the choir on the front cover.) We will be producing about 250 CDs which we will sell locally and on our tour to England this summer.

thank you, Jackie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.46.252 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 16 May 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's fine with me. -- King of 02:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. However, the verticals of the building could be rectilinear, as it is not really close to the photographer. --Cccefalon 09:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment you see the perspective distortion, especially on the right side? With this problem I can´t promote this image.--Hubertl 17:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I cropped off a bit of the right side. As for the actual perspective distortion, I don't think it is particularly necessary or desirable to avoid, especially with ultrawide lenses. --King of Hearts 00:51, 13 May 2015 (UTC) With the crop its ok for me.--Hubertl 05:10, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prospect Park New York May 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 03:24, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prospect Park New York May 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:47, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prospect Park New York May 2015 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Might be worth your time to remove the flying birds (I see two) but not a requirement. --Crisco 1492 03:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Douglas Osheroff photographing along CA-1 May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:43, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Jersey City July 2014 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:49, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:43, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 04:08, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 04:08, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prospect Park New York May 2015 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prospect Park New York May 2015 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prospect Park New York May 2015 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Lens correction well done! --Hubertl 05:37, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prospect Park New York May 2015 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Park New York May 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Park New York May 2015 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I like the inclusion of multiple people; shows how busy the area is. --Crisco 1492 04:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment It is a lovely composition and nice colour but the museum building is not sharp but still a important part of the composition.-ArildV 10:38, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bumped up the sharpness a little, better? --King of Hearts 03:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC) Thank you. QI imo. --ArildV 06:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ArildV: Did you forget to change the status? --King of Hearts 00:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 003.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 003.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:02, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Park New York May 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Park New York May 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Park New York May 2015 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:21, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment The glass dome is distorted, try another upright correction. --MB-one 19:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed King of Hearts 01:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but it looks worse to me now. It seems as if the whole glass dome is leaning to the right. --MB-one 12:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All the verticals are straight, so it's gotta be correct, don't you agree? --King of Hearts 00:04, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
*  Support OK for me. --Hubertl 08:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:San Francisco from Twin Peaks September 2013 panorama 5 edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Francisco from Twin Peaks September 2013 panorama 5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park December 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barker Dam Joshua Tree December 2013 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park December 2013 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barker Dam Joshua Tree December 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barker Dam Joshua Tree December 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park December 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:11, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keys View Joshua Tree December 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:11, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barker Dam Joshua Tree December 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:17, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park December 2013 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very nice.--Johann Jaritz 02:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barker Dam Joshua Tree December 2013 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keys View Joshua Tree December 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:49, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prospect Park New York May 2015 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 05:50, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keys View Joshua Tree December 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:10, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artist's Drive Death Valley December 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Christian Ferrer 05:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Badwater Basin Death Valley December 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:48, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Badwater Basin Death Valley December 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 06:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zabriskie Point Death Valley December 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:22, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lower Manhattan skyline from New Jersey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valley View, Yosemite National Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oracle Corporation headquarters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mesquite Flat Sand Dunes Death Valley December 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 04:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 13:09, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prospect Park New York May 2015 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree National Park December 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 13:09, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Badwater Basin Death Valley December 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. I suppose the sky was really that cyanic. --Code 13:14, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zabriskie Point Death Valley December 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality image --DKrieger 11:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Park New York May 2015 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 14:43, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama Towers Las Vegas December 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York New York Las Vegas December 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Anyone seen Z.Z. Top? Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zabriskie Point Death Valley December 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments R.I.P. Michelangelo Antonioni. Excellent quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Newport Jersey City May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paterson Avenue Hoboken May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality, however small CA at bottom right (see note) --Christian Ferrer 04:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McWay Falls Big Sur May 2011 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:55, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McWay Falls Big Sur May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McWay Falls Big Sur May 2011 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McWay Falls Big Sur May 2011 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Death Valley National Park December 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aria Las Vegas December 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riverview Park Jersey City May 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zabriskie Point Death Valley December 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Badwater Basin Death Valley December 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riverview Park Jersey City May 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice but some cw tilt.