User talk:Jo Weber

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page!

Archive

Welcome to the Commons, Jo weber![edit]

--SieBot 22:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Westalpen-Gebirgsgruppen nach Rochlitz & Bacher 2006.svg[edit]

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problem fixed --Jo 23:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images: Mineraly.sk_-_sutina.jpg[edit]

Hello, the first page generally describes w:gravel. The second one is about w:peat, while the image shows w:ferns. As a Slovak-English dictionary you can use e.g. http://slovniky.atlas.sk/ or ask me again (may take a while until I answer). Or ask at the Slovak Wikipedia (Slovenian is another language, BTW) to translate the descriptions to English. ~~helix84 15:43, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The adjective is Slovak, BTW. No offense taken :) ~~helix84 19:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Klimaänderungen im Phanerozoikum[edit]

Hallo. Du hast bei der Übersetzung des Diagramms "Klimaänderungen im Phanerozoikum" das Kurzzeitmittel und das Langzeitmittel vertauscht. Gruß Fanny the preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.116.228.80 (talk • contribs) 09:54, 4. Apr. 2008

Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe den Fehler korrigiert. Jo 12:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated License[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


It has been found that Image:Anthophyllite in Komatiite.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 14:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problem fixed.--Jo (talk) 14:10, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Jo, kannst Du bitte in Deinem Schema der Eifelflüsse noch die Warche mit ihren Nebenflüssen in die Amel fließen lassen. In der Cat. fehlt z. B. noch der Bayhon, der die Grenze zwischen den Gemeinden Waimes und Malmedy bildet. Danke.--G. C. Friedrich (talk) 19:23, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duhon, die belgisch/luxemburgischen Flüsse sind bis auf wenige Ausnahmen eigentlich Ardennenflüsse, keine Eifelflüsse, oder täusche ich mich da?--Jo (talk) 19:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Jo, da kommt wieder das nicht so recht zu lösende Thema Eifel / Ardennen durch. In keinem wiki-Artikel wird ein Machtwort gesprochen, habe jedenfalls noch nichts gefunden. Die Quellen von Hill, Rur und Pouleurbach / Hogne liegen jedenfalls nur wenige hundert Meter entfernt auf der Hochfläche von Botrange im Deutsch-Belgischen Naturpark Hohes-Venn / Eifel. Warche, Holzwarche, Kyll und Our entspringen ebenfalls nur wenig entfernt rund um Losheimergraben. Die belgische Polzei nennt sich in diesem Gebiet POLIZEIZONE EIFEL. Von Ardennen keine Spur. Vielleicht stöberst Du ja mal bei Gelegenheit in den Artikeln der Gegend ( z.B. Portal EIFEL ). Tschüß --G. C. Friedrich (talk) 12:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ich kenne das Problem gut. Selbst wenn die Polizei (und auch der größte Teil der Deutschen Gemeinschaft) sich als Eifel versteht, entspricht das nicht unbedingt dem allgemeinen Konsens. Meist wird dabei die Grenze zwischen Eifel und Ardennen an den Landesgrenzen gezogen, auch wenn man ebenso gut argumentieren könnte, dass die Sprachgrenze Deutsch/Französisch/Letzeburgisch die beiden Gebiete abgrenzt.
Diesen konkreten Fall sollte man nicht hier diskutieren, sondern auf einer der von Dir angesprochenen Seiten. Aber gib mir bitte Bescheid, damit ich die Diskussion verfolgen kann und eventuell meinen Senf dazu beitragen kann. Gruß, --Jo (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ardennes[edit]

Guten Abend, Jo,

thank you for your geological map.

But it could be better: River Ourthe has two almost equal sources, Ourthe occidentale (You marked it.) and Ourthe orientale. And further important rivers passing through or coming out of the Ardennes are the Sambre, the Oise, and the Sauer/Sûre.

Also: Außer der von dir eingezeichneten Ourthe occidentale hat die Ourthe einen zweiten, fast gleich großen Quellfluss, die Ourthe orientale. Als Teil der nördlichen (und westlichen) Begrenzung der Ardennen ganz wichtig ist die Sambre. Die Oise sollte mit hinein als einer der wichtigsten Flüsse Nordfrankreichs und die Sauer/Sûre als Sammler allen der Mosel zufließenden Ardennenwassers.

Gruß

Ulamm (talk) 21:41, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ulamm, die Flüsse sind hier nicht die Info, die die Karte geben soll, deshalb sind nur zwei eingezeichnet. Die anderen sollen da nicht rein, dafür wäre eine eigene geographische Karte der bessere Ort. Gruß, --Jo (talk) 06:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Jo Weber!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 16:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything fixed --Jo (talk) 14:33, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Geology of Germany has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Arcalino (talk) 15:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mitteleuropäische Varisziden Karte[edit]

Hallo, sag mal hast du vielleicht noch eine Rohfassung von deiner Karte https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kontinentales_Tiefbohrprogramm_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland#mediaviewer/Datei:Gliederung_der_Varisziden_in_Mitteleuropa.jpg ? Die zeigt nämlich sehr schön Deck-, Grundgebirge sowie Fränkisches Lineament Bayerischer Pfahl und wäre leicht verändert in vielen anderen Artikeln sehr hilfreich. --Christian b219 (talk) 12:43, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Da sind einige Betriebssystemsupdates drübergegangen ... Ich suche mal nach.--Jo (talk) 18:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Geht nicht so ohne Weiteres. Ich bleibe dran (wahrscheinlich nächstes Wochenende). Gruß, --Jo (talk) 11:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:PacificNW volcanics.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PacificNW volcanics.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sly Mill.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:AR Ouachita Mountains.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 14:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bedaccelerograph.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely,   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]