User talk:Halavar/Archive1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Halavar!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Copyright status: File:Tablica tras rowerowych Greenways w Austrii.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tablica tras rowerowych Greenways w Austrii.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 19:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 22:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ludwikówka manor house in Pszczyna, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All right. Look at the change in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for the support and for the good advice. Halavar (talk) 10:12, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

VI discussion

Hi Halavar ! You answered, yesterday evening, some remarks I wrote under your "Powiat office in Rybnik". Only a few words to add. -- a/ I think you understand Archaeo and me are trying to help you when, reviewing your photos, we're emphasizing perspective distortions and oversaturated colours. It's not only "personnal feelings" but long term view ( explanation underneath in c/) --b/ This page is the coolest page on Commons but I think contributors, whatever their opinion may be about a picture (see Berthold Werner's Sphinx for instance), are trying to provide Wikipedia with the the best pictures they can upload in a category. Whereafter, it's always possible to discuss. --c/ A reward on VI page is temporary. Suppose "Powiat office in Rybnik" is assessed ; if someone uploads his own photo of the same place with a perspective correction, he will go to "Most valued reviews" and his photo will replace yours (after a vote) as a VI. --d/ You say your software isn't the best. Software isn't a problem : I've told you about Gimp and Rawtherapee which are free softs and can be downloaded and used as well as with Windows, Mac, or Linux. They're not at the very top but work well enough, I think (and I'm not the only one), they can do a good work. Hugin is the third free useful soft imo : you can easily make panoramas with it. If you've got any problem with one of these tools, you can always ask a question on one of the numerous forums on the web... or ask some Commons contributors. --d/ You're not "a specialist". Apart from some specialists of everything (there are some on Commons !), we all have problems as well with our tools as with the way we look at our photos. That's why the different pages exist on Commons with possible reviews every day. Even though they may look harsh (or unfair) in the beginning these reviews are always useful after a while. -- e/ As for the VI criterias, I think (but I'm an old-timer now) the essential is not to be logical, but to be reasonable ! ( have another look above at c/, even if you don't mind a lot about rewards !). -- I hope this discussion will help you. I also hope my English doesn't sound French too much ! -- Friendly. JLPC (talk) 10:13, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the message and finally for your first support on my image. I agree with what you said. There is no doubt, that every image can be better. Mine, yours or anyone else. If someone have enough time, good software and computer skills in that software - his images definitely would be better. I am aware that my images are not perfect. So because of that, they are not Quality Images. But QI are not the same as Valued Images (VI). I think that you and Archaeo forget about this distinction and don't agree with criteria of VI. And this is a big problem... Why? Because if image don't get aprove of you or Archaeo, practically this image won't get status of VI. There are almost no other reviewers. So even if my images met all 6 criteria, they are not supported and can't get status of VI. This is not fair... I know that my images are not perfect. And of course they can be better. I'm trying to make better images. And I'm still learning on software editing. Thank you for your advice about software. But I think my images shouldn't be excluded on that supporting process. I know that a reward on VI page is temporary. And I understand what happened when someone upload a better images. But there are no better ones now! Quote from the criteria: "A VI is the best available image of its type on Commons, not the best that can be conceived of". And sadly now it is not true... I think Admins of Commons, especially User:MichaelMaggs should get a message about this situation and they should decide what to do. Maybe they should change criteria of VI to be more challenging, on point 3 maybe they should be similar to those of Quality Images, as you and Archaeo would like. I would be glad if you change your approach. Halavar (talk) 12:13, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Halavar. Sorry to interfere, but me too, I think you are wrong, and I think you misunderstood the VI rules... I've nothing to add to the message by JLPC, but please, have a look to the promoted images, and compare with yours. No, VI is not QI, But yes, VI candidates must have a reasonable technical quality, with no oversaturated skies, perspective corrected, no stitching errors, no overprocess, minimum sharpness etc. COM:IG works in VI too. If not, the image does not illustrate the subject well, and do not "fit" with the criterion 3. I am not against you, nor anything like that. I don't understand what you mean with Michael Maggs, he cannot change the rules, and cannot change any vote... Of course I can help you if you wish and if needed, and be sure I know the rules, all the rules, very well. Please notice that I have nominated, with success, some candidates...

