User talk:Ianusius/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Please do not leave off template:copyrightbywikimedia in such cases (the image is actually kind of illegal without it)... AnonMoos (talk) 13:15, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. -- Ianusius (talk) 13:15, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ianusius,

könntest du die Hintergrundfarbe des Wappenschildes bitte noch korrigieren? Die sollte weiß sein, nicht transparent. Gruß --Rosenzweig δ 19:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hab es versucht, hat aber mehr kaputt gemacht, als das es genutzt hätte. Hier die Diskussion zum Bild: genau hier. -- Ianusius (talk) 21:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sichtungswettbewerb Logo.png

Hallo Ianusius, kannst du mir erklären, was die Bildnotiz "das innere des Auges" bei File:Sichtungswettbewerb Logo.png soll? ;-) Wolltest du nur die Funktion testen? Oder soll das einen Sinn haben? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Nachfrage! Es war tatsächlich nur ein Test der Funktion, mehr nicht. ;) Viele Grüße -- Ianusius (talk) 02:13, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 :-D Sachen gibt's. Hier ist übrigens die Hilfeseite dazu: Help:Gadget-ImageAnnotator/de Dort findet sich auch der Abschnitt Zum Ausprobieren, wo du testen kannst.
Bitte benutze für Tests möglichst keine "echten" Bilder. Wenn nötig, eignen sich BIlder aus Category:Test images dazu eher. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
okay. -- Ianusius (talk) 02:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ich weiß - muss man erstmal alles wissen. :-) War natürlich nicht als Vorwurf gedacht. Gute Nacht! --Saibo (Δ) 03:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Danke dann! :-) -- Ianusius (talk) 05:25, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed your speedy deletion request to a regular deletion discussion per the guidelines. The discussion is at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unlabeled Renatto Luschan Skin color map.svg. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:31, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. -- Ianusius (talk) 11:40, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:NEPTUNE Canada overview map.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:NEPTUNE Canada overview map.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:10, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done -- Ianusius (talk) 18:17, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Ianusius, bitte bezeichne das nicht als Vandalismus. Erstens fehlte der Link auf die Datei in der englischen WP (habe ich nun nachgetragen) und zweitens fehlt schon der DAtei in der englischen WP eine Quelle - es ist sicher genauer angebbar wo die Datei (wohl aus dem Internet) her ist. Auch ist fraglich, ob die NEPTUNE-Leute nur stupide kombiniert haben, oder ob deren Arbeit Schöpfungshöhe hat und damit geschützt ist - NEPTUNE ist ja keine Regierungsorganisation der USA, oder? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 13:49, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, es ist für mich Vandalismus, ohne einen genauen Kommentar einfach nur ein fettes Bapperl auf die Seite zu kleben, ohne irgendwas zu sagen. Erst mit Suche über TinEye bin ich grade auf diese Animation gestoßen, die das Original sein müsste, aus der das Bild abgeleitet ist. Der Teil der Regierungsorganisation (Hintergrund vermutlich) ist ja geklärt, und die paar Beschriftungen haben garantiert keine Schöpfungshöhe. Viele Grüße -- Ianusius (talk) 13:58, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1) If you can read English, please read w:WP:HITLER - it's a light-hearted essay I wrote about a while ago about referring to edits as vandalism, or w:WP:NOTVAND if you don't have time for that. 2) I haven't committed any copyright violations, so I'm not sure why you dropped that message on my page. I can understand if you're upset (I've been there myself) but I would prefer if you would just use words to communicate being unhappy. Thanks! Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:14, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
2) first: I'm very sorry about that. One of my gadgets went wrong, I didn't want to drop this wrong message.
1) You also hadn't used any words but a big red notification without any own words. So I thought it would just be vandalism because you also hadn't answered on my or on your own talk page.
I also prefer objective discussions – so let's start. I think that the file has no really threshold of originality because there is just an easy map with a few captions. The map is from the NASA, so we're allowed to use it and the captions have no threshold of originality. The source was given later. Sincerely, -- Ianusius (talk) 10:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a link/file name of one of the source maps? Or did you just assume that the NEPTUNE project has only added captions? A source map would make it clear - I did search for one but was not successful. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, I haven't got a source map. I have really assumed that the whole map is from the NASA. If that's a big problem, I even could ask NEPTUNE by mail. Sincerely, -- ianusius ✆ Disk. 21:25, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Asking them would be the best - maybe even asking for a permission. Then we have it clear for all future. Magog, what is your opinion? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 23:17, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'll soon ask after Magog has answered. Cheers -- ianusius ✆ Disk. 13:21, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I just had a look at the source you did find: yes, this it is. It is clearly a screenshot (the black on top and blue left, right, bottom borders show it). Sadly, there is no other source / licensing info on the src page except the info inside the image (watermark). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 00:02, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is too difficult to respond on my smartphone right now. I'm afraid I'll have to ask for your patience until I get a working computer running. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:56, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's no problem for me. -- ianusius ✆ Disk. 21:12, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright; I'm back! At this point, it's already been long enough I don't well remember my original reason for marking the file for deletion, but looking at the file history, I'm sure it was because the file was, in fact, unsourced [1]. While strictly speaking it said it was from NASA/USGS by way of NEPTUNE Canada, that source is too poor IMHO to actually help us to verify the copyright status (which is why we have the no source tag to begin with... to help us verify the status). Had a similar template existed, I would have marked it with poorly sourced instead of no source (although I suppose {{Bsr}} fits the bill, I didn't think it fit well enough).
Regardless, it's certain well enough sourced now! Thanks for all your help in correcting the source well enough to help it avoid deletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:50, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I also thank you! Cheers -- ianusius ✆ Disk. 13:01, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Discussion finished. Okay? -- ianusius ✆ Disk. 13:01, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I have added a link to this discussion on the file's talk page for future reference. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:02, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ianusius. Ist das 4:3-Format bewusst gewählt? IMHO würde das Bild durch Beschneiden gewinnen. --Leyo 16:25, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, es war das Format der Kamera. Von mir aus kann es beschnitten werden, ich habe nichts dagegen. :) Grüße -- ianusius ✆ Disk. 16:26, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gut, ich habe {{Crop}} eingetragen. --Leyo 16:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Ianusius!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 15:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rekursion.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hidro (talk) 22:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:44, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knoppers.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 20:05, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agnóstico.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

37.160.0.91 18:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]