User talk:Hiiumaamudeliklubi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hiiumaamudeliklubi!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kultuurimälestised Vikipeediasse[edit]

Tere! Palun kinnita esimesel võimalusel oma eelistustes (link ülal paremal reas) oma e-mailiaadress, et saaksin Sulle läbi Commonsi kirja saata. Asi puudutab kultuurimälestiste fotovõistlust ja on väga oluline. Lase headel uudistel endani jõuda! Adeliine (talk) 12:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Hiiumaamudeliklubi,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kõpu tuletorn. Vaade ülevalt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good but small.--ArildV 11:43, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Hiiumaamudeliklubi,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hellamaa panoraam.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hellamaa panoraam.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turbaraba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality image. --DAJF 02:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hellamaa panoraam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --P e z i 08:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanikatsi laiu panoraam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Püha kirik 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Very small file. --XRay 12:39, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarks[edit]

Hi Hiiumaamudeliklubi, please respect Commons:Watermarks and do NOT watermark your images. -- Ies (talk) 17:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angla tuulikud 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice detail and color --Daniel Case 07:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Käsmu sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kihnu õigeusu kirik 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heltermaa-Rohuküla praam 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kungla sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quite sharp! Can see the details from a distance Good quality. --Caballero1967 21:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lennusadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lumekunst2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuressaare linn ja sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 06:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kärdla sadam 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. English desrcription would be helpful. --Ermell 21:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done Kruusamägi 12:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montu sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noblessner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koguva sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Okay to me. --Florstein 09:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohuküla sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo and I know it is quiet difficult to make a sharp photo like this Q1one --Michielverbeek 23:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palade lasteaed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soela sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kärdla Lennujaam Hiiumaal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuletõrjujate kokkutulek 2013 Hellamaa rannas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 06:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pühalepa kirik, Hiiumaa 2016 jaanuar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment I know this is a difficult shot but can you at least try to fix the perspective problem? --Code 07:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Better now? Kruusamägi 14:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly I don't see any difference but after having another look I believe that from this perspective the verticals simply can't be rectiliniear, so I give a  Support. Second opinion appreciated anyhow. --Code 06:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lennusadam 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lennusadam 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Kahala järv[edit]

Kas siin pildil on ikka Kahala järv? Mulle endale tundub see pigem nagu et:Lohja järv. Kruusamägi (talk) 04:20, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruserahu, Esiküla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kassari merepõhi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]