User talk:Grendelkhan/Archive 1

Archive 1

Image:Buchbinder-Rabbi Praying.jpg

Translation is fine :) --Leafnode 15:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Jan Matejko

OK, however it's very simple: Yan Mateyko :-) Pibwl 14:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Here you are Pibwl

That was fast! Thank you. grendel|khan 08:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Excuse a delay in further request (I've noticed, that you've already did it). To be frank, I don't know, what is the difference between English Simeon and Simon, so I can't tell - but there is only one Polish name "Szymon", so it might tbe both. ..Or wait: I've looked at pl:Symeon: "Symeon (...) More popular curently is its modified form Szymon". So Szymon would be Simon, and Symeon (rarely used) - Simeon. Pibwl 22:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: Image:Barrios de Alicante - (Blanco).png and Image:Barrios de Alicante - Color.PNG

Hi Grendelkhan! I didn't manage very well with SVG, but I'll try to convert all the maps. I want to check if it's easier to generate the derived maps 'cos Paint's quite disgusting... ;-) Thank you very much for your advice. Regards from Spain. --Kokoo 15:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:LaTeXEditor.png

Hey Grendelkhan! I've got a question to the image above: You've written in the comments that the screenshot shows OS X Widgets. Now it is Windows with the Flyakite (Mac) theme – does that matter? (I don't know much about copyright things for screenshots, I only wonder) – bye, – Simon / ?! 17:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

There's a discussion on the Village Pump about this. It's very tricky to get a truly unencumbered screenshot out of MS Windows, as the icons and such are copyrighted. I think ReactOS will, if it's ever stable, help with this, but until then I think screenshots of Windows software that show the UI need to live on their local Wikipedias. grendel|khan 19:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

QIC

Hey Grendelkhan, I noticed you were eager to close nominations on QIC :-). May I suggest that you concentrate your work on the Consensual Review section, and Commons:Quality_Images/Recently_promoted (I see you've been active there as well). The other closings are handled automatically by User:QICbot. --Dschwen 13:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Ah, so they are. Good to know! grendel|khan 13:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strutting pigeon.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

That's some nice pigeon you have there! Thanks again for your help with the deletion problem earlier today. -- Lisasmall 04:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Godward-In the Tepidarium-1913.jpg

If you want to try to remove the moire effect, you have to scan it with much more resolution, the maximum that is allowed by your scanner. Make different attempts, trying to rotate it using small angles and inverting it with Gimp or Photoshop, then post your results and I might try to improve it. Don't expect great results, though. Alessio Damato 07:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Alas, it's not my scan; I'm not affiliated with the folks at the Art Renewal Center, and I don't have access to the book they scanned it from. If it can't be fixed from what's been uploaded already, I guess it can't be fixed. grendel|khan 15:56, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello Grendelkhan, thanks for uploading this beautiful painting! regards, Mantlewood

Featured image promotion - The Accolade by Edmund Blair Leighton

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Edmund blair leighton accolade.jpg, uploaded by DopefishJustin and nominated by you on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Edmund blair leighton accolade.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

James F. (talk) 12:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:AsimovOnThrone.png

Any news on the invariant section stuff? If so, please contribute to the deletion request. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:20, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

PD-US Government and Library of Congress

OK,

I'll keep it in mind.

Thanx,

Al Lemos 15:06, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

"...no pages that link to this file"

Hi, Grendelkhan. Have pity on a newbie please and tell me why Image:Glenn_Alan_Fine.jpg says at the bottom of the page that it's not linked to anything, when in fact it illustrates his Wikipedia entry. I'm also having a rotten time categorizing things. I only found the DOJ tag by looking at John Ashcroft. Later, I uploaded someone from NIH and I don't know where to find a list of agency-specific tags. I'm having a very hard time getting around in the Commons, though I've gotten pretty agile over Wikipedia. -- Lisasmall 04:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

It says that it's not linked to anything because it's not linked to anything... on Commons. To see where this image is used on the various wikis that pull media from Commons, click the "check usage" tab at the top of the page (to the right of "file", "discussion", "edit", "history" and "watch"). (The link goes here, if you're having trouble finding it--but note that some of the databases are way out of date!)

