User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive7

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 4 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 4 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 4 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, rynek 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --C messier 15:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, rynek 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --C messier 15:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz, wnętrze 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, muzeum 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sufficient quality --Hubertl 12:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Best of this lot --Daniel Case 07:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Little unsharp at upper left, but otherwise OK --Daniel Case 07:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, fort na Owczej Górze 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice DOF --Daniel Case 07:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Bystrzycka Street in Gorzanów, main entrance, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 23:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Kapliczka w Wolanach 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Kapliczka w Wolanach 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 8 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 19:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 9 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 19:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 9 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 5 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 5 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pręgierz w Kłodzku 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay, I guess you're right --DXR 22:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Piława Dolna, kościół św. Katarzyny 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 16:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Kontakt w sprawie publikacji fotografii

Dzień dobry. Bardzo serdecznie proszę o pilny kontakt z biurem prasowym Stowarzyszenia Wikimedia Polska, pod adresem natalia.szafran(at)wikimedia.pl lub ewentualnie o podanie mi swojego maila na stronie dyskusji. Chodzi o publikację Twojej fotografii w czasopiśmie. Pozdrawiam serdecznie Magalia (talk) 12:11, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Międzygórze, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:52, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:41, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Nowy Waliszów, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Nowy Waliszów, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Nowy Waliszów, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met.. --JLPC (talk) 15:56, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Nowy Waliszów, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:52, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Nowy Waliszów, pond at the manor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:41, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Nowy Waliszów, pavilion at the manor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:41, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Lawrence church in Stary Waliszów, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Lawrence church in Stary Waliszów, tower bell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Lawrence church in Stary Waliszów, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 14 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, rynek 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 13 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:24, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 13 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 14 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:36, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sky should be denoised. --Halavar 12:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC) There are 3 white dots on the sky. They should be cloned out. --Halavar 20:59, 18 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 20:01, 19 November 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 22:48, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Zieleniec, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Margaret in Stara Łomnica, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:45, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Margaret in Stara Łomnica, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Stara Łomnica, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good choice. --JLPC (talk) 14:48, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 32 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Matejki 7 i 9.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:48, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment good quality, but tilted --Hubertl 11:48, 21 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 12:51, 21 November 2014 (UTC) QI for me now! Thanks! --Hubertl 18:15, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Daszyńskiego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Daszyńskiego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. P.S. Zgodnie z obowiązującymi zasadami, pamiętaj o odpowiednich nazwach dla swoich nominowanych zdjęć! --Halavar 11:09, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Otmuchów, zespół zamkowy, pałac 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic centre of Kłodzko, evening view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:46, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Roch in Stara Łomnica, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 12:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City Scales House in Nysa, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:45, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City Scales House in Nysa, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope & useful. --Halavar (talk) 12:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polychromy, City Scales House in Nysa, Poland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House number 67 in Stary Waliszów, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Featured

Halo Jacek,can give a look at this [1] photo on Featured? I think they deserve ? Dzięki.--LivioAndronico talk 09:06, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 36 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 20 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:28, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 31 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:06, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 28 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:30, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kolumna maryjna 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

New version

Hi! I have seen that you have uploaded a new version of the picture of the observatory of Edinburgh. Thanks, it looks fine, the only bad thing is that the sky is noisier now. I have also nominated it on FPC, I hope it works, it was a beautiful morning in Edinburgh that day! --Kadellar (talk) 11:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. However, please remove the slight magenta CA in the branches at the left side. --Cccefalon 12:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, ul Wojska Polskiego 23 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment See the note about the left side. --Halavar 11:58, 24 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 12:33, 24 November 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 13:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 43 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 38 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 12:16, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 15 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --C messier 15:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kolumna maryjna 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Both sides are leaning out, the branches of the right tree are purple --Christian Ferrer 07:10, 22 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 19:30, 22 November 2014 (UTC) Sorry, I've just another CAs (see note) --Christian Ferrer 08:25, 23 November 2014 (UTC) This is not the CA, but a small coma and this can not be corrected. --Jacek Halicki 11:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC) However I did, revert if you don't like. --Christian Ferrer 17:29, 23 November 2014 (UTC) Thx although I do not see very much difference. --Jacek Halicki 20:06, 23 November 2014 (UTC)OK. --Mattbuck 22:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House number 112 in Stary Waliszów, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:47, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside chapel in Stary Waliszów, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:48, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Wilkanów, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Wilkanów, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:51, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dzikovia Castle in Tarnobrzeg, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:52, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic center of Duszniki-Zdrój, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frederic Chopin Theatre in Duszniki-Zdrój, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope & useful. --Halavar (talk) 13:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 13:24, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Krakowska Street in Duszniki-Zdrój, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 15:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Kategorie

