User talk:Helmy oved/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 → |
Thanks and request
Heya, this is Russavia. Thanks for continuing to upload from Flickr numerous photographer's photos. Can I ask, when you upload, in f2c could you add Category:Aviation files (check needed). This way any additional categories can be added by other editors who do a lot of that type of work, myself included. This account will likely be globally locked by the time you read this, but if you need to get in touch you can pop by User_talk:Russavia. I check in there weekly. Cheers A65-95 (talk) 07:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Ok. No problem. --Helmy oved 08:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Heya, this is Russavia. Thanks for that. I see you have pretty much cottoned on to the categorisation that is used, great stuff. Can you possibly pop a list here of the Flickr streams you keep an eye on and upload regularly...perhaps I can give you a couple more to look out for, if you wish? Cheers, N791AS (talk) 20:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Russavia. Until recently I started actively edit in this project and don't understand about the list you're talking. Can you explain a little more please? Cheers --Helmy oved 03:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry mate, I meant do you have a list of the aviation flickr streams that you regularly upload from Flickr? HL8209 (talk) 18:36, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- I don't have nothing (I still don't understand). Sorry for the delay. --Helmy oved 05:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- I see you upload regularly from lasta29, Eric Salard, and others on Flickr. Do you have a list of streams on Flickr you upload regularly? I can give you some more if you don't have them already :) S2-AGU (talk) 01:09, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- I make this search every day to see the new files that are uploaded, so I uploaded some pictures of the streams that you mentioned. For now I uploaded from lasta29, Anna Zvereva, byeangel, Robert Underwood, Alec Wilson, Eric Salard, John Taggart, Tim Felce and others that I have found in the searches. If you have some more I would like to upload images of them. Regards
- I see you upload regularly from lasta29, Eric Salard, and others on Flickr. Do you have a list of streams on Flickr you upload regularly? I can give you some more if you don't have them already :) S2-AGU (talk) 01:09, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- I don't have nothing (I still don't understand). Sorry for the delay. --Helmy oved 05:46, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry mate, I meant do you have a list of the aviation flickr streams that you regularly upload from Flickr? HL8209 (talk) 18:36, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Russavia. Until recently I started actively edit in this project and don't understand about the list you're talking. Can you explain a little more please? Cheers --Helmy oved 03:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Heya, this is Russavia. Thanks for that. I see you have pretty much cottoned on to the categorisation that is used, great stuff. Can you possibly pop a list here of the Flickr streams you keep an eye on and upload regularly...perhaps I can give you a couple more to look out for, if you wish? Cheers, N791AS (talk) 20:26, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Ok. No problem. --Helmy oved 08:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
File:VVO 5135 (17609424184).jpg - Rename
I've renamed a few of your files, because it was Criterion#1-Uploader's request.
I think you should think-through your naming system. The names should be friendly for other users and should contain best possible description, for example Antonov An-12BK, London Airport, 2015 RF-12025. It should be easy to find in the searching-machine what user is looking for.
The choice is yours, of course ;-)
Have a nice evening, Wieralee (talk) 22:33, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Wieralee. I agree with you, I'll remember that the next time. Regards --Helmy oved 00:04, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Blurry images
Hey, it's me again, I noticed that on some photos you have added {{Blurry}} to them. This is one example. As you can see I have removed that template, as it isn't blur, but rather heat haze. I have added that image, and will do so with others too, to Category:Aircraft with heat haze. This is a category you might like to remember ;) Cheers S2-AGU (talk) 01:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Ok. Thanks --Helmy oved 01:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Bots
You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.
What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.
This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.
If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!
- The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
- Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.
Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.
Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.
Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Interest in a new project?
Hi mate, it's Scott here (Russavia). Do you engage in aviation photography? Would you possibly be interested in a new Creative Commons based project for aviation photography? Might you spare 5 minutes to do the survey at http://www.aviationcommons.org? I can be contacted via the email listed on the survey if you want to get in contact. Cheers N510AG (talk) 14:42, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Filemover!
