User talk:Joalpe/Archive 2016

GLAM

Olá Joalpe, vi o pedido de ajuda do Teles na esplanada do commons. O problema é que vocês estão misturando muito os projetos e trabalhos então a comunidade de colaboradores não sabe ao certo a quem compete cada coisa. Não é uma boa pratica operar mais de um usuário com nomes diferentes sem identificar a ligação entre eles e ainda mais editar o mesmo conteúdo ou mesma página com ambos os usuários, é preciso delimitar o que é trabalho do seu usuário pessoal, o que é trabalho do grupo e o que é do laboratório. Todo material a ser carregado no commons deve ser quando possível, carregado pelo proprio autor. Como a maioria das fotos incluem metadados informando o nome do fotografo ou instituição, estes precisam fornecer informações sobre os direitos autorais das imagens ao movimento wikimedia para que possam verificar. Importante não confundir direito patrimonial com direito autoral. Caso tenham feito um contrato com o fotografo, precisam ver como isso ficou definido para que o uso das imagens não impliquem violação de direito autoral. Passamos por essas questões no projeto do Museu da Imigração de São Paulo. Se tiver qualquer dúvida, é só pergungar que te ajudamos nessa empreitada sem problemas. Estamos todos aqui pelo bem do movimento Wikimedia. Os acordos GLAM demandam certa burocracia, mas depois de compreender bem, o trabalho evolui naturalmente Rodrigo Padula (talk) 18:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Obrigado. Comecei aos poucos a resolver a questão, passo a passo. A última etapa está aqui Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Template:MAV-FMVZ_USP-license. Se puder ajudar, agradeço -- é burocracia mesmo. Joalpe (talk) 01:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Guara MAV.jpg

Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Technique of dehydration applied in a foal.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Technique of dehydration applied in a foal.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Capra hircus (goat) skeleton adult skeleton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english vernacular name in parenthesis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 4 September 2016 (UTC) -- like that, Archaeodontosaurus? --Joalpe (talk) 00:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Equus ferus caballus (horse) anatomy dehydrated foals.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english vernacular name in parenthesis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Archaeodontosaurus like that? -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 13:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taxidermized Capra (goat) tongue taxidermized adult goat tongue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment very interesting but this is not a "natural" tongue, we must reduce the scope for taxidermy. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC) -- Hi, Archaeodontosaurus, is this OK now? --Joalpe (talk) 13:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:00, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anatomy of Equus caballus (horse) hoof after technique of vinylite and corrosion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very nice. Look at the changes of scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 01:37, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dehydrated Equus ferus caballus (horse) head.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. INeverCry 21:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glycerinated cattle kidneys.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment it would help if the image is used. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 14 September 2016 (UTC) -- Hi, Archaeodontosaurus, being used on pt.wikipedia. --Joalpe (talk) 09:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Support good start --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Fotos Casa de Nhonhô Magalhães

Olá, professor! Vou responder as dúvidas pelos tópicos: 1- Enviei o modelo do pedido de licença por e-mail para os autores das fotos e pedi para que enviassem ainda hoje o e-mail à Wikipédia. Vou ficar acompanhando e cobrando o envio para que tudo esteja conforme as regras o mais rápido possível. O Rodrigo tem me orientado sobre os passos e tirado as minhas dúvidas. Vou te avisar assim que obter uma resposta dos autores quanto ao envio do e-mail. 2-Sobre as fotos externas, elas serão de minha autoria e vou tirá-las neste final de semana! Ainda não realizei esta tarefa, porque estava esperando a resposta da assessoria sobre a solicitação de entrada à Casa. Como, infelizmente, ainda não há uma resposta concreta e o prazo para subir as fotos é até o dia 28, eu farei apenas as fotos externas, porém continuarei tentando a autorização para conhecer o patrimônio. Espero ter respondido as perguntas! Obrigada pela ajuda --Barbara Cassia Martins (talk) 12:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Professor, estou confirmando com os autores se as fotos já foram publicadas. Acredito que apenas uma está no Instagram, nesse caso, tenho que explicitar na própria foto? --Barbara Cassia Martins (talk) 17:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Oi Professor! Obrigada pela ajuda com o licenciamento das fotos, fiquei feliz e aliviada que elas já foram liberadas. Hoje a tarde eu vou subir as fotos de minha autoria. --Barbara Cassia Martins (talk) 16:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

????