It is very good for the VI page to have candidates like you, and you show us many new and interesting monuments or places. But look at you own promoted images. Why were they promoted ? Because the distortion is "reasonable" and "acceptable" !

Again, if you need help in discovering softwares, please don't hesitate to ask. As for me, I use the same quoted by JLPC.

Anyway, don't worry, and do your best !--Jebulon (talk) 21:50, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint James church in Racibórz, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Perspective distortion and unrealistic colors --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC) I don't agree with you. I made lots of pictures of this church few months ago and also yesterday, and this church has got these colors when it is a sunny day. I think you don't like my pictures because I'm using polarizing filter. And because of this contrast and colors are better. The other thing - there are 6 Valued Image criteria and very good technical quality of the pictures is not the most important. Halavar (talk) 09:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment It is strongly advised not to use polarizing filter. It distorts the colors. Here the cloud must be white are blue and the front painted white is red. The polarisanst filters are advised to remove undesirable reflections. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:34, 29 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment So it looks that, even if my photos match all 6 criteria of Valued Images, you will never approve my photos because I'm using polarizing filter and also my pictures are not perfect as Quality images standards... Well, I think it is not fair. There are 6 Valued Images criteria and we should comply with those criteria. Halavar (talk) 12:54, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Does not meet the third criteria. The colors are not what you see, the building is not tilted. A desaturation is possible. Perspective correction is also possible. If you do not master these two points I'm ready to work with you for you to learn. --  Comment You are wrong - picture met all 6 criteria. Please read again the Criteria no. 3 Commons:Valued image criteria. I think that you don't remember those criteria... Halavar (talk) 18:20, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
•  Info I uploaded new version of picture with reduced saturation. Halavar (talk) 22:29, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
• Yes it is better. Now just straighten the walls. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)  Info I uploaded new version. Now I think it is better. If not, I give up. For me it is good and more importantly image met all 6 criteria. We shouldn't ignore them. Halavar (talk) 09:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
• I put a corrected version of your image, you can keep it or remove it if you want. Whatever you choose I vote favorably because you understand the principle and you make a real effort.
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment It should also, a caption in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 2 October 2013 (UTC)  Done English description added. Halavar (talk) 09:15, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:20, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Dom, Rynek 9, Pszczyna 2.JPG

File:Dom, Rynek 9, Pszczyna 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Mary Magdalene in Bełk, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Color and perspective distortion that are not normal, but are acceptable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:38, 1 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment It should also, a caption in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 2 October 2013 (UTC)  Done English description added. Halavar (talk) 09:29, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity church in Palowice, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Unnatural, but still acceptable colors. We need a caption in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 2 October 2013 (UTC)  Done I uploaded new version with reduced saturation level. Also, English description added. Halavar (talk) 09:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:23, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

promoted

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:28, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Three Brothers Fountain in Cieszyn, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and nice imo. --JLPC (talk) 10:18, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:01, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption of Saint Mary in Zebrzydowice (Silesian Voivodeship), Poland. South elevation..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne chapel in Goczałkowice-Zdrój, Poland. General view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : colours and perspective are to be corrected imo. --JLPC (talk) 10:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)  Info I uploaded new version of image, according to suggestions, with perspective correction and reduced saturation. Hope it's better now. Halavar (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

