User talk:Juvarra

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Archive 2008-2010


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

I added the license, thanks! Juvarra (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You like the Irish music? Eddylandzaat (talk) 13:41, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I like most Irish and Celtic music. Juvarra (talk) 17:29, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hoj, Juvarra. Could you please tell us who are the guys in this image? I first thought of Omnia but I think they've all got a different look at the moment. Regards, De728631 (talk) 17:26, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They're a Dutch Celtic folk band named Rapalje. See their website: http://www.rapalje.com Juvarra (talk) 17:29, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, I just got that myself. Should've known since I've seen them last year in Hamburg. Thanks, anyway! De728631 (talk) 17:30, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Virginiakapic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hold and wave (talk) 19:20, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dduke.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hold and wave (talk) 20:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Self-portraits

I noticed that you replaced your 2009 self-portrait with a "NO IMAGE AVAILABLE" stamp. Wouldn't it be easier to request that it be deleted? Rationale: "this is a self-portrait that is used only on my userpage on nlwiki, and I have changed my mind about having it on Commons". DS (talk) 12:19, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaap_de_Wreede.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Everymean (talk) 18:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaap_de_Wreede.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Neferlandje (talk) 18:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Petervangent.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Heav1980 (talk) 12:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Siebelt video still

Hello Martijn, the File:Petersiebelt.png that you uploaded in January this year, seems to be a still from this film. It starts with a mention of Withchunt Production being the 2005 copyright holder. Are you behind this name? Then I think it would be better to mention the film in the source info. If not, the copyright status has to be figured out. Awaiting your reply, regards, Apdency (talk) 18:30, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shot the video and was as that time board member of Stichting Witchhunt Productions. Don't have access to the Google account as Google disabled Google Video accounts only they left the videos remain online. I'm mentioned in the credits of the video. Juvarra (talk) 22:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It's only now that I have taken a look at the end of the film and saw the credits. Everything clear so. I added source info and two categories to the file. Regards, Apdency (talk) 10:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:HorstMahler.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DaB. (talk) 20:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Popned.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pitpisit (talk) 12:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Popned.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pitpisit (talk) 12:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]