--ArildV 05:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I'm just not seeing it. Do note that the fence itself is crooked; I calibrated under the assumption that the closest fencepost on the far left and the skyscrapers on the far right are straight. --King of Hearts 05:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Sorry, my mistake. the tilt was an illusion, probably because of disortion of the skyscrapers on the far right. --ArildV 05:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK IMHO for QI (althought, it isn't very sharp to the right). --C messier 06:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Sur May 2011 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Park New York May 2015 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden April 2015 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Smart.--Johann Jaritz 06:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! McWay Falls Big Sur May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A few dark on the left but is good --Livioandronico2013 07:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barker Dam Joshua Tree December 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 07:27, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artist's Drive Death Valley December 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 07:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:54, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larus californicus Point Mugu September 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Mugu September 2013 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualiy.--ArildV 07:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 05:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:25, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Long Island City New York May 2015 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Absolutely brilliant --Crisco 1492 01:03, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 01:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 01:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Long Island City New York May 2015 panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 07:06, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Long Island City New York May 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:46, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Photographer photographing photographers. Two of them are not Wikipedians. What a shame!--Hubertl 06:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barker Dam Joshua Tree December 2013 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:23, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Long Island City New York May 2015 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco September 2012 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photographers Manhattanhenge New York May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 05:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Long Island City New York May 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:59, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 004 edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 004.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Long Island City New York May 2015 panorama 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Long Island City New York May 2015 panorama 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 04:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Long Island City New York May 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco September 2012 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 16:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Quicksort, animation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoboken Terminal May 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:29, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoboken Terminal May 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco September 2012 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:29, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palo Alto Baylands January 2013 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please see my note. --Cccefalon 07:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presidio San Francisco September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality. --C messier 09:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco September 2012 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco September 2012 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality, but what are the foreground structures? --C messier 08:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC
They are unmarked on Google Maps and various other maps I've found on the web, so I assume they're unnamed and non-notable. --King of Hearts 23:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK. --C messier 06:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dock Bridge Newark June 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:43, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Newark Legal Center June 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barker Dam Joshua Tree December 2013 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. It´s a late afternoon situation --Hubertl 23:35, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carmel Highlands May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:43, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glacier Point Yosemite August 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 21:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mono Lake Old Marina August 2013 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:43, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amtrak Dock Bridge Newark June 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mono Lake Old Marina August 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harrison June 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:01, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Long Island City New York May 2015 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Not the best light situation but given these conditions the quality is good. --Code 05:30, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
I hereby award King of Hearts The Photographer's Barnstar – for your tireless work and a plenty of self-created and uploaded nice photos, quality and featured pictures. Well done and keep going!
With best regards, George Chernilevsky talk 17:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amtrak Dock Bridge Newark June 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:40, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:40, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lobos September 2012 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Mugu September 2013 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harrison June 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:45, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Newark Penn Station June 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --ArildV 16:06, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midtown Manhattan from Queens May 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dock Bridge Newark June 2015 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 04:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amtrak Dock Bridge Newark June 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:52, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amtrak Dock Bridge Newark June 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:51, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dock Bridge Harrison Newark June 2015 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PATH Dock Bridge Newark June 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Mugu September 2013 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:52, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carmel Highlands May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 15:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harrison June 2015 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:13, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dock Bridge Newark June 2015 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amtrak Dock Bridge Newark June 2015 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Mugu September 2013 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Mugu September 2013 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is good but those shadows, wait for another user to review, otherwise its promotion. Luxure 09:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support good quality, the these shadows are IMHO not a problem for QI. --C messier 15:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prospect Park New York May 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:11, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 panorama 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brooklyn Botanic Garden New York May 2015 panorama 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fremont Central Park April 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, QI for me --Hubertl 06:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Amtrak Dock Bridge Newark June 2015 003.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Amtrak crossing the Passaic has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 10:19, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Stanford Oval May 2011 panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stanford Oval May 2011 panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]