User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive18

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica grobowa w Domaszkowie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica grobowa w Domaszkowie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:46, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica grobowa w Domaszkowie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kapliczka Czterech Patronów na Przełęczy Śnieżnickiej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kapliczka Czterech Patronów na Przełęczy Śnieżnickiej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dom nr 138 w Wilkanowie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 01:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Chmura Cumulus congestus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kapliczka Czterech Patronów na Przełęczy Śnieżnickiej 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportQI--Jebulon 08:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and sharp, good DoF. Please see the note.--Jebulon 08:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC) SupportOK now, thanks. Good series, one of the first times I support five the same day from the same photographer ! --Jebulon 09:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI.--Jebulon 08:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportNice.--Jebulon 08:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good.--Jebulon 08:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumna Trójcy Świętej w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:50, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowej Wsi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowej Wsi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowej Wsi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 09:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowej Wsi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowej Wsi 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowej Wsi 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowej Wsi 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowej Wsi 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Nowej Wsi 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Berschbach Pinus nigra 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Czarna Kopa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it´s good like this whithout the foreground it would be boring. --Hubertl 18:42, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Barbary w Jaworku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Barbary w Jaworku 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Barbary w Jaworku 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Barbary w Jaworku 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 08:23, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Barbary w Jaworku 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Barbary w Jaworku 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 08:37, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Józefa w Międzygórzu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Międzygórze, ul. Sanatoryjna 12 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 08:41, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Międzygórze, ul. Sanatoryjna 12 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Międzygórze, ul. Sanatoryjna 12 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good photo -- George Chernilevsky 08:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Międzygórze, ul. Sanatoryjna 5 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:07, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Międzygórze, ul. Sanatoryjna 5 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Międzygórze, ul. Sanatoryjna 5 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Międzygórze, ul. Sanatoryjna 5 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 11:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Międzygórze, ul. Wojska Polskiego 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Międzygórze, ul. Wojska Polskiego 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:13, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Międzygórze, ul. Wojska Polskiego 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:13, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wilkanowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The sharpness of the top of the lamp post could be better, but excellent picture, with a very good anc appealing composition.--Jebulon 08:40, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wilkanowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wilkanowie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

File talk:2016 Międzygórze, ul. Sanatoryjna 13 03.jpg

Witam,

ustosunkujesz się jakoś do tej uwagi? --jdx ^Re: 14:55, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wilkanowie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko PTTK „Na Śnieżniku” 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Lewis Hulbert 10:05, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko PTTK „Na Śnieżniku” 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko PTTK „Na Śnieżniku” 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko PTTK „Na Śnieżniku” 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko PTTK „Na Śnieżniku” 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko PTTK „Na Śnieżniku” 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko PTTK „Na Śnieżniku” 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportQI. I like the sky (difficult, but well managed).--Jebulon 16:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stacja ratunkowa GOPR w Międzygórzu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościoł Michała Archanioła w Rudnicy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:15, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościoł Michała Archanioła w Rudnicy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:31, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościoł Michała Archanioła w Rudnicy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościoł Michała Archanioła w Rudnicy 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko PTTK „Na Śnieżniku” 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Rudnicy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Rudnicy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Rudnicy 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:10, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Rudnicy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Chronostych na cokole figury św. Jana Nepomucena w Lądku-Zdroju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:59, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościoł Michała Archanioła w Rudnicy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of the Visitation in Wambierzyce, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Gigant in Międzygórze, northern part.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Archangel Michael in Rudnica, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Archangel Michael in Rudnica, exposure from NNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 10:43, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Pierre André (talk) 10:24, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wodospad Wilczki w Międzygórzu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wodospad Wilczki w Międzygórzu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:19, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Węzeł szlaków turystycznych na Hali pod Śnieżnikiem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:19, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Śnieżnik 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Śnieżnik 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of John of Nepomuk in Lądek-Zdrój, chronogram.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Archangel Michael in Rudnica, altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Archangel Michael in Rudnica, porch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Bolesława Chrobrego Square in Kłodzko, Glatzer Gebirgsverein plaque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope, useful.--Jebulon (talk) 02:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Śnieżnik 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Śnieżnik 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:33, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Śnieżnik 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Śnieżnik 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:33, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Śnieżnik 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Biedronka, logo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower house in Rudnica, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Śnieżnik 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:29, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Śnieżnik 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 08:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Śnieżnik 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 08:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Średniak i Smrekowiec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:10, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Żmijowiec i Czarna Góra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:10, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Archangel Michael in Stary Gierałtów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 17:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Anioł przed mauzoleum von Magnisów w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Betonowóz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bukówka, Wzgórza Rogówki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Cmentarz w Nowym Gierałtowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though somewhat random composition. --Smial 09:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Cmentarz w Nowym Gierałtowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower house in Rudnica, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Pierre André (talk) 21:12, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower house in Rudnica, tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Pierre André (talk) 21:13, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum of von Magnis family in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, angel sculpture in front of mausoleum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rogówka Hills, Bukówka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mercedes-Benz Actros 3236 (first generation), cement mixer truck.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Cmentarz w Nowym Gierałtowie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Cmentarz w Nowym Gierałtowie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Cmentarz w Nowym Gierałtowie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Cmentarz w Nowym Gierałtowie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Cmentarz w Nowym Gierałtowie 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bystrzyckie, Czerwoniak, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station building in Stronie Śląskie, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 21:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station building in Stronie Śląskie, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 21:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stronie Śląskie train station, water crane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Czerwoniak 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Czerwoniak 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Stroniu Śląskim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support IMO, the composition of the previous photo (File:2016_Dworzec_kolejowy_w_Stroniu_Śląskim_01.jpg) is much more better, but, this photo is a QI, too. Dmitry Ivanov 12:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Stroniu Śląskim 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery at the church in Nowy Gierałtów, lapidarium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 07:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

