User talk:KPFC

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, KPFC!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Queen – montagem – new.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Queen – montagem – new.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear KPFC,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello KPFC, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Code issues in User:KPFC/common.js

Hi KPFC, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:KPFC/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 5 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 1 character 2: Expected a string and instead saw {. - Evidence: {{SD|1=empty, not needed, <span style="font-family: URW Chancery L">[[User:KPFC|K​P​F​C​]]</span> [[User Talk:KPFC|💬]] 18:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)}}
2. ISSUE: line 1 character 3: Expected ':' and instead saw 'SD'. - Evidence: {{SD|1=empty, not needed, <span style="font-family: URW Chancery L">[[User:KPFC|K​P​F​C​]]</span> [[User Talk:KPFC|💬]] 18:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)}}
3. ISSUE: line 1 character 5: Expected a JSON value. - Evidence: {{SD|1=empty, not needed, <span style="font-family: URW Chancery L">[[User:KPFC|K​P​F​C​]]</span> [[User Talk:KPFC|💬]] 18:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)}}
4. ISSUE: line 1 character 5: Expected '}' and instead saw '|'. - Evidence: {{SD|1=empty, not needed, <span style="font-family: URW Chancery L">[[User:KPFC|K​P​F​C​]]</span> [[User Talk:KPFC|💬]] 18:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)}}
5. ISSUE: line 1 character 6: Expected '(end)' and instead saw '1'. - Evidence: {{SD|1=empty, not needed, <span style="font-family: URW Chancery L">[[User:KPFC|K​P​F​C​]]</span> [[User Talk:KPFC|💬]] 18:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)}}

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 18:52, 22 May 2017 (UTC).

Code issues in User:KPFC/common.js

Hi KPFC, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:KPFC/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 1 column 7: Invalid left-hand side in assignment

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 18:52, 22 May 2017 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vespa orientalis (KPFC) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 15:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinops spinosissimus (KPFC) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinops spinosissimus (KPFC) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanessa cardui (KPFC).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taglilien Hybride (KPFC).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 12:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papilio machaon (KPFC) (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 02:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinops spinosissimus (KPFC) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 02:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phacelia tanacetifolia 01 (KPFC).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passionsblumenhybrid (KPFC).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 22:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blossom of Rubus sectio Rubus (KPFC) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echinops spinosissimus and Carlina Graeca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi KPFC, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Didym (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Didym (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-02 Kurmainzische Statthalterei Erfurt – Jugendfotoworkshop (KPFC) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-22 Carrer de Verdi – Barcelona (KPFC) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Hallo KPFC,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!

---

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi KPFC,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019!

Χαίρετε!

Λαμβάνετε αυτό το μήνυμα επειδή συμμετείχατε προηγουμένως στον ετήσιο διαγωνισμό Wiki Loves Monuments στην Ελλάδα. Θα χαρούμε να συμμετάσχετε και φέτος στο Wiki Loves Monuments και να βοηθήσετε να καταγράψετε την τοπική μας κληρονομιά για τις μελλοντικές γενιές.

Μπορείτε να βρείτε περισσότερες λεπτομέρειες στον ιστότοπο Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Ελλάδα. Ή αν έχετε τραβήξει φωτογραφίες σε άλλες χώρες, μπορείτε να ελέγξετε τις διεθνείς επιλογές. Ο διαγωνισμός του τρέχοντος έτους διαρκεί μέχρι τις 30 Σεπτεμβρίου 2019.

Πολλές ευχαριστίες για τη βοήθειά σας για άλλη μια φορά! --Geraki ^T_L^G 04:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi KPFC,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi KPFC,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:2020-02-13 Margit Stumpp (KPFC) 01.jpg

File:2020-02-13 Margit Stumpp (KPFC) 01.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions, Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely! Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

File:2020-02-13 Margit Stumpp (KPFC) 02.jpg

File:2020-02-13 Margit Stumpp (KPFC) 02.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions, Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely! Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo KPFC,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Logo TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen

Hallo, ich habe gesehen, dass die Datei zunächst zu File:TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen 1984 to 1996.svg verschoben wurde und dann wieder zurückgesetzt wurde. Um etwas Licht ins Dunkel zu bringen, was das Logo angeht, habe ich etwas recherchiert. Ggf. können dann alle falschen Dateinamen entsprechend angepasst werden:

