User talk:Ivan2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ivan2010!
Pay attention to copyright
File:DOBLE JUEGO.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Motopark (talk) 15:06, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atardece en el campo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 22:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fragmento del Valle de Viñales. Cuba.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:30, , 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Yayabo. SS.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Componentes electronicos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:19, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sistema de regadio circular.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puesta de Sol en las montañas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful. --Mattbuck 21:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sistema de regadio circular en toda su magnitud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Good image, but please add an english description and a geo location.--XRay 07:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)  Comment Agradezco la sugerencia pero no poseo conocimientos suficientes como para hacer la la descripción correcta en ingles, ademas de no contar con la posibilidad de geolocalizar. Agradeceria mucho si alguien pudiese ayudarme en eso, ¿Seria posible?. Muchas gracias. --Ivan2010 08:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)✓ Done, french version added too. But I'm not able to geolocalize. As it is not a mandatory, I  Support support this good image.--Jebulon 21:46, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Margaritas Chinas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --JOAQUIND 14:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cupula parroquia poblado de Fomento. Sancti Spiritus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Lo siento, solo tiene hecha una pequeña correcion, pense que seria permitido y podria ser valorada. Ojala pudiera ser reconsiderada nuevamente--Ivan2010 12:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Iván, me temo que tal y como está no es aceptable. ¿Por que no intentas aplicar en esa zona una máscara para eliminar ruido, así se podría eliminar las líneas visibles. Si no sabes cómo, puedo darle un intento Poco a poco 13:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sería fabuloso si usted pudiese, y se lo agradeceria mucho, es una de las parroquias más antiguas que en este 2014 está cumpliendo medio siglo. Muchas gracias Poco a poco, y un saludo cordial desde aquí--Ivan2010 13:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ New version uploaded now we need a third opinion Poco a poco 21:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias Poco a poco por tu trabajo y tu esfuerzo, esperemos entonces a una segunda opinión. Un saludo.Ivan201016:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Switching to English: we need a third opinion! Poco a poco 20:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC) I dont fully understand the discussion, but i think the new version is good enough for QI. --ArildV 09:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle en Trinidad que da acceso al Casco Historico.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radio Selena B210.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The crop is far too tight. Can you recover a little bit more space? --Cccefalon 21:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done--Ivan2010 16:34, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Support The lower part could be a little bit darker and magenta reduced, but it already can pass as QI imo. --Cccefalon 19:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Edición extraña[edit]

Hola Iván, ¿podrías explicar esta edición?. No la entiendo la mire por donde la mire. Saludos, Poco2 22:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Iván, aquí te vuelves a equivocar, está página se ha asignado a tu cuenta, pero eso no significa que puedas hacer en ella lo que quieras. Eliminar mensajes civilizados de forma aleatoria no es de recibo. Por favor, no lo vuelvas a hacer. Poco2 18:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hola Poco a poco, evidentemente hay algunos que aunque tratamos, luego no logramos. Pensé que podía organizar esa página como la de usuario. Una vez más pienso, pienso mal, y actuo acorde a lo que pensé. Y creo que me quedó claro que con buenas intenciones se comenten barbaridades tambien. Creo que debo detenerme un poco, y quizas aprender antes de continuar haciendo cosas así. Releeré nuevamente, y estaré al tanto de lo que me digas, y lo que me digan finalmente. Gracias otra vez, en verdad lo siento. Ivan2010
Te dejo un par de enlaces: es:WP:PDD, es:WP:UT Poco2 20:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias Poco a poco, no había visto estos enlaces, ni siquiera sabía que exitian. Las he pasado a word para releerlas con calma, así como algunos enlaces más que están en las mismas, mi conexión es aún via modem, y me demora mucho el estar tiempo conectado y pasar de pagina a pagina. Estaré al tanto. Un salduo,Ivan2010

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radio SELENA-B210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Cccefalon 05:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piedras en Rio Yayabo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle de los Ingenios. Trinidad.Cuba.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Cccefalon 15:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Typewriter Underwood 1945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --P e z i 19:32, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read COM:Image guidelines carefully before promoting anything at QIC! This image is for sure not QI! --A.Savin 12:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hola A.Savin, he comprendido, gracias por su explicación, me disculpo ante usted, no ocurrirá más, un saludo y le reitero las gracias.