 Support Looks better now, even though the perspective isn't perfect. --JLPC (talk) 17:29, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prison Tower in Racibórz, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment May be the image needs perspective correction to be better than the similar images in this scope.--XRay ^talk 16:26, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 Comment I've just made a perspective correction. I don't know how to make it better... Halavar (talk) 19:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 Support There is only one image in the scope similar to this one and with an similar quality. And it is yours too. I think this one is the best in scope.--XRay ^talk 14:47, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lutheran church in Návsí, Czech Republic - SW view ..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope and useful, even though the sky could be a little bit brighter imo. I've added "SW view" to the scope, as I will do, from now on, for absent-minded usual candidates (see above !).--JLPC (talk) 09:42, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:19, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower of Town hall in Cieszyn, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

VI

You forgot to sign your last vote VI. Your pictures are much better quality! Good day. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

I don't understand, which image I forgot to sign? About my images - Thank you:) Halavar (talk) 10:08, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archive of Cieszyn Silesia Military History in Jablunkov, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:43, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Durrës Archaeological Museum, Durrës, Albania..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:36, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amphitheatre of Durrës, Durrës, Albania..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Nice to have a Valued Image from Albania, rare event.--Jebulon (talk) 22:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks a lot. I have lots of pictures from Albania, so in the future I'm gonna upload them to Commns and some of them nominate as Valued Images. This country is not a popular destination and should have some Valued Images on Commons, so therefore I'm counting on you guys. Halavar (talk) 23:00, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orthodox Cathedral of Saint Paul and Saint Astius, Durrës, Albania..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Venetian Tower in Durrës, Albania..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : OK, useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polish primary school in Návsí, Czech Republic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	I hereby award you this Photographer's Barnstar for the myriad of your beautiful photos from Cieszyn Silesia and beyond. Keep up the great work / tak trzymać! :) Darwinek (talk) 20:32, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Witam. Skoro otrzymałeś tego barnstara na Commons, to jednak dodaj go do swojej strony tutaj. To bardzo dobrze, że masz taką ilość zdjęć do wrzucenia, zawsze się przyda kiedy ktoś wrzuca na Commons setki jakościowych zdjęć. Cieszę się zatem na kolejne fotki. :) W razie jakichkolwiek pytań/prośby o pomoc, śmiało podchodź i pytaj. - Darwinek (talk) 05:51, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Church of the Assumption in Racibórz, Poland. N-W side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. (It's looks really red, but it's natural.)--XRay ^talk 14:53, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa House in Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exaltation of the Holy Cross church in Ustroń, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity lutheran church in Skoczów, Poland. South elevation..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lutheran church of the Apostle James in Ustroń, Poland. South side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Question

Do you read your email? I write to you and I do not have an answer. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:06, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok I think I understand. In "Preference" (top right) as you put your email address. If you did you put the letters can not happen to you. I'm not the only one trying to write to you.

Another possibility is to go to my page and on the left side you choose "Send an email". In this email, give me your address. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Great Mosque in Durrës, Albania. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:14, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Kończyce Wielkie, Poland. S-W elevation..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : perspective correction is needed imo. --JLPC (talk) 10:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment Hmm, but I've made it. I don't know where it's a problem. Halavar (talk) 11:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment The tower leans, it is not difficult to correct --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)  Info I uploaded new version. Hope it's better now:) Halavar (talk) 15:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Yes very good now. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Zdjęcia

Cześć. Na VI udzielam się raczej rzadko, choć jeśli pojawiają się zdjęcia z interesującego mnie terenu to czasem zaglądam. Boję się tylko aby ktoś nie zarzucił, że promujemy się nawzajem ;) Staram się tam wrzucać do nominacji zdjęcia głównie z bardziej znanych obiektów, bo kiedyś mi zwrócono uwagę, że "nie każdy kościół czy ratusz może otrzymać wyróżnienie" - teraz chyba nieco to poluzowano, bo kryteria "znaności" np. kościołów były dość śliskie. Nie mniej jest chyba nadal warunek, aby obiekt na zdjęciu miał poświęcony sobie artykuł w dowolnej wersji językowej - u Ciebie w kilku przypadkach tak chyba nie było (np. o baszcie więziennej w Raciborzu) czy np. Szkole Podstawowej w Nawsi - przyznaję się szczerze, że takich nominacji bym nie poparł, bo w końcu szkół jest od groma. Ale najwyraźniej obecnie nie zwraca się na to większej uwagi ;) Co do Śląska to mam mało zdjęć nadających się na VI, bo fotografuję ostatnio głównie za granicą. Pozdrawiam --Pudelek (talk) 13:15, 28 October 2013 (UTC) PS>widzę, że dla odmiany niektórzy czepiają się np. zaburzonej perspektywy, a przecież na VI jakość techniczna ma tak naprawdę drugorzędne znaczenie i nie powinna być brana pod uwagę w przypadku wysokiej encyklopedyczności.