• File:TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen.svg hat so nie existiert, stattdessen war sofort seit 1990 bis heute(!) die Farbgebung wie bei w:de:Datei:Logo TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen (2021).svg vorhanden, siehe auch https://pictures.abebooks.com/inventory/20443485861.jpg. Vielleicht wurde es nicht so gut vektorisiert oder anderes, aber auf dem Mannschaftsbild von 1990 sieht man eindeutig bereits denselben schwarzen Rand, die Schriftart und das Rot vom aktuellen Logo. Entsprechend müsste eigentlich w:de:Datei:Logo TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen (2021).svg das File:TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen.svg ersetzen (ohne Jahreszahl). Sobald der Gesamtverein TSV (ohne Fußball) sein Logo doch mal ändern sollte, kann man ja dann über eine Umbenennung à la ...(1990-20..) nachdenken.
• Von 1984 bis 1990 wurde sogar eine etwas andere Logovariante verwendet, die noch nicht vektorisiert oder in anderer Form hochgeladen wurde, siehe https://pictures.abebooks.com/inventory/20443485761.jpg, 1990 erkennt man es noch auf den Trikots (https://pictures.abebooks.com/inventory/20443485830.jpg). TSV Bayer ist z.B. nebeneinander geschrieben. Sollte das mal irgendwann in der de:Wikipedia oder bei Commons hochgeladen werden, müsste die Datei eigentlich Datei:TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen 1984-1990 heißen.

Ich hoffe, dass das hilfreich war. Vielleicht können die Dateien ja entsprechend umbenannt werden, falls alles mit Commons-Richtlinien etc. vereinbar ist. Da kenne ich mich nicht aus. 194.8.192.162 09:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hallo, 194.8.192.162. Dachte erst das sei ein offensichtlicher Fehler, weil ich das Logo des Fußballvereins kannte ohne zu wissen, dass der Verein ein anderes Logo hat, dann hab ich den Hinweis auf w:de:Diskussion:TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen gesehen.

Das einzige, was bei File:TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen.svg nicht stimmt ist ja die Umrandung und der Rotton, sehe ich das richtig? Falls es in der aktuellen Form tatsächlich nie existiert hat, würde hier einfach eine neue Version hochladen. –KPFC 💬 10:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Genau. Die neue Version existiert ja sogar bereits bei w:de:Datei:Logo TSV Bayer 04 Leverkusen (2021).svg 185.209.238.168 15:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Hallo KPFC,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Renaming

Can you explain to me why the names of some of these files [1]? The designations were made in accordance with the designation of the source which is consequently based on the designations given by the author. Bes-ARTTalk 15:09, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

@KPFC I am going to ask an admin about your doing because I dont think you even tried to check the source. Thanks Bes-ARTTalk 15:26, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Bes-ART, these were not the actual titles of the lithographs. The ones i requested and are visible under the actual lithographs are the alternative titles by G. D. Beresford. The actual titles are also known and can be seen in this website. You have to press each image to see the original title and alternative title. The ones you originally used are certainly not the original. Also, the categories you removed were relevant. These regions were part of the Ottoman Empire, geographically at the time part of Albania or Epirus (depending on the author), and today part of Greece. Demetrios1993 (talk) 15:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

A name like "File:Janina, the capital of Albania.jpg" is a highly ambiguous name, which says nothing about the context of the actual image falling under COM:FNC criterion 2, specifically "Only information is the location (broad) The only piece of meaningful information is a broad location, such as a city, province, or country. In this case, the location is so large that an average person would not be able to figure out where the image was taken or what the image depicted, without assistance from someone that knows the area."

I think including the original name in the new name might have been better practice indeed. But the original names per se were nonsensical. You wouldn't ask the same about a picture named "Washington, the capital of the US.jpg", would you? Regards, KPFC 💬 15:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

I am ok with putting the year to give context, but you did change other by removing the original naming which was very very sensical giving that in that time it was considered by many Albania, so the original name was OK. They are published in a work called Twelve Sketches in double tinted Lithography of Scenes in Southern Albania in London 1855. Bes-ARTTalk 15:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Bes-ART, did you read what i wrote above? The titles you used are modern titles by Wellcome Collection; this can also be understood by the parentheses that are used, referring to modern-day Greece. Demetrios1993 (talk) 15:53, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

I initially assumed, what Demetrios confirmed, that given that one of the title had the addition "(subsequently Greece)" they were not the original titles, so it was obvious to me to move them to the title printed on the files itself. But I don't really care, so you should get to an agreement with him on this. KPFC 💬 16:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Why delete Isabel Path and Fabian Path?

Why are you requesting my track history images for Hurricanes Isabel and Fabian to be deleted?! There is nothing specifically wrong with these two images. The only downturn is they might be hard to differentiate from one another. I've chosen to replace the images with the track plot colors that is reflected on the Saffir-Simpson Article used Here. The image before was using the OLD track colors that are now outdated/. Other people have began replacing these types of images with new plot colors too. I seriously do not understand why you are requesting these images to be deleted. If possible, please re-think and appeal this decision to avoid deleting these two images. If there is something specifically wrong with them, please let me know so i can re-work on them. Thank you. YourGeneric (talk) 04:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)