As for agency-specific tags, check in USGov PD license tags; there are eighty in there at the moment. Try and use the most specific one that you can find. (Though note that, for instance, Template:PD-USGov-DOS and Template:PD-USGov-State are redundant. Aargh.) grendel|khan 19:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Vasnetsov samolet.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Vasnetsov samolet.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 23:10, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
J. Robert Oppenheimer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Problem with crit 4/5 (info on the image page). We miss a date and a place for the photograph, for the moment it's only possible to vaguely infer them from the book title, but nothing certain. Best picture we have of the guy, though. --Eusebius (talk) 12:57, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Second thoughts + improvements in the image page. It is a studio shot so location is irrelevant, date should be precise enough. --Eusebius (talk) 15:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Info Just FYI--I pulled the date from the info page at NARA (ID 558579); we can infer that the picture was taken at Los Alamos (since movement out of the facility would have been restricted at the time, and it was an official portrait), but that's kind of guessworky. grendel|khan 15:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
  • OK, thanks. We don't need location info here, it's irrelevant. --Eusebius (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Question Would you care to make the scope "J. Robert Oppenheimer"? --Eusebius (talk) 15:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

   Done I took the liberty to do it. --Eusebius (talk) 21:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 21:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scott McCloud.

review

•  Support - Easily the best image we have of him. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Previous reviews

•  Neutral Not enough reasons to oppose, but the other image shows him in his natural environment. Maybe I think to much like an ecologist ;-). Lycaon (talk) 10:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 10:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 12:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Bernard Sumner.jpg

File:Bernard Sumner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Grendelkhan, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 06:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Operating systems used on top 500 supercomputers.svg

Hi Grendelkhan, thanks for updating the data for the file! Just a note, I had problems uploading the updated SVG and asked for help over here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload_help#Uploading_SVG_file_fails_with_.22This_file_contains_HTML_or_script_code_that_may_be_erroneously_interpreted_by_a_web_browser..22 --HeWhoMowedTheLawn (talk) 13:03, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

File:US Monthly Solar Power Generation.svg

Please correct File:US Monthly Solar Power Generation.svg. The data for March and April were both entered as 2013-03, showing a curve that goes straight up. Thanks. Apteva (talk) 22:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for fixing the source; that's my bad. The file's been updated now. grendel|khan 05:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 23:52, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
X-rays of human polydactyly - hands.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment We must attach the scope to the category that contains the picture and in this case to limit the "hand" because the foot can also be the object of this feature. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

• IMO, we should add "radiography", because a photograph can be worth a scope too (I have some, with seven fingers !!)--Jebulon (talk) 21:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Polydactyly to Polydactyly - radiographs of hands --grendel|khan 23:19, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• I've simplified the scope. Yes one need a link, but only one ! Well, complicated... Anyway, I had a look to the category, and I would like you to explain, please, why you did chose this picture especially. Why should it be the "best in scope" ? Thanks. --Jebulon (talk) 00:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Is there something missing in the 'reason' field above? It's clear, it's a useful illustration (judging by its popularity), and it's high-quality enough to be a FP. -- grendel|khan 00:12, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very useful. Usually the 6th finger is frustrating, here it is very well trained, it seems even usable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for all answers. All is good, best in scope indeed.--Jebulon (talk) 12:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:16, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westin Bonaventure towers.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Painting of Yom Kippur observance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment An excellent images, but the scope is too general. I suggest "Painting of Yom Kippur observance". This will leave the way open for further VIs such as photographs of the Yom Kippur observance or anything else connected with the ritual. Martinvl (talk) 15:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Yom Kippur to Painting of Yom Kippur observance --grendel|khan 22:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

 Support the picture is the best in this better scope, even if it is not obvious that it shows a Yom Kippour celebration (for the goy I am).--Jebulon (talk) 23:42, 30 September 2015 (UTC)  Support Following the change of scope as suggested earlier, I am happy to support this nomination. Martinvl (talk) 06:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erich von Stroheim.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grover Norquist.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DDR3 RAM SO-DIMM.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful. Yann (talk) 17:33, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Airport diagrams

• 
  Example, not northed

Hi Grendelkhan,

should I rotate all airport maps, which are not oriented north?--Kopiersperre (talk) 13:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

I have no darned idea. I just uploaded these because I was pleased to have gotten decent SVG out of the FAA's website, and I wrote a nifty Python script to do the whole thing. Maybe someone at Commons:WikiProject Aviation would be able to help? grendel|khan 04:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Commons

Welcome to the Commons, Grendelkhan/Archive 1!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 16:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coleus plant top view.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrysaora achlyos swimming downwards in tank.gk.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entrance of the Steve Jobs Building at Pixar, at dusk..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Previous reviews
•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crooked bridge at Chateau Montelena Winery.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Uoaei1 03:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stock at the Jelly Belly factory.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat low DOF and a bit noisy, but still good quality. --Smial 10:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red-necked wallaby.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wachusett Mountain in winter.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Squirrel closeup profile.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral Metropolitana de Sao Paulo 3 Brasil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NYC Public Library Research Room Jan 2006-1- 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caerulea3 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States – Results!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2016}} to your userpage!