@Moheen Reeyad: What for? I don't plan to nominate other photos in this scope. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

 Comment Scope is too broad unless this image shows the entire cemetery. Charles (talk) 08:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: The cemetery is bigger, but lapidarium is all in the picture. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

 Comment OK, if that's what it is. Charles (talk) 22:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

 Support OK for me, but Moheen demand is not unreasonable. If you put the view orientation here avoids many discussions. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stronie Śląskie train station, water tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 21:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 21:14, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stronie Śląskie train station, crane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 21:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Żelazno.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope ~ Moheen ^(talk) 23:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magnis palace and park complex in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 23:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 21:16, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Stroniu Śląskim 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Stroniu Śląskim 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Stroniu Śląskim 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:52, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Stroniu Śląskim 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Stroniu Śląskim 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magnis Palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 19:53, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:26, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gates of Magnis palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, Jacek you have forgotten to add the geocode. DeFacto (talk). 21:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 06:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:29, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magnis palace and park complex in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, home of gardener, and orangery with greenhouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:30, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magnis palace and park complex in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, cowshed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:33, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:33, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2016 Anioł przed mauzoleum von Magnisów w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Anioł przed mauzoleum von Magnisów w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Bolesławowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Bolesławowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Stroniu Śląskim 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:26, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Stroniu Śląskim 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magnis palace and park complex in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, residential outbuilding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bialskie Mountains, Gierałtowska Kopa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Goszów, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment SW exposure perhaps? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 21:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bialskie Mountans, Gołogrzbiet i Łysiec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór von Münchhausenów w Żelaźnie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór von Münchhausenów w Żelaźnie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:10, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich, brama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:10, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bolesławów, John of Nepomuk statue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Nowy Gierałtów, grave of priest Stefan Witczak.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Złote Mountans, Kowadło, exposure from WSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady Queen of Poland and Saint Maternus church in Stronie Śląskie, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 14:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich, dom ogrodnika i oranżeria 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich, dom ogrodnika i oranżeria 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich, dom ogrodnika i oranżeria 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich, obora 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich, oficyna mieszkalna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Stroniu Śląskim 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Vincent church in Bielice, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Michael Klahr plaque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Pierre André (talk) 21:07, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Vincent church in Bielice, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Solidarity Polish-Czech-Slovak plaque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Andrew church in Trzebieszowice, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Nowy Gierałtów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich, park 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gierałtowska Kopa, Góry Bialskie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gierałtowska Kopa, Góry Bialskie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:04, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Goszów 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint John the Baptist in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint John the Baptist in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, spire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Bolesławów, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Bolesławów, exposure from WSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Gołogrzbiet i Łysiec, Góry Bialskie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Grób ks. Stefana Witczaka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kowadło, Góry Złote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, perhaps a bit bright --DXR 08:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Królowej Polski i św. Maternusa w Stroniu Śląskim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Bolesławów, spire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Bolesławów, ridge turret.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nowa Biela, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Biała Lądecka in Nowy Gierałtów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:53, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół w Bielicach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół w Bielicach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Verum 09:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno palace, exposure from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope ~ Moheen ^(talk) 12:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory of Saint Andrew parish in Trzebieszowice, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:22, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory of Saint Andrew parish in Trzebieszowice, exposre from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stary Gierałtów, fire station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół w Bielicach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół w Bielicach 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół w Bielicach 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Andrzeja w Trzebieszowicach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Andrzeja w Trzebieszowicach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:27, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Śnieżnik Mountains, Szeroka Kopa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Złote Mountains, Szewczyk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Słupiec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Złote Mountains, plaque on Gierałtowska Pass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folwark in Żelazno, barn and granary.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Pierre André (talk) 20:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folwark in Żelazno, outbuilding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:50, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Pierre André (talk) 21:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Żelazno palace park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Pierre André (talk) 21:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Post office in Strzelin, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Post office in Strzelin, avant-corp.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House of the Dukes of Brzeg in Strzelin, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Strzelin, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Strzelin, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Cmentarz w Nowym Gierałtowie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Cmentarz w Nowym Gierałtowie 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Cmentarz w Nowym Gierałtowie 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:47, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:46, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Strzelin, sigbal box, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:56, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Strzelin, signal box, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Strzelin, first platform shed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Strzelin, second platform shed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support -- Mathieu MD (talk) 06:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:59, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:48, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Kalinowice Górne, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 00:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Kalinowice Górne, residential outbuilding, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 00:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Kalinowice Górne, residential outbuilding, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 00:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Logo Biedronki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Biela 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:49, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Biela 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:34, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Biela 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Biela 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:35, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Kalinowice Górne, outbuilding, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Pierre André (talk) 08:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Immaculate Conception and Saint Susanna church in Stolec, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support--Pierre André (talk) 08:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Immaculate Conception and Saint Susanna church in Stolec, spires.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:50, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinty church in Przeworno, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:50, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Bartholomew church in Wigańcice, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- Mathieu MD (talk) 06:58, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Biela 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 10:09, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Biela 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Biela 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowa Biela 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 10:09, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowy Gierałtów, próg na Białej Lądeckiej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Bartholomew church in Wigańcice, gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Bartholomew church in Wigańcice, cemetery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Niedźwiednik, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support--Pierre André (talk) 08:56, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Niedźwiednik, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Diagrams