Witaj – mam prośbę – czy mógłbyś w wolnej chwili dodać kategorie do zdjęć w tym wkładzie [2] – przepraszam za dorzucanie pracy, ale zdjęcia nie zawsze są dobrze opisane, a zauważyłem, że to są Twoje okolice – więc na pewno szybciej niż ja znajdziesz odpowiednie kategorie, a ja muszę przy takich zdjęciach "biegać" po internecie szukając odpowiedzi na pytanie: co to jest, gdzie to jest? na przykład na takim zdjęciu [3] itd. / oczywiście sprawa nie jest pilna, zdjęcia są z września 2013, rok już czekały, więc mogą jeszcze trochę poczekać – pozdrowienia – Darekm135 (talk) 21:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 50.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 48.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 52.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 15 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:43, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 13 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 12 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for QI.--Jebulon 21:33, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:56, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Orientation changed to "portrait". --P e z i (talk) 22:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:18, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:57, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Słowackiego Street in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Słowackiego Street in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:59, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stone bridge in Bardo, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:23, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:15, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Tarnobrzeg, pipe organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Tarnobrzeg, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Sprzymierzonych Street in Duszniki-Zdrój, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Withdraw

Hi jacket if you want withdraw a nomination you must replace the word Decline,nomination o discuss with the word "Withdrawn" and the box will be grey. For this once i do it for you,regards. --LivioAndronico talk 21:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pręgierz w Kłodzku 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 12:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC) It is by no means perfect, but I think it passes the threshold, just so. --Ram-Man 03:42, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Simon and Jude church in Szalejów Dolny view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Simon and Jude church in Szalejów Dolny, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:21, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory in Szalejów Dolny, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Wojska Polskiego Street in Duszniki-Zdrój, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Barbara church in Droszków, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:33, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Left side might be cropped. See the note. --Halavar 12:55, 27 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 13:13, 27 November 2014 (UTC)  Comment I can't accept this. You should cut the left side of the image. Instead, you erased a part of the building that standing there! --Halavar 14:36, 27 November 2014 (UTC)  Done--Jacek Halicki 20:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:27, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:59, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, organy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:58, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 40.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mural w Dusznikach-Zdroju.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:18, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:18, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Anthony in Gołogłowy, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Anthony in Gołogłowy. view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery chapel in Jaszkowa Dolna, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery chapel in Jaszkowa Dolna, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:23, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:55, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Jaszkowa Dolna, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:24, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:55, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Jaszkowa Dolna, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 16:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:56, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kamień Napoleona 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Jagiełły 3 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:19, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Jagiełły 3 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:19, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 22 i 23 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Kościuszki 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ziębice, kościół św. Jerzego 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. The car is disturbing. --XRay 12:14, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Jaszkowa Dolna, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 17:33, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Kłodzko, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:35, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Kłodzko, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Kłodzko, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:52, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Kłodzko, main nave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support IMO best in scope.--XRay ^talk 16:48, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Orientation changed to "portrait". --P e z i (talk) 23:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:07, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poor Clares of Perpetual Adoration monastery complex in Kłodzko, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:57, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:28, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poor Clares of Perpetual Adoration monastery in Kłodzko, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:01, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:28, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poor Clares of Perpetual Adoration monastery in Kłodzko, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints George and Adalbert church in Kłodzko, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- ChristianFerrer 19:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints George and Adalbert church in Kłodzko, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 15:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kudowa-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:15, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kudowa-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kudowa-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 12:09, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kudowa-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Chrobrego 5 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments there are some CAs. --C messier 10:48, 27 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 21:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC) * Support Good for me now.--Jebulon 14:00, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Plebania w Chorzelowie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Plebania w Chorzelowie 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please consider my proposals for eventual enhancements. --Cccefalon 16:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 20:26, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Łukasiewicza Street in Kłodzko, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:20, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Łukasiewicza Street in Kłodzko, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:20, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franciscan monastery complex in Kłodzko, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 20:32, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franciscan monastery complex in Kłodzko, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 20:33, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Martin in Żelazno, evening view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support-- Best in scope Jiel (talk) 14:20, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 18:09, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Kłodzko, ceiling.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 18:09, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Kłodzko, main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:47, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 18:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Kłodzko, northern side nave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:49, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 18:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piasek island in Kłodzko, part of the eastern shore in the evening.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope -- Jiel (talk) 15:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 18:10, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, krzywa wieża 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for a single shot. --Hubertl 15:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:27, 2 December 2014 (UTC)  Comment. Very disturbing shadow. No QI for me. -- Spurzem 18:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:24, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, pomnik Bartosza Głowackiego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Szalejów Dolny, kościół śś. Szymona i Tadeusza 03.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Szalejów Dolny, kościół śś. Szymona i Tadeusza 03.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --Halavar 14:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu, wikarówka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The quality is enough for QI, you won´t nominate this for FP, I presume ;-) --Hubertl 01:16, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI but yet the left side is leaning out (you probably used the open door as reference which is not rectilinear) --Cccefalon 11:16, 26 November 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 17:49, 26 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:38, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wita Stwosza Street in Kłodzko, evening view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Kolejowa Street in Kłodzko, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:32, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, starówka 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most żelazny 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 23:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kudowa-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 16:50, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --C messier 17:10, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
26 Łukasińskiego Street in Kłodzko, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:32, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
26 Łukasińskiego Street in Kłodzko, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:32, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pond in Paczków, view at dawn from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, organy.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, organy.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Przecławiu 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:40, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, pieta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:49, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, pieta 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, pieta 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:40, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Kłodzko, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Kłodzko, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Kłodzko, hall councilors.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Orientation changed to "portrait". --P e z i (talk) 21:52, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:52, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, św. Jan Nepomucen 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but left side is leaning out yet. --Cccefalon 13:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 16:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC) Thank you. --Cccefalon 17:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, św. Jan Nepomucen 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 13:01, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, św. Wacław 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, św. Wacław 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:11, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful.--JLPC (talk) 15:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 01:26, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
29 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : good, but the template "Personality rights" is needed imo. --JLPC (talk) 15:14, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