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States during the month of October! The United States contest saw over 1,700 people contribute over 11,000 great photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States and its territories. In addition to National Register of Historic Places sites, we welcomed uploads of sites designated by state- and local-level historical institutions and societies. Hundreds of these photos are already being used to illustrate Wikipedia articles!

We're excited to announce that our national judging process has concluded, and that we have selected the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in the United States! We were amazed by all of the uploads, and regret having to narrow it down to just 10. That being said – congratulations to our national winners and their amazing shots! Our 10 winners will be sent to the international Wiki Loves Monuments jury, who will then select the winners of the international contest. If you're interested in seeing the winners of the other various national contests as they are announced, you may do so at Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 winners.

Finally, we have also created a feedback form for all participants in the United States to fill out. The survey is optional and anonymous, and only takes a minute or two – we hope to use the feedback to organize better events in the future!

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, and we hope to see you again for future Commons photography events! ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 06:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian Call.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clarion River, seen from Interstate 80 in Pennsylvania.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment You need to set up the scope so that it links to the relevant category in which the image is nominated for VI, not link it to the articles in which it appears...--Godot13 (talk) 05:22, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Done! grendel|khan 15:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

• Better, but not quite there... The main category (the one you are looking for the VI to be in) is the first half, the second part is a modifier or specifier to narrow down the scope even further. I'll change your scope to the proper format. What you list as a reason is not accurately stated- in the given category there are several pictures of the Clarion River, but this may be the only view from I-80... If you have any questions, let me know.--Godot13 (talk) 19:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful.--Godot13 (talk) 03:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Video of Category:Ouzo effect.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and unique at the present time. lNeverCry 02:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 00:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sciurus carolinensis (eastern gray squirrel) heads, in profile..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Fixed; thanks! grendel|khan 13:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Montipora capricornis (leaf plate montipora) in aquarium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Screw conveyor moving grape stems at Chateau Montelena.gk.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Connecticut Highway 10.png

And also:

• File:Connecticut Highway 15.png
• File:Connecticut Highway 16.png
• File:Connecticut Highway 17.png
• File:Connecticut Highway 20.png
• File:Connecticut Highway 21.png
• File:Connecticut Highway 22.png
• File:Connecticut Highway 27.png
• File:Connecticut Highway 30.png
• File:Connecticut Highway 31.png
• File:Connecticut Highway 34.png
• File:Connecticut Highway 37.png
• File:Connecticut Highway 9.png

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rschen7754 22:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solar park bench at Iowa State Fair grounds.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 02:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windham Town Hall tower front view.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The tower seems tilted, could you try to improve the perspective? --Basotxerri 17:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)  Done Rotated, cropped slightly. Grendelkhan 06:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC) That's it, thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Oscar Apfel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:42, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meleagris gallopavo (Wild turkey) in flight, side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful, I have added English name which is needed, as binomial needs to be in itlaics so I've done that. Charles (talk) 23:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waymo self-driving car front view.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Google driverless car, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope. Yann (talk) 00:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Google driverless car, side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope. Yann (talk) 00:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caterpillar D5K2 on FR 488 on the Sandia Crest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Top of Tent Rocks National Monument panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 07:51, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prairie dog eating a carrot.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio Grande flowing through Cochiti Dam spillway.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Steady on subject --Daniel Case 04:09, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden snail crossing the sidewalk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The flower in front could have been removed for a cleaner foreground, but otherwise very good. :) --Peulle 17:21, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Labradorescence in labradorite..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat lapping water off ground in slow motion.gk.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 22:59, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Long motorboat on the Chao Phraya River in Bangkok.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:53, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiger playing with a piece of wood in a pool.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice video, but it needs to be renamed. The tiger is not playing with a leaf, it is playing with a piece of wood. --W.carter 22:59, 1 May 2017 (UTC)  Comment Updated the description and requested a rename. My bad! Grendelkhan 02:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC) Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 16:54, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caltrans survey marker on bridge over CA-17 at Hamilton Avenue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 06:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pedestrian overpass at Hamilton VTA station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3D printed sugar cube.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting subject, and I would consider this good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:18, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cocktail tomatoes at Campbell farmer's market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clover flower on bed of raspberries.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:40, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock climbing in Mohonk Preserve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2017!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2017}} to your userpage!