Hello dear Jacek Halicki. I will be glad to know your opinion about this image, this, this, and also this. I spent hours to illustrate them and they are also featured pictures in Commons. It definitely will be important for me to know and see your opinion. Thank you and also thanks for your contributions on Wikimedia projects. Ali Zifan 04:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

@Ali Zifan: Thanks for your confidence, but I don't know about biology or svg files. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nowy Gierałtów, próg na Białej Lądeckiej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 08:56, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie, oficyna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:03, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Niedźwiednik, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Niedźwiednik, gatehouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. --Pierre André (talk) 22:07, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Niedźwiednik, porch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Evangelist church in Niedźwiednik, defensive wall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be useful that this image is used. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 11:23, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 00:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie, oficyna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the image is leaning out (at the left). --XRay 09:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 10:11, 31 July 2016 (UTC)  Support Thanks. --XRay 13:07, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie, oficyna mieszkalna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie, oficyna mieszkalna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Żelaźnie, stajnia i spichrz 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Some noise in the shadows. --XRay 09:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Plebania w Trzebieszowicach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Martin church in Stary Henryków, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be useful that this image is used. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 00:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks! Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 17:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Martin church in Stary Henryków, spire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Martin church in Stary Henryków, porch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Martin church in Stary Henryków, epitaph of the fifteenth century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Plebania w Trzebieszowicach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Remiza OSP w Starym Gierałtowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Remiza OSP w Starym Gierałtowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Sklep Biedronka w Stroniu Śląskim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Łysa Góra i Ostróg, Góry Bardzkie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Defensive walls in Strzelin, at Pocztowa Street.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nysa Kłodzka, in Morzyszów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Tomice, park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Karczowice, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful (but needs some refurbishment ;-) ) --Llez (talk) 04:53, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