 Support : all criteria met now. --JLPC (talk) 17:45, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
31 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 01:35, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:58, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, św. Franciszek Ksawery 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:21, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, św. Franciszek Ksawery 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:00, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --663highland 15:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Wojska Polskiego 11 33.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:47, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:56, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statues on the Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko, pieta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good choice + useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:48, 5 December 2014 (UTC)--PS : it would be nice to turn "staues" into "statues" :)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statues on the Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko, John of Nepomuk statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statues on the Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko, Saint Wenceslaus statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:50, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
33 Armii Krajowej Street in Kłodzko, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful; It is understood that photography was hard to do. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Skrzynce, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:54, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Łukasińskiego 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:13, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Kłodzko, evening view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Czeska Street in Kłodzko, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment We can not see the whole building in contrast to this image: File:Kłodzko, Czeska 21, 28.JPG --Halavar (talk) 20:14, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

 Info Na zdjęciu które proponujesz są dwa budynki: Czeska 21 i Browarna 1, sprawdź na Targeo lub Google Maps. Na nominowanym przeze mnie jest tylko Czeska 21. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 00:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

 Support Ok, rzeczywiście, masz rację. Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 00:45, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
30 Czeska Street in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Halavar (talk) 21:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
32 Czeska Street in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
34 Czeska Street in Kłodzko, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Halavar (talk) 23:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klacz i źrebię.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, rynek 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Sandomierska 25, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:09, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Sandomierska 25, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, pomnik Bartosza Głowackiego 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Rynek 31 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better, QI to me now --Poco a poco 16:27, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, zespół klasztorny franciszkanek 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Jacek Can you remove the duals spot of the notes? Grazie.--Livioandronico2013 22:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 23:41, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Good quality. Ops excuse me for dealy --Livioandronico2013 14:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statues on the Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko, Francis Xavier statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:20, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old portal at Czeska Street in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 16:21, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 16:23, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 16:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Władysława Jagiełły Square in Kłodzko, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 14:37, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Pawłowskiego 14, muzeum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Pawłowskiego 14, muzeum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:28, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Pawłowskiego 14, muzeum 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I had raised the darks a little bit more, but nethertheless, it's good for QI. --Cccefalon 12:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Pawłowskiego 14, muzeum 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, św. Wacław 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but ok --Poco a poco 13:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Kościelna Street in Kłodzko, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:14, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Władysława Jagiełły Square in Kłodzko, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Proposed crop, see the note. (wyciąć dół kadru ze zbyt mocno przyciągającym wzrok niebieskim autem i mało potrzebną jezdnią) --Halavar (talk) 23:28, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope --Halavar (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Kościelna Street in Kłodzko, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Kościelna Street in Kłodzko, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:54, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Kościelna Street in Kłodzko, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Kościelna Street in Kłodzko, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Kościelna Street in Kłodzko, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment A short explanation and the date of 1550 would be helpful, in the caption and "VI reason". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good now (see the caption) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Kościelna Street in Kłodzko, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Lutycka Street in Kłodzko, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 13:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Matejki Street in Kłodzko, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 23:27, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:16, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:19, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Skrzynce, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question The church seems to be heavily leaning to the right, can you improve that? Additionally it would be fine if you could add an English description (although this is not mandatory, of course). --Code 20:52, 11 December 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 11:53, 12 December 2014 (UTC) Acceptable now IMO. --Code 22:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Matejki Street in Kłodzko, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 17:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
20 Okrzei Street in Kłodzko, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
20 Okrzei Street in Kłodzko, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Stryjeńskiej Street in Kłodzko, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Stryjeńskiej Street in Kłodzko, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Wodna Street in Kłodzko, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:08, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Wodna Street in Kłodzko, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Administration building at Kłodzko Hospital, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:09, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building of Department of Neurology at Kłodzko Hospital, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, wozownia, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:56, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building of Department of Neurology at Kłodzko Hospital, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:09, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kłodzko Hospital, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:11, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:09, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, wozownia, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please clone out the "something" in upper right corner (see notice). --P e z i 11:55, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, wozownia, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A few dark but good --Livioandronico2013 