Hi there! My name is Kevin, one of the organizers of Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States. Last year, you contributed to our 2016 event. It was a great success thanks to you and many others, with over 1,700 people contributing over 11,000 great photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States. Over 1,000 of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, making our open knowledge about United States history and heritage all the better.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information, including updated tips, lists, and prizes. Like last year, you'll be able to upload your new photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, and we hope to see you in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 08:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suvarnabhumi Airport Terminal E interior at dusk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support - Excellent composition. Sharpness is questionable, there is also some graininess and the file isn't huge, so I expect this to go to Consensual Review unless you are able to improve those things. -- Ikan Kekek 23:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View across Mohonk Preserve with bench.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Surprising composition which is good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Front loading garbage truck loading a dumpster.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States – Results!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2017}} to your userpage!

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States during the month of October! The United States contest saw over 1,400 people (the most of any nation this year) contribute over 8,000 great photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States and its territories. Hundreds of these photos are already being used to illustrate pages on various Wikimedia projects.

We're excited to announce that our national judging process has concluded, and that we have selected the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States! These photos are recognized for their photographic quality, artistic merit, and their encyclopedic value as illustrations of unique historical sites. We were amazed by all of the uploads, and regret only being able to formally recognize the top 10. That being said – congratulations to our national winners and their amazing shots! Our 10 winners will be sent to the international Wiki Loves Monuments jury, who will then select the winners of the international contest. If you're interested in seeing the winners of the other national contests, you may do so at Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 winners.

If you would like to view all the photos submitted for the U.S. this year, you may do so here.

Finally, we have also created a feedback form for all U.S. participants to fill out. The survey is optional and anonymous, and only takes a minute or two – we hope to use the feedback to organize better events in the future!

A quick thank you to our national jury, as well as Commons editors who have helped categorize and place photos for the event. And finally, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments and helping to preserve our history through photography - we hope to see you again for future Commons photography events!

~Kevin Payravi & Nikikana, from Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States (16:27, 15 November 2017 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Welcome cocktails on Fiji Airways 910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality PumpkinSky 02:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Streetcar 1009 near Pier 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 13:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VTA light rail arriving at Hamilton station.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:32, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interstate 40 in Albuquerque looking west.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The resolution is too small for this kind of photograph. Please upload a much better resolution. --XRay 05:05, 22 November 2017 (UTC)  Comment @XRay: Fixed! (Didn't realize my phone was backing up low-quality copies instead of HQ originals.) Grendelkhan 21:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Very weak  Support The resolution is still small, but better. The quality of the photograph could be better too, it's the result of a smartphone. The quality is similar to an aerial view, so it's QI IMO. May be there are other opinions. --XRay 05:21, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northbound onramp to CA-17 at Hamilton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality, except for maybe the cropped lamp post. Everything else is very nice, however.--RaboKarbakian 03:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sawtoothed beach cave at Año Nuevo State Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, what's in the cave - surprise! --Michielverbeek 23:45, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VTA light rail station at Lockheed Martin Transit Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunset across trees outside Santa Fe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Pudelek 11:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anderson Overlook on a cloudy day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 19:49, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black squirrel carrying a walnut in its mouth, close view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macaca fuscata yakui (Japanese macaque).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Very useful. I have added English name to scope. We don't need to specifiy 'in the wild'. For a sub-species nomination that would be assumed. Charles (talk) 11:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:17, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UP 807 crossing Hamilton Avenue in Campbell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UP 559 about to cross Hamilton Avenue in Campbell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Clearly tilted (see background) --Poco a poco 10:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)  Comment Rotated to correct; please take a look. Grendelkhan 23:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:28, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campbell water tower, aerial view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Useful picture, thank you! --Podzemnik 03:53, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Top down view of Ainsley House in Campbell, California.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:16, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suspension footbridge in Yakusugi Land.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:21, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trachemys scripta elegans partially submerged.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KTC 11:46, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trachemys scripta elegans partially submerged, three quarter view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:16, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aerial view of Campbell farmer's market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:00, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trachemys scripta elegans in koi pond at Hakone Gardens.webm, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 11:51, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corvus corone orientalis perching on a railing in Kyoto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You'll have to identify that crow and fix the tilt --Poco a poco 11:30, 16 June 2018 (UTC)  Done Identified, rotated, and requested a rename. Grendelkhan 17:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC)  Support Thanks, QI now --Poco a poco 19:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caterpillar 226D breaking up curb in Campbell, front view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stream outside Shimogamo-jinja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge and stream at Shimogamo Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Gets a little ragged near the top, but the bridge and colorful flowers are in focus --Daniel Case 17:18, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2018!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2018}} to your userpage!