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exaltation of the Holy Cross parish church in Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland. S-W side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Dębieńsko, Poland. S-W side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 09:39, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:20, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
All Saints church in Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland. North elevation..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Warning bell tower is packed, it is necessary to stretch it finds its right proportions. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Info I uploaded new version, hope it's better now. It is still not perfect, but if I stretch more, cross on the tower will be cut. So this is maximum of stretching. Halavar (talk) 17:01, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Info I uploaded new version of the image with right proportions and better light. Halavar (talk) 12:14, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Thomas Becket in Racibórz, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Ornontowice, Poland. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The colors are not natural. The red curves and Green are supersaturated. The blue curve is acceptable. Good perspective correction. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 26 October 2013 (UTC)  Info I uploaded new version with reduced saturation. Hope it is better now. Halavar (talk) 17:27, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Useful, good version. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:18, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Catherine in Rybnik-Wielopole, Poland. S-W side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, because it shows the whole back of the church, not hidden by trees. But technically, this one is far much better. Maybe you could try to get this kind of results...--Jebulon (talk) 16:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment There was unfortunately a strange light on that day on 10:45 A.M. Halavar (talk) 17:04, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main gate of Lutheran Cemetery in Cieszyn, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:29, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Barbara and Saint Joseph church in Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support It's OK for me - Pudelek (talk) 13:23, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cultural and Social Center in Český Těšín, Czech Republic. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Courthouse in Cieszyn, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:00, 3 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thank you:) Previous reviews

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:05, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Lutheran school in Návsí, Czech Republic. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 16:40, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former city hospital (1807-1897) in Racibórz, Poland. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:00, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building of National Health Fund delegacy in Rybnik, Poland. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House of children and youth, former town hall in Jablunkov, Czech Republic. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful [sky nevertheless borderline imo ;)]--JLPC (talk) 17:28, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:06, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thermal power station in Dětmarovice, Czech Republic. View from west..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:44, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor house in Bażanowice, Poland. View from west..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 08:43, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

FPC FRBN Set

Hi Halavar- You reviewed this set when it was nominated for VIS. If you have the opportunity, could you review it for FPC. Thanks-Godot13 (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corpus Christi parish church in Jankowice Rybnickie, Poland. View from south..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monastery of Sisters of Mercy of St. Borromeo in Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland. View from west..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 15:46, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Návsí, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : new file uploaded. Feel free to reverse. --JLPC (talk) 15:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for the edit JLPC :) No need to reverse:) Halavar (talk) 16:52, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:16, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Good Shepherd church in Istebna, Poland. View from east..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope! --Pudelek (talk) 21:04, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose This picture: POL Istebna Kościół Dobrego Pasterza 1.jpg is better for the scope. It would reduce the scope to: facade.
•  Support There are similar pictures but I think this one is the best in scope.--XRay ^talk 18:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lutheran church of the Apostles Peter and Paul in Wisła, Poland. S-E elevation..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope.--XRay ^talk 17:25, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:39, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lutheran church in Golasowice, Poland. View from West..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Halavar, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main Gate of the Communal Cemetery in Cieszyn, Poland. South side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. --JLPC (talk) 17:29, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Domyślne kategorie

Hej.