Firma[edit]

Hola Iván, espero que vaya todo bien por allá. Te tengo una respuesta pendiente referente a las firmas. Cuando incluyes un comentario en una discusión lo correcto y conveniente es firmar para que se incluyan enlaces a la página de usuario y/o discusión, así como la fecha. El software de Mediawiki facilita esta función transformando de forma automática las cuatro tildes en la firma. Así que basta con que termines un comentario incluyendo lo siguiente ~~~~ y Mediawiki se encarga del resto. Las cuatro tildes las encuentras en la cabecera de la ventana de edición (haz clic en Edittools, al español herramientas de edición). Alternativamente puedes incluir directamente las cuatro tildes "a mano". En mi teclado se encuentran en la tecla del "*" y "+" y para añadirlas tienes que presionar simulatáneamente las teclas "alt gr" (a la derecha de la barra) y "+". Espero que te sea de ayuda. Saludos! Poco2 07:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC) PD: Te dejo un enlace: es:Ayuda:Tutorial (páginas de discusión)[reply]

Hola Poco_a_poco, gracias por tus palabras que son muy valiosas para mi, pues me ayudan en algo que me es crucial; “ahorrar tiempo de conexión ante mi anticuado modem”, así que en verdad mil gracias. Este es el primer comentario que firmo de la forma en que me has explicado, lo hice haciendo click sobre las 4 tildes que están en la ventana de edición y todo funcionó a las mil maravillas!!!!, hice también un intento con el teclado, pero eso no me funcionó, al parecer debe ser algo de mi teclado o del idioma en que esté, pero no importa, la ya opción que me has dado de poder hacerlo mediante las tildes de la ventana de edición, es súper válido para mí. No te soy más extenso esta vez como en otras ocasiones para no ocuparte mucho de tu tiempo, una vez más gracias por tus ayudas de siempre y por acá seguiré, colaborando lentamente y tratando de hacer las cosas bien para que el paso del tiempo me ayude. Cuídate mucho por allá, y sabes que por aquí estoy por si algo necesitas en que lo que sea yo quien te pueda ayudar. Un abrazo Ivan2010 13:13, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nota: Ahora que he usado un par de veces más la firma con las tildes, he notado que sí me coloca la firma, fecha y hora, pero no me convierte en link de enlace mi nombre de usuario ¿¿?? Ivan2010 13:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porton de entrada Cementerio de Colon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 05:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signature for voting[edit]

When you voted in the "/2014 - June - Ruins, cemeteries and ghostly places" challenge here, your signature did not have a link to your user page. Please check your signature is configured to produce a link. The tool I use to count votes relies on this to work out who voted and whether they are eligible. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 17:34, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hy Colin,done. Excuse me and thank you for your observation. Thank you again. -- Ivan2010

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atardecer en piscina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please reduce the colour noise.--ArildV 05:20, 7 September 2014 (UTC) Thank you. I think the new version is ok.--ArildV 18:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Don't over-categorize[edit]

Hi Ivan2010, please don't over-categorize your images. Respect COM:OVERCAT to avoid further mistakes. -- Ies (talk) 14:04, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me,-- Ies, I will correct it, thank you for your alert. --Ivan2010 14:20, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi --Ies, corrected,Thanks again. --Ivan2010 14:25, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arbol seco en un amanecer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deseos[edit]

Hola Iván, muchas gracias por tus deseos que quisiera hacer extensivos a ti y a tu familia. Un fuerte abrazo a tu precioso país y un placer poder haberte echado una mano, Poco2 14:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Participation on COM:QI[edit]

Ivan;