Hello! Last year you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States. Thanks to people like you it was a great success, with over 1,400 people contributing over 8,000 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information. The event runs similar to last year with some small but exciting changes: improved state guides, an interactive map, and a larger prize pool! Like last year, you'll be able to upload your photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 11:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schaff Chalet in Mohonk Preserve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shawangunk Ridge as seen from a Mohonk Preserve hiking trail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 21:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardea herodias standing on a rock at St. Pete Beach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardea herodias head at St. Pete Beach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gopherus polyphemus walking through brush near Caspersen Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 11:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gopherus polyphemus crossing path at Caspersen Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana iguana on Sanibel Island.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana iguana on Sanibel Island, close up.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality to me. I see some minor problems, e.g. misc. CAs, but they do not spoil the image, and the overall effect is really natural and good. --Aristeas 11:08, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macropus rufogriseus with joey in pouch grazing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:50, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potamochoerus porcus digging at Lowry Park Zoo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macropus rufogriseus with joey in pouch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Cute. Could be sharper, but it's a large file and IMO, good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 00:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macropus rufogriseus with joey in pouch leaning down.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:31, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macropus rufogriseus with joey looking out from pouch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:31, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potamochoerus porcus at Lowry Park Zoo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skytop Tower in Mohonk Preserve from opposite end of the lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Needs perspective correction. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment Done! --Grendelkhan 01:27, 13 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment The tower on the right is upright now. But the lake on the left still has not horizontal surface and the houses near the lake lean outward. --Johannes Robalotoff 12:11, 13 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment Made another try at it; if this isn't good, I'll take it to Graphics Lab. Grendelkhan 17:34, 15 January 2019 (UTC)  Support IMHO Perspective is OK now. --Aristeas 17:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wallabia bicolor eating from hand, side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 15:35, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Google bus at Sunnyvale campus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:11, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirounga angustirostris calling 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirounga angustirostris calling 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 03:55, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Corrections to some of your aerials

This is looking south along I-25.

This is looking east along 237.

I corrected a couple of descriptions and asked for corresponding name changes. I'd be happy to check others if you want. Dicklyon (talk) 03:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

@Dicklyon: Hey, thank you! Wow; I can't believe how badly I mixed those up. Thank you so much for fixing them--if you notice anything else I've gotten the direction wrong on, please feel free to fix it; I don't have anything in mind right now, but I really, really appreciate it. grendel|khan 20:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirounga angustirostris calling 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Could have been sharper but good good --Podzemnik 07:27, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mirounga angustirostris calling 1 edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mirounga angustirostris calling 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suricata suricatta on a stump at Happy Hollow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:59, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! John Deere 544K at construction site in Sunnyvale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bales of PET bottles closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Interesting too --Podzemnik 20:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homeless tents and flag under CA-87 in San Jose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sleeping Vulpes zerda at Happy Hollow, closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice shot --D-Kuru 15:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Can I nominate your video at Commons:Featured video candidates

Hey Grendelkhan,

If you don't mind can I please nominate your video File:Cat lapping water off ground in slow motion.gk.webm for the featured video tag ? If you wish you can nominate it yourself. And you can vote for your video if you wish. Best, Eatcha (talk) 10:37, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

@Eatcha: Please do--I'd be honored! (And there's generally no need to ask, but it's very kind of you to.) Thanks! grendel|khan 02:57, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Gottlieb-Self-Portrait in Polish Nobleman's Dress 1874.jpg

File:Gottlieb-Self-Portrait in Polish Nobleman's Dress 1874.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gower (talk) 15:15, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2019

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--21:39, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Screenshot-mw1.3-ie5.png

File:Screenshot-mw1.3-ie5.png has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Made a mistake. Forgot that the focus is IE, which makes it illegal here...) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Leaderboard.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--00:06, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aptenodytes patagonicus Nils Olav at Edinburgh zoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Template:PD-automated

Template:PD-automated is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: This PD-ineligible license tag was never approved at Commons talk:Threshold of originality, nor anywhere else. I removed it from the list of PD-ineligible tags. See: diff. "What Links Here" shows it already being used on 3 images, and so it needs to be deleted before more damage is done. Also, see this discussion where it was not approved: Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Copyright status of images taken by automated cameras. (Traffic enforcement, speed, red light, etc). If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Timeshifter (talk) 19:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Template:PD-automated

