User talk:Kilom691/Archive 2012 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Humpback whale photo[edit]

Hi. Why did you label the following photo as "unidentified cetacean/mysticeti" (whichever it was)? It is clearly a humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae). Heck, baleine a bosse is the French term for the species! A little kid could recognize it as what it is. SHFW70 (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sorry for not being an expert, but I have never seen a whale. Happy New Year ! Frédéric (talk) 09:43, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then why are you editing pages on subjects you don't know anything about? I just fixed another page that you labeled as an "unidentified cetacean", even though it is clearly a humpback. SHFW70 (talk) 01:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Knickers" is a very British word which many outside Britain may not clearly understand... AnonMoos (talk) 11:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Strebelle La Vague.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Think it's actually a parasol... AnonMoos (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amélioration SVG[edit]

Bonjour,

Je suis tombé par hasard sur cette page en:File talk:Pavage domino.svg. Je me suis donc permis de corriger File:Pavage domino.svg (et d'en profiter pour nettoyer un peu le fichier). Je vois que tu améliores toi aussi les SVG, aurais-tu une technique particulière pour le faire ? (personnellement, j'utilise surtout un simple traitement de texte).

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 15:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour la correction. Oui, je nettoye un peu des svg de temps en temps, avec Emacs. Frédéric (talk) 20:00, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Je t'en prie (vu comme je suis tombé par hasard dessus, je me suis dit que si je ne le faisais pas personne d'autre ne le ferait).
Emacs ? Je ne connais cet éditeur que de nom. Y a-t-il vraiment des avantages (personnellement, j'utiliser l'éditeur de base d'Ubuntu : Gedit ; il est un peu limité mais globalement suffisant, à part peut-être l'absence de regex).
Pour information, j'ai ébauché un cours sur la wikiversité : v:fr:Optimiser un fichier SVG. Si tu y vois des erreurs ou des manques, n'hésite pas à me le signaler.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Emily Davison.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Emily Davison.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Emily Davison.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

howcheng {chat} 05:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SVG[edit]

Hi! Can you create SVG files? I need an SVG file for WikiKids. Thanks, Josse.Cottenier Overleg 16:44, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Well, yes I can. But you should rather describe your need in the Graphic Lab Commons:Graphic Lab, as other people will read your message there and may be interested to help you.
Yours, Frédéric (talk) 18:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 22:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update: internationalisation of date in {{Delete}}[edit]

Hello, Kilom691. You have new messages at Template talk:Delete#internationalisation of date.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

--Ricordisamoa 12:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:CERO fear.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dcoetzee (talk) 05:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Helene Hübener has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henry-Baudot - Femme nue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.217.15.78 00:41, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abies alba Meyers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:24, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acer platanoides Meyers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:36, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adolph Wagner in Blitz.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alnus glutinosa Meyers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Archaeopteryx Meyers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arrosoir.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:43, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Augen und Nerven (Meyers).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:27, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:August Gaul Lion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:30, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aussere Gehoergang (Meyers).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:39, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baender der Hand (Meyers).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Betula pendula Meyers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carpinus betulus Meyers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 12:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 01:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Category:Unidentified birds[edit]

Hi Kilom - this is for unidentified birds, not identified ones, like File:1st American avocets return ... (6806157694).jpg!! If the file is already correctly identified, please use the correct species category, instead of making others do so ;-)) Thanks! - MPF (talk) 16:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Yes, I understand. But is there any better category for "images of birds remaining to be classified in their species category" ? F (talk) 16:13, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, for the above, it is Category:Recurvirostra americana. All it means is looking up the scientific name, that's the same as I am doing, and I can't keep up with the rate you're dumping them in the general unidentified category! For every one I recat, there's 3 more dumped! - MPF (talk) 16:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I am stopping for now. I was hoping that finding uncategorized bird pictures and putting them in some category where to find them and work on them was still "job being done", if not done in full. Finding the binomial name is of course much more time-consuming. I know some of the species, but I am no ornithologist to know all of them just at first sight. Do you think I should stop hunting for pictures of birds that have no category ? Maybe one could create a specific category (Category:Media of birds needing categories) ? F (talk) 16:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is a little more time-consuming, but I think part of the duties of an editor to do so ;-) A lot of them I too have to drag the English name into google search and then copy the scientific name and paste it into the category box - just the same as you would be doing! Yes, if the English (or other language name) doesn't give an immediate clear search result (e.g. 2 or 3 google search results giving different English-scientific combinations), then put it in cat:Unidentified birds for someone else more experienced to check. But 90% of them are simple. - MPF (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just a note to ask you that if all you are doing is adding names, please no not remove the "Check categories" template because I've found a couple where images have been left without locations and local classifications (e.g. "Mammals of X"). Thanks. Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • I find it's actually worse than that- for instance, in File:Emile Faynot, Marville.png, you added a category for the subject of the painting but didn't add one for the artist- so such images appear in the place category, but not the artist category- this is important because he is a 20th century artist and the uploader of these is claiming "own work", which cannot be correct; not adding the artist category makes it far harder to find all such images, should they need to be deleted. Please review your categorising methods: if you're going to add categories, please add all relevant categories before removing {{Check categories}}. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk)
      • I guess you're just going to ignore everyone, huh? You added two photos to the unidentified anseriformes category even though they specifically say in the title what they are. Why do you continue to do this? It's not that hard to copy and paste. Heck, I take the time to type them out (even for the names I don't know off the top of my head)!

Admin ?[edit]

Bonjour,

Accepterais-tu que je propose ta candidature comme admin ? Yann (talk) 13:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non merci, sans façons. F (talk) 17:08, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Categories and please avoid "over-categorization"[edit]

Hi Kilom691, some categories have been tagged as {categorize}, therefore p.e. that edit has been fixed. Please also check Commons:categories and avoid so-called "over-categorization". Best regards, Roland zh (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Alfred Glendening has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 18:08, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons - Jean-Yves Lechevallier[edit]

Hello Kilom691, and thank you for your interest and concern for the artist. Authorisation has been sent by mail, by the artist himself to Commons and an OTRS ticket issued subsequently a while ago.--DDupard (talk) 09:16, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wellcome Images Barnstar[edit]

Wellcome Images volunteer barnstar
Thank you for helping to categorise the Wellcome Image library uploads. You are in our project hall of fame for your work! :-) -- (talk) 17:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your work adding person categories for these... I had originally intended to try to do that as part of the batch upload, but the OCR text I had to work with was unreliable. It's probably a better job for humans. :-) --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 17:15, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific spotted dolphin photo[edit]

Why did you label a photo that clearly states exactly what species it is in the file upload and caption as "unidentified delphinidae"? All you had to do was look up its scientific name. PhysalusAntiquorum (talk) 19:56,