Hi Helmy oved, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:
- Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
- Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
- Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
Heads-up
Hi, as a long term colleague on upload projects, I thought I'd drop you a personal heads-up for my request for adminship, today being the last day for views. RFA's tend to only have a small proportion of the community taking part, so it can be difficult to judge if this is representative. --Fæ (talk) 13:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!
https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Another Flickr stream
Hi there bud, it's Scott here. Can you add this to the list of Flickr streams you regularly upload. His category can be found at Category:Photos by Rob Schleiffert, so please add that to the uploads as well. Cheers, 106.68.35.72 15:33, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Hiya again, could you also add this to your list. Category:Photographs by Guillaume Normand is his category. Cheers VP-BOX (talk) 16:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
File:2015 Miramar Air Show (21901987032).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 11:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Airbus Military, A400M, EC-406 (17902032183).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Airbus Military, A400M, EC-406 (18334939668).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 11:20, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Airbus Military, A400M, EC-406 (18518292942).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 11:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Airbus Military, A400M, EC-406 (18522745395).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 11:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
File:D-ABON B753W EDDL 190415 EBOERS1 (17232238526).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 13:56, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
File:EC-LVQ A320SH EDDL 190415 EBOERS1 (17232238116).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Josve05a (talk) 14:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Adding template and removing category
I have seen that you, just like me, work on the photos in the category:Jetphotos.net photos (credit bar). If you remove the bar, then you should add the template {{Metadata from image}}. Also remove the abovementioned category: [[Category:Jetphotos.net photos (credit bar)]]. This is only there for administration purposes. Once you have removed the bar, the category becomes obsolete. Regards, Wereldburger758 (talk) 06:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Wereldburger758. Thanks for your edits, I had planned to use VFC to remove the category and add the template, but I didn't have much time to do it. Cheers --Helmy oved 01:17, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, Helmy oved, understood. Regards, Wereldburger758 (talk) 08:30, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Images with watermarks
Hello, please don't manually add an image with a watermark to Category:Images with watermarks, the category specifically requests you don't. Instead, use the template {{Watermark}} instead. It saves me from having to do this. Cheers, and thanks for the aviation work you've been doing! Riley Huntley (talk) 06:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Riley Huntley. I'll remember the next time. Regards --Helmy oved 06:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Whitespace
You're just changing whitespace at this point mate. Riley Huntley (talk) 02:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry. It was a mistake to try to erase a double template. --Helmy oved 03:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia in Esperanto
Dear colleague! I have seen your global contributions and I know that your are a believable contributor. So, if you agree, I shall give to you an autopatrolled (autoreview) flag in Wikipedia in Esperanto. Gamliel Fishkin 14:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Gamliel Fishkin. I agree, thanks for the confidence. Cheers --Helmy oved 14:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Coréia do Sul x México - Futebol masculino - Olimpíada Rio 2016 (28792989942).jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coréia do Sul x México - Futebol masculino - Olimpíada Rio 2016 (28792989942).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Coréia do Sul x México - Futebol masculino - Olimpíada Rio 2016 (28792989942).jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Elisfkc (talk) 20:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry...