Szczerze mówiąc nie wiem czy jest to możliwe z tymi kategoriami - nigdy w to za bardzo nie wnikałem i swoją kategorię dodaję również ręcznie. Co do zdjęcia - hmm... zdjęcie jest zrobione z tyłu, więc wydaje mi się, że bardziej encyklopedyczne byłoby ujęcie z przodu, a takiego nie posiadam. Więc chyba jednak nie będę tego wrzucał na VI.

Pozdrawiam również :) --Pudelek (talk) 15:00, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
School of Music in Żory, Poland. N-W side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:59, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:24, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fence Gate of St. John the Baptist Church in Racibórz, Poland. South side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --JLPC (talk) 21:07, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gate building of the Pszczyna Palace (Gate of the Chosen), Poland. South side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lutheran Church in Rybnik, Poland. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good but, the orientation of the view would be useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:55, 23 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment I forget about that. You've got right, thanks:) Now I added the orientation. Halavar (talk) 11:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)  Support OK, now. --JLPC (talk) 16:52, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Jesus in Cieszyn, Poland. View from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:01, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Lutheran church of the Apostles Peter and Paul in Český Těšín

Hi, if you have a problem to stretch the image make me an email I will explain. friendly --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Fatima church in Istebna, Poland. View from West..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skanderbeg Museum in Krujë, Albania. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful.--JLPC (talk) 18:06, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lutheran church of the Apostles Peter and Paul in Český Těšín, Czech Republic. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Perspective correction crushed the monument. The clock must be square. The door is lowered too. The correction is easy. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 29 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for the good advice. I uploaded new version of the image. Halavar (talk) 11:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:09, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain with statue of the Immaculata (Blessed Virgin Mary) in Jablunkov, Czech Republic..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best un rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The walls of the castle in Krujë, Albania. East side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower in the Castle, Krujë, Albania. SW side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. (I've added "SW side", as we ususally do.) --JLPC (talk) 16:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church of Saint George in Puńców, Poland. Gothic portal..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Ilustracie na medal

Witam.

Dzięki za info, zastanowię się. Jak będę miał czas, to może coś dam do nominacji.

Pozdrawiam, Jarek

Virgin

Think about placing your image in several categories, as shown : here --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for notice this. I found a proper category for my image: Category:Statues of Madonna and Child in Poland. I think it's fits perfectly. Also, I've created new category for my (and other) images: Category:Statues of Virgin Mary in Silesian Voivodeship Halavar (talk) 09:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Thomas Becket in Racibórz, Poland. Entrance..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:47, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Florian's chapel in Palowice, Poland. View from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:08, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:33, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John of Nepomuk chapel in Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland. View from south..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:34, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brama cmentarza komunalnego w Cieszynie1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The sky is on the verge to show artefacts. It needs a little bit denoising IMO. --Cccefalon 05:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)  Done The sky looks better now after denoising. Thanks for the hint. Halavar 17:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Good for QI --Cccefalon 20:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Kościół Najświętszego Serca Pana Jezusa w Czeskim Cieszynie 6.JPG

Very nice view, I hope someone will promote the image. I won't do it myself because of this discussion -- Smial (talk) 00:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

I hope that too:) Thank you for your help in that image. Halavar (talk) 00:43, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Our Lady on the Academic church of the Assumption of Mary in Rybnik, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:30, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of St. Anthony and statue of pope John Paul II in Rybnik, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Problem compression third lower image. The poor Pope looks like a dwarf. Easy to fix. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)  Done You're right. Thanks for the hint. I uploaded new, fixed version. Halavar (talk) 09:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 21:42, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:40, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Academic church of the Assumption of Mary in Rybnik, Poland. View from West..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:55, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Dome of the Rock - Ceramic tile detail