Template:PD-automated has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Three Aptenodytes patagonicus at Edinburgh Zoo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 19:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2023

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--17:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Lingualibre

Hello Grendelkhan,

We are investigating the issue, see lingualibre:LinguaLibre:Chat_room. Yug (talk) 08:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Pregnancy test series starting to show positive.jpg

File:Pregnancy test series starting to show positive.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

重庆轨交18 (talk) 01:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green sea glass at Año Nuevo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:50, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea glass at Glass Beach in Fort Bragg 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea glass at Glass Beach in Fort Bragg 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Human pregnancy test, daily series.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Scope must be linked to correct category of similar images. Might also suggest scope be made a little more specific, say, "Human pregancy test, daily series". --GRDN711 (talk) 17:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done There is no category for "human pregnancy test", but I've updated it to link to the appropriate category, and specified "daily series". Thanks for the heads-up! grendel|khan 02:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

 Support useful and used. Scopes need to have a linked scope category but the actual wording of the scope does not have to match the linked scope category name. In this case, the scope category - Category:Pregnancy test, is a sub-category of parent Category:Human pregnancy, so there is an implicit connection.

Less you think pregnancy tests should not be explicitly categorized, try googling "pet pregnancy tests" :). --GRDN711 (talk) 01:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Adjusted the name of the scope accordingly, linking to the same category, thank you! grendel|khan 04:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centro Ybor station at ground level.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirounga angustirostris calling 1 edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 08:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carnegie Library in Marion, Illinois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments needs perspective correction --Nikride 11:34, 16 March 2024 (UTC)  Done Perspective corrected. Grendelkhan 08:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC) too little space on top --Nikride 08:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)  Done Not sure what I was thinking there; please have another look. Grendelkhan 14:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)  Support looks better --Nikride 14:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden retriever gnawing at the farmer's market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoses used to refill underground tanks at Rotten Robbie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gray-headed junco standing on a rock at Randall Davey Audubon Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VTA bus 9901 interior looking forward.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A82 near Loch Achtriochtan Viewpoint.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koyaike Park from airplane window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maurycy Gottlieb - Jews Praying in the Synagogue on Yom Kippur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Трифонов Андрей 21:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ground mounted solar panels.gk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VTA bus 9901 at Borregas Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is leaning out. Please check the perspective. --XRay 04:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC) The bus is leaning (the road isn't flat); should the bus look vertical, or the buildings in the background? Grendelkhan 10:16, 20 March 2024 (UTC) Please have a look to the elements in the background. --XRay 13:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)  DoneOkay, I've modified it so that the post on the right and the poles on the left are both vertical. Is that better? Grendelkhan 20:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thank you. --XRay 06:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AC Transit bus FC10 servicing route 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 14:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)  Done Corrected. Grendelkhan 08:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC) Worse now, please, undo the tilt and fix the verticals on both sides --Poco a poco 19:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)  Comment I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're asking for, if not to make it so the telephone poles are vertical. Can you be more specific? Grendelkhan 23:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC) Houses in the back and posts should all be vertical. --Poco a poco 20:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)  Done Okay, I think I have it this time. Please have another look. Grendelkhan 04:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Better, but the far right is not straight yet --Poco a poco 19:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)  Comment Are you sure? I made it so the telephone pole on the left and the one on the right are vertical; anything beyond that would require more complicated distortion than a simple perspective fix. I apologize for not getting it; would you mind giving it a try yourself? Grendelkhan 22:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Loot at the house further to the right. I believe that the post you took as reference is not vertical --Poco a poco 20:40, 22 March 2024 (UTC)  Done Ah, I get it now! Okay, please have another look; the left pole and the house at right are both vertical now. Grendelkhan 17:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)  Support You made it! :o) --Poco a poco 22:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caterpillar backhoe loader at construction site in Sunnyvale, back view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forest on Yakushima from Route 592.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 23:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Anderson Overlook on a cloudy day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 23:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forest covered hills on Yakushima.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 23:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tree roots at Meiji Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 23:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junonia grisea perching on a flower, wings open.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea glass at Glass Beach in Fort Bragg 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caterpillar 302.7D excavator on Barrow Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Leaning in and the geo coordinates should be checked. --Ermell 15:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC)  Done Perspective corrected, and the coordinates look good to me. (It's on Barrow Street, which is correct.) Grendelkhan 20:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)