Sorry, I have save the cut over the original image, you can reverse my action. --Gap5200 (talk) 03:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC) File:Terminam os Jogos Olímpicos Rio 2016 (29068653701).jpg
- Gap5200. Don't worry mate. You can upload your image with a new name. Regards --Helmy oved 03:56, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
Picture of the Year 2013 Results
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Helmy oved,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
TUSC token 7301a7ef7aae0008a2431d7662452c79
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Nagoya Airport/Chubu Int'l Airport
Hi there, I notice from Alec Wilson's photos you are catting some photos as Nagoya Airport, when they should be Chubu (Centrair) Int'l Airport. This is one example. I'm making the necessary changes as I go through latest uploads. Also, would it be possible to add Category:Aviation files (check needed) to uploads when full categories are not included? Cheers, Fairchildfh227 (talk) 03:39, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, I have not yet reviewed my latest uploads from Alec Wilson, these categories were added by other user. --Helmy oved 04:08, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Airbus A350-1000 picture
Hi: I'm afraid your F-WLXV A350-1041 uploaded picture is copyrighted by Pedro Aragão as per Jetphotos.net image sub-title: Image Copyright © Pedro Aragão. Please check out and retrieve it if needed. Kinds regards.--philmarin (talk) 21:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hola Philmarin. Sí, esas imágenes tienen copyright, pero hace algún tiempo Pedro Aragão dio permiso, a través de OTRS, para subir algunos de sus archivos desde jetphotos.net y airliners.net bajo una licencia libre (cc-by-sa-3.0). Actualmente hay más de 7000 imágenes subidas desde esas webs con ese permiso (pueden verse en Category:Photos by Pedro Aragão). Saludos --Helmy oved 22:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Helmy, buenos días: encantado de aprender que Pedro Aragão haya liberado un montón de fotos suyas. Una buena iniciativa que mucho otros deberián copiar. Siento mucho lo de mi, entonces sin objeto, comentario. Un saludo.--philmarin (talk) 07:46, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
File:Eiffel Tower Paris honor our victims "Fluctuat Nec Mergitur" (22707193477).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
I'll have to check my program 🍺💲🚬 15:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Eiffel Tower Paris honor our victims (22707199217).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
I'll have to check my program 🍺💲🚬 15:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Deletion notices
Some aeroplane images you uploaded are up for deletion discussion here. You may want to comment. Ww2censor (talk) 23:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Begonia venosa ?
Hi Helmy oved, are you sure that File:Begonia venosa (18157300986).jpg is a Begonia venosa sp. ? One can see more than a unique species on the photograph you have uploaded, and Compare with other files in Category:Begonia venosa. Maybe it's a confusion of label in the garden. Move it into Category:Unidentified Begonia if you have any doubt. --Salix (talk) 21:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Your VFC installation method is deprecated
Hello Helmy oved, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
File:N7379E - Boeing 737 MAX 9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Marc Lacoste (talk) 09:17, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello Helmy,
I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.
Cheers,
--MB-one (talk) 19:48, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Beitraege zur Naturgeschichte has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jochen Burghardt (talk) 06:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
. Charles (talk) 16:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
File:Transaero (Siberian Tiger livery), EI-XLN, Boeing 747-412 (21544278369).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glrx (talk) 18:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Transaero (Siberian Tiger livery), EI-XLN, Boeing 747-412 (21740458861).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glrx (talk) 17:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
File:Transaero (Siberian Tiger livery), EI-XLN, Boeing 747-412 (21543152470).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glrx (talk) 17:09, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
File:G-BNWB 26072018LHR (43719445881).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 02:10, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I see that you have used a template infobox on this site (I did'nt realise these were in use). If I wished to amend the content, eg to add more history, how would I do so? Sorry if I am being stupid here, but I could'nt find a way to amend it. Thanks. Ardfern (talk) 09:36, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Ardfern: You can delete the template and do it in your own way. I do not use that template either, I think I copied it from another place when I created that category. --Helmy oved 17:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:12, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Category:Atlas_de_zoologie has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jochen Burghardt (talk) 20:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Deletion file joon.jpg
Hi Helmy_Oved I have submitted an undeletion request,as i have from the beginning (21st december 2017) the written confirmation from the author that i can use his picture see below: olivier LANDES <olandes269@yahoo.fr>
jeu. 21 déc. 2017 13:36
À moi
Traduire le message Désactiver pour : anglais Hello,
Do you speak french?
For use my picture in wikipéda, no problem but with the copyright and please add the link of this photo to "jetsphoto" for any requests for authorization to use.
Olivier Landes
Le Lundi 18 décembre 2017 15h56, "christophe.buty@gmail.com" <christophe.buty@gmail.com> a écrit :
Hello,
i would like to use your picture for the JOON page of Wikipedia if you would agree please?
Sent from photo https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8771071
Now can you please stop chasing this picture this is quite frustrating to wrongly assume I have breached the copyrights policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisE18 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- @ChrisE18: send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded (File:JOON.jpg) and the above demanded information in your request.--Helmy oved 06:20, 18 October 2018 (UTC)