User talk:Iruka13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Iruka13.

This is the user talk page of Iruka13, where you can send messages and comments to Iruka13.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.


You have been indefinitely blocked[edit]

Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

See here for the relevant discussion. --Natuur12 (talk) 22:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "block duration is not justified — Ирука13 14:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)"[reply]
Decline reason: "The block duration (indefinite block) is justified. The main problem with you is importing problems from other projects into Commons. In addition you uploaded files, which you considered yourself copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@Natuur12: Hello. I am about to apply for an unlock. To do this, I need to understand why I was blocked (COM:BP:Appealing a block). Please explain to me the reason for blocking, here, in 1-2 sentences. — Ирука13 11:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the discussion here what do you believe the reason for blocking you is? Natuur12 (talk) 12:36, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Natuur12: COM:BP:Instructions for administrators:When blocking:
Provide a reason for the block. The rationale should preferably use links to relevant policies to help the blocked user understand why they have been blocked. Where appropriate, diffs or permanent links documenting the reason for the block are also helpful. — Ирука13 17:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The point is, this has already been explained by myself at the end of this discussion, and again by Taivo when he declined your unblock request. Natuur12 (talk) 17:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Natuur12: Am I banned for uploading images that are known to be inappropriate?
Is it difficult for you to say that I was banned for uploading images that are obviously inappropriate under a license? — Ирука13 20:18, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: , здравствуйте. Как вы считаете, администратор Natuur12 в достаточной мере (COM:BP:Instructions for administrators:When blocking) разъяснил мне причину моей блокировки? — Ирука13 10:16, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page acces[edit]

Dear Iruka13,

I've received your email but I'm not the right person to process your unblock request since I've not been really involved with community matters last year. However, I did unblock your talk page so you can make a public unblock request. Kind regards, Natuur12 (talk) 17:12, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I recognize the blocking as justified and I promise not to commit such actions in the future. — Ирука13 10:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)"[reply]
Decline reason: "This request has been open for more than a month, and in a highly watched category. That it has not been acted upon is, in and of itself, suggestive that it is not persuasive or is otherwise inadequate. This indeed appears to be the case; as only certain examples: 1) the initial request ("I recognize the blocking as justified and I promise not to commit such actions in the future") was a mere reformulation of prose at COM:BP with no genuine original--thus credible, sincere--content (i.e., devoid of explanation of the problematic actions, the policies of which they ran afoul, why we can can expect the issue to discontinue, etc.) and 2) even after request for elaboration, the response failed to identify the genuine issue. While perhaps a language issue, "the search for justice instead of finding a compromise" is in no way a reasonable summation of the precipitating behaviour. Эlcobbola talk 21:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

Which actions do you promise to avoid in the future? We want to be sure, that you have changed. You must understand, which were the reasons leading to your block, so that you can avoid these mistakes. Taivo (talk) 13:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you said, the main reason for the duration of the block was the transfer of the conflict from an adjacent project to Commons. Including: adding files to Wikimedia Commons that are obviously not subject to a free license. In addition, the search for justice instead of finding a compromise (unwillingness to work for the good of the project). Elements of the previous conflict that resulted in the 14-day ban: excessive pressure on editors, classified as "trolling" and "harassment". — Ирука13 08:01, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]