Hi Halavar- I am trying to see if I can get the image above featured on 10 different wikipedias. Right now it is at 7. I wondered, only if you are comfortable with the image and quality, if you wouldn't mind nominating for pl.wikipedia.
If you have any reservations, do not worry I will not take it personally at all. Many thanks.-Godot13 (talk) 06:25, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Czech Brethren evangelical church in Český Těšín, Czech Republic. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Best in scope but it will have a higher value with a little perspective correction IMO (the right is leaning in a bit) Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:44, 12 December 2013 (UTC)  Comment I do not see it... I should stretch image to the left or right? Which side is not straight? Halavar (talk) 10:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Halavar, the right wall is not straight --Christian Ferrer  Done I uploaded new version. Hope it's better now. Halavar (talk) 11:44, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

 Support ok better and best in scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:42, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moravian-Silesian Beskids and Jesus Church - View from Communal Cemetery in Cieszyn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Promotion in VI

Thank you for promotions, do not forget to put "Promoted" --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

You're right, I forgot about that. Thank you for reminding me about change in status. I must remember this:) Halavar (talk) 17:14, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacred Heart of Jesus Church in Český Těšín, Czech Republic. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope and useful. --JLPC (talk) 21:39, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Previous reviews

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 19:52, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Halavar, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass in the Church of the Providence of God in Jaworze, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:39, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass window with the image of Saint Barbara in the Church of the Providence of God in Jaworze, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 02:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland. View from S-E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 12:23, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Visitation in Kończyce Małe, Poland. Generel view of interior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 12:22, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kościół Najświętszego Serca Pana Jezusa w Czeskim Cieszynie 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --Kreuzschnabel 18:49, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacred Heart of Jesus parish church in Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland. View from East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:34, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Birth of St John the Baptist in Rudzica, Poland..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Barelisation problem of the facade. Easy to fix --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)  Info I uploaded new version, hope it's good now. Halavar (talk) 15:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:47, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:29, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption of Saint Mary in Zebrzydowice, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
All Saints parish church in Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Usefull --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption of Saint Mary in Wodzisław Śląski, Poland. Exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:47, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
• I don't think it is necessary or useful to specify "View from N-W", unless there also should a very different view from another side, i.e. that the building is not symetric. Yann (talk) 09:04, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't understand you Yann... Ok, I've changed the scope, hope that now my image will be supported. Halavar (talk) 10:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support OK now. Yann (talk) 05:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Info I've just added "Exterior" in the scope.--Jebulon (talk) 19:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

promoted

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
All Saints parish church in Górki Wielkie, Poland. Side view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

• I don't think it is necessary or useful to specify "South elevation", unless there also should a very different view from another side, i.e. that the building is not symetric. Yann (talk) 09:06, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't understand you Yann... Ok, I've changed the scope, hope that now my image will be supported. Halavar (talk) 10:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
  • I think one scope for one building is usually enough.
  •  Support Now supported. Yann (talk) 12:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
• A change of scope offsets the positive votes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose I am opposed to this type of non-specific scope that no longer can promote another image of this church. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
  • @Archaeodontosaurus: That's the point of this whole project: to promote ONE image for ONE subject. I find it interesting to define which image best represents a building as a whole. I don't find interesting to define a different scope for every image of the same building. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
• I disagree with this interpretation. Is not shown in the facade of this church. But this facade is important, it also deserves a scope. If we one day aerial view, if we have a view of the interior, all deserve our interest. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:31, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
  • @Archaeodontosaurus: We need to discuss this generally, not here. That's why I started Commons talk:Valued image candidates#VI is becoming a FP.2FQI bis. Please give your opinion there. I will stay neutral for this nomination for now. Yann (talk) 16:15, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I've added "Side view" to the scope. I think Side view is a different scope than facade and interior, and all of them should have different scopes. Halavar (talk) 09:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support This scope is also very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:53, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 19:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint James church in Racibórz, Poland. Interior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint James church in Simoradz, Poland. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Support OK for me. Yann (talk) 10:56, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of John the Baptist in Racibórz, Poland. Portal..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support IMO best in scope.--XRay ^talk 17:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)