File:2016 Tablica informacyjna na Przełęczy Gierałtowskiej 01.jpg

File:2016 Tablica informacyjna na Przełęczy Gierałtowskiej 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wdwd (talk) 14:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stronie Śląskie, ul. Kościuszki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stronie Śląskie, ul. Nadrzeczna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Szewczyk (Hraniční vrch), Góry Złote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Słupiec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 12:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Szeroka Kopa, Masyw Śnieżnika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Churschwandt Palace in Stolec, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Pierre André (talk) 22:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Tomice, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 04:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Churschwandt Palace in Stolec, first outbuilding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 04:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Churschwandt Palace in Stolec, second outbuilding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 04:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2016 Tablica informacyjna na Przełęczy Gierałtowskiej 01.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tablica informacyjna na Przełęczy Gierałtowskiej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zespół pałacowy w Żelaźnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 08:42, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zespół pałacowy w Żelaźnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:44, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Churschwandt Palace in Stolec, third outbuilding.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Churschwandt Palace in Stolec, third outbuilding, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Brzegowa Street in Strzelin, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Brzegowa Street in Strzelin, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Budynek urzędu pocztowego w Strzelinie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tablica pamiątkowa na Przełęczy Gierałtowskiej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Brzegowa Street in Strzelin, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Brzegowa Street in Strzelin, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Brzegowa Street in Strzelin, balcony.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Brzegowa Street in Strzelin, cornice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dom Książąt Brzeskich w Strzelinie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly noisy but still OK IMO (ISO 400 wasn't the best option here). --Basotxerri 08:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:21, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:39, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Wodna Street in Strzelin, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Wodna Street in Strzelin, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Wodna Street in Strzelin, balconies.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:26, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Wodna Street in Strzelin, corbels.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Would nice to have heading info along the geoloc --Mathieu MD (talk) 09:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:46, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, budynek telegrafu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:41, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, druga wiata peronowa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:46, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, druga wiata peronowa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:41, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Świętego Floriana Street in Strzelin, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Świętego Floriana Street in Strzelin, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Świętego Floriana Street in Strzelin, remains of the castle wall of fifteenth century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town Hall Tower in Strzelin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Mathieu MD (talk) 17:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, druga wiata peronowa 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:46, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, druga wiata peronowa 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:46, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, druga wiata peronowa 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:45, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, nastawnia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:46, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, nastawnia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:43, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nowy Gierałtów, waterfall on Biała Lądecka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, beautiful image and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trackless trains in Poland, in Srebrna Góra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. --Pierre André (talk) 21:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Castle, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Castle, tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, nastawnia 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, nastawnia 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, pierwsza wiata peronowa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, zejście do tunelu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, zejście do tunelu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, zejście do tunelu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, zejście do tunelu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dworzec kolejowy w Strzelinie, zejście do tunelu 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Kalinowicach Górnych 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Kalinowicach Górnych 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Tablica informacyjna na Przełęczy Gierałtowskiej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Kalinowicach Górnych 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Kalinowicach Górnych 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Kalinowicach Górnych 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Kalinowicach Górnych 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Kalinowicach Górnych 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Kalinowicach Górnych 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 09:43, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Kalinowicach Górnych 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Kalinowicach Górnych 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Kalinowicach Górnych 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Kalinowicach Górnych 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:48, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015 Igliczna, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Igliczna, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica szpitalna w Strzelinie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica szpitalna w Strzelinie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP i św. Zuzanny w Stolcu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP i św. Zuzanny w Stolcu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP i św. Zuzanny w Stolcu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Trójcy Przenajświętszej w Przewornie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Wigańcicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Wigańcicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Wigańcicach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Meteor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Wigańcicach 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Wigańcicach 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Wigańcicach 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Castle, cloister.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Castle, palm vault.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:00, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Castle, fresco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:00, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Castle, Marianne of the Netherlands stained glass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 21:00, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perseids, in Poland in 2016.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Pierre André (talk) 09:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Scope seems to me a little bit too narrow - what is difference between Perseids viewed from Poland and Perseids viewed from anywhere else? (but - maybe I am wrong...)--Grtek (talk) 20:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty w Niedźwiedniku 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:56, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Marcina w Starym Henrykowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:15, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Marcina w Starym Henrykowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:01, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Marcina w Starym Henrykowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:02, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heating plant in Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Castle, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 22:02, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park at Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Castle, southern part.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Garden at Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Castle, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Garden at Kamieniec Ząbkowicki Castle, gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Ratusz w Lądku-Zdroju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good.--Jebulon 08:06, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Marcina w Starym Henrykowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:56, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Marcina w Starym Henrykowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:06, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mury obronne w Strzelinie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Nysa Kłodzka w Morzyszowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:06, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former protestant church in Srebrna Góra, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:25, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former protestant church in Srebrna Góra, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:26, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway suspension bridge in Srebrna Góra, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:27, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway suspension bridge in Srebrna Góra, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:27, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Scope changed at Commons:Valued image candidates/Castle Rising Castle 2016.jpg

Hi Jacek, I've changed the scope on Commons:Valued image candidates/Castle Rising Castle 2016.jpg following a reviewer's comment. Can you please review your vote. Thanks. DeFacto (talk). 17:45, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Karczowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Park w Karczowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:23, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Park w Karczowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:10, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Park w Rudnicy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:23, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Park w Tomicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 08:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway viaduct in Srebrna Góra, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway viaduct in Srebrna Góra, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bardzkie, Łysa Góra and Ostróg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
30 Letnia Street in Srebrna Góra, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Can you show a link to an official government website please which lists all these buildings as official monuments. Thanks. Charles (talk) 12:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment temporary oppose till my question is answered. thanks. Charles (talk) 10:59, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
• Here and here. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:30, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

 Comment Many thanks. Charles (talk) 10:33, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Karczowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks like there is plenty of work to do at the palace.--Famberhorst 15:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Stolcu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Main object is sharp. However grass in the front looks very unnatural, I think oversharpened and overexposed; you might better crop it and/or make it darker. IMO the pylon adds something to the composition. ----Michielverbeek 08:32, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Stolcu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Stolcu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Tomicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Srebrna Góra Fortress, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:31, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shooting stands in Poland, in Stara Morawa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cierniak, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC)