User talk:Junior Jumper/2020
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome, Dear Patroller!
Hi Junior Jumper,
You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.
As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.
We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.
If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.
-- ~riley (talk) 18:51, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- @~riley: Thank you.--Tæ 08:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
QI nomination
Thank you for nominating File:Petermann Ranges (AU), Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park, Uluru, Kuniya Walk -- 2019 -- 3636.jpg at COM:QIC. Sorry, but I've reverted your nomination. The photograph is already nominated at the same day. --XRay talk 08:04, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- @XRay: Thanks. I have seen it now.--Tæ 08:06, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Close-up of Tropaeolum majus flowers droplets -20190830-RM-081005.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Close-up of Tropaeolum majus flowers droplets -20190830-RM-081005.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Macropus giganteus - Brunkerville.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Macropus giganteus - Brunkerville.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Fem (Vimeo―260746580).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eatcha (talk) 18:32, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
On Commons:License review/Requests
are two questions by me still pending (re #1 and #3). Best, --Achim (talk) 17:17, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Achim55:
- 1. Yes, I have consider the location.
- 3. I have answer the question.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 17:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
LR request
Hey, I've closed your LR request as not done as it seems like you aren't ready for it yet. However, I believe that you'll become a license reviewer soon. In the mean time, do read COM:Licensing policy and if you have any questions, I'd be more than happy to help you. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 07:39, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Minorax: OK, I will take time for reading the license policies.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 08:54, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Letters of the obscure (26544312078).jpg
Hi, it is not absolutely certain whether the books displayed really contain the famous Epistolae obscurorum virorum - and if so, what edition - since there is no description. Could you possibly talk to the photographer about that issue? Cheers, --Hodsha (talk) 13:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Godzilla Cartoon.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
1989 (talk) 18:52, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Auerbach Kirche Innen-20190815-RM-160503.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Auerbach Kirche Innen-20190815-RM-160503.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, — Rhododendrites talk | 16:44, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Tibet
Thank for you destroying the naming scheme of a set of location maps [1]. "Tibet" to "Tibet Autonomous Region", well, maybe, but why "adm" to "administrative"? You are a file mover? Fine. Please stay to those files where you cannot destroy naming schemes. I am really sick of actions like these. NNW 10:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- @NordNordWest: Why you are saying that I have destroyed the naming scheme. I have only corrected the name of Tibet to Tibet Autonomous Region. Please note that Tibet is an autonomous region of China not an ordinary province. It has been given the special status. So it is better to use the term autonomous region.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 06:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- No, you also changed "adm" to "administrative" although "adm" is the standard. And the corresponding relief map has got still the name "China Tibet rel location map.svg". That's rubbish. They have to have the same naming scheme. NNW 08:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- @NordNordWest: So what you want to say? Should I abbreviate the word administrative to adm in the image.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 09:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, of course. And I will move China Tibet rel location map.svg myself. This is the best example of an unnecessary discussion. It could have been avoided if filemovers would know what they do. NNW 09:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Parliaments seats diagrams
Hello. Thanks for your contributions! I've noticed however that you tend to add black borders to seats diagrams of the composition of parliaments. These borders are used for undirectly elected, nominated or ex officio members in such diagrams, and are very useful to show the difference between seats in parliament with both directly and indirectly elected members of the same party. Could you please not add them to every parliament in your future edits? It's not really needed after all, and add a darker contrast to the colors, which sometime make them percieved differently to the eyes. The only exception is when the color is white, something we usually try to avoid, in which case some shade of grey is usually used. Cordially.--Aréat (talk) 03:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Aréat: But I have seen the black borders in most of the diagrams (even those which are not authored by me).--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 06:54, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Junior Jumper: I think that's because you've worked on indian elections pages, which are somehow in their own bubbles on this matter. I've been participating on elections pages for countries all over the world since years, and I can assure you the borders aren't used in their election pages, nor on parliament ones. You can look up the "List of elections in 2019" for example, or any page on a specific Parliament that show it. ;) Note that I don't mean to prevent the use on indian election pages if that how's it been done in them, but please don't use the borders for others countries diagrams. --Aréat (talk) 07:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Aréat: OK. I will take care in future. Thanks for your advice.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 07:23, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Junior Jumper: Thank you for your comprehension. Don't hesitate to ask if you have troubles with complex elections tables. I'm pretty used to making those. Anyways, have a great day. ;) --Aréat (talk) 07:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 06:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
File:BBC Scotland corporate logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:13, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
File:HDS Tower, Plot F2, JLT, Dubai (34242400486).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Regarding Tamil Nadu Assembly
I think to have a Westminster style assembly member logo.. Nk TheWikipedian (talk) 17:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Suggestion
- Hello @Junior Jumper: If you feel like sharing your valuable suggestions which may help to make me a good editor. I value your time and appreciate your hard work. Thanks and regards. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:53, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Muzaffarpur, Bihar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Biplab Anand (Talk) 02:28, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, De728631 (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!
Welcome to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020
India |
Hello Junior Jumper/2020!
From September 1 to September 30, 2020, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the tenth time. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year. You might remember this event as you had participated in one of the previous editions. We will be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record our monuments for future generations and win exciting prizes! You can find more details in this page.
Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Perfume (5959461561).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Elisfkc (talk) 00:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
File:1939 German doll owned by Jewish refugee (26652536878).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:53, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Oblation (1935) Sunrise (30854495933).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
120.29.106.189 05:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Antique doll (7689349010).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Two Black Vectors ("Dos Vectores Negros" (1967 - Luis Caruncho (1929 - 2016) (34359860272).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : JotaCartas.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 23:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted content
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Please, if you vote at QIC it is not neccessary to promote already promoted images. A second promotion is only useful in the discussion section. Otherwise please try to review images without review first. Thank you. --XRay 💬 05:59, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- @XRay: Please tell me which image I have re-promoted? I think there was a problem in my QIC vote tool.😅😅--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 10:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Please have a look to the QIC page. If you load the page, you can review the images. But you should reload the page after a review. In the meantime others will review too. An example of two reviews: First: "Good quality. --XRay 05:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)", second: "Pro Good quality. --Junior Jumper 05:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)" This can happen, no problem. There are 4 minutes between the two reviews. May be you forget to reload. Another example: First: "Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:55, 30 November 2020 (UTC)", second "Pro Good quality. --Junior Jumper 05:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)" One hour and four minutes between these two reviews. Impossible if there was a reload. --XRay 💬 10:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- @XRay: Thanks. I will take care in future 😀😀--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 13:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Alice (4411655375).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
GeorgHH • talk 13:52, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
File:USA 2013 Global Forever Stamp (13593158764).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |