User talk:IM3847

Main Page

Discuss

Quality images

Outreach

This is IM3847’s talk page, where you can send messages and comments to IM3847.

• This is not a forum for general discussion of the page’s subject.
• Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
• Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
• New to Commons? Check out the project scope. Ask questions, get answers.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Best image of Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Have no problem with this image being VI but IMHO the scope needs to be improved. Suggest a scope of "Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650" (with same scope link) with the VI value statement being that this is the best image (and therefore most valuable) of this particular motorcycle model. That seems a more appropriate scope to me. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

@GRDN711:  Done. --iMahesh (talk) 17:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 16:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karakavalasa railway bridge on Kothavalasa–Kirandul line.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sri Amaralingeswara Swamy Rath Yatra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Machilipatnam Lighthouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama of Visakhapatnam Port.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
• @Archaeodontosaurus: done. --iMahesh (talk) 05:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sunkarametta Church before its renovation.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment There is a problem because since the day of the photograph the church has been restored and repainted, it no longer has the same appearance. The scope must be reduced by specifying this point.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus:  Done

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
SCI Yamuna - IMO 9575618 – front portside view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment According to COM:VICR (6) a diagram of a process or an object, (like flight control surfaces) must be specified as indicated in this diagramy File:Aft (PSF).jpg, --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
• @Pierre André Leclercq: done, please review again. --iMahesh (talk) 05:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
  

   Comment iMahesh Suggest "front view and portside" as sub-scope, --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

  @Pierre André Leclercq:  Done --iMahesh (talk) 09:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect for me, best in scope --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose IMHO this is a credible VI nomination and agree in general with Pierre's comments. However, the scope, as written, still seems overly descriptive. The fact that this ship is in located in Mumbai is good information to be recorded in the ship description, but the city is not on display and is superfluous to the scope. Suggest a simpler, more focused scope such as:
  '''|scope=[[:Category:SCI Yamuna (ship, 2012) | ''SCI Yamuna'' - IMO 9575618]] – port view''' with a scope link to the ship category, would work better here.
  

The ship name and IMO # uniquely identify this ship matching what is shown on the bow. While the sub-scope could be "front port view", IMO the image appears to be more port side than front.

The value statement becomes that this image represents is the best port view of this ship-by-name, irrespective of where it is docked. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

@GRDN711:  Done please check again. --iMahesh (talk) 13:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

 Support with changes. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)