14:05, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, wozownia, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:48, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, kordegarda 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, kordegarda 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:12, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, ujeżdżalnia, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:04, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, klasztor, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but please, fix the note --Poco a poco 12:13, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, klasztor, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, klasztor, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building of Department of Pulmonology Diseases at Kłodzko Hospital, view from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:21, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building of Department of Pulmonology Diseases at Kłodzko Hospital, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 17:36, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Grottgera Street in Kłodzko, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main Post Office in Kłodzko, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 17:34, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Immaculate Conception in Kłodzko, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 18:22, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:18, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic centre of Kłodzko, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:10, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Wojska Polskiego Street in Kłodzko, view from NNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Krosnowice, view from NNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Krosnowice, view from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Ławica, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz, wnętrze 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz, wnętrze 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz, wnętrze 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:12, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:12, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ratusz 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:48, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel in Krosnowice, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Krosnowice, park near palace, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:41, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint John the Baptist in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:45, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum of von Magnis family in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, view from WNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oppersdorfe's park and palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, view from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:43, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Origami modułowe.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Origami modułowe.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oppersdorfe's palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, view from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:18, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gates of Magnis palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:19, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Saint John the Baptist church in Piszkowice, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Churchyard walls of Saint Catherine of Alexandria church in Stary Wielisław, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:09, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:14, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Kłodzko, ratusz, wnętrze 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Kłodzko, ratusz, wnętrze 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Piszkowice, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 13:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jan Ziębicki chapel mausoleum in Stary Wielisław, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:01, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wall of Saints Simon and Jude church graveyard in Szalejów Dolny.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:01, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:55, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --JLPC 16:38, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --JLPC 17:21, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:26, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, ujeżdżalnia, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:36, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne chapel in Szalejów Dolny, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 21:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne chapel in Szalejów Dolny, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --JLPC (talk) 21:03, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bożków Palace, view from WNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:04, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mary Magdalene chapel in Szalejów Dolny, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:28, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mary Magdalene chapel in Szalejów Dolny, view from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 16:29, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Szalejów Dolny, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park at the palace in Szalejów Dolny, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church complex in Szalejów Górny, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, stare miasto 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:41, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica alarmowa w Pstrążnej, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica alarmowa w Pstrążnej, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica alarmowa w Pstrążnej, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica alarmowa w Pstrążnej, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:41, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a considerable aliasing in the background branches. Should be fixable. Also a little bit brightening will improve this nice motif. --Cccefalon 13:32, 18 December 2014 (UTC) I do not know what this could be improved, the background is just outside the DOF.--Jacek Halicki 20:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC) Maybe you are right. And it's really a nice motif. --Cccefalon 10:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower of Saint George church in Szalejów Górny, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- ChristianFerrer 17:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church graveyard wall in Szalejów Górny, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:58, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gatehouse of Saint George church complex in Szalejów Górny, view from NNE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno train station, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno palace, gatehouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 22:00, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Żelazno, view from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
36 Zdrojowa Street in Kudowa-Zdrój, view from WSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Sts. Peter and Paul in Kudowa-Zdrój, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Sts. Peter and Paul in Kudowa-Zdrój, tower bell, view from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wooden barn in Pstrążna, view from ENE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wiatrak w Pstrążnej, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:09, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wiatrak w Pstrążnej, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wiatrak w Pstrążnej, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, zajazd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cottage from Kudowa-Zdrój in museum in Kudowa Zdrój-Pstrążna. view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me. --Hockei 18:00, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old inn from Szalejów Dolny in museum in Kudowa Zdrój-Pstrążna, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:52, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cottage from Nowa Łomnica in museum in Kudowa Zdrój-Pstrążna, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:52, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry in Pstrążna, view from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:52, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Catherine in Kudowa-Zdrój, wiev from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment need geolocation -- ChristianFerrer 19:33, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  : Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