Please be careful when you nominate images on COM:QI. You removed most of the nominations and reviews in a recent edit.[1] --Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:51, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Instrumentos medicos de uso en Cardiología.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Bahnfrend 16:05, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Objetos medicos de uso en Cardiología.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Bahnfrend 16:05, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reloj de pendulo Ansonia C-1904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 18:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burro para tomarse fotos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI but poor animal -- Spurzem 22:23, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque en Casco Historico. Trinidad.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Buzón del desafío de febrero 2016[edit]

Hola, he visto la foto del león, tengo otra foto similar, pero antes de subir mi foto necesito saber el lugar donde proviene tu foto ? --Doalex (talk) 09:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC) Otra cosa, la fecha de tu foto es 10 de marzo de 2016, 10:45:46 ??[reply]

Hola --Doalex, mis saludos para usted. Mi foto del león proviene de la fachada de entrada de la entidad de correos que radica en la Habana Vieja, en la provincia de La Habana, acá en Cuba. Es la única instalación para el servicio de correos que tiene ese tipo buzón en La Habana Vieja, no conozco si pueda existir en otro sitio una igual o similar.
En cuanto al error de la fecha, fue algo que no aprecié, y al no darme cuenta no lo corregí, esa foto yo salí a tomarla hace solo unos días.
Para lo que pueda servirle acá estoy. Le reitero mis saludos, -- Ivan2010 11:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
He corregido la fecha de ambas fotografías, muchas gracias por su observación.
Ivan2010, existen fotos parecidas en España vease Category:Post boxes in Spain. --Doalex (talk) 17:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias --Doalex he podido verlas, no sabia ese dato. De todas formas era algo lógico, esa entidad de servicios de correos de acá, data de la época de la colonia española en la isla, estoy seguro que si hiciéramos una investigación tal vez fuera la misma compañía de correos de allá a la que pertenecía esta. Gracias por permitirme un conocimiento nuevo. Cuente con un servidor. Mis saludos -- Ivan2010 17:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ivan2010 Por la fecha no se si es importante pero en los datos de los archivos en la sección Metadatos se ve Fecha y hora de la generación de los datos : 10:45 10 mar 2016, no se que maquina utilza usted pero tiene algunos ajustes que no van, en el menú de fechas.--Doalex (talk) 17:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Si, --Doalex tiene usted toda la razón, el error estaba en el menú fecha de la cámara, al ser una fecha adelantada, y por ende imposible, es elemental que debió se algún problema electrónico, lo he corregido para las próximas, muchas gracias. -- Ivan2010 18:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Retrato de una anciana fumando tabaco-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments impresionante vista , incluso con la baja profundidad de campo --Ralf Roletschek 19:47, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anciana fumando Tabaco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments suficiente para QI --Ralf Roletschek 19:48, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big close-up de anciana fumando.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atardecer en la Costa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Hubertl 06:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge Winner
Congratulations!

Your picture Niños jugando en la playa2.JPG won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Children playing, in April 2016. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Re:Lo siento[edit]

Disculpa que me haya entrometido, pero las imágenes de bichos (insectos, arañas...) y las de plantas, deben estar perfectamente determinadas (tener una categorización exacta) para ser QI.

No solamente tú sufres esa circunstacia, yo también, todos.

Si quieres presentar a QI un insecto o una planta, puedes recurrir a los enlaces que te acabo de mostrar: Hay que subir la foto con baja calidad, ellos la determinan, pero pueden pasar meses para que lo acaben de hacer.--Lmbuga (talk) 01:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por tus excelentes fotos. Encantado--Lmbuga (talk) 01:48, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panteon de Emilio Bacardi y Moreau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well done with this lens. --Hubertl 14:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Insecto polinizando.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Insecto polinizando 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok now. QI for me. --Hubertl 05:02, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arroyuelo en paisaje Caribeño.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Tomas Terry-Cienfuegos. Cuba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Done --Ivan2010 16:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It was still over-categorized, but I have fixed that. Good quality. --Slaunger 21:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Insecto Polinizando. (Mayor Resolución).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tractor perforando la tierra para colocación de sistema de regadíos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tractor arando la tierra para cultivo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amanecer en el campo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge – Third Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Tractor arando la tierra para cultivo.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Tractors, in April 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 02:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 01:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]