[1]. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 22:50, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Capybara skeleton.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Capybara skeleton.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Skul of crocodile (Crocodylidae).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skul of crocodile (Crocodylidae).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pointer (dog) heart (Pointer heart, after technique of gelatin injection and diaphanization).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 03:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thoroughbred (horse) heart Thoroughbred heart, after technique of formalin fixation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 03:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 03:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Camelus dromedarius heart Dromedary heart, after technique of latex injection and formalin fixation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 22:50, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chrysocyon brachyurus (Guara wolf) heart. After technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tapirus terrestris (Tapir) heart. After technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Equus mulus (Mule) heart, after technique of latex injection and formalin fixation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Otariidae (Sea lion) heart, after technique of latex injection and formalin fixation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vinylite and corrosion applied in a horse hoof.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vinylite and corrosion applied in a horse hoof.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Balaenoptera acutorostrata (Minke whale) heart Minke whale heart, after technique of glycerination.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inia geoffrensis (boto) heart Boto heart after technique of formalin fixation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:56, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aepyceros (Impala) heart Impala heart, after technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:29, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:58, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Coppieters2.jpg

And also:

• File:Coppieters4.jpg
• File:Coppieters3.jpg
• File:Coppieters1.jpg

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola _talk 23:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mazama americana (Red Brocket) heart. Red Brocket heart after technique of latex injection and formalin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris (capybara) heart Capybara heart after technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:14, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Caiman yacare (wetland alligator) heart Wetland alligator heart after technique of formalin fixation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panthera leo (Lion) heart. Lion heart after technique of formalin fixation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 01:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tapirus terrestris (Tapir) heart. Tapir heart after technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 21:31, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

• Conditionally  Oppose solely for the purpose of a question, and will change to support once the question is satisfactorily addressed: What is the English, or if possible the scientific formula name for Spalteholz? Once we've established that, I think the scope should be rephrased to reflect the answer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Myocastor coypus (Nutria) heart. Nutria heart after technique of latex injection and formalin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Ok. --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:49, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aepyceros melampus‎ (Impala) heart after technique of formalin fixation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Conepatus semistriatus (Striped hog-nosed skunk) heart. Striped hog-nosed skunk heart after technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
• Conditional  Oppose per above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 10:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canis familiaris (Dalmatian dog) heart. Dalmatian dog heart after technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 02:58, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

• Conditional  Oppose for the same reason as above: What is the English or scientific name for Spalteholz? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Ikan Kekek: this is the name of an anatomical conservation technique, as you can see here, named after Wener Spalteholz who invented it. There is no English name for the technique, which is know scientifically by this name. --Joalpe (talk) 20:07, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much for explaining. Would you please link to that page or another page that explains the procedure in the file descriptions of all the photos using it? If so, I will be happy to remove my objections and vote to support all photos using it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Ikan Kekek, I have included a reference to Category:Gelatin injection. --Joalpe (talk) 00:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, but I still feel that if you are referencing a technical procedure called Spalteholz diaphanization by name, you should either explain what Spalteholz diaphanization is or link to a page that does. I hope that doesn't seem unreasonable, but I don't think it is, given that Wikimedia is an educational foundation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Ikan Kekek: I have added a description and a reference of the technique on each one of images you have contested. I hope this is enough now.--Joalpe (talk) 12:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Sure. Thank you and  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canis familiaris (Poodle dog) heart. Poodle dog heart after technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Conditional  Oppose per above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:23, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canis familiaris (Afghan Hound dog) heart. Afghan Hound dog heart after technique of gelatin injection and Spalteholz diaphanization.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Conditional  Oppose per above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

 Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:23, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trefoil knot Video on tying a trefoil knot.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and the only video (animated JPEGs are not the same) to cover this scope on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canis lupus familiaris (dog) knee joint Knee joint of dog, after technique of dissection.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Equus ferus caballus (horse) carpal joint Carpal joint of horse, after technique of dissection.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 22:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)