 Support -- ChristianFerrer 07:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:52, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Catherine in Kudowa-Zdrój, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment need geolocation -- ChristianFerrer 19:34, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
:: Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:49, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

 Support -- ChristianFerrer 07:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:53, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Xmas and happy new year

Merry Xmas and happy new year --LivioAndronico talk 11:11, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.png

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, plebania 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, plebania 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Cccefalon 10:04, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery at the church of St. Catherine in Kudowa-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:46, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Exaltation of the Cross in Konradów, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:46, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Konradów, view from WNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 22:10, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:45, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Konradów, view from ENE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 22:11, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:44, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Orientation changed to "landscape". --P e z i (talk) 23:44, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 23:42, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 22:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 Support Nev1 (talk) 15:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Corsair Dominator Platinum 2x4GB, 1866MHz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:27, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 23:15, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, wóz w skansenie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 09:20, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rzochowska, kapliczka III i plebania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Staromłyński Square in Lądek-Zdrój, view from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka, view from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 Support Nev1 (talk) 15:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Nev1 (talk) 15:16, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:39, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Andrew church in Trzebieszowice, view from NNE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory of Saint Andrew parish in Trzebieszowice, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:11, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:43, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:42, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted a little bit CCW. --Halavar 10:19, 25 December 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 20:29, 25 December 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 21:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Foto 2014 Bożków, pałac 01.jpg is very well made. I did miss the voting but i will put it as photo of the day on Serbian Wiki. Поздрав. --Mile (talk) 16:46, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry in Dańczów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Term "view from WSW" is unnecessary, because this is a simple belfry, it looks the same from every angle. --Halavar (talk) 15:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:31, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good now. --Halavar (talk) 23:00, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity church in Jeleniów, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Chopina Street in Lewin Kłodzki, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Image needs perspective correction. --Halavar (talk) 15:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:32, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

& Support Ok. Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 23:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 Kościuszki Square in Lewin Kłodzki, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, pieta 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 13:08, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, Ukoronowanie NMP 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:34, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, św. Jan Nepomucen 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 13:08, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, Ukoronowanie NMP 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, Ukoronowanie NMP 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:31, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace annex in Trzebieszowice, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:26, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic centre of Międzylesie, market square, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13 Wolności Square in Międzylesie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:55, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Wolności Square in Międzylesie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 18:56, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Bożków, pałac 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Bożków, pałac 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Obniżenie Dusznickie z Zieleńca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. no faults in my opinion. --Hubertl 15:56, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, Ukoronowanie NMP 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:59, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, Ukoronowanie NMP 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:59, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, Ukrzyżowanie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Reddish CA on the gold elements. See the note. --Halavar 13:46, 27 December 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:12, 27 December 2014 (UTC)  Support After another fix it's good now. --Halavar 16:01, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry in Jerzykowice Wielkie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment 1. Look to the notes. 2. Term "view from WSW" is unnecessary, because this is a simple belfry, it looks the same from every angle. --Halavar (talk) 14:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:23, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

• Not done. Only half done;) --Halavar (talk) 23:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  

   Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:42, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good now. All criteria met. --Halavar (talk) 16:53, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Wolności Square in Międzylesie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 01:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
16 Wolności Square in Międzylesie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:15, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2-4 Wojska Polskiego Street in Międzylesie, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 01:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Bożków, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:15, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Bożków, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:16, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Martin in Dzikowiec, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC) Modifiez le paramètre status (attention, il est sensible à la casse) pour le positionner

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Martin in Dzikowiec, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 28 December 2014 (UTC) Modifiez le paramètre status (attention, il est sensible à la casse) pour le positionner

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:39, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Avexir Core 2x4GB, 1600MHz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:09, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB, 1600MHz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Corsair Vengeance 4GB, 1600MHz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:09, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, plebania 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 15:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Dzikowiec, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, Ukoronowanie NMP 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Cccefalon 12:23, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 31, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:10, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 31, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:10, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 31, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:10, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A bit tilted CCW. --C messier 14:43, 28 December 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 21:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --C messier 23:19, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Bartholomew church in Czerwieńczyce, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:58, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Jugów, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The image is leaning to the right. It needs perspective correction. --Halavar (talk) 16:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:17, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good now. Best in scope. --Halavar (talk) 22:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Jugów, view from WNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Michael the Archangel in Ludwikowice Kłodzkie, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 17:11, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former evangelical church, now Museum of the Sowiogórska Land in Ludwikowice Kłodzkie, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 17:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:57, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Featured

Halo Jacek,can give a look at this [4] photo on Featured? I think they deserve ? Dzięki and Happy new year --LivioAndronico talk 10:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
AVEXIR Technologies RAM modules.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Only one in scope or not, I'd suggest to change the scope to AVEXIR Technologies RAM modules. --El Grafo (talk) 17:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:05, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

→  Support --El Grafo (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:27, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most, Ukrzyżowanie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Cccefalon 11:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC)  Question Please can you insert the coordinates? --Steindy 12:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 31, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please can you insert the coordinates? --Steindy 12:48, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 31, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Cccefalon 11:36, 30 December 2014 (UTC)  Question Please can you insert the coordinates? --Steindy 12:48, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 31, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, plebania 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Główna Street in Ludwikowice Kłodzkie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Simple house doesn't need a direction view. So according to that I think this is the best in scope image. --Halavar (talk) 12:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Muzeum Ziemi Sowiogórskiej in Ludwikowice Kłodzkie, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Cross church in Nowa Ruda, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Nowa Ruda, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -Halavar (talk) 17:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Karta pamięci Sandisk SDHC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Boguszyn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle in Nowa Ruda, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drinking house in Polanica-Zdrój, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drinking house in Polanica-Zdrój, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 17:57, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Dzikowiec, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Images needs perspective correction. --Halavar (talk) 13:01, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Lądek-Zdrój, view from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 17:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stare miasto w Bardzie, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 17:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Ukoronowania NMP w Bardzie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 18:00, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 33, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mikrofon USB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo ul. Główna 19, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo ul. Główna 23, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The same woman ... --XRay 12:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bardo ul. Główna 23, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Armii Krajowej 33, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Ukoronowania NMP w Bardzie, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:22, 03 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Zwiastowania NMP w Bardzie, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 13:26, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Anthony in Nowy Wielisław.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Polanica-Zdrój, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 Support — better than File:2014 Polanica-Zdrój, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP 30.JPG. And, I think, the photo may by a QI. --Brateevsky {